The role of service providers' linguistic backgrounds on assessment of multilingual children.

INTRODUCTION: Cultural and linguistic competencies play a critical role in speech-language pathology services when working with people from diverse linguistic backgrounds with communication disorders (CD; Hopf et al., 2021). The personal experiences of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) influence their cultural and linguistic competence skills. Training programs that consider these personal factors might address the unique needs of the SLPs based on their experiences. The current research explores the connection between the linguistic backgrounds of the SLPs and the challenges and needs they reported while assessing multilingual children with CD. METHOD: This study uses a survey method for documenting and comparing 105 SLPs with varying linguistic backgrounds - monolingual, bilingual, and multilingual - on their reported challenges and needs associated with evaluating communication abilities in children from multilingual families with CD. RESULTS: Although all the SLPs worked with children from multilingual families, their linguistic backgrounds introduced differences in their clinical assessment opinions. Across all SLPs in the study, common challenges were the limited availability of interpreters, dedicated assessment materials, multilingual clinical supervisors, and pre-professional training opportunities. CONCLUSION: This study provides valuable information on the effects of linguistic backgrounds on the clinical opinions of SLPs and alludes to the importance of personal experiences on clinical practices. Future research that examines other personal factors and their effects on the SLPs' clinical opinions and practices will help the development of evidence-based cultural and linguistic competence training programs.

The role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement.

This study investigated the role of speed of processing, rapid naming, and phonological awareness in reading achievement. Measures of response time in motor, visual, lexical, grammatical, and phonological tasks were administered to 279 children in third grade. Measures of rapid object naming, phonological awareness, and reading achievement were given in second and fourth grades. Reading group comparisons indicated that poor readers were proportionally slower than good readers across response time measures and on the rapid object naming task. These results suggest that some poor readers have a general deficit in speed of processing and that their problems in rapid object naming are in part a reflection of this deficit. Hierarchical regression analyses further showed that when considered along with IQ and phonological awareness, speed of processing explained unique variance in reading achievement. This finding suggests that a speed of processing deficit may be an "extraphonological" factor in some reading disabilities.