The diagnostic performance of ultrafast MRI to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic performance of ultrafast magnetic resonance imaging (UF-DCE MRI) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted until September 1, 2023, in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of UF-DCE MRI in breast lesion stratification were screened and included in the meta-analysis. Pooled summary estimates for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and hierarchic summary operating characteristics (SROC) curves were pooled under the random-effects model. Publication bias and heterogeneity between studies were calculated. RESULTS: A final set of 16 studies analyzing 2090 lesions met the inclusion criteria and were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Using UF-DCE MRI kinetic parameters, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, and area under the curve (AUC) for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions were 83% (95% CI 79-88%), 77% (95% CI 72-83%), 18.9 (95% CI 13.7-26.2), and 0.876 (95% CI 0.83-0.887), respectively. We found no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the two main UF-DCE MRI kinetic parameters, maximum slope (MS) and time to enhancement (TTE). DOR and SROC exhibited low heterogeneity across the included studies. No evidence of publication bias was identified (p = 0.585). CONCLUSIONS: UF-DCE MRI as a stand-alone technique has high accuracy in discriminating benign from malignant breast lesions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: UF-DCE MRI has the potential to obtain kinetic information and stratify breast lesions accurately while decreasing scan times, which may offer significant benefit to patients. KEY POINTS: • Ultrafast breast MRI is a novel technique which captures kinetic information with very high temporal resolution. • The kinetic parameters of ultrafast breast MRI demonstrate a high level of accuracy in distinguishing between benign and malignant breast lesions. • There is no significant difference in accuracy between maximum slope and time to enhancement kinetic parameters.

In Search of the Lost Clip: Outcome of Women After Needle-Guided Lumpectomy of a Marking Clip.

BACKGROUND: Needle localization of a marking clip is required to guide accurate removal of many breast lesions. When the clip is not visualized on specimen radiography, concerns regarding the completeness of cancer removal and long-term outcomes arise. Using a large cohort of women undergoing breast conservation, we examined the magnitude of the problem and the outcome of women with a missing clip. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study including all women undergoing mammographic wire-guided localization between 2013 and 2018 with a specimen radiograph showing a missing clip. The control group included women with successful removal of the clip(s). Data included demographics, cancer and treatment characteristics, and outcome. The groups were compared in regard to margin status, repeat surgery, and recurrence rates. RESULTS: The research group included 43 women [5% of the cohort; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-7.2] with a missing clip. Positive margins were comparable (7, 17% of cases; 29, 15% of 196 cases in the control group; p = 0.96). Eleven women (33%) had a residual clip visualized on post-operative mammography; in four cases, a percutaneous biopsy of the clip was successful, all with no residual tumor. There was no significant difference in re-excision rates (14% vs. 8%, p = 0.23) or in local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of women with a missing clip, the clip is not visualized on post-operative mammography. Those with a residual clip can be managed with percutaneous biopsy as long as the lesion was removed with clear margins, with comparable outcomes as women in whom the clip is visualized on specimen radiograph.

Breast MRI during lactation: effects on tumor conspicuity using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of lactation on breast cancer conspicuity on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in comparison with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parametric maps. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven lactating patients with 16 biopsy-confirmed pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) lesions were prospectively evaluated by DCE and DTI on a 1.5-T MRI for pre-treatment evaluation. Additionally, DCE datasets of 16 non-lactating age-matched breast cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed, as control. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) comprising two regions of interests of the normal parenchyma was used to assess the differences in the tumor conspicuity on DCE subtraction images between lactating and non-lactating patients, as well as in comparison against DTI parametric maps of λ1, λ2, λ3, mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), and maximal anisotropy index, λ1-λ3. RESULTS: CNR values of breast cancer on DCE MRI among lactating patients were reduced by 62% and 58% (p < 0.001) in comparison with those in non-lactating patients, when taking into account the normal contralateral parenchyma and an area of marked background parenchymal enhancement (BPE), respectively. Among the lactating patients, DTI parameters of λ1, λ2, λ3, MD, and λ1-λ3 were significantly decreased, and FA was significantly increased in PABC, relative to the normal lactating parenchyma ROIs. When compared against DCE in the lactating cohort, the CNR on λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD was significantly superior, providing up to 138% more tumor conspicuity, on average. CONCLUSION: Breast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI is markedly reduced during lactation owing to the marked BPE. However, the additional application of DTI can improve the visualization and quantitative characterization of PABC, therefore possibly suggesting an additive value in the diagnostic workup of PABC. KEY POINTS: • Breast cancer conspicuity on DCE MRI has decreased by approximately 60% among lactating patients compared with non-lactating controls. • DTI-derived diffusion coefficients and the anisotropy indices of PABC lesions were significantly different than those of the normal lactating fibroglandular tissue. • Among lactating patients, breast cancer conspicuity on DTI-derived parametric maps provided up to 138% increase in contrast-to-noise ratio compared with DCE imaging.

Yield of surveillance magnetic resonance imaging after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: There are no evidence-based guidelines for surveillance of women after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction. Several societies recommend against routine breast imaging in this setting. Despite these recommendations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to follow these women. We sought to examine the findings on MRI studies done in this setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study including all consecutive MRI exams done after bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction between January 2010 and April 2018. Data collected included demographic information, family history, BRCA status, indication for bilateral mastectomy, type of reconstruction, findings on MRI, and work-up of MRI findings. Cancer detection rate and interval cancer rates were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine women had 415 surveillance MRI exams. Most (372, 90%) studies were done in women with implant-based reconstruction. Four hundred and five (98%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 96-99%) of the studies were negative. One breast recurrence was found on MRI (cancer detection rate 2.4 per 1000 MRI exams, 95% CI 0.4-13); however, this woman was simultaneously diagnosed with metastatic disease. The false-positive rate was 90% (95% CI 54-99%). During follow-up three women were diagnosed with local recurrence (interval cancer rate 5 per 1000, 95% CI 1.3-17) and 4 women were diagnosed with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION: The yield of surveillance MRI in women with bilateral mastectomy and reconstruction is very low. As most of the cohort had retro-pectoral implant-based reconstruction, it appears safe to recommend against surveillance MRI in this setting regardless of the indication for mastectomy.

Noncontrast Breast MRI During Pregnancy Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and contrast-enhanced MRI is contraindicated because gadolinium agents are known to cross the placenta. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and clinical utility of noncontrast breast MRI using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the diagnostic workup of PABC. STUDY TYPE: Prospective. POPULATION: Between November 2016 and January 2018, 25 pregnant participants (median gestational age: 17 weeks) were recruited from eight referral breast-care centers nationwide. Imaging indications included: newly-diagnosed PABC (n = 10, with 11 lesions), palpable mass/mastitis (n = 4), high-risk screening (n = 10), and monitoring neoadjuvant-chemotherapy response (n = 1). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 1.5T, T2 -weighted, and DTI sequences, prone position, with a scan duration of ∼12 minutes. ASSESSMENT: DTI parametric maps were generated and analyzed at pixel resolution, with reference to ultrasound (US) and pathology. STATISTICAL TESTS: Two-tailed Student's t-test was applied for evaluating differences between DTI parameters of PABC vs. healthy fibroglandular tissue. Pearson's correlation test was applied to measure the agreements between λ1-based longest tumor diameter, US, and pathology. RESULTS: All scans were technically completed and reached diagnostic quality, except one with notable motion artifacts due to positional discomfort, which was excluded. Nine out of 11 known PABC lesions and one newly-diagnosed lesion were visible on λ1, λ2, λ3, mean diffusivity (MD), and λ1-λ3 maps, with substantial parametric contrast compared with the apparently normal contralateral fibroglandular tissue (P < 0.001 for all). Two lesions of 0.7 cm were not depicted by the diffusivity maps. Tumor diameter measured on a thresholded λ1 map correlated well with US (r = 0.97) and pathology (r = 0.95). Malignancy was excluded by DTI parametric maps in scans of symptomatic and high-risk patients, in agreement with US follow-up, except for one false-positive case. DATA CONCLUSION: Noncontrast breast MRI is feasible and well-tolerated during pregnancy. Further studies with a larger and homogeneous cohort are required to validate DTI's additive diagnostic value, albeit this study suggests a potential adjunct role for this noninvasive approach in breast evaluation during pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:508-517.

Use of Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women Diagnosed With Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia at Core Needle Biopsy Helps Select Women for Surgical Excision.

PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) at core needle biopsy (CNB). METHODS: The breast MRI database at our centre was queried for studies performed between January 2010 and December 2016 for the clinical indication of ADH diagnosed at CNB. Medical files were reviewed for demographic data, clinical information, and radiology and pathology reports. Pathological results of the surgical specimens were considered the gold standard for comparison with breast MRI findings. In women not undergoing excision, at least 2 years of follow-up was used to ascertain the benign nature of the finding. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included in the study. Thirty-one (62%) patients had surgical excision of the ADH lesion, and 7 (23%) were upgraded to malignancy. Breast MRI accurately identified 6 of the 7 cases. Six of the 12 women (50%) with positive MRI findings at the biopsy site were upgraded to malignancy on surgical pathology, compared with only 1 of 19 (5%) with negative MRI findings. Forty-nine percent of the women with a negative MRI did not undergo surgical excision of the ADH lesion, compared with 8% of the women with a positive MRI (P = .009), with no cancer diagnosed during follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of breast MRI for predicting upgrade to malignancy were 86%, 83%, 97%, and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MRI may have a role in the management of women diagnosed with ADH on CNB, to minimize diagnostic excisional biopsies.

Do All Women With Abnormal Sonographic Axillary Lymph Nodes Need a Biopsy?

PURPOSE: With the increased use of breast ultrasound for different indications, sonographically abnormal axillary lymph nodes are not a rare finding. We examined clinical and imaging characteristics in correlation with pathological reports of the sonographic guided biopsies to assess the yield of needle biopsy of these nodes. METHODS: Clinical, imaging and pathology data were collected for 171 consecutive patients who underwent sonographic guided needle biopsy of an abnormal lymph node between 2008 and 2013. Malignancy rates were examined for different clinical settings: palpable axillary mass, previous history of breast cancer, findings suggestive of a systemic disease, and those with a breast finding of low suspicion or an incidental abnormal axillary lymph node. Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were excluded. RESULTS: Twelve patients (7%) were found to have a malignancy on their axillary lymph node biopsy. Malignancy rates increased with age, and varied with clinical presentation: Axillary mass (8, 26%); history of breast cancer (2, 11%); systemic disease (0%) and breast finding of low suspicion or incidental abnormal lymph node on screening (1, 1%). Low rates of malignancy were found when the cortex was <6 mm (1, 0.8%). The most important imaging finding associated with malignancy was lack of a preserved hilum, in which case almost a third (10, 29%) of the biopsies were malignant. Only 1 of 89 women with a breast finding of low suspicion or an incidental abnormal axillary lymph node was found to have malignancy. In this case the lymph node had no hilum. CONCLUSIONS: In women without breast cancer, a highly suspicious breast mass or an axillary mass, more stringent criteria should be used when evaluating an abnormal axillary lymph node on sonography, as the malignancy rates are very low (1%).

Pushing the envelope in breast conserving surgery - is multiple-wire localization (3 or more wires) associated with increased risk of compromised margins and long-term recurrence?

INTRODUCTION: In the last two decades there has been a paradigm shift with breast conserving surgery (BCS) being applied to larger and more extensive breast malignancies. The aim of this study is to examine the success of BCS being performed in patients with extensive breast malignancies requiring at least 3 wires for localization, and to assess possible risk factors for failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective single center review of 232 patients who underwent BCS between 2010 and 2020 requiring at least 3 wires for localization, thus comprising the multi-wire group (MWG). The cohort included a control group of 232 single-wire BCS patients (SWG) chronologically matched with the MWG. Patients with either invasive malignancy or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were included in the study. Clinical, radiological, and pathological data was collected. Proportions of positive surgical margins, re-lumpectomies and conversion to mastectomy were calculated. Survival analysis for locoregional and distant recurrence was performed. RESULTS: Women in the MWG were younger (mean age 57 vs. 63.1, P < 0.001), had larger tumor size (mean size 5.1 cm vs. 1.3 cm, p < 0.001), a higher prevalence of calcifications on mammograms (72 % vs. 17 %, P < 0.001), a higher proportion of positive lymph nodes (75 % vs. 45 %, P = 0.019), and an elevated incidence of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component (72 % vs. 38 %, P < 0.001). Positive surgical margins were higher in the MWG (13 % vs 7 %, P = 0.03), which lead to higher proportions of re-lumpectomies or conversion to mastectomies (7 % vs 4 %, P = 0.17). On multivariate analysis of the entire cohort, patients with positive margins were more likely to have a DCIS component (77 % vs 53 %, P = 0.001), an infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) component (15 % vs 9 %, P = 0.013), and positive ER hormonal status (94 % vs 85 %, p = 0.05). The number of wires was not an independent predictor of positive margins. On long-term analysis, the locoregional disease-free survival was similar between the SWG and MWG (P = 0.1). However, the MWG showed higher rates of distant metastasis (12 % vs 4 %, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: BCS requiring 3 or more wires is associated with a slightly higher proportion of positive margins. The increased risk of positive margins appears to be related to the type of tumor (DCIS component, ILC component and ER status) rather than to the number of wires. The number of wires does not significantly impact locoregional disease-free survival.

Our Experience in Diagnosing and Treating Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (BIA-ALCL).

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is an uncommon T-cell lymphoma detected in association with textured implants. It presents as a fluid accumulation around the implant, usually years after the implantation. We present our experience in diagnosing and treating four patients with BIA-ALCL, each widely differing from the other. Data on patients' surgical history, relevant medical information, and findings on pathological slides were retrieved from their medical charts and retrospectively reviewed. Each of the four patients was diagnosed with BIA-ALCL, one after breast augmentation, one after breast reconstruction with an implant, one after breast reconstruction with a latissimus dorsi flap and implant, and the fourth after the removal of breast implants. The cases were presented to a multidisciplinary team and subsequently underwent surgery. All four are currently free of tumors, as established by a negative follow-up via positron emission tomography-computed tomography. Although the incidence of BIA-ALCL is rare, these cases emphasize the need to rule out the diagnosis of BIA-ALCL in patients with textured implants or a history of implanted textured devices who present with symptoms such as late seroma or peri-implant mass. This pathology is typically indolent and slow-growing and heightened awareness for an early diagnosis could lead to quicker intervention and enhanced patient management.

Data From a One-Stop-Shop Comprehensive Cancer Screening Center.

PURPOSE: Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally. However, by implementing evidence-based prevention strategies, 30%-50% of cancers can be detected early with improved outcomes. At the integrated cancer prevention center (ICPC), we aimed to increase early detection by screening for multiple cancers during one visit. METHODS: Self-referred asymptomatic individuals, age 20-80 years, were included prospectively. Clinical, laboratory, and epidemiological data were obtained by multiple specialists, and further testing was obtained based on symptoms, family history, individual risk factors, and abnormalities identified during the visit. Follow-up recommendations and diagnoses were given as appropriate. RESULTS: Between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2019, 8,618 men and 8,486 women, average age 47.11 ± 11.71 years, were screened. Of 259 cancers detected through the ICPC, 49 (19.8%) were stage 0, 113 (45.6%) stage I, 30 (12.1%) stage II, 25 (10.1%) stage III, and 31(12.5%) stage IV. Seventeen cancers were missed, six of which were within the scope of the ICPC. Compared with the Israeli registry, at the ICPC, less cancers were diagnosed at a metastatic stage for breast (none v 3.7%), lung (6.7% v 11.4%), colon (20.0% v 46.2%), prostate (5.6% v 10.5%), and cervical/uterine (none v 8.5%) cancers. When compared with the average stage of detection in the United States, detection was earlier for breast, lung, prostate, and female reproductive cancers. Patient satisfaction rate was 8.35 ± 1.85 (scale 1-10). CONCLUSION: We present a proof of concept study for a one-stop-shop approach to cancer screening in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. We successfully detected cancers at an early stage, which has the potential to reduce morbidity and mortality as well as offer substantial cost savings.[Media: see text].

Patient Satisfaction and Surgical Outcome After Oncoplastic Reconstruction following Radical Lumpectomy Versus Standard Lumpectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Oncoplastic reconstruction (OR) enables widening of the indications for breast conserving therapy (BCT) and is redefining the limits of breast conservation. We examined the outcome and satisfaction of patients undergoing OR after radical lumpectomy (excision of more than 25% of the breast volume) and compared it to the outcome of women undergoing OR after standard lumpectomy. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, cohort study, including all patients undergoing OR after BCT between 2009 and 2018, was conducted. The ratio of volume of excision to breast volume was calculated using imaging studies. The study group included women that had more than 25% of their breast volume removed. The remainder formed the control group. Demographic characteristics, oncological treatment, and operation properties were collected. We compared post-operative complications, margin status and need for further surgery, as well as patient satisfaction, evaluated using the BREAST-Q Questionnaire. Results: One hundred and fifty women were included, of whom 24 (16%) comprised the study group with a mean breast volume reduction of 39%, while the remainder (mean volume reduction 8%) served as controls. Patient, tumor characteristics and treatment were comparable. There was a non-significant higher proportion of women in the radical group that underwent a second operation due to complications or positive margins [4/24 (16.7%) vs. 14/126 (11%), p = 0.4). Physical well-being was similar but satisfaction with breasts and with outcome was slightly lower for the study group. These differences did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: Surgical outcome and patient satisfaction in women undergoing very extensive breast resections with OR are comparable to standard resections.

The impact of tumor detection method on genomic and clinical risk and chemotherapy recommendation in early hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic breast cancers share aggressive clinico-pathological characteristics compared to screen-detected breast cancers. We assessed the association between the method of cancer detection and genomic and clinical risk, and its effect on adjuvant chemotherapy recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with early hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2neu-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, and known OncotypeDX Breast Recurrence Score test were included. A natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was used to identify the method of cancer detection. The clinical and genomic risks of symptomatic and screen-detected tumors were compared. RESULTS: The NLP algorithm identified the method of detection of 401 patients, with 216 (54%) diagnosed by routine screening, and the remainder secondary to symptoms. The distribution of OncotypeDX recurrence score (RS) varied between the groups. In the symptomatic group there were lower proportions of low RS (13% vs 23%) and higher proportions of high RS (24% vs. 13%) compared to the screen-detected group. Symptomatic tumors were significantly more likely to have a high clinical risk (59% vs 40%). Based on genomic and clinical risk and current guidelines, we found that women aged 50 and under, with a symptomatic cancer, had an increased probability of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy recommendation compared to women with screen-detected cancers (60% vs. 37%). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated an association between the method of cancer detection and both genomic and clinical risk. Symptomatic breast cancer, especially in young women, remains a poor prognostic factor that should be taken into account when evaluating patient prognosis and determining adjuvant treatment plans.

Ultrasound guided tattooing of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients prior to neoadjuvant therapy, and identification of tattooed nodes at the time of surgery.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer patients with lymph node (LN) metastases at diagnosis often undergo neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). Identification of a LN which regressed after NAT remains a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate marking of involved nodes by tattooing with carbon suspension, and identifying these nodes during surgery. METHODS: A small amount (0.2-0.5 ml) of carbon suspension was injected into one or two axillary LNs under ultrasound guidance at the time of LN biopsy or before or shortly after starting NAT for LN positive breast cancer. During surgery an attempt was made to identify and remove the tattooed LN as a separate specimen. All patients underwent sentinel LN mapping and biopsy and/or axillary LN dissection as mandated by their clinical status. RESULTS: Sixty three patients underwent tattooing of axillary LNs with no complications or adverse events. At surgery a tattooed node was identified in 60 patients (95%; 95% CI 87, 98). Of 56 patients who underwent sentinel mapping with Tc99, in 51 (91%; 95% CI 81, 96) at least one radioactive LN was identified. Of 50 patients in whom both radioactivity and tattoo were identified in axillary LNs, in 40 (80%; 95% CI 67, 89) LNs were radioactive and tattooed, however in 10 patients (20%; 95% CI 11, 33), the tattooed LN was not radioactive. CONCLUSIONS: Tattooing of axillary LNs is safe and easily performed. Tattooing was helpful in identifying the marked LN in the majority of cases. This technique helps to ensure that metastatic LNs are identified and removed at surgery after NAT.

Prophylactic breast irradiation reduces background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on MRI: A secondary analysis.

PURPOSE: We recently showed that prophylactic breast irradiation (PBI) reduces the risk of contralateral breast cancer in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing treatment for early breast cancer. It has been suggested that Background Parenchymal Enhancement (BPE) may be a biomarker for increased risk of breast cancer. METHODS: For participants in the trial we reviewed the MRI prior to enrollment and following radiation treatment and scored the contralateral breast for BPE and density. RESULTS: Significant reduction of BPE was more commonly noted following PBI (p = 0.011) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: Reduction of BPE by PBI may contribute to its prophylactic effect.

Follow-up of patients undergoing oncoplastic surgery - more palpable masses and benign biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Oncoplastic reconstruction is increasingly used in the management of women undergoing breast conserving surgery. We examined the findings on breast exam and imaging of patients who underwent breast conservation with or without oncoplastic reconstruction. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction would present with more palpable and imaging abnormalities compared to lumpectomy alone and undergo therefore more biopsies. METHODS: All patients undergoing breast conservation with oncoplastic reconstruction for breast cancer between 2009 and 2014 were included in the study group. The control group was created by matching 4 women that underwent lumpectomy alone during the same week to each patient in the study group. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, tumor characteristics, post-operative complaints, breast exam, imaging and biopsies done during follow-up. RESULTS: The study group included 67 women who had lumpectomy and immediate oncoplastic reconstruction and 268 women that underwent lumpectomy alone.Patients undergoing immediate oncoplastic reconstruction had more advanced disease; larger mean tumor size (3.1 cm versus 1.9 cm, P < 0.001), higher rate of involved lymph nodes (48% versus 26%; P < 0.001) and use of neoadjuvant treatment (39% versus 15%; P < 0.001).After oncoplastic reconstruction, new lumps (18% versus 5%; P = 0.004) were found more frequently, and there was a higher rate of women undergoing biopsies (31% versus 11%; P < 0.001). This finding remained significant after controlling for age, type of tumor, use of neoadjuvant treatment and volume of tissue removed. Over ninety percent of biopsies in the oncoplastic group were benign, most commonly-fat necrosis (N = 15, 60% of the biopsies). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate oncoplastic reconstruction is associated with increased palpable masses and imaging abnormalities, requiring biopsies. Patients and clinicians should be aware of the benign nature of most of these findings.

Breast Imaging Utilizing Dedicated Gamma Camera and (99m)Tc-MIBI: Experience at the Tel Aviv Medical Center and Review of the Literature Breast Imaging.

The scope of the current article is the clinical role of gamma cameras dedicated for breast imaging and (99m)Tc-MIBI tumor-seeking tracer, as both a screening modality among a healthy population and as a diagnostic modality in patients with breast cancer. Such cameras are now commercially available. The technology utilizing a camera composed of a NaI (Tl) detector is termed breast-specific gamma imaging. The technology of dual-headed camera composed of semiconductor cadmium zinc telluride detectors that directly converts gamma-ray energy into electronic signals is termed molecular breast imaging. Molecular breast imaging system has been installed at the Department of Nuclear medicine at the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv in 2009. The article reviews the literature well as our own experience.

Assessment of Residual Disease With Molecular Breast Imaging in Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy: Association With Molecular Subtypes.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer is an ongoing challenge of breast imaging. This study evaluates the accuracy of a novel dedicated system for molecular breast imaging (MBI) composed of the new generation of cadmium zinc telluride detectors in assessing residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical data, imaging, surgical, and pathological findings of 51 women with breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy were recorded. MBI findings were correlated with surgical pathology results. Accuracy of MBI in predicting complete pathological response and size of residual disease was assessed according to molecular subtypes. RESULTS: The size of the largest focus of uptake on MBI correlated with the largest dimension measured on pathology (r = 0.55; P < .001). This correlation was stronger for triple negative and HER2/neu positive subtypes (r = 0.92 and 0.62, respectively). Sixteen patients (31%) had complete pathological response. The sensitivity and specificity of MBI for detecting residual disease were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66-93) and 69% (95% CI, 42-88), respectively. For triple negative or HER2/neu positive disease the sensitivity and specificity were 88% (95% CI, 62-98) and 75% (95% CI, 43-93), respectively. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of MBI in assessing residual disease after neoadjuvant treatment might be related to the molecular subtype. Accuracy is highest in the triple negative and HER2/neu positive subtypes.

Yield of selective magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative workup of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients planned for breast conserving surgery.

The role of routine preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients planned for breast conserving surgery is presently being debated. In our medical center we practice selective use of preoperative MRI; we sought to examine the yield of MRI in this highly selected group of patients. A retrospective study of all newly diagnosed breast cancer patients presenting between January 2007 and July 2010 to the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (Tel Aviv, Israel) was completed. Patients planned for breast conserving surgery who underwent preoperative MRI were included in this study. Patients and tumor characteristics, indication for MRI, findings on MRI, consequent workup, and impact on surgical treatment were recorded. Association between preoperative characteristics and yield of MRI was examined. During the study period, 105 patients that were candidates for breast conserving surgery underwent preoperative evaluation with MRI. Use of breast MRI increased over time. Rates of mastectomy were stable throughout the study years. Dense mammogram was the most frequent (51, 68%) indication for MRI. Additional suspicious findings were found in 41 (39%) patients, prompting further workup including 36 biopsies in 25 patients, of which 22 (61%) were with cancer. These additional findings prompted a change in the surgical plan in a third of the patients. In most patients (92; 88%) clear margins were achieved. Limiting the use of MRI in the preoperative workup of breast cancer patients to a selected group of patients can increase the yield of MRI.

Tumor lesion detection: when is integrated positron emission tomography/computed tomography more accurate than side-by-side interpretation of positron emission tomography and computed tomography?

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is added value to oncology studies performed with a dedicated in-line positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanner as compared with PET read side by side with diagnostic CT (DCT). METHODS: Forty-one consecutive oncology patients referred for PET/CT who had contemporary DCT scans for review were enrolled. Body regions assessed on a DCT scan were assessed on PET/CT and by side-by-side reading of PET and DCT (SBS PET/DCT). Lesions identified on DCT, the CT portion of PET/CT, SBS PET/DCT, and the reading of fused PET/CT images were scored as benign or malignant. The PET portion of the PET/CT study was read by 2 teams: the first read the SBS PET/DCT scan and the other read the complete fused PET/CT scan. For discordant lesions, the final diagnosis was determined by pathologic findings (n = 6) or imaging follow-up (n = 21). RESULTS: Twenty-seven (16.1%) of the 168 lesions were discordant when comparing analysis of fused PET/CT and SBS PET/DCT. Sixteen (9.5%) were fundamentally discordant, and 11(6.6%) were discordant in degree of confidence. For all discordant lesions only, the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy for PET/CT were 100%, 33%, 100%, 94%, and 78%, respectively, and for SBS PET/DCT, they were 38%, 50%, 19%, 73%, and 30%, respectively (P < 0.001 for sensitivity, P = not specific for specificity). The 2 main causes for misclassification on SBS PET/DCT were incorrect localization (n = 12) and changes occurring in the time gap between DCT and PET/CT (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: In-line PET/CT offers better lesion localization in comparison to the visual fusion of PET and CT, especially for small lymph nodes, lesions adjacent to mobile organs, or lesions adjacent to the chest or abdominal wall.