Comparison of a portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based spirometer (Spirofy™) with the vitalograph alpha Touch™ spirometer in evaluating lung function in healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients-a randomized, crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Spirofy™ is India's first portable, pneumotach flow-sensor-based digital spirometer developed to diagnose asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In this study, we compared the performance of the Spirofy™ device with that of the Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer in measuring the lung capacities of healthy individuals, asthmatics, and COPD patients. We also assessed the inter-device variability between two Spirofy™ devices. METHODS: In a randomized, three-way crossover, open-label study, we measured the differences in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) between the Spirofy™ and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometers. A proportion of the FEV1/FVC ratio distribution of < 0.7 was used to compare the diagnostic accuracies of the Spirofy™ with Vitalograph™ Alpha Touch™ spirometers. RESULTS: Ninety subjects participated in this study. The mean ± SD FVC values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 2.60 ± 1.05 L, 2.64 ± 1.04 L, and 2.67 ± 1.04 L, respectively. The mean ± SD FEV1 values obtained from the Spirofy™ 1, Spirofy™ 2, and Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ devices were 1.87 ± 0.92 (L), 1.88 ± 0.92 (L), and 1.93 ± 0.93 (L), respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the FVC and FEV1 values recorded by Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, Spirofy™ 1, and Spirofy™ 2. As compared to Vitalograph Alpha Touch™, the Spirofy™ device showed good sensitivity (97%), specificity (90%), and overall accuracy (93.3%) at an FEV1/FVC ratio < 0.7. No inter-device variability was observed between the two Spirofy™ devices. CONCLUSION: Spirofy™ is a portable and easy-to-use device and is as accurate as the standard Vitalograph Alpha Touch™ spirometer for the diagnosis of COPD and asthma. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/09/036492 (Clinical Trials Registry - India).

Breath-actuated INhalation TheRapy: survey of phySicians' PErCepTion (INTROSPECT) in Nepal.

OBJECTIVE: Breath-actuated inhalers (BAIs) are gaining attention in the management of obstructive airway diseases (OADs). In Nepal, a BAI containing fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FPS) has been available for a year. This survey is aimed at determining the perception and experience of physicians in Nepal concerning BAIs. METHODS: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was conducted. A total of 141 physicians participated and filled the survey. RESULTS: Most physicians felt that the right device should be easy to teach, learn and remember. They considered coordination and multiple steps as the primary challenges with pressurized metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers, respectively. Most of them agreed that BAIs could address these challenges. BAIs were not only preferred by most of the physicians for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease but were also the preferred choice in newly diagnosed patients. Physicians believed that if current patients were shifted to BAIs, it could improve inhalation technique (88%) and compliance/adherence (81%). Almost all of them (92-97%) agreed that teaching the breathing technique and the cleaning process was easier and faster in BAIs. BAIs were considered easy and simple to use. Also, BAI's dose-counter helps patients to increase adherence to inhalation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this INTROSPECT survey, physicians in Nepal believed that BAIs could address the key challenges faced with using pMDIs and DPIs in asthma and COPD patients.

Safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in hospitalised COVID-19 patients: a retrospective analysis of active surveillance database.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data on safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir in COVID-19 management is scant. We present findings of data analysis conducted for assessing the safety and clinical outcomes of remdesivir treatment for COVID-19 in India. METHODS: This retrospective analysis used data from an active surveillance programme database of hospitalised patients with COVID-19 who were receiving remdesivir. RESULTS: Of the 2329 patients included, 67.40% were men. Diabetes (29.69%) and hypertension (20.33%) were the most common comorbidities. At remdesivir initiation, 2272 (97.55%) patients were receiving oxygen therapy. Remdesivir was administered for 5 days in 65.38% of patients. Antibiotics (64.90%) and steroids (47.90%) were the most common concomitant medications. Remdesivir was overall well tolerated, and total 119 adverse events were reported; most common were nausea and vomiting in 45.40% and increased liver enzymes in 14.28% patients. 84% of patients were cured/improved, 6.77% died and 9.16% showed no improvement in their clinical status at data collection. Subgroup analyses showed that the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients < 60 years old than in those > 60 years old. Amongst patients on oxygen therapy, the cure/improvement rate was significantly higher in those receiving standard low-flow oxygen than in those receiving mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, or high-flow oxygen. Factors that were associated with higher mortality were age > 60 years, cardiac disease, diabetes high flow oxygen, non-invasive ventilation and mechanical ventilation. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that remdesivir is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile. The clinical outcome of cure/improvement was 84%, with a higher improvement in patients < 60 years old and on standard low-flow oxygen.

Knowledge, practice pattern and attitude toward asthma management amongst physicians from Nepal, Malaysia, Lebanon, Myanmar and Morocco.

OBJECTIVE: This survey aimed to understand the physicians' practice pattern and challenges faced while treating their patients with asthma in five countries-Malaysia, Nepal, Myanmar, Morocco and Lebanon. METHODS: Questionnaire-based data was gathered from internal medicine doctors (209), general practitioners (206), chest physicians (152) and pediatricians (58) from 232 locations from across the five countries. RESULTS: Of the 816 physicians, 374 physicians encountered at least 5 asthma patients daily. Approximately, 38% physicians always used spirometry for diagnosis and only 12% physicians always recommended Peak flow meter (PFM) for home-monitoring. Salmeterol/fluticasone (71%) followed by formoterol/budesonide (38%) were the most preferred ICS/long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA); Salbutamol (78%) was the most preferred reliever medication. 60% physicians said >40% of their patients were apprehensive to use inhalers. 72% physicians preferred a pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) to a dry powder inhaler (DPI) with only a third of them using a spacer with the pMDI. 71% physicians believed that using similar device for controller and reliever can be beneficial to patients. Skipping medicines in absence of symptoms (64%), incorrect inhaler technique (48%) and high cost of medication (49%) were considered as major reasons for non-adherence by most physicians. Incorrect inhaler technique (66%) and nonadherence (59%) were considered the most common causes of poor asthma control. CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities to improve the use of diagnostic and monitoring tools for asthma. Non-adherence, incorrect inhaler technique and cost remain a challenge to achieve good asthma control. Asthma education, including correct demonstration of inhaler, can potentially help to improve inhaler adherence.

Real-world evaluation of the clinical safety and efficacy of fluticasone/formoterol FDC via the Revolizer® in patients with persistent asthma in India.

The combination of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABAs) is widely used for the management of asthma. This prospective, open-label, non-comparative, observational, 24-week multicentre study is the first real-world study from India to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination of fluticasone/formoterol (Maxiflo® 100/6 mcg or 250/6 mcg) capsules via the Revolizer® device in patients with persistent asthma. The primary efficacy analyses included mean change in Asthma Control Test (ACT™) at 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks. Secondary efficacy analyses included mean change in morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) at the end of 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks, number of patients having symptom-free days and nights at the end of 4, 8, 16 and 24 weeks, the number and severity of exacerbations over 24 weeks and response to the Usability Preference Satisfaction Confidence questionnaire after 1 week. Overall, 385 (of 401; 96.01%) enrolled patients completed the study. The mean change in ACT™ score was 6.7 ± 3.71 (95% CI: 6.32, 7.06; p < 0.0001) at week 24. The ACT™ score at weeks 4, 8 and 16 showed progressive and statistically significant increase from baseline. A statistically significant improvement in morning and evening PEFR at weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24 was reported. The proportion of patients experiencing symptom-free days and nights continuously increased from baseline to week 24. A good safety profile over the 24-week period was observed. The Revolizer® device was preferred by 94.26% patients over their current device. Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate FDC capsules administered via a single-dose dry powder inhaler ([DPI], (Revolizer®) offers a novel, well-tolerated and effective treatment option for the long-term management of asthma.

Fixed-dose combination of three drugs, i.e. LABA/LAMA/ICS for COPD: Results of a real-world study from India.

BACKGROUND: The use of triple therapy with inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta-agonist and long-acting antimuscarinics has been shown to be beneficial in COPD patients who continue to have symptoms and exacerbations, despite receiving dual bronchodilator combinations. This study assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of once-daily, fixed-dose combination of Tiotropium/Formoterol/Ciclesonide (TFC) (18 mcg/12 mcg/400 mcg) via dry powder inhaler (DPI) or metered dose inhaler (MDI) in patients with COPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this 24-week, open-label, prospective, non-comparative, multicentre, real-world study, COPD patients requiring triple therapy as judged by their physician, were enrolled. The primary endpoint was mean change from baseline in pre-dose Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1) at week 24. Pre and post-dose (30 min) FEV1, Forced Vital capacity (FVC), COPD Assessment Test (CAT), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) score and safety were also evaluated. A post-hoc analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of the triple drug combination among smoker and non-smoker COPD patients. RESULTS: Out of the 297 patients enrolled [mean age 61 ± 10 years; 84.8% males; 55.2% smokers and post-dose FEV1 (% predicted) 39 ± 16%], 253 completed the study. Mean change in pre-dose FEV1 from baseline to week 24 increased significantly after administering the triple drug combination [580 ± 600 mL, 95% CI (510, 650 mL), p < 0.0001]. The increase in the pre-dose FEV1 was significant at all time points (p < 0.0001). Similar improvements were seen in pre-dose FVC, post-dose FEV1 and post-dose FVC across all time points. CAT scores and the proportion of patients with improved mMRC score improved at all visits. The post-hoc analysis showed that TFC significantly increased pre-dose FEV1 both among smokers [mean change 200 ± 430 mL, 95% CI (130, 270 mL), p < 0.0001] as well as non-smokers [990 ± 470 mL, 95% CI (900, 1070 mL), p < 0.0001] at week 24. This difference was significant from week 12 onwards. Mean change in pre and post-dose FEV1 and FVC was significant across all visits between the two groups. At week 24, CAT score reduced significantly from baseline (overall: -6.6 ± 6.07; smokers: -5.17 + 6.96; non-smokers: 8.06 ± 4.44; all p < 0.0001). The mean difference between the two groups was 2.88 (p < 0.0001) at week 24. TFC was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: In this real world, multicentre study in India, TFC significantly improved lung function, symptoms and quality of life among all patients with COPD, but the effect was more pronounced among non-smoker COPD patients.

Comparison of fluticasone/formoterol with budesonide/formoterol pMDI in adults with moderate to severe persistent asthma: Results from a 12-week randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy of inhaled corticosteroid/long acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LABA) is the cornerstone of managing asthmatics who are uncontrolled with low-medium dose of ICS. The novel ICS/LABA combination of fluticasone propionate and formoterol (flu/form) provides potent anti-inflammatory and rapid bronchodilatory effect. This randomized, multi-centre, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of flu/form (125/6 mcg BD; Maxiflo®) with the well-established budesonide/formoterol combination (bud/form 200/6 mcg BD), both delivered through a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma over 12 weeks. METHODS: This study enrolled patients between 18 and 65 years. The primary end-point was to demonstrate non-inferiority for the mean change in the pre-dose morning peak expiratory flow values (PEF). The secondary end-points included lung function assessments, number of symptom-free days and nights, rescue medication use, day-and night-time symptom scores and safety evaluation. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-two patients were randomized to either flu/form (n = 117) or bud/form (n = 115). At the end of 12 weeks, flu/form was non-inferior to bud/form with regards to the primary end-point of morning PEF (48.07 L/min vs. 49.03 L/min, p > 0.05). These improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.0001) vs baseline. Similar improvements were observed between the two groups for secondary efficacy end-points including FEV1, symptom-free nights, rescue medication use, day-and night-time symptom scores (p > 0.05). Flu/form exhibited a safety profile comparable to that of bud/form. CONCLUSION: Fluticasone/formoterol combination administered through a pMDI is as efficacious and well-tolerated as budesonide/formoterol and offers a new therapeutic option for patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma.

A Questionnaire-based Survey of Physician Perceptions of the Prevalence of Antimicrobial Resistance and Their Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a serious problem being faced by physicians worldwide. This article was designed to study physician perceptions of antibiotic resistance and their prescribing patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A structured questionnaire was developed for reporting the prevalence of antibiotic resistance as perceived by physicians and recording their antibiotic preferences in specific contexts. A total of 539 intensivists across India participated in the study. RESULTS: The prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens was reported to be on the rise in Intensive Care Units. The prevalence rate of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was reported to be between 20% and 40% by 33% of the participants. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the preferred beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic by the majority of intensivists (47%) in the treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers. Meropenem was recommended to be used at a higher dose (2 g t.i.d.) by 41% of intensivists for Pseudomonas/Acinetobacter infections with high minimum inhibitory concentration values for meropenem. De-escalation data revealed that 43% of intensivists "always" would like to de-escalate from carbapenems, based on the antibiotic susceptibility data. Minocycline was recommended by 33% for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and by 21% for bloodstream infections caused by MDR Acinetobacter. Up to 83% of intensivists preferred the use of nebulized colistin for the management of VAP/hospital-acquired pneumonia. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the prevalence of MDR Gram-negative pathogens is perceived to be on the rise. Prescription patterns indicate high levels of variability. Hence, antibiotic stewardship is essential to standardize antibiotic prescriptions not only for efficacy but also to reduce the burden of multiple drug resistance.

Lipid management in India: a nationwide, cross-sectional physician survey.

BACKGROUND: Current international guidelines on dyslipidemia are not concordant on various aspects of management. Also, there are no uniformly accepted Indian guidelines. We, therefore, performed a physician survey to understand lipid management practices in India. METHODS: An anonymous survey questionnaire was administered to gauge physicians' self-reported behavior regarding lipid management aspects. Results were expressed in terms of percentages based on the number of responses obtained. RESULTS: A total of 404 physicians participated in the survey. Eighty-eight percent respondents ordered a lipid profile before starting statin therapy, and 80% preferred to set lipid targets, though the tools used for calculating cardiovascular risk varied. Atorvastatin was preferred over rosuvastatin in primary prevention (72.9 vs. 32.4%), secondary prevention (54.6 vs. 46.7%), diabetic patients (56.3 vs. 40.3%) and post-ACS (78.3 vs. 34%). High-intensity statins were preferred by 73.7% of respondents in post-ACS cases. Fifty percent doctors chose not to use a statin in diabetic patients, irrespective of their LDL-C levels. The most preferred drug option for managing atherogenic dyslipidemia and moderate hypertriglyceridemia was statin-fibrate combination (55.1%) and fibrates (35.4%), respectively. Sixty-three percent doctors preferred to prescribe statins in patients with moderately high LDL-C and normal triglycerides, without CHD or CHD risk equivalents. Around 28% of doctors preferred not to use pharmacotherapy for managing isolated low HDL. Of the participants, 73% used fibrates in ≤20% of their dyslipidemic patients, with fenofibrate being the most preferred (90.5%). Ezetimibe was mainly used in patients with uncontrolled LDL-C despite statin therapy (52.4% respondents). Most preferred approaches to manage statin intolerance included reducing statin dose (39%) and stopping and restarting statins at a lower dose (34.5%). Fifty-two percent of doctors chose not to alter pre-existing therapy in patients who had LDL-C levels at goal but elevated non-HDL-C levels. CONCLUSION: This is the first survey in India that provides useful insights into Indian physicians' self-reported perspectives on managing dyslipidemia in routine clinical practice. Despite concordance with the currently available guidelines in certain aspects, there is incongruence in managing specific dyslipidemia problems. Further continuing medical education and the development of evidence-based, India-specific lipid guidelines can help reduce some of these differences.

Salmeterol/fluticasone through breath-actuated inhaler versus pMDI: a randomized, double-blind, 12 weeks study.

OBJECTIVE: Salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) formulated in a breath-actuated inhaler (BAI) overcomes the co-ordination problem associated with the pressurized-metered dose inhaler (pMDIs). Our aim was to compare the efficacy and the safety of SFC given through the BAI versus the conventional pMDI in moderate-to-severe asthmatics. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, prospective, active-controlled, parallel group, multicenter, 12 weeks study, 150 asthmatics were randomized to receive SFC (25/125 mcg) through either BAI or pMDI. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean change in pre-dose morning PEFR value at 12 weeks and the secondary efficacy endpoints included, mean change in FEV(1), pre-bronchodilator FVC, pre-dose morning and evening PEFR, symptom scores at 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Patient preferences for device and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the mean change in pre-dose morning PEFR in BAI and pMDI groups was 50.72 L/min and 48.82 L/min, respectively (p < 0.0001; both groups) and the difference between the two groups was not significant. Both the treatment groups showed a statistically significant improvement in secondary endpoints at all-time points compared with baseline. The usability questionnaire assessment results showed that the BAI device was preferred by 75% of patients as compared with 25% preferring pMDI. SFC in both BAI and pMDI devices was found to be safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to demonstrate that SFC given through the BAI produces comparable efficacy and safety endpoints as pMDI. Additionally, BAI was the preferred inhaler by patients compared to conventional pMDI.

Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium-formoterol via single pressurized meter dose inhaler (pMDI) versus tiotropium alone in COPD.

BACKGROUND: Bronchodilators form the main stay of treatment for COPD. When symptoms are not adequately controlled with one bronchodilator, addition of another bronchodilator is recommended. We have recently developed a combination of tiotropium and formoterol in a single pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) (Cipla Ltd., India). The aim of this study was to compare the bronchodilator effects of a single dose of 18 mcg of tiotropium versus a single dose of a combination of 18 mcg tiotropium plus 12 mcg formoterol administered via a pMDI in subjects with moderate-to-severe COPD. STUDY DESIGN: 44 COPD subjects were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, multi-centre, cross-over study. 18 mcg tiotropium and 18 mcg tiotropium plus 12 mcg formoterol were administered via pressurized metered dose inhalers on two separate days. FEV(1), FVC and Inspiratory capacity (IC) were measured before, 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after the study drugs were administered. RESULTS: Compared with tiotropium alone, a combination of tiotropium plus formoterol showed a faster onset of bronchodilator response (p < 0.01 for FEV(1) and FVC), a greater mean maximum change in FEV(1) (p = 0.01) and FVC (p = 0.008) and greater AUC(0-24h) values for FEV(1), FVC and IC. Trough FEV(1) and FVC values were also greater in the combination group. CONCLUSION: A combination of tiotropium plus formoterol administered via a single inhaler produced a superior bronchodilator response than tiotropium alone over a period of 24 h.

Pharmacokinetics of colistin in critically ill patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infection.

PURPOSE: Colistin, which had not been used widely because of nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity, has gained clinical importance in recent times due to the resurgence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Very few studies, especially pharmacokinetic studies, have been performed with intravenous colistimethate sodium, and none in India. The aim of our study was to study the single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of colistin in patients with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infections. METHOD: This was a prospective open-label pharmacokinetic study done in an intensive care unit in a tertiary care hospital on 15 critically ill patients with proven multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli infection. Colistimethate sodium was injected as intermittent intravenous infusions in accordance with the recommendations on the package insert. For patients weighing ≥ 60 kg with a normal renal function or with a creatinine clearance (CL(CR)) of between 20 and 50 ml/min, the drug was administered at 2 million international units (MIU) every 8 h; for those with a CL(CR) of 10-20 ml/min, the dose was 2 MIU every 12 h. Those patients who weighed <60 kg were administered 50,000 IU/kg/day in three divided doses at 8-h intervals. Both single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetics of colistin were determined and correlated with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A wide inter-individual variation was observed in pharmacokinetic parameters. The median (range) of the maximum plasma drug concentration/minimum inhibitory concentration (C(max)/MIC) ratio for Acinetobacter spp. was 13.4 (1.3-40.3) following the administration of a single dose of colistimethate sodium and 26.3 (0.9-64.9) at steady-state. For Pseudomonas spp., these values were 3.18 (1.6-23.1) following the single dose and 3.82 (2.3-10.9) at steady-state. For those patients whose cultures grew Acinetobacter spp., an optimum value of the C(max)/MIC ratio of >8 was achieved in seven of nine patients after the single dose and in seven of eight patients at steady-state. For those patients whose cultures grew Pseudomonas spp, only one patient after the single dose and one patient at steady-state achieved a C(max)/MIC ratio of >8. A significant association was noted between dose and survival, and a trend was observed with patients weighing ≤ 60 kg (who received 50,000 IU/kg/day instead of 6 MIU/day for those >60 kg) having an increased mortality. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetic parameters of colistin were comparable to those reported in previous studies in critically ill patients. However, the recommended dose may be inadequate to maintain the C(max)/MIC ratio to an optimal level-at least in patients infected with Pseudomonas spp. The dose recommendation should be based only on creatinine clearance and not body weight.

Tackling Counterfeit Drugs: The Challenges and Possibilities.

Drugs that have been manufactured or packaged fraudulently are referred to as counterfeit/fake/spurious/falsified drugs because they either lack active ingredients or have the incorrect dosages. Counterfeiting of drugs has become a global issue with which the whole world is grappling. The World Health Organization states the frightening figure in which almost 10.5% of the medications worldwide are either subpar or fake. Although developing and low-income countries are the targets of the large-scale drug counterfeiting activities, fake/substandard drugs are also making their way into developed nations including the USA, Canada, and European countries. Counterfeiting of drugs is leading to not only economic loss but is also playing its part in the morbidity and mortality of patients. The recent COVID-19 pandemic fuelled the demand for certain categories of medicines such as antipyretics, remdesivir, corticosteroids, vaccines, etc., thus increasing the demand and manufacture of subpar/fake medicines. This review articulates the current trends and global impact of drug counterfeiting, current and potential measures for its prevention and the role of different stakeholders in tackling the menace of drug counterfeiting.

A narrative review on the Synchrobreathe™: A novel breath-actuated pressurised metered-dose inhaler for the treatment of obstructive airway diseases.

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs), are widely used to deliver drugs for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Incorrect use of inhalers is one of the main obstacles to achieving better clinical control. Indeed, with pMDIs, patients fail to synchronise actuation with inhalation due to a lack of coordination and with DPIs insufficient inspiratory effort compromises drug deposition in lungs. More than 50% of patients desire to switch their pMDIs and DPIs for a better device. This led to the development of pressurised breath-actuated inhalers (BAIs) with the aim of combining the beneficial features of pMDIs and DPIs and mitigating their problems. BAIs, e.g., Synchrobreathe™, are designed such that they are activated by a low inhalation effort and mechanically actuate the dose in synchrony to inspiration, thereby resolving the need to coordinate actuation with inspiration. BAIs have advantages, including ease of use, high lung deposition of medication, and greater patient preference. We discussed the design features, operating procedure, and clinical evidence of the Synchrobreathe™ device (Cipla Ltd, India), a BAI available with a wide range of drug combinations. Studies have shown that a higher number of patients (68.19%) used the Synchrobreathe™ without any error than the pMDI (56.21%), and that the vast majority of them (92%) found it easy to understand and use. The Synchrobreathe™ is an innovative, easy-to-use inhaler that may overcome many limitations associated with pMDIs and DPIs, thus potentially improving management of obstructive airway diseases and patients' quality of life.

Perceptions and Attitudes of Patients and Their Family Caregivers on Nebulization Therapy for COPD.

Purpose: The aim of the survey was to evaluate attitudes and perceptions toward nebulization therapy for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Indian population. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional, multicenter, quantitative survey was conducted from July to August 2019 among 103 COPD patients [>40 years, either gender, belonging to socio-economic class (SEC) A or SEC B] and their family caregivers. One-on-one interviews were conducted telephonically via an online survey platform (KoBo data collection tool) using a structured questionnaire. Patients receiving home nebulization were included, and the usage of nebulizers, satisfaction, and benefits and concerns with nebulizers were assessed. Results: Overall, 47% patients were on handheld inhalers + nebulizer, 54% used nebulizer for >8 weeks, and 27% used nebulizers daily for home maintenance. Majority of the patients (77%) were satisfied with nebulization therapy. Around 70% family caregivers opined that the quality of life of COPD patients improved post-nebulization therapy. The benefits of nebulizers perceived by patients were easier breathing (89%), feeling of well-being (86%), and ease of use (86%), while family caregivers reported reduced hospitalization (76%) and easier breathing (75%). Among those with prior experience with inhalers, 72% felt nebulizers gave long-term relief, while 65% perceived having immediate relief compared to inhaler. Overall, 61% opined that benefits with nebulizers outweighed the inconvenience associated with its use. Key concerns regarding nebulizers cited by patients were time-consuming procedure (50%), feeling of dependency (49%), and social embarrassment (48%), while family caregivers highlighted social embarrassment (45%) and multiple daily use (45%) as major concerns. Majority of the patients (73%) were compliant with their recommended frequency of the nebulizer. Conclusion: This first-of-its-kind survey highlights that the majority of patients and family caregivers were satisfied with nebulizers and reported improvements in symptoms and reduced hospitalizations with nebulizer therapy. The patients preferred nebulized therapy to inhalers.

A review of the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/formoterol fixed-dose combination.

INTRODUCTION: Fluticasone propionate/formoterol fumarate (FP/FORM) is one of the newer combinations among inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and long-acting ß2-agonist (LABA) combination formulations currently available. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of this FP/FORM combination, it is important to review all the available evidence and take a comprehensive look at the current and relevant data in the patient population suffering from asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). AREAS COVERED: In this focused review, we summarize the available literature published until January 2021 using the PubMed/Medline and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases on the efficacy and safety of FP/FORM with its mono-components; concurrent administration of FP+FORM; and with other ICS/LABA combinations in asthma and COPD patients. EXPERT OPINION: FP/FORM combination therapy is a strong alternative in the treatment of persistent asthma and moderate-severe COPD. Extensive study of several trials has established the superior efficacy of FP/FORM combination therapy over FP or FORM monotherapy, comparable efficacy with FP+FORM and non-inferiority to other ICS/LABA fixed-dose combinations. The safety profile of FP/FORM has also been found to be comparable with respect to its mono-components and their concurrent use, and also other ICS/LABA combinations such as formoterol/budesonide and fluticasone/salmeterol.

Efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium/formoterol delivered via a dry powder inhaler in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Results from a multi-centre, open-label, randomised study.

Background: We designed this randomised, open-label, parallel group, multi-centre study to investigate the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium/formoterol, a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist fixed dose combination, delivered through a dry powder inhaler (DPI) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Material and Methods: We randomised (1:1) patients with moderate to severe COPD (N = 356) to receive glycopyrronium 25 µg/formoterol 12 µg via DPI twice daily (GF-DPI) or glycopyrronium 50 µg monotherapy via DPI once daily (G-DPI). The primary study endpoint was the mean change from the baseline in pre-dose trough-forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) at 12 weeks. Results: At week 12, the mean increase from the baseline in pre-dose trough FEV1 was higher in the GF-DPI group (120 ml) than in the G-DPI (60 ml) group. The mean difference (MD) between treatment groups was 0.06 L (95% CI: 0.00-0.12 L, P < 0.0001 for non-inferiority). At week 12, the mean pre-dose forced vital capacity (FVC), 1 hour post-dose FEV1, and post-dose FVC increased significantly from the baseline only in the GF-DPI group (p < 0.0001). The reduction in the COPD assessment test score was greater in the GF-DPI group (p = 0.0379). The average daily number of puffs of rescue medication and the reduction in mean modified Medical Research Council scale, COPD, and Asthma Sleep Impact Scale score at week 12 were similar between groups (p > 0.05). Overall, 35 adverse events and two serious adverse events unrelated to study drugs were reported. Both groups had similar results for overall drug safety. Conclusion: The results demonstrate efficacy and safety of GF-DPI in Indian patients with moderate to severe COPD. Treatment with GF-DPI significantly improved the lung function and quality of life and was well tolerated.

The evidence for using tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus lamivudine as a nucleoside analogue backbone for the treatment of HIV.

This article evaluates the evidence supporting use of the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3 â€‹TC) combination as a dual nucleoside backbone within a triple drug antiretroviral regimen. Key trials that assess the relative efficacy, safety and resistance profile of 3 â€‹TC and emtricitabine (FTC) are discussed. Clinical use of 3 â€‹TC and FTC with two tenofovir prodrugs -TDF and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) - is presented. Recommendations from various international guidelines for the construction of triple and emerging dual regimens are summarised. In conclusion, data suggest the therapeutic equivalence of 3 â€‹TC and FTC, especially when 3 â€‹TC is combined with TDF.

The emerging role of nebulization for maintenance treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at home.

Inhalation therapy is the cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. However, for many COPD patients who are managed at home, nebulization therapy offers an effective alternative treatment and fulfills the gap of catering to the specific population of patients who are unable to use handheld inhaler devices appropriately. The present review highlights key aspects, namely selection of the right beneficiaries for home nebulization, available drugs in nebulized formulations for the treatment of COPD, and the importance of care, cleaning, and maintenance, which are prerequisites for ensuring successful nebulization therapy.

Understanding Practice Patterns of COPD: A Survey of Physicians in Nepal, Sri Lanka and Malaysia.

INTRODUCTION: There is much recent data from Nepal, Sri Lanka and Malaysia that can help us understand the practice patterns of physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in these countries. We conducted this survey to understand the practice patterns of physicians related to the diagnosis and management of COPD in these three countries. METHODS: This questionnaire-based, observational, multicentre, cross-sectional survey was carried out with 438 randomly selected physicians consulting COPD patients. RESULTS: In the survey, 73.29% of the physicians consulted at least five COPD patients daily (all patients > 40 years of age). 31.14% of the COPD patients visiting their doctors were women. Among physicians, 95.12% reported that at least 70% of their patients were smokers. 34.18% of the physicians did not routinely use spirometry to diagnose COPD. Most physicians preferred a short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) (28.19%) in the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Group-A and long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist plus long-acting ß2-agonist/inhaled corticosteroids (LAMA + LABA/ICS) in both the GOLD Group-C (39.86%) and Group-D (72.89%) patients. A significant number (40.67%) of physicians preferred LABA/LAMA for their GOLD Group-B patients. A pressurised metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with or without spacer was the most preferred device. Only 23.67% of the physicians believed that at least 70% of their patients had good adherence (> 80%) to therapy. Up to 54.42% of the physicians prescribed inhalation therapy to every COPD patient. Also, 39.95% of the physicians evaluated their patients' inhalation technique on every visit. Up to 52.67% of the physicians advised home nebulisation to > 10% of patients, with nebulised SABA/short-acting muscarinic receptor antagonist (SAMA) being the most preferred management choice. Most physicians offered smoking cessation advice (94.16%) and/or vaccinations (74.30%) as non-pharmacological management, whereas pulmonary rehabilitation was offered by a smaller number of physicians. Cost of therapy and poor technique were the most common reasons for non-adherence to COPD management therapy. CONCLUSION: Awareness of spirometry can be increased to improve the diagnosis of COPD. Though physicians are following the GOLD strategy recommendations for the pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of COPD, awareness of spirometry could be increased to improve proper diagnosis. Regular device demonstration during each visit can improve the inhalation technique and can possibly increase adherence to treatment.