Liver transplantation in adults with liver disease due to common variable immunodeficiency leads to early recurrent disease and poor outcome.

Common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) is the most common form of primary immunodeficiency characterized by antibody deficiency, recurrent bacterial infections, and autoimmunity. Advanced chronic liver disease occurs in a subset of patients with CVID and manifests with various histological features, such as nodular regenerative hyperplasia, inflammation, fibrosis, and cholangiopathy. We present a case series characterizing the outcomes in adult patients transplanted for primary CVID-related liver disease. We discuss the unique transplantation challenges faced in this primary immunodeficiency group including susceptibility to infections and early disease recurrence. There is a statistically significant decrease in 3-year and 5-year survival after liver transplantation in those with CVID-related liver disease (55% at 3 and 5 years) compared with all-comers (89% at 3 years, 81% at 5 years), prompting a need for discussion of suitability of transplantation in this group of patients as well as methods for reducing posttransplantation risk such as scrupulous search for infectious agents and reduction of immunosuppression. Liver Transplantation 24 171-181 2018 AASLD.

A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional imaging techniques are insensitive to liver fibrosis. This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of MR elastography (MRE) stiffness values and the ratio of phosphomonoesters (PME)/phosphodiesters (PDE) measured using (31)P spectroscopy against histological fibrosis staging. METHODS: The local research ethics committee approved this prospective, blinded study. A total of 77 consecutive patients (55 male, aged 49 ± 11.5 years) with a clinical suspicion of liver fibrosis underwent an MR examination with a liver biopsy later the same day. Patients underwent MRE and (31)P spectroscopy on a 1.5 T whole body system. The liver biopsies were staged using an Ishak score for chronic hepatitis or a modified NAS fibrosis score for fatty liver disease. RESULTS: MRE increased with and was positively associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = 0.622, P < 0.001). PME/PDE was not associated with fibrosis stage (Spearman's rank = -0.041, p = 0.741). Area under receiver operating curves for MRE stiffness values were high (range 0.75-0.97). The diagnostic utility of PME/PDE was no better than chance (range 0.44-0.58). CONCLUSIONS: MRE-estimated liver stiffness increases with fibrosis stage and is able to dichotomise fibrosis stage groupings. We did not find a relationship between (31)P MR spectroscopy and fibrosis stage. KEY POINTS: Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and MR spectroscopy can both assess the liver. MRE is superior to ( 31 ) P MR spectroscopy in staging hepatic fibrosis. MRE is able to dichotomise liver fibrosis stage groupings. Gradient-echo MRE may be problematic in genetic haemochromatosis.

Is there disparity between risk and incidence of cardiovascular disease after liver transplant?

BACKGROUND: Hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are recognized complications of liver transplantation, but whether they contribute to the development of cardiovascular disease is uncertain. We aimed first to determine the prevalence of risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) after liver transplantation and second to study the effect of liver transplantation on the predicted 10-year risk of developing CHD and the incidence of cardiovascular events in comparison with a matched local population. METHODS: Data on blood pressure, serum lipids, weight, diabetes mellitus, smoking, and incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke were obtained retrospectively from the case notes of 181 consecutive adult liver transplant recipients (median follow-up 54 months). The Framingham coronary risk equations were used to calculate the 10-year probability of developing CHD. RESULTS: The prevalences of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia after transplantation were 77% and 62%, respectively. The predicted 10-year risk of CHD increased from 6.9% before transplantation to 11.5% at 1 year after transplantation, whereas that of a matched local population was 7%. Compared with a matched nontransplant population, the incidence ratios for MI and stroke were 0.55 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-3.06 ) and 1.45 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-5.22), respectively. No patients died from MI or stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients have a high prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease, exceeding that of the general population, and have a higher predicted risk of developing CHD. Despite this, there were no deaths from CHD or stroke during the study period.

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt and liver transplantation--how safe is the bridge?

Many of the current indications for use of transjugular intrahepatic stent-shunts are also indications for consideration of orthotopic liver transplantation. Tripathi et al. report a similar operative mortality and early graft function in a series of cases transplanted with a TIPSS compared to apparently matched controls, although a higher frequency of post-operative renal dysfunction.

Liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation has evolved from an experimental procedure to an acceptable therapy for end-stage liver disease. The major challenges now faced are donor organ shortage, long-term complications related to immunosuppressive therapy, and the prevention and treatment of disease recurrence.

A randomized controlled trial of late conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based to sirolimus-based immunosuppression in liver transplant recipients with impaired renal function.

Renal impairment is common in patients after liver transplantation and is attributable in large part to the use of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based immunosuppression. We sought to determine whether conversion to sirolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with improved renal function. In a single-center, randomized, controlled trial, 30 patients at least 6 months post liver transplantation were randomized to remain on CNI-based immunosuppression or to switch to sirolimus-based immunosuppression. The primary outcome measure was change in measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) between baseline and 12 months. Of 30 patients randomized, 3 were withdrawn at randomization, leaving 14 patients on CNI and 13 on sirolimus. There was a significant improvement in delta GFR following conversion to sirolimus at 3 months (7.7 mL/minute/1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 3.5-11.9) and 1 yr (6.1 mL/minute/1.73 m2; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-11.4). The difference in absolute GFR between the 2 study groups was significant at 3 months (P=0.02), but not at 12 months (P=0.07). The principal adverse events following conversion were the development of skin rash (9 of 13 patients, 69%) and mouth ulcers (5 of 13 patients, 38%). Two patients developed acute rejection at 2 and 3 months following conversion, 1 in association with low sirolimus levels and 1 having stopped the drug inadvertently. In conclusion, overall, this study suggests that conversion to sirolimus immunosuppression is associated with a modest improvement in renal function. Side effects were common, but tolerable in most patients and controlled with dose reduction.