Long term effects of oral vitamin E supplement in type II diabetic patients.

This triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to determine the effect of the vitamin E on fasting blood sugar (FBS), serum insulin, and glycated hemoglobin (GHb) in type 11 diabetic patients (NIDDM). A total of 100 patients, with no complications, aged 20-60 years old were chosen from those consulting the Isfahan Social Security Service Diabetes Clinic and divided randomly into two treated and placebo groups, and matched for age, sex, level of education, and occupation. The treated and placebo groups were given vitamin E tablets (200 IU/day) and placebo respectively. Serum vitamin E, total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), FBS, insulin, and GHb were measured at the beginning and at the end of the study (a period of 27 weeks); FBS, GHb and insulin levels were also determined several times during the period. Blood lipids and FBS were measured using the ELAN 2000 autoanalyzer at the Isfahan Cardiovascular Research Center, while for measuring insulin the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method was used; GHb was determined calorimetrically (thiobarbituric acid), and for vitamin E measurements the Hansen and Warwick method was used, by which the vitamin E was determined fluorometrically. The findings of this study show no effect of vitamin E supplementation in the patients: GHb did not change appreciably, FBS was reduced nonsignificantly (-4.3% in the treated group vs. -14.0% in the placebo group, p < 0.05). In the case of insulin, no increase was seen; instead, a decrease was observed (slightly more than 17% in the two groups, p = 0.15). No changes were observed in the levels of blood lipids. It was concluded that a daily vitamin E supplement of 200 IU for a period of 27 weeks does not affect insulin, GHb, or FBS in type II diabetic patients. However, since this antioxidant vitamin is beneficial in other ways in these patients, it would seem justified to recommend its use. Certainly, more extensive research is necessary to draw definite conclusions.

The Relationship between Weight and CVD Risk Factors in a Sample Population from Central Iran (Based on IHHP).

BACKGROUND: Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of mortality all around the world. Obesity is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In this respect, we decided to examine the effect of the subgroups of weight on cardiovascular risk factors. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was done in 2006 using the data obtained by the Iranian Healthy Heart Program (IHHP) and based on classification of obesity by the World Health Organization (WHO). In this study, the samples were tested based on the Framingham risk score, Metabolic Measuring Score (MMS) and classification of obesity. Chi-square and ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 12514 people with a mean age of 38 participated in this study. 6.8% of women and 14% of men had university degrees (higher than diploma). Obesity was seen in women more than men: 56.4% of women and 40% of men had a Body Mass Index of (BMI) ≥ 25 Kg/m2. 13% of the subjects had FBS > 110 and13.9% of them were using hypertensive drugs. In this study, we found that all risk factors, except HDL cholesterol in men, increased with an increase in weight. This finding is also confirmed by the Framingham flowfigure for men and women. CONCLUSION: One of every two Americans, of any age and sex, has a Body Mass Index of (BMI) ≥ 25 Kg/m2. Obesity associated CVD and other serious diseases. Many studies have been done in different countries to find the relationship between obesity and CVD risk factors. For example, in the U.S.A and Canada they found that emteropiotic parameters, blood presser and lipids increased by age(of both sexes). Moreover, another study done in China, which is a country in Asia like Iran, shows that BMI has an indirect effect on HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride. This data is consistent with the results of the current study. However, In China they found that this relationship in men is stronger than women, but our study reveals the opposite.