The Influence of Hypercapnia and Atmospheric Pressure on the Pao2/Fio2 Ratio-Pathophysiologic Considerations, a Case Series, and Introduction of a Clinical Tool.

OBJECTIVES: The ratio between Pao2 and Fio2 is used as a marker for impaired oxygenation and acute respiratory distress syndrome classification. However, any discrepancy between Fio2 and o2 fraction in the alveolus affects the Pao2/Fio2 ratio. Correcting the Pao2/Fio2 ratios using the alveolar gas equation may result in an improved reflection of the pulmonary situation. This study investigates the difference between standard and corrected Pao2/Fio2 in magnitude, its correlation with the mortality of acute respiratory distress syndrome classification, and trends over time. DESIGN: A register and a retrospective study combined with the development of a mathematical model to determine the difference between standard and corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratio for various levels of Paco2 and atmospheric pressure. SETTING: ICU in a secondary hospital in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the ICU for pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Register cohort: January 1, 2010, till March 1, 2020 (n = 1008). Retrospective cohort: March 1, 2020, till June 1, 2020 (n = 34). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The register was used to determine the 7-day ICU mortality per acute respiratory distress syndrome classification based on the standard and corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratio. The retrospective dataset correlated the Paco2 with Pao2/Fio2 ratio over time in patients with assumed stable oxygenation. The model demonstrated an increased difference between the standard and corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratios by a lower Fio2 and atmospheric pressure and higher Pao2 and Paco2. Reclassification of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome resulted in an increase in mortality from 28.1% for standard Pao2/Fio2 to 30.6% for corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratios. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores correlated better with 7-day ICU-mortality when corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratio was used for classification. For patients with Fio2 less than 50% (n = 55), change in Paco2 correlated with change in Pao2/Fio2 ratio (r = -0.388; p = 0.003). INTERVENTIONS: A corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratio was calculated. CONCLUSIONS: Correcting the Pao2/Fio2 ratio for the alveolar gas equation predominantly affects patients with high ratios between Pao2 and Fio2 and Paco2 and at low atmospheric pressure. Using the corrected Pao2/Fio2 ratio for acute respiratory distress syndrome classification results in improved correlation with the 7-day ICU mortality and increases generalization among acute respiratory distress syndrome studies. The authors provide a free, web-based tool.

Moral distress and ethical climate in intensive care medicine during COVID-19: a nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19. METHODS: An extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. "Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families" was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect,  ethical awareness and support. "Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions" and "Self-reflective and empowering leadership" received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p < 0.001) and intensivists (p < 0.05) compared to one year prior. CONCLUSION: Levels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.