Combined dermatan sulfate and endothelial progenitor cell treatment: action on the initial inflammatory response after arterial injury in C57BL/6 mice.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Dermatan sulfate (DS), an anticoagulant and antithrombotic glycosaminoglycan, also has anti-inflammatory activity. In this study, we investigated the effect of DS treatment in the presence or absence of bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNCs) or endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in the vascular response to carotid artery lesion in C57BL6 mice. METHODS: Thrombus formation, the expression of adhesion molecules and factors involved in vascular remodeling, inflammation or vascular tone were analyzed by histologic examination, Western blotting and enzyme-linked immunoassay 1 and 3 days after vascular injury. RESULTS: DS injections prevented thrombus formation and decreased P-selectin expression after 3 days of the injury. DS treatment also increased plasma SDF-1 levels but failed to rescue endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) expression, which is responsible for vascular tone. Treatment with MNCs alone failed to prevent thrombus formation 1 day after injury and increased intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression, likely because of the inflammatory nature of these cells. Treatment with EPCs with DS was the most efficient among all therapies studied. Dual administration of EPCs and DS promoted an increase in the expression of adhesion molecules and, at the same time, induced a higher expression of eNOS at the injury site. Furthermore, it stimulated an elevated number of EPCs to migrate and adhere to the vascular wall. DISCUSSION: Simultaneous treatment with EPCs and DS increased the expression of adhesion molecules, prevented thrombosis, rescued the expression of eNOS and increased migration of EPCs to the site of injury, thereby affecting thrombus remodeling and inflammation and can be involved in vessel hemostasis.

Differentiation of C57/BL6 mice bone marrow mononuclear cells into early endothelial progenitors cells in different culture conditions.

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can be isolated from bone marrow and characterized by the expression of cellular markers such as CD34, CD133, VEGFR2, CD31, and VE-Cadherin, by the uptake of acetylated low-density lipoprotein and by in vitro tube formation in tridimensional matrices. These cells are able to differentiate into mature endothelial cells and participate in the re-endothelization of damaged vessels. In this work, we tested different cultured media that can promote the proliferation and differentiation of mononuclear cells (MNCs) into early EPCs, with defined concentrations of growth factors and serum in order to establish a composition that may ensure us the reproducibility of our cultures. MNCs from mice bone marrow were cultivated using selective culture media containing DMEM or M199 supplemented with 10% FBS, VEGF, bFGF, and IGF, for 3, 7, and 14 days. Differentiation into early EPCs was analyzed using immunohistochemistry, FACS and western blotting and by functional parameters as uptake of ac-LDL, and formation of vessel-like structures. The cells cultivated with medium DMEM-M1 (DMEM plus VEGF, bFGF and IGF) expressed CD34, CD133, CD31, VEGFR2, and VE-Cadherin at all culture time-points with increased expression of these markers after 7 days. Only EPCs cultured for 30 days were able to form vessel-like structure. The uptake of ac-LDL was observed after 3, 7, 14, and 30 days, confirming the differentiation of mononuclear cells into early EPCs. DMEM-M1 was able to sustain MNCs proliferation and differentiation, increasing the expression of the characteristic EPC markers, allowing the expansion of early EPCs in culture in a similar way to that observed in commercial available media.

Circulating progenitor and mature endothelial cells in deep vein thrombosis.

INTRODUCTION: Mature circulating endothelial cells (CEC) and circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) have been described in several conditions associated with endothelial injury. Their role in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has not been previously evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this pilot study we evaluated the time course of CEC and EPC release after vena cava experimental DVT in mice, using the FeCl3 model. We also evaluated their presence in patients with DVT at different phases of the disease (acute and chronic phase). CEC and EPC were evaluated by Flow Cytometry. RESULTS: In mice, both CEC and EPC were increased 24 hours after DVT induction, peaking 48 hours thereafter. After 72 hours, CEC counts decreased sharply, whereas EPC counts decreased less substantially. In DVT patients we observed a significant increase in CEC counts immediately after DVT compared to healthy individuals. Patients with chronic disease also presented a significant elevation of these cell count. In a subgroup of patients for whom serial samples were available, CEC counts decreased significantly after 9-15 months of the acute event. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the participation of these cells in the reparative processes that follows DVT, both at immediate and late time-points. The different kinetics of CEC and EPC release in experimental DVT suggests a heterogeneous role for these cells in the reparative events after DVT.

Dermatan sulfate and bone marrow mononuclear cells used as a new therapeutic strategy after arterial injury in mice.

BACKGROUND AIMS: Previously, we have demonstrated that administration of dermatan sulfate (DS) suppresses neointima formation in the mouse carotid artery by activating heparin co-factor II. A similar suppressive effect was observed by increasing the number of progenitor cells in circulation. In this study, we investigated the combination of DS and bone marrow mononuclear cells (MNC), which includes potential endothelial progenitors, in neointima formation after arterial injury. METHODS: Arterial injury was induced by mechanical dilation of the left common carotid artery. We analyzed the extension of endothelial lesion, thrombus formation, P-selectin expression and CD45(+) cell accumulation 1 and 3 days post-injury, and neointima formation 21 days post-injury. Animals were injected with MNC with or without DS during the first 48 h after injury. RESULTS: The extension of endothelial lesion was similar in all groups 1 day after surgery; however, in injured animals treated with MNC and DS the endothelium recovery seemed to be more efficient 21 days after lesion. Treatment with DS inhibited thrombosis, decreased CD45(+) cell accumulation and P-selectin expression at the site of injury, and reduced the neointimal area by 56%. Treatment with MNC reduced the neointimal area by 54%. The combination of DS and MNC reduced neointima formation by more than 91%. In addition, DS promoted a greater accumulation of MNC at the site of injury. CONCLUSIONS: DS inhibits the initial thrombotic and inflammatory processes after arterial injury and promotes migration of MNC to the site of the lesion, where they may assist in the recovery of the injured endothelium.

Clinical Translation of Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy for Graft Versus Host Disease.

Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is a common condition in patients subjected to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The immune cells derived from the grafted stem cells attack recipient's tissues, including those from the skin, liver, eyes, mouth, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, neuromuscular system, and genitourinary tract, may lead to severe morbidity and mortality. Acute GVHD can occur within few weeks after the allogeneic cells have engrafted in the recipient while chronic GVHD may occur any time after transplant, typically within months. Although treatable by systemic corticosteroid administration, effective responses are not achieved for a significant proportion of patients, a condition associated with poor prognosis. The use of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) as an alternative to treat steroid-refractory GVHD had improved last decade, but the results are still controversial. Some studies have shown improvement in the life quality of patients after MSCs treatment, while others have found no significant benefits. In addition to variations in trial design, discrepancies in protocols for MSCs isolation, characterization, and ex vivo manipulation, account for inconsistent clinical results. In this review, we discuss the immunomodulatory properties supporting the therapeutic use of MSCs in GVHD and contextualize the main clinical findings of recent trials using these cells. Critical parameters for the clinical translation of MSCs, including consistent production of MSCs according to Good Manufacturing Practices (GMPs) and informative potency assays for product quality control (QC), are addressed.