A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saroglitazar in Patients With Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) without biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are at increased risk of liver-related mortality. Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual PPAR agonistic properties (α/γ). There is a strong mechanistic rationale for studying saroglitazar in PBC because PPARα is a molecular target of fibrates that showed improvements in liver tests in patients with PBC. METHODS: In this 16-week, open-label, phase 3 study, 37 patients were screened across 3 clinical centers to enroll 7 patients. All patients received daily dose of saroglitazar 4 mg for 16 weeks in addition to their ongoing treatment with UDCA. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at week 16 as compared to baseline. RESULTS: Mean age of the study population was 51.1 ± 10.0 years, all patients were female of Mexican descent, and mean body mass index was 25.5± = 4.8 kg/m2. Six (85.7%) patients reported taking ursodiol at baseline and continued throughout the study with a mean daily dosage of 417 mg. Among these, the daily dosage of UDCA 500 mg in 4 and 250 mg in 2 subjects, respectively. The mean baseline ALP level was 230 ± 103 U/L. The primary efficacy endpoint, mean change (reduction) from baseline in ALP concentration at week 16 based on the modified intent-to-treat population was -94 ± 53 U/L (P = 0.003), corresponding to a reduction of 48 ± 23%. Treatment with saroglitazar 4 mg resulted in a rapid and sustained decrease of ALP levels at week 4 (-84 ± 47 U/L, P = 0.003). Six patients who completed the study achieved mean ALP reduction of at least 40% at week 4 and all subsequent visits. DISCUSSION: Although the study was terminated because of lack of enrollment, saroglitazar daily for 16 weeks resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP with an acceptable safety profile in patients with PBC.

[Comparison of two different vaccination schemes against Hepatitis A and B in Mexican children and adolescents]. / Comparación de dos esquemas diferentes de vacunación contra hepatitis A y B en niños y adolescentes mexicanos.

BACKGROUND: Development of multiple antigens in combined vaccines offers the advantages of reducing costs, increasing compliance and provides dual protection. Hepatitis A is an endemic disease in Mexico and hepatitis B, notwithstanding low prevalence, confers risk of progression to cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and high medical costs in consequence. OBJECTIVE: Determine immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined vaccine when compared with use of conventional vaccines simultaneously. METHODS: The present study was a prospective, open, and randomized trial; 73 healthy children and adolescents were included, all with negative serologic markers. They were assigned to one of the following groups: Group 1, combined vaccine (n = 49) Twinrix (HAV 720 UE/HBV 20 micrograms), and group 2, separate vaccines (n = 24) Engerix B 20 micrograms/Havrix 720 UE. Both groups were given two-dose series at months 0 and 6. Geometric titles of antibody production (GMT) anti-HAV and anti-HBV were determined in months 1, 2, 6 and 7. Adverse reactions were registered during the study. RESULTS: No difference was observed between the two groups in age or gender. Immunogenicity anti-HAV: 100% of vaccines in both groups reached seroprotective levels (> or = 33 mUI/mL). Antibody titles in group 1 were three times higher than those in group 2 (9,696 mIU/mL vs. 3,940 mIU/mL [p = 0.003]) at the end of the study. Immunogenicity anti-HBV: All subjects in both groups reached seroprotective levels (> or = 10 mIU/mL) with similar antibody titles at the end of the study (group 1: 5,603 mIU/mL vs. group 2: 5,201 mIU/mL [p = 0.55 NS]). Reactogenicity: No serious adverse reactions were observed; main were local, and frequency and characteristics were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Seroprotective levels and reactogenicity obtained from use of a combined vaccine against hepatitis A/B are acceptable when compared with use of conventional vaccines administered separately.