RESUMO
Introduction: Although some correlates of primary care physicians (PCPs) telemedicine adoption have been studied, little is known about whether the intention to use video-consultations (VCs) relates to how PCPs view their power, relative to other stakeholder groups in primary care. The aim of this study was (1) to describe PCPs', patients', and policy makers' (PMs) views of their power and (2) to explore how PCPs views of power are associated with their intention to use VC. Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was used. Interviews were conducted with five focus groups that comprised 42 patients; five focus groups with 52 PCPs; and 24 individual interviews with PMs. A total of 508 patients, 311 PCPs, and 141 PMs completed the questionnaire, assessing intention to use VC and stakeholders' relative power. The qualitative data were analyzed using the thematic method; survey data were analyzed using quantitative methods. Results: All stakeholder groups rated PCPs' power as significantly lower, relative to that of patients and managers. PCPs' intention to use telemedicine was found to be significantly related to perceived power gaps between them and patients (r = -0.24, p < 0.001) and between them and managers (r = -0.45, p < 0.001). Themes revealed in the analysis describing how PCPs' low power influences their intention to use VC were as follows: PCPs' low-impact telemedicine-related decisions, increased work overload, "big brother" control, and Health Maintenance Organization demands for telemedicine mandatory usage. Conclusions: To successfully adopt VC, efforts should be made to increase PCPs' relative power, by strengthening their involvement in decision-making procedures and by increasing PCPs' control over their work environment.
Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Intenção , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Telemedicina , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
Using a time-dependent approach, we investigated all-site and site-specific cancer incidence in a large population stratified by diabetes status. The study analyzed a closed cohort comprised of Israelis aged 21-89 years, enrolled in a health fund, and followed from 2002 to 2012. Adjusting for age, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, we calculated hazard ratios for cancer incidence using Cox regression separately for participants with prevalent and incident diabetes; the latter was further divided by time since diabetes diagnosis. Of the 2,186,196 individuals included in the analysis, 159,104 were classified as having prevalent diabetes, 408,243 as having incident diabetes, and 1,618,849 as free of diabetes. In both men and women, diabetes posed an increased risk of cancers of the liver, pancreas, gallbladder, endometrium, stomach, kidney, brain (benign), brain (malignant), colon/rectum, lung (all, adenocarcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma), ovary, and bladder, as well as leukemia, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. No excess risk was observed for breast cancer in premenopausal women or for thyroid cancer. Diabetes was associated with a reduced risk of prostate cancer. Hazard ratios for all-site and site-specific cancers were particularly elevated during the first year following diabetes diagnosis. The findings of this large study with a time-dependent approach are consistent with those of previous studies that have observed associations between diabetes and cancer incidence.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Menopausa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Integration between organizational units to achieve common goals has been of interest to health systems because of the potential to improve patient-centered care. However, the means by which integrative practices actually influence patient-centered care remain unclear. Whereas many studies claim a positive association between implementation of integrative practices and patient-centered care, others raise concerns that integrative practices may not necessarily improve patient-centered care. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the mechanism by which integrative practices influence patient-centered care and to suggest a systematic approach for effective integration. APPROACH: We conducted a qualitative study comparing diabetes and mental health services through focus groups with 60 staff members from one health maintenance organization. We developed quantitative indicators to support the suggested model. FINDINGS: We identified a five-category framework of integrative practices that each directly and distinctively influences patient-centered care. Moreover, our findings suggest that integrative practices influence patient-centered care indirectly through creation of interdependent treatment competence, which enables providers to repeatedly deliver interdependent treatment in a flexible and adaptive way. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Providers should carefully implement integrative practices considering patient and disease characteristics, as our findings suggest that more implementation of integrative practices is not necessarily better for patient-centered care. Specifically, optimal implementation refers to the collective implementation of different integrative practices and thus encompasses both the extent (i.e., the amount of currently implemented practices out of those considered important to implement) and the extensiveness (i.e., the amount relative to the implementation of other practices) that may lead to interdependent treatment competence and higher patient-centered care. We suggest a creative measurement method of comparing the relative implementation of integrative practices that may assist managers and policy makers in developing interdependent treatment competence.
Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Adulto JovemRESUMO
The present study examined physicians' perceived barriers to the management of mental illness in primary care settings in Israel. Seven focus groups that included a total of 52 primary care Israeli physicians were conducted. Open coding analysis was employed, consisting of constant comparisons within and across interviews. Three major themes emerged: (a) barriers to the management of mental illness at the individual-level, (b) barriers to the management of mental illness at the system-level, and (c) the emotional ramifications that these barriers have on physicians. The findings highlight the parallelism between the experiences of primary care physicians and their patients. The findings also stress the need to attend to physicians' emotional reactions when working with patients who suffer from mental illness and to better structure mental health treatment in primary care.
Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial , Ansiedade/terapia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Depressão/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Adulto , Ansiolíticos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Ansiedade/terapia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Serviços de Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Psicoterapia , Estresse PsicológicoRESUMO
Due to the increasing prevalence of diabetes and the shortage of endocrinologists, family physicians have an important role in diabetes management. The purpose of this study was to examine the sources of knowledge, attitudes and practices of family physicians regarding the management of type 2 diabetes. Attendees at continuous medical education (CME) programs in Israel were requested to respond anonymously to written questions about their sources of knowledge about diabetes, the methods of diabetes management they advise their patients, their knowledge of diabetes medication treatments, and their attitudes toward people with type 2 diabetes. Questionnaires were completed by 362 family physicians (79% response rate). Of them, 329 (91%) reported that they usually manage their patients' diabetes care, including that of patients with concomitant risk factors. Their most common recommendations for diabetes control were: to increase physical activity, decrease total calorie intake, consult with a dietitian and undergo weight loss counseling. Almost all physicians (97%) reported providing lifestyle change counseling. Sixty percent reported lacking knowledge about nutritional issues. Only 58% answered correctly regarding the effect of the anti-diabetic drug, GLP1 analog. Board certified family physicians and their residents exhibited more knowledge about diabetes practice than did non-board certified family physicians. The great majority of family physicians surveyed usually manage their patients' diabetes themselves, and do not refer them to diabetes specialists. The implementation of strategies that will enhance the competencies and confidence of family physicians in diabetes management are important for achieving successful treatment.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Estilo de Vida , Médicos de Família/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Aconselhamento , Dieta , Exercício Físico , Feminino , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Encaminhamento e Consulta/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos de AutoajudaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) is commonly used as a screening instrument, as a continuous measure of change in depressive symptoms over time, and as a means to compare the relative efficacy of treatments. Among several abridged versions, the 6-item HAM-D6 is used most widely in large degree because of its good psychometric properties. The current study compares both self-report and clinician-rated versions of the Hebrew version of this scale. METHODS: A total of 153 Israelis 75 years of age on average participated in this study. The HAM-D(6) was examined using confirmatory factor analytic (CFA) models separately for both patient and clinician responses. RESULTS: Responses to the HAM-D(6) suggest that this instrument measures a unidimensional construct with each of the scales' six items contributing significantly to the measurement. Comparisons between self-report and clinician versions indicate that responses do not significantly differ for 4 of the 6 items. Moreover, 100% sensitivity (and 91% specificity) was found between patient HAM-D6 responses and clinician diagnoses of depression. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the Hebrew HAM-D(6) can be used to measure and screen for depressive symptoms among elderly patients.
Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Depressão/psicologia , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Israel , Masculino , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Psicometria , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , TraduçãoRESUMO
This study evaluated patients' and physicians' characteristics associated with the purchase of benzodiazepines by older primary care patients in Israel. The analytic sample consists of those 6,421 patients age 65 and older. We used multi-level analysis with whether or not benzodiazepines were purchased at least once between June 2005 and 2007 as an outcome. We also evaluated patients' and physicians' characteristics associated with the purchase of benzodiazepines for 6 months or longer. Almost half the sample (41.5%) purchased benzodiazepines at least once during the study period and more than half (54.5%) of those purchasing benzodiazepines had a continued purchase for 6 months or longer. Physicians' characteristics explained only a small portion of the variance associated with purchasing, whereas patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with purchasing. Any intervention to improve the use of benzodiazepines should be directed at both patients and physicians.
Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapêutico , Transtornos do Humor/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Análise Multinível , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Distúrbios do Início e da Manutenção do Sono/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Both diabetes and glucose-lowering medications have been associated with an increased risk of cancer incidence. This study will compare cancer incidence rates in individuals with and without diabetes; and will investigate, in individuals with diabetes, an association between glucose control and cancer incidence; and between the use of specific glucose-lowering medications, as well as no drug exposure, and cancer incidence. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a population based historical cohort study of all individuals aged 21 years or older (about 2,300,000) who were insured by Clalit Health Services, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel during a ten-year study period. Four study groups will be established according to the status of diabetes and cancer at study entry, Jan 1, 2002: cancer free, diabetes free; cancer free, diabetes prevalent; cancer prevalent, diabetes free; and cancer prevalent, diabetes prevalent. Individuals without diabetes at study entry will be followed for diabetes incidence, and all four groups will be followed for specific cancer incidence, including second primary neoplasms. Glucose control will be assessed by HbA1c and by fasting plasma glucose levels. Time dependent regression models for cancer incidence will account for glucose-lowering medications as they are added and changed over the follow-up period. A large number of demographic and clinical variables will be considered, including: age, gender, BMI, smoking status, concomitant medications, glucose control (assessed by HbA1c and by fasting plasma glucose) and cancer screening tests. DISCUSSION: Strengths of this study include the large population; high quality comprehensive data; comparison to individuals without diabetes, and to those with diabetes but not treated with glucose-lowering medications; and the extensive range of variables available for analysis. The great increases in diabetes prevalence and in treatment options render this study particularly relevant and timely. The Israeli national healthcare system, characterized by high standard and uniform healthcare, offers an advantageous environment for its conduct.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Glicemia , Estudos de Coortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Israel/epidemiologia , RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Primary care has an important role in cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) and a minimum size of scale of primary care practices may be needed for efficient delivery of CVRM . We examined CVRM in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in primary care and explored the impact of practice size. METHODS: In an observational study in 8 countries we sampled CHD patients in primary care practices and collected data from electronic patient records. Practice samples were stratified according to practice size and urbanisation; patients were selected using coded diagnoses when available. CVRM was measured on the basis of internationally validated quality indicators. In the analyses practice size was defined in terms of number of patients registered of visiting the practice. We performed multilevel regression analyses controlling for patient age and sex. RESULTS: We included 181 practices (63% of the number targeted). Two countries included a convenience sample of practices. Data from 2960 CHD patients were available. Some countries used methods supplemental to coded diagnoses or other inclusion methods introducing potential inclusion bias. We found substantial variation on all CVRM indicators across practices and countries. We computed aggregated practice scores as percentage of patients with a positive outcome. Rates of risk factor recording varied from 55% for physical activity as the mean practice score across all practices (sd 32%) to 94% (sd 10%) for blood pressure. Rates for reaching treatment targets for systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and LDL cholesterol were 46% (sd 21%), 86% (sd 12%) and 48% (sd 22%) respectively. Rates for providing recommended cholesterol lowering and antiplatelet drugs were around 80%, and 70% received influenza vaccination. Practice size was not associated to indicator scores with one exception: in Slovenia larger practices performed better. Variation was more related to differences between practices than between countries. CONCLUSIONS: CVRM measured by quality indicators showed wide variation within and between countries and possibly leaves room for improvement in all countries involved. Few associations of performance scores with practice size were found.
Assuntos
Doença das Coronárias/terapia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prevenção Secundária/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Gerenciamento Clínico , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Prevenção Secundária/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of a long-term intervention including 72% of Israeli diabetes patients, aimed at improving diabetes care in a primary care setting. DESIGN: A retrospective periodic population-based cross-sectional study. SETTING: Two health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in Israel-intervention and control. PARTICIPANTS: All diagnosed diabetes patients enrolled in both HMOs. INTERVENTION: Multifaceted interventions directed toward primary care providers, including educational strategies, registries, clinical pathways, care quality indicators, computerized reminders and feedback. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance in quality indicators, compared with an HMO that did not implement an intervention program. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes increased from 20.2/1000 in 1995 to 63.7/1000 in 2007. Annual testing of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) rose from 22% in 1995 to 88% in 2007. The corresponding figures for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were 23 and 89%, and for microalbumin 10 and 69%, respectively (P< 0.0001 for all comparisons). The proportion of HbA1c ≤7% increased from 10 to 53%, while HbA1c >9% decreased from 40 to 13% (P< 0.0001). Good control of LDL ≤100 mg/dl increased from 26 to 59% (P< 0.0001). In the comparison HMO, subtle increases in the performance of HbA1c (55.8-63.4%), LDL (59.7-67.0%) and microalbumin (55.1-67.6%) were noted between 2005 and 2007, respectively. HbA1c ≤7 and >9% remained stable (36 and 13%, respectively), while LDL ≤100 mg/dl rose from 38 to 44% in the control HMO. CONCLUSION: A community-oriented program for diabetes care led to improvements in performance of tests, as well as control of HbA1c and LDL among 72% of diabetes patients in Israel.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Lactente , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of invasive pneumococcal infections in industrialized countries is above 50/100,000 annuaty in adults over the age of 65 years. The Israel Ministry of Health recommends 23-valent polysaccharide anti-pneumococcaL vaccination for patients with immune suppression or chronic diseases and citizens above the age of 65 years. METHODS: in 1.1.2008 pneumococcal vaccination for adults was introduced as a quality measure in CLalit Health Services (CHS). At the time of the introduction of pneumococcaL vaccination as a new quality measure in CHS, as one of 70 quality measures in community medicine, the target population included all CHS enrollees over 65 years of age and patients with specific chronic diseases. The relative weight of this quality measure within the set of CHS quality measures was set at 3.19%. The goal for the measure was set at 75%. Pneumococcal vaccination was paired with the influenza vaccination campaign. Mandatory copayment was reduced from NIS 57 to NIS 25 for enroLLees without supplementary medical insurance, and from NIS 11 to NIS 5 for enrollees with supplementary insurance. An alert for performing pneumococcaL vaccination for the target population was introduced into the medical software used by all CHS physicians. RESULTS: During a period of two years foLLowing the introduction of pneumococcaL vaccination as a quality measure in CHS, approximately 400,000 CHS enrollees within the target population received pneumococcaL vaccination, and the rate of immunization increased 10-fold (with respect to August 2007). CONCLUSION: The introduction of pneumococcal vaccination as a quality measure in CHS, coupled by other managerial and service-related actions, substantially increased the vaccination rates.
Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Idoso , Custo Compartilhado de Seguro , Humanos , Programas de Imunização/estatística & dados numéricos , Seguro de Serviços Farmacêuticos/economia , Israel/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/economia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde , Software , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The majority of older adults seek depression treatment in primary care. Despite impressive efforts to integrate depression treatment into primary care, depression often remains undetected. The overall goal of the present study was to compare a single item screening for depression to existing depression screening tools. METHODS: A cross sectional sample of 153 older primary care patients. Participants completed several depression-screening measures (e.g. a single depression screen, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Major Depression Inventory, Visual Analogue Scale). Measures were evaluated against a depression diagnosis made by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. RESULTS: Overall, 3.9% of the sample was diagnosed with depression. The most notable finding was that the single-item question, 'do you think you suffer from depression?' had as good or better sensitivity (83%) than all other screens. Nonetheless, its specificity of 83% suggested that it has to be followed up by a through diagnostic interview. Additional sensitivity analyses concerning the use of a single depression item taken directly from the depression screening measures supported this finding. CONCLUSIONS: An easy way to detect depression in older primary care patients would be asking the single question, 'do you think you suffer from depression?'
Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Psicometria/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
The quality indicators program in the community has existed in Clalit Health Services for over a decade. As a part of this program, approximately 70 evidence-based quality indicators have been defined, in 11 different domains. The indicators relate to preventive medicine (immunizations, early detection of diseases, e.g. colorectal cancer, breast cancer, hypertension, chronic renal failure), chronic disease management (diabetes, hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease, asthma, congestive heart failure), care of the elderly (prevention of repeated hospitalizations) and child care (obesity detection, anemia detection and treatment). The indicators program is founded on one of the worldwide leading information systems, based on a common data warehouse with data regarding sociodemographic factors, purchase of medications, health services utilization, laboratory and imaging data, as well as a unique, validated registry of chronic diseases. The program has led to progress in several domains, including control of diabetes and hyperlipidemia, pneumococcal vaccination and early detection of colorectal cancer. The program narrowed the gaps and reduced inequalities between the Arab and Jewish populations, and between socioeconomic levels. The improvement in quality indicators is based on teamwork of physicians, nurses, other health professionals and administrative staff. The day-to-day work and the major effort invested in Clalit's enrollees are reflected in the continuing improvement in clinical quality.
Assuntos
Administração de Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/normas , Árabes , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/terapia , Demografia , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/normas , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Israel , Judeus , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to identify and test the effectiveness of work strategies employed by regional implementation teams to attain high quality care for diabetes patients. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The study was conducted in a major health maintenance organization (HMO) that provides care for 70 per cent of Israel's diabetes patients. A sequential mixed model design, combining qualitative and quantitative methods was employed. In-depth interviews were conducted with members of six regional implementation teams, each responsible for the care of 25,000-34,000 diabetic patients. Content analysis of the interviews revealed that teams employed four key strategies: task-interdependence, goal-interdependence, reliance on top-down standardised processes and team-learning. These strategies were used to predict the mean percentage performance of eight evidence-based indicators of diabetes care: percentage of patients with HbA1c < 7 per cent, blood pressure < or = 130/80 and cholesterol < or = 100; and performance of: HbA1c tests, LDL cholesterol tests, blood pressure measurements, urine protein tests, and ophthalmic examinations. FINDINGS: Teams were found to vary in their use of the four strategies. Mixed linear models analysis indicated that type of indicator (simple process, compound process, and outcome) and goal interdependence were significantly linked to team effectiveness. For simple-process indicators, reliance on top-down standardised processes led to team effectiveness, but for outcome measures this strategy was ineffective, and even counter-effective. For outcome measures, team-learning was more beneficial. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings have implications for the management of chronic diseases. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: The advantage of allowing team members flexibility in the choice of the best work strategy to attain high quality diabetes care is attested.
Assuntos
Complicações do Diabetes/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Sistemas Pré-Pagos de Saúde , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente , Humanos , Comunicação Interdisciplinar , Israel , Estudos LongitudinaisRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Video consultations (VCs) provide increased accessibility of primary care to remote areas and overall improved care for chronic patients. They also contribute to higher patient satisfaction and improved resource management. Despite these benefits, VC integration into the health system is complex and slow. Understanding the VC-related preferences of three key stakeholders-patients, primary care physicians (PCPs) and policy makers (PMs)-is crucial for achieving optimal implementation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to select relevant attributes and levels for a discrete choice experiment (DCE) of stakeholders' choice-VC or traditional in-clinic consultation (I-CC) in primary care. METHODS: Ten semi-structured focus group interviews and 24 semi-structured individual interviews were conducted. Data analysis was performed inductively, using a thematic content analysis method. An attribute-ranking exercise was then conducted based on the results gleaned from the interviews. RESULTS: The most important attributes when choosing either VC or I-CC, for both patients and PMs, were: (1) time to next available appointment; (2) time in line before consultation; (3) relationship to PCP; and (4) quality of consultation. For PCPs, the most important attributes were: (1) time in line before consultation; (2) patient's self-management ability; (3) consultation purpose; (4) quality of consultation. CONCLUSIONS: This qualitative study identified attributes and levels for a DCE quantitative stage among three key stakeholder groups. It adds to the literature of examples of developing DCE attributes, and to literature about the stakeholder benefits in the area of telemedicine in healthcare.
Assuntos
Comportamento de Escolha , Preferência do Paciente , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Gravação em Vídeo , Adulto , Difusão de Inovações , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Melhoria de Qualidade , Encaminhamento e Consulta/tendências , Gravação em Vídeo/tendênciasRESUMO
Previous studies have documented a high prevalence of psychological distress and mental illness among older immigrants from the former Soviet Union (FSU) in Israel. Yet, this population rarely seeks help from mental health providers. The present study aimed to identify beliefs and attitudes about depression and anxiety among older immigrants from the FSU treated in primary care, and among their primary care physicians, who were also FSU immigrants. The study used focus group (FG) interviews with primary care patients (n = 12) and physicians (n = 23). The interviews were transcribed and analyzed using open thematic coding. Three main themes were identified: a) avoidance of discussion of mental health and stigma regarding mental illness; b) expectations to control one's mental state; and c) limited opportunities to acquire knowledge about Western mental health. Primary care physicians recognized the barriers facing their older immigrant patients concerning mental health diagnosis and treatment. Yet, due to work overload, their ability to assist older immigrants was limited. The findings suggest that older immigrants from the FSU might benefit from mental health information and exchange of ideas about Western mental health.
Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Aculturação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estigma Social , U.R.S.S./etnologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported an association between anti-psychotic medications and diabetes. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between antipsychotic medications and diabetes in patients of different ages. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a large health maintenance organization's drug claim database (3.7 million members) was performed. All patients treated with antipsychotic drugs during 1998-2004 were identified. Patients with diabetes were defined by a record of antidiabetic drug use during 2004. The prevalence of diabetes in different age groups treated with antipsychotics was compared with the prevalence of diabetes among enrollees in the same age groups not treated with antipsychotics. RESULTS: Among 82,754 patients treated with antipsychotics, the association between diabetes and consumption of antipsychotics was strongest in the younger age groups and decreased with increasing age: for patients aged 0-24 years, OR 8.9 (95% CI 7.0 to 11.3); 25-44 years, OR 4.2 (95% CI 3.8 to 4.5); 45-54 years, OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.8 to 2.1); 55-64 years, OR 1.3 (95% CI 1.2 to 1.4); and 65 years or older, OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.9 to 1.0). However, the risk associated with atypical antipsychotics was lower than the risk associated with typical antipsychotics, with ORs ranging from 0.7 in patients 0-24 years old to 0.3 in those 65 years or older. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic drug use was associated with diabetes mellitus. This association was stronger in younger patients. In older adults, the difference was much smaller and, in some cases, there was no association. A lower risk was associated with atypical agents, as compared with typical antipsychotics. Clinicians should be aware that young adults treated with antipsychotics are at increased risk for diabetes.
Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus/induzido quimicamente , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Adequate premises, equipment and organization of care are prerequisites for good primary care. The lack of a generally accepted systematic framework for practice management contributes to clinical outcome variations as well as inequalities in health care delivery. OBJECTIVE: To validate, localize and assess an internationally validated method for practice assessment in primary care in Israel. METHODS: The international tool contained 6 domains, 171 indicators and 470 items in 32 different aspects of primary health care provision. The instrument was translated into Hebrew. The major assessment in Israel was performed in 30 practices of Clalit Health Services by practice visits of 2 independent observers who completed check lists, structured interviews with the management staff of the clinic, work satisfaction questionnaires of the clinic staff and satisfaction questionnaires to patients at 30 clinics. The data was processed and analysed by SPSS. Frequency distribution and descriptive statistics were computed for all questions. Factor and reliability analysis were used to reduce the remaining items to a reduced number of indicators. OUTCOMES: From the initial 171 indicators and 470 items, we have managed to downsize the process of evaluation to a feasible size of 57 indicators and 142 items which have been proved as discriminating between the practices on an international level. The Israeli assessment downsized the number of locally discriminating indicators to 50. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: The resulting set of indicators is good and valid for improving the organization and management of general practices. On a national Israeli level there is need for further validation, which will include all the Israeli providers.
Assuntos
Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Israel , Idioma , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
AIMS: The Hypoglycaemia Assessment Tool (HAT) study investigated the health economic impact of hypoglycaemic events in 24 countries, including countries without previously published data on hypoglycaemia. METHODS: Self-assessment questionnaires and patient diaries (4-week prospective period) were completed by adults with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin for more than 12â¯months (Nâ¯=â¯27,585). RESULTS: Direct economic impacts of hypoglycaemia during the 4-week prospective period, included increased blood glucose monitoring (reported by 69.7% [T1D] and 60.9% [T2D] of patients), hospitalisation (T1D 2.1%; T2D 3.4% of patients) and medical contact (clinic or telephone; T1D 3.8%; T2D 6.8% of patients). Regional variation in medical contact and hospitalisation was found, with the highest usage in Russia (T1D 17.1%; T2D 17.3%), and Latin America (T1D 5.2%; T2D 6.8%) respectively. Indirect economic impacts following hypoglycaemia included loss of productivity due to absence from work or study; 3.9% (T1D) and 6.2% (T2D) of patients. Regional differences in work productivity were noted among patients with T2D, with a low prevalence in Northern Europe and Canada (0.9%) and high in Southeast Asia (14.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that hypoglycaemia has a significant but variable impact on the economics of diabetes healthcare globally.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/economia , Hipoglicemia/economia , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/farmacologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies show disparities in the provision of physical health-care for people with severe mental illness. This observation includes countries with universal health insurance. However, there is limited in-depth data regarding the barriers preventing equality of physical health-care provision for this population. This study applied the capabilities approach to examine the interface between general practitioners and patients with severe mental illness. The capabilities approach provides a framework for health status which conceptualizes the internal and external factors relating to the available options (capabilities) and subsequent health outcomes (functioning). METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 general practitioners and 15 patients with severe mental illness, and then thematically analyzed. RESULTS: We identified factors manifesting across three levels: personal, relational-societal, and organizational. At the personal level, the utilization of physical health services was impaired by the exacerbation of psychiatric symptoms. At the relational level, both patients and physicians described the importance of a long-term and trusting relationship, and provided examples demonstrating the implications of relational ruptures. Finally, two structural-level impediments were described by the physicians: the absence of continuous monitoring of patients with severe mental illness, and the shortfall in psychosocial interventions. CONCLUSION: The capability approach facilitated the identification of barriers preventing equitable health-care provision for patients with severe mental illness. Based on our findings, we propose a number of practical suggestions to improve physical health-care for this population: 1. A proactive approach in monitoring patients' health status and utilization of services. 2. Acknowledgment of people with severe mental illness as a vulnerable population at risk, that need increased time for physician-patient consultations. 3. Training and support for general practitioners. 4. Increase collaboration between general practitioners and mental-health professionals. 5. Educational programs for health professionals to reduce prejudice against people with severe mental illness.