Meta-analysis of benefits of portal-superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis without surgery. No standard treatment has yet been accepted for patients with portal-superior mesenteric vein (PV-SMV) infiltration. The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the results of pancreatic resection with PV-SMV resection for suspected infiltration with the results of surgery without PV-SMV resection. METHODS: A systematic search was performed of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library in accordance with PRISMA guidelines from the time of inception to 2013. The inclusion criteria were comparative studies including patients who underwent pancreatic resection with or without PV-SMV resection. One, 3- and 5-year survival were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were identified involving a total of 9005 patients (1587 in PV-SMV resection group). Patients undergoing PV-SMV resection had an increased risk of postoperative mortality (risk difference (RD) 0.01, 95 per cent c.i. 0.00 to 0.03; P = 0.2) and of R1/R2 resection (RD 0.09, 0.06 to 0.13; P < 0.001) compared with those undergoing standard surgery. One-, 3- and 5-year survival were worse in the PV-SMV resection group: hazard ratio 1.23 (95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 1.43; P = 0.005), 1.48 (1.14 to 1.91; P = 0.004) and 3.18 (1.95 to 5.19; P < 0.001) respectively. Median overall survival was 14.3 months for patients undergoing pancreatic resection with PV-SMV resection and 19.5 months for those without vein resection (P = 0.063). Neoadjuvant therapies recently showed promising results. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed increased postoperative mortality, higher rates of non-radical surgery and worse survival after pancreatic resection with PV-SMV resection. This may be related to more advanced disease in this group.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in adult liver transplantation recipients: a systematic review of risk factors for mortality and immunosuppression role.

OBJECTIVE: Data on mortality, immunosuppression, and vaccination role regarding liver transplant (LT) recipients affected by COVID-19 are still under debate. This study aims to identify risk factors for mortality and the role of immunosuppression in COVID-19 LT recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of SARS-CoV-2 infection in LT recipients was performed. The primary outcomes were risk factors for mortality, the role of immunosuppression and vaccination. A meta-analysis was not performed as there was a different metric of the same outcome (mortality) and a lack of a control group in most studies. RESULTS: Overall, 1,343 LT recipients of 1,810 SOT were included, and data on mortality were available for 1,110 liver transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mortality ranged between 0-37%. Risk factors of mortality were age >60 years, Mofetil (MMF) use, extra-hepatic solid tumour, Charlson Comorbidity Index, male sex, dyspnoea at diagnosis, higher baseline serum creatinine, congestive heart failure, chronic lung disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, BMI >30. Only 51% of 233 LT patients presented a positive response after vaccination, and older age (>65y) and MMF use were associated with lower antibodies. Tacrolimus (TAC) was identified as a protective factor for mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant patients present additional risk factors of mortality related to immunosuppression. Immunosuppression role in the progression to severe infection and mortality may correlate with different drugs. Moreover, fully vaccinated patients have a lower risk of developing severe COVID-19. The present research suggests safely using TAC and reducing MMF use during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Laparoscopic hepatic resection.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopy in general surgery is increasingly being performed, only recently has liver surgery been performed with laparoscopy. We critically review our experience with laparoscopic liver resections. METHODS: From January 2000 to April 2004, we performed laparoscopic hepatic resection in 16 patients with 18 hepatic lesions. Nine lesions were benign in seven patients (five hydatid cysts, three hemangiomas, and one simple cyst), five were malignant in five patients (five hepatocarcinoma), and four patients had an uncertain preoperative diagnosis (one suspected hemangioma and three suspected adenomas). The mean lesion size was 5.2 cm (range, 1-12). Twelve lesions were located in the left lobe, three were in segment VI, one was in segment V, one was in segment IV, and one was in the subcapsular part of segment VIII. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 6.2%; intraoperative bleeding requiring blood transfusions occurred in two patients. Mean operative time was 120 min. Mean hospital stay was 4 days (range, 2-7). There were no major postoperative complications and no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection with laparoscopy is feasible in malignant and benign hepatic lesions located in the left lobe and anterior inferior right lobe segments (IV, V, and VI). Results are similar to those of the open surgical technique in carefully selected cases, although studies with large numbers of patients are necessary to drawn definite conclusions.

Intrahepatic, peri-hilar and distal cholangiocarcinoma: Three different locations of the same tumor or three different tumors?

BACKGROUND: Few papers deal with pathologic characteristics and outcome of the 3 different cholangiocarcinomas based on location (intrahepatic, peri-hilar, distal). There is little evidence regarding similarity and differences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From two tertiary referral Italian Centers (in Bologna and Verona), 479 patients with cholangiocarcinoma were evaluated between 1980 and 2011. Several pathologic characteristics and their impact on survival were analyzed among resected patients for cholangiocarcinomas depending on the site of origin. RESULTS: Tumour location was intrahepatic in 172 cases (36%), peri-hilar in 243 (51) and distal in 64(13%). Curative resection was performed in 339 (70%) patients. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma showed higher probability to achieve R0 resection (81%), but was more frequently associated with presence of microvascular invasion (71%). Distal cholangiocarcinoma presented less R0 resections (58%), higher lymphnode involvement (60%) and lower microvascular invasion (49%). Hilar cholangiocarcinoma had intermediate characteristics (R0: 65% of cases). Median follow up was 30.2 ± 38 months; the 5 years overall survival was 31% in the resected population. Overall survival curves were similar among the three groups. At univariate analysis surgical margins, lymphnode status, perineural invasion, T category, TNM stage, microvascular invasion, tumour grading had significant impact on survival. At multivariate analysis, only microvascular invasion was significantly related to long term results (HR = 1,7; 95% CI = 1,0-2,5)". CONCLUSION: Micro-vascular invasion has the strongest impact on survival in all three types of cholangiocarcinoma. In case of comparable pathologic characteristics and stage, the three tumors show similar outcome; depending on location, it shows a different tendency to invade bordering structures which affect the outcome.