A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network.

Just as reference genome sequences revolutionized human genetics, reference maps of interactome networks will be critical to fully understand genotype-phenotype relationships. Here, we describe a systematic map of ?14,000 high-quality human binary protein-protein interactions. At equal quality, this map is ?30% larger than what is available from small-scale studies published in the literature in the last few decades. While currently available information is highly biased and only covers a relatively small portion of the proteome, our systematic map appears strikingly more homogeneous, revealing a "broader" human interactome network than currently appreciated. The map also uncovers significant interconnectivity between known and candidate cancer gene products, providing unbiased evidence for an expanded functional cancer landscape, while demonstrating how high-quality interactome models will help "connect the dots" of the genomic revolution.

A Network-Based Framework to Discover Treatment-Response-Predicting Biomarkers for Complex Diseases.

The potential of precision medicine to transform complex autoimmune disease treatment is often challenged by limited data availability and inadequate sample size when compared with the number of molecular features found in high-throughput multi-omics data sets. To address this issue, the novel framework PRoBeNet (Predictive Response Biomarkers using Network medicine) was developed. PRoBeNet operates under the hypothesis that the therapeutic effect of a drug propagates through a protein-protein interaction network to reverse disease states. PRoBeNet prioritizes biomarkers by considering i) therapy-targeted proteins, ii) disease-specific molecular signatures, and iii) an underlying network of interactions among cellular components (the human interactome). PRoBeNet helped discover biomarkers predicting patient responses to both an established autoimmune therapy (infliximab) and an investigational compound (a mitogen-activated protein kinase 3/1 inhibitor). The predictive power of PRoBeNet biomarkers was validated with retrospective gene-expression data from patients with ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis and prospective data from tissues from patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease. Machine-learning models using PRoBeNet biomarkers significantly outperformed models using either all genes or randomly selected genes, especially when data were limited. These results illustrate the value of PRoBeNet in reducing features and for constructing robust machine-learning models when data are limited. PRoBeNet may be used to develop companion and complementary diagnostic assays, which may help stratify suitable patient subgroups in clinical trials and improve patient outcomes.

Commentary on Cohen et al.: Role of Clinical Factors in Precision Medicine Test to Predict Nonresponse to TNFi Therapies in Rheumatoid Arthritis.

A 2021 study described the development and validation of a blood-based precision medicine test called the molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) that uses 23 features to identify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who are likely nonresponders to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy. Both the gene expression features and clinical components (sex, body mass index, patient global assessment, and anti-cyclic citrullinated protein) included in the MSRC were statistically significant contributors to MSRC results. In response to continued inquiries on this topic, we write this letter to provide additional insights into the contribution of clinical components to the MSRC on the Network-004 validation cohort.

RETRACTED: Network-based response module comprised of gene expression biomarkers predicts response to infliximab at treatment initiation in ulcerative colitis.

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the authors after consulting with the Editors. During a follow-up study, the authors regretfully discovered that the microarray probe-to-gene mapping was incorrect. Although the methodology and primary findings remain the same, the identity of the biomarker genes are incorrect as a result of this honest mistake. The extent of the changes to correct this information necessitated the publication of a corrected version of this article: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2022.03.006.

Network-based response module comprised of gene expression biomarkers predicts response to infliximab at treatment initiation in ulcerative colitis.

This cross-cohort study aimed to (1) determine a network-based molecular signature that predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to the tumor necrosis factor-ɑ inhibitor (TNFi) therapy, infliximab, in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and (2) address biomarker irreproducibility across different cohort studies. Whole-transcriptome microarray data were derived from biopsies of affected colon tissue from 2 cohorts of infliximab-treated UC patients (training N = 24 and validation N = 22). Response was defined as endoscopic and histologic healing at 4-6 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively. From the training cohort, genes with RNA expression that significantly correlated with clinical response outcomes were mapped onto the Human Interactome network map of protein-protein interactions to identify a largest connected component (LCC) of proteins indicative of infliximab response status in UC. Expression levels of transcripts within the LCC were fed into a probabilistic neural network model to generate a classifier that predicts inadequate response to infliximab. A classifier predictive of inadequate response to infliximab was generated and tested in a cross-cohort, blinded fashion; the AUC was 0.83 and inadequate response was predicted with a 100% positive predictive value and 64% sensitivity. Genes separately identified from the 2 cohorts that correlated with response to infliximab appeared distinct but mapped onto the same network region of the Human Interactome, reflecting a common underlying biology of response among UC patients. Cross-cohort validation of a classifier predictive of infliximab response status in UC patients indicates that a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapies is present in patients' baseline gene expression data. The goal is to develop a diagnostic test that predicts which patients will have an inadequate response to targeted therapies and define new targets and pathways for therapeutic development.

A Molecular Signature Response Classifier to Predict Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Inhibitors: The NETWORK-004 Prospective Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Timely matching of patients to beneficial targeted therapy is an unmet need in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) that predicts which patients with RA are unlikely to respond to tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy would have wide clinical utility. METHODS: The protein-protein interaction map specific to the rheumatoid arthritis pathophysiology and gene expression data in blood patient samples was used to discover a molecular signature of non-response to TNFi therapy. Inadequate response predictions were validated in blood samples from the CERTAIN cohort and a multicenter blinded prospective observational clinical study (NETWORK-004) among 391 targeted therapy-naïve and 113 TNFi-exposed patient samples. The primary endpoint evaluated the ability of the MSRC to identify patients who inadequately responded to TNFi therapy at 6 months according to ACR50. Additional endpoints evaluated the prediction of inadequate response at 3 and 6 months by ACR70, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI. RESULTS: The 23-feature molecular signature considers pathways upstream and downstream of TNFα involvement in RA pathophysiology. Predictive performance was consistent between the CERTAIN cohort and NETWORK-004 study. The NETWORK-004 study met primary and secondary endpoints. A molecular signature of non-response was detected in 45% of targeted therapy-naïve patients. The MSRC had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64 and patients were unlikely to adequately respond to TNFi therapy according to ACR50 at 6 months with an odds ratio of 4.1 (95% confidence interval 2.0-8.3, p value 0.0001). Odds ratios (3.4-8.8) were significant (p value < 0.01) for additional endpoints at 3 and 6 months, with AUC values up to 0.74. Among TNFi-exposed patients, the MSRC had an AUC of up to 0.83 and was associated with significant odds ratios of 3.3-26.6 by ACR, DAS28-CRP, and CDAI metrics. CONCLUSION: The MSRC stratifies patients according to likelihood of inadequate response to TNFi therapy and provides patient-specific data to guide therapy choice in RA for targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi-exposed patients.

A blood-based molecular signature response classifier (MSRC) integrating next-generation RNA sequencing data with clinical features predicts the likelihood that a patient with rheumatoid arthritis will have an inadequate response to TNFi therapy. Treatment selection guided by test results, with likely inadequate responders appropriately redirected to a different therapy, could improve response rates to TNFi therapies, generate healthcare cost savings, and increase rheumatologists' confidence in prescribing decisions and altered treatment choices. The MSRC described in this study predicts the likelihood of inadequate response to TNFi therapies among targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi-exposed patients in a multicenter, 24-week blinded prospective clinical study: NETWORK-004. Patients with a molecular signature of non-response are less likely to have an adequate response to TNFi therapies than those patients lacking the signature according to ACR50, ACR70, CDAI, and DAS28-CRP with significant odds ratios of 3.4­8.8 for targeted therapy-naïve patients and 3.3­26.6 for TNFi-exposed patients. This MSRC provides a solution to the long-standing need for precision medicine tools to predict drug response in rheumatoid arthritis­a heterogeneous and progressive disease with an abundance of therapeutic options. These data validate the performance of the MSRC in a blinded prospective clinical study of targeted therapy-naïve and TNFi therapy-exposed patients.

NHLBI-CMREF Workshop Report on Pulmonary Vascular Disease Classification: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Cardiovascular Medical Research and Education Fund held a workshop on the application of pulmonary vascular disease omics data to the understanding, prevention, and treatment of pulmonary vascular disease. Experts in pulmonary vascular disease, omics, and data analytics met to identify knowledge gaps and formulate ideas for future research priorities in pulmonary vascular disease in line with National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Strategic Vision goals. The group identified opportunities to develop analytic approaches to multiomic datasets, to identify molecular pathways in pulmonary vascular disease pathobiology, and to link novel phenotypes to meaningful clinical outcomes. The committee suggested support for interdisciplinary research teams to develop and validate analytic methods, a national effort to coordinate biosamples and data, a consortium of preclinical investigators to expedite target evaluation and drug development, longitudinal assessment of molecular biomarkers in clinical trials, and a task force to develop a master clinical trials protocol for pulmonary vascular disease.