RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib alone or in combination with other agents is already one of the standard therapies for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients and produces impressive response rates in newly diagnosed MM as well. However, carfilzomib-related cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) - including hypertension (all grades: 12.2%; grade ≥3: 4.3%), heart failure (all grades: 4.1%; grade ≥3: 2.5%) and ischemic heart disease (all grades: 1.8%; grade ≥3: 0.8%) - may lead to treatment suspensions. At present, there are neither prospective studies nor expert consensus on the prevention, monitoring and treatment of CVAEs in myeloma patients treated with carfilzomib. METHODS: An expert panel of the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with the Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension and with the endorsement of the European Hematology Association aimed to provide recommendations to support health professionals in selecting the best management strategies for patients, considering the impact on outcome and the risk-benefit ratio of diagnostic and therapeutic tools, thereby achieving myeloma response with novel combination approaches whilst preventing CVAEs. RESULTS: Patients scheduled to receive carfilzomib need a careful cardiovascular evaluation before treatment and an accurate follow-up during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: A detailed clinical assessment before starting carfilzomib treatment is essential to identify patients at risk for CVAEs, and accurate monitoring of blood pressure and of early signs and symptoms suggestive of cardiac dysfunction remains pivotal to safely administer carfilzomib without treatment interruptions or dose reductions.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Monitorização Fisiológica , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Within the last two decades the therapeutic options for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have changed dramatically. The implementation of high-dose chemotherapy with melphalan and subsequent autologous blood stem cell transplantation initially led to prolonged survival in younger, fit patients. Furthermore, recent data suggest that patients with high-risk disease seem to benefit most from tandem transplantation approaches. Therefore, risk stratification at initiation of first-line treatment is of great importance. With the advent and integration of the so-called novel agents, such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and bortezomib into first-line treatment, both transplant eligible and ineligble patients gained new therapeutic perspectives. In Germany, the combination of bortezomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone is currently considered the standard of care as induction regimen before high-dose treatment and transplantation; however, the combination of lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone is increasingly being used, but is still not yet approved in Germany. For patients where high-dose therapy and stem cell transplantation are not feasible, bortezomib and lenalidomide are available as backbone agents of various combination regimens. Recently, the anti-CD38 antibody daratumumab has been approved in combination with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone as primary treatment for newly diagnosed patients. An allogeneic stem cell transplantation can be considered for younger patients without relevant comorbidities and with high-risk disease or early relapse after autologous blood stem cell transplantation but should only be performed within controlled clinical trials and in specialized centers.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Bortezomib/uso terapêutico , Lenalidomida/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/cirurgia , Transplante de Células-Tronco/métodos , Talidomida/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/provisão & distribuição , Alemanha , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Transplante Homólogo/métodosRESUMO
AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the combined use of the radiotracers 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF in treatment response evaluation of a group of multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) by means of static (whole-body) and dynamic PET/CT (dPET/CT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with primary, previously untreated MM scheduled for treatment with HDT followed by ASCT were enrolled in the study. All patients underwent PET/CT scanning with 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF before and after therapy. Treatment response by means of PET/CT was assessed according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1999 criteria. The evaluation of dPET/CT studies was based on qualitative evaluation, semi-quantitative (SUV) calculation, and quantitative analysis based on two-tissue compartment modelling and a non-compartmental approach leading to the extraction of fractal dimension (FD). RESULTS: An analysis was possible in 29 patients: three with clinical complete response (CR) and 26 with non-CR (13 patients near complete response-nCR, four patients very good partial response-VGPR, nine patients partial response-PR). After treatment, 18F-FDG PET/CT was negative in 14/29 patients and positive in 15/29 patients, showing a sensitivity of 57.5 % and a specificity of 100 %. According to the EORTC 1999 criteria, 18F-FDG PET/CT-based treatment response revealed CR in 14 patients (18F-FDG PET/CT CR), PR in 11 patients (18F-FDG PET/CT PR) and progressive disease in four patients (18F-FDG PET/CT PD). In terms of 18F-NaF PET/CT, 4/29 patients (13.8 %) had a negative baseline scan, thus failed to depict MM. Regarding the patients for which a direct lesion-to-lesion comparison was feasible, 18F-NaF PET/CT depicted 56 of the 129 18F-FDG positive lesions (43 %). Follow-up 18F-NaF PET/CT showed persistence of 81.5 % of the baseline 18F-NaF positive MM lesions after treatment, despite the fact that 64.7 % of them had turned to 18F-FDG negative. Treatment response according to 18F-NaF PET/CT revealed CR in one patient (18F-NaF PET/CT CR), PR in five patients (18F-NaF PET/CT PR), SD in 12 patients (18F-NaF PET/CT SD), and PD in seven patients (18F-NaF PET/CT PD). Dynamic 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT studies showed that SUVaverage, SUVmax, as well as the kinetic parameters K1, influx and FD from reference bone marrow and skeleton responded to therapy with a significant decrease (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 57.7 % and a specificity of 100 % in treatment response evaluation of MM. Despite its limited sensitivity, the performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT was satisfactory, given that 6/9 false negative patients in follow-up scans (66.7 %) were clinically characterized as nCR, a disease stage with very low tumor mass. On the other hand, 18F-NaF PET/CT does not seem to add significantly to 18F-FDG PET/CT in treatment response evaluation of MM patients undergoing HDT and ASCT, at least shortly after therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico por imagem , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Adulto , Idoso , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Radioisótopos de Flúor , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalan/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fluoreto de Sódio , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for autologous transplantation is a well-established process. As a new generation of leukapheresis (LP) machines has been launched, measures of benchmarking and quality control need to be defined in order to ensure consistent collection performance. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this project was to establish and evaluate a benchmarking system for autologous PBSC collection. METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated PBSC collection data of 198 patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma in first-line therapy who underwent LP in 2013 and 2014 at our institution. Half the patients in 2014 were assigned randomly to undergo LP with the new Terumo BCT Spectra Optia (Terumo BCT, Garching, Germany), while the COBE Spectra (Terumo BCT) was used in all other cases. In 2014, we implemented a previously described formula for predicting daily CD34+ cell collection. As a benchmark, we developed the performance ratio: collected/predicted CD34+ cells. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the number of collected CD34+ cells, the collection efficiency (collected/processed CD34+ cells) and performance ratio between the two collection devices and between LP procedures in 2013 and 2014. CONCLUSIONS: We present a comprehensive benchmarking tool that is easy to implement, requires minimal expense and allows specific adjustment of LP parameters for optimisation of LP performance. With this approach, we could confirm the equal efficiency of the two compared apheresis systems.
Assuntos
Separação Celular , Mieloma Múltiplo/sangue , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Adulto , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignancy of terminally differentiated B cells/plasma cells and is primarily located in the bone marrow. Symptomatic multiple myeloma typically presents with osteolyses, anemia, reduced renal function, and/or hypercalcemia. In the case of such MM-related end organ damage, urgent systemic treatment is indicated. In order to prevent end organ damage, current guidelines now recommend treatment initiation already when certain biomarkers are met. Current first-line treatment is based on proteasome inhibition and immunomodulation. Eligible patients still benefit from the addition of high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. Radiotherapy and orthopedic interventions play an important role in the treatment of localized skeletal complications. For relapsed MM, five novel agents have been approved in Europe during the last two years. These are second-generation proteasome inhibitors (carfilzomib, ixazomib) as well as first-in-class monoclonal antibodies (daratumumab, elotuzumab) and a histone deacetylase inhibitor (panobinostat). Triple combinations based on the established regimens lenalidomide/dexamethasone and bortezomib/dexamethasone plus one of the novel agents have been shown to significantly prolong progression-free survival. Median overall survival of patients with MM has doubled since the turn of the millennium.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Terapia Combinada , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Inibidores de Proteassoma/uso terapêutico , Radioterapia AdjuvanteRESUMO
The underlying case report describes the successful endovascular prevention of an aortic injury by a bone cement skid after kyphoplasty. The intervention was performed in order to prohibit fatal aortic rupture or embolisation and underlines the role of vascular surgery techniques in interdisciplinary clinical networks.
Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/lesões , Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares/instrumentação , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/cirurgia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/cirurgia , Idoso , Terapia Combinada , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Cifoplastia , Resultado do Tratamento , Lesões do Sistema Vascular/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The current analysis investigated the prognostic significance of gadopentetate dimeglumine on survival and renal function in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disorders. METHODS: In this study 263 patients who had received gadopentetate dimeglumine within a prospective trial investigating dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were compared with 335 patients who had undergone routine, unenhanced MRI. RESULTS: We found no significant prognostic impact of the application of contrast agent on progression-free survival in patients with either monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smouldering or symptomatic myeloma and no significant prognostic impact on overall survival in patients with symptomatic myeloma. Since renal impairment is a frequent complication of myeloma, and decreased renal function is associated with a higher risk of complications in patients receiving contrast agents, we evaluated the impact of contrast agent on renal function after 1 year. In the present analysis the only significant adverse impact on kidney function occurred in symptomatic myeloma patients who already had impaired renal parameters at baseline. Here, the renal function did not recover during therapy, whereas it did so in patients with normal or only slightly impaired renal function. CONCLUSION: If general recommendations are adhered to, gadopentetate dimeglumine can be safely applied in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease.
Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Gadolínio DTPA , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Paraproteinemias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Nefropatias/complicações , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Paraproteinemias/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: High-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients <65 years. Safety and outcome of ASCT for patients >65 years is currently uncertain, especially since the introduction of novel agents for induction and maintenance therapy. Furthermore, there are no conclusive data available on risk assessment in elderly patients treated with HDT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 202 patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed MM who underwent ASCT at our institution. Patients were stratified by age into three groups (60-64, 65-69 and 70-75 years). For safety assessment, we compared data about hospitalization, hematopoetic reconstitution and early mortality. Remission before and after ASCT was analyzed according to age and application of novel agents. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to identify impact of age, remission before/after ASCT and maintenance therapy as well as ISS score and cytogenetic aberrations on outcome in elderly patients. RESULTS: The assessment of safety, remission before/after ASCT as well as EFS and OS showed no significant differences between the three groups (median EFS: 60-64 years: 27 months; 65-69 years: 23 months; 70-75 years: 23 months; median OS: not reached). Patients receiving novel agents as part of induction therapy achieved significantly higher nCR + CR rates than patients treated without novel agents. In Cox regression analysis, ISS and cytogenetics as well as remission after ASCT had the highest prognostic impact on EFS and OS. Maintenance therapy was associated with longer EFS in uni- and multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: ASCT is feasible for selected patients >65 and >70 years without increased mortality. Age at transplantation has no prognostic significance on outcome after ASCT. Novel agents during induction therapy and maintenance therapy improves outcome of older patients eligible for ASCT. ISS and cytogenetic analysis should be carried out routinely for risk assessment.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Idoso , Autoenxertos , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Indução , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The diagnosis and treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) are progressing continuously. This article aims at summarizing the current status in the diagnosis and treatment of MM, emphasizing a clinical point of view. Prognostic factors can be determined by clinical parameters, molecular analyses and patient characteristics (e.g. age and comorbidities). The international staging system (ISS) and cytogenetics, such as the high-risk aberrations 17p deletion, translocation (4;14) and insertion 1q21 > 2 copies, are key factors in risk stratification of MM patients. Induction therapy based on novel agents, namely bortezomib, followed by subsequent high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation is considered the standard of care for younger, newly diagnosed MM patients (≤ 70 years). Transplant-ineligible patients should receive thalidomide or bortezomib-based chemotherapy. The combination of bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) was shown to significantly improve overall survival (OS) compared to melphalan and prednisone (MP, 56.4 vs. 43.1 months, p = < 0.01). Recent results suggest that lenalidomide-based therapy not incorporating alkylating agents might be a competitive alternative with a favorable toxicity profile for transplant-ineligible patients. Maintenance therapies are of increasing clinical significance in MM as they have the ability to prolong overall survival; however, thalidomide maintenance therapy should not be used in MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics as it shortens OS. Refractory or relapsed MM treatment continues to improve with the development of second and third generation immunomodulatory agents and proteasome inhibitors. For example, pomalidomide and dexamethasone vs. high-dose dexamethasone significantly improved OS (12.7 vs. 8.1 months, p = 0.03). Novel therapy strategies include targeted and stroma-directed approaches. Antibodies targeting CS-1 (elotuzumab) and CD38 (daratumumab) in particular are currently undergoing advanced clinical phase II/III trials.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia de Indução/métodos , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/métodos , Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/genéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is still a fatal plasma cell cancer. Novel compounds are currently clinically tested as a single agent in relapsing patients, but in best cases with partial response of a fraction of patients, emphasising the need to design tools predicting drug efficacy. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are anticancer agents targeting epigenetic regulation of gene expression and are in clinical development in MM. METHODS: To create a score predicting HDACi efficacy, five MM cell lines were treated with trichostatin A (TSA) and gene expression profiles were determined. RESULTS: The expression of 95 genes was found to be upregulated by TSA, using paired supervised analysis with Significance Analysis of Microarrays software. Thirty-seven of these 95 genes had prognostic value for overall survival in a cohort of 206 newly diagnosed MM patients and their prognostic information was summed up in a histone acetylation score (HA Score); patients with the highest HA Score had the shorter overall survival. It is worth noting that MM cell lines or patients' primary MM cells with a high HA Score had a significant higher sensitivity to TSA, valproic acid, panobinostat or vorinostat. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the HA Score allows identification of MM patients with poor survival, who could benefit from HDACi treatment.
Assuntos
Inibidores de Histona Desacetilases/farmacologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiplo/genética , Acetilação/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Histonas/metabolismo , Humanos , Ácidos Hidroxâmicos/farmacologia , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiplo/enzimologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/metabolismo , Gradação de Tumores , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Transcriptoma , Regulação para Cima/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Advanced multiple myeloma (MM) and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM) are incurable B-cell malignancies. This is the first full clinical report of atacicept, a fusion protein that binds to and neutralises the B-cell survival factors, B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), in MM and WM. METHODS: In this open-label phase-I study, 16 patients with advanced disease (12 MM, 4 WM) received one cycle of five once-weekly subcutaneous injections of atacicept (2, 4, 7 or 10 mg kg(-1)). Patients with stable disease after cycle 1 entered an extension study (either two additional cycles (2, 4 and 7 mg kg(-1) cohorts) or 15 consecutive weekly injections of atacicept 10 mg kg(-1)). RESULTS: Atacicept was well tolerated, systemically and locally; the maximum tolerated dose was not identified. Of 11 patients with MM who completed initial treatment, five patients were progression-free after cycle 1 and four patients were progression-free after extended therapy. Of four patients with WM, three patients were progression-free after cycle 1. Consistent with atacicept's mechanism of action, polyclonal immunoglobulin isotypes and total B cells were reduced. Bone-marrow density, myeloma cell numbers and plasma concentrations of soluble CD138 also decreased. CONCLUSION: Atacicept is well tolerated in patients with MM and WM, and shows clinical and biological activity consistent with its mechanism of action.
Assuntos
Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão/farmacocinética , Sindecana-1/sangue , Macroglobulinemia de Waldenstrom/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
PURPOSE: The 7th Heidelberg Myeloma Workshop was held on April 5th and 6th, 2019 at the University Hospital Heidelberg. METHODS AND RESULTS: Main topics of the meeting were (1) diagnostics and prognostic factors, (2) role of immunotherapy in multiple myeloma (MM), (3) current therapy of MM, (4) biology and genomics of MM as well as (5) novel treatment concepts. A debate on the status of minimal residual disease (MRD) driven therapy was held. CONCLUSION: Diagnostics and treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed MM are continuously evolving. While advances in the field of (single cell) genetic analysis now allow for characterization of the disease at an unprecedented resolution, immunotherapeutic approaches and MRD testing are at the forefront of the current clinical trial landscape.
Assuntos
Mieloma Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiplo/etiologia , Mieloma Múltiplo/mortalidadeRESUMO
We present a case report of a successful high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation without the use of allogeneic blood product support in a 70-year-old patient suffering from multiple myeloma. Based on the experience in this case and thorough evaluation of the literature, we consider pre-transplant Hb level of 11-12 g/dl, platelet count higher than 70/nl, good WHO performance status of two and lower and informed consent as important eligibility criteria. During cytopenia recommended supportive measures include growth factor support with erythropoietin and G-CSF, p.o. iron treatment as well as prophylactic use of anti-fibrinloytic agents. Furthermore we discuss additional options that might be considered depending on the individual factors as e.g. pre-transplant collection and cryoconservation of autologous platelet concentrates. Moreover, an analysis of socio-economic issues regarding this procedure is presented. We conclude that allogeneic blood product free transplantation is a feasible procedure that can be offered to the patients belonging to distinct religious groups refusing allogeneic blood products as Jehovás Witnesses and patients presenting other contraindications for transfusions.
Assuntos
Testemunhas de Jeová , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Idoso , Criopreservação , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Plaquetoferese , Indução de Remissão , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34(+) cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 x 10(6)/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34(+) cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells.