RESUMO
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is the most common epigenetic overgrowth and cancer predisposition disorder. Due to both varying molecular defects involving chromosome 11p15 and tissue mosaicism, patients can present with a variety of clinical features, leading to the newly defined Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWSp). The BWSp can be further divided into three subsets of patients: those presenting with classic features, those presenting with isolated lateralized overgrowth (ILO) and those not fitting into the previous two categories, termed atypical BWSp. Previous reports of patients with BWS have focused on those with the more recognizable, classic features, and limited information is available on those who fit into the atypical and ILO categories. Here, we present the first cohort of patients recruited across the entire BWSp, describe clinical features and molecular diagnostic characteristics, and provide insight into practical diagnosis and management recommendations that we have gained from this cohort.
Assuntos
Síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann/terapia , Síndrome de Beckwith-Wiedemann/genética , Metilação de DNA , Feminino , Genótipo , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , FenótipoRESUMO
Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS) is an overgrowth disorder with a heterogeneous phenotypic spectrum. There is an increased prevalence of monozygotic twinning in BWS. Given the epigenetic nature and phenotypic spectrum that defines BWS, twins are often discordant for clinical features, and clinicians are faced with the challenge of diagnosing and managing these twins. We present a cohort of multiple pregnancies in which one or more child from each pregnancy was diagnosed with BWS. We conducted a chart review of monochorionic and dichorionic gestations. Clinical scores for monochorionic twins demonstrated phenotypic discordance between the proband and twin. Based on linear regression analysis, a higher clinical score in the proband correlated with larger phenotypic discordance between twin siblings. Despite phenotypic discordance, however, we observed a consistent additive clinical score for a pregnancy (proband's plus twin's scores from a pregnancy). This idea of a finite degree of affectedness for a pregnancy implies a finite number of epigenetically affected cells. This further corroborates the idea that timing of monozygotic monochorionic twinning correlates with the disruption of establishment and/or maintenance of imprinting. The difference in clinical score between a proband and their twin may be due to diffused mosaicism, whereby there is an asymmetric distribution of affected cells among the multiple fetuses in a monozygotic monochorionic pregnancy, leading to a spectrum of variably affected phenotypes. Based on these findings, we recommend an algorithm for a conservative approach to clinically evaluate all children in a monozygotic multiple gestation affected by BWS.