RESUMO
Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a subset of new onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) that involves a febrile infection prior to the onset of the refractory status epilepticus. It is unclear whether FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are distinct conditions. Here, we compare 34 patients with FIRES to 30 patients with non-FIRES NORSE for demographics, clinical features, neuroimaging, and outcomes. Because patients with FIRES were younger than patients with non-FIRES NORSE (median = 28 vs. 48 years old, p = .048) and more likely cryptogenic (odds ratio = 6.89), we next ran a regression analysis using age or etiology as a covariate. Respiratory and gastrointestinal prodromes occurred more frequently in FIRES patients, but no difference was found for non-infection-related prodromes. Status epilepticus subtype, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and outcomes were similar. However, FIRES cases were more frequently cryptogenic; had higher CSF interleukin 6, CSF macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1a), and serum chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) levels; and received more antiseizure medications and immunotherapy. After controlling for age or etiology, no differences were observed in presenting symptoms and signs or inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that FIRES and non-FIRES NORSE are very similar conditions.
Assuntos
Febre , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Estado Epiléptico/etiologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Febre/etiologia , Febre/complicações , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/etiologia , Criança , Convulsões Febris/etiologia , Eletroencefalografia , Idoso , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Síndromes Epilépticas , Pré-EscolarRESUMO
In response to the evolving treatment landscape for new-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) and the publication of consensus recommendations in 2022, we conducted a comparative analysis of NORSE management over time. Seventy-seven patients were enrolled by 32 centers, from July 2016 to August 2023, in the NORSE/FIRES biorepository at Yale. Immunotherapy was administered to 88% of patients after a median of 3 days, with 52% receiving second-line immunotherapy after a median of 12 days (anakinra 29%, rituximab 25%, and tocilizumab 19%). There was an increase in the use of second-line immunotherapies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8) and ketogenic diet (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3-2.6) over time. Specifically, patients from 2022 to 2023 more frequently received second-line immunotherapy (69% vs 40%; OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.9)-particularly anakinra (50% vs 13%; OR = 6.5; 95% CI = 2.3-21.0), and the ketogenic diet (OR = 6.8; 95% CI = 2.5-20.1)-than those before 2022. Among the 27 patients who received anakinra and/or tocilizumab, earlier administration after status epilepticus onset correlated with a shorter duration of status epilepticus (ρ = .519, p = .005). Our findings indicate an evolution in NORSE management, emphasizing the increasing use of second-line immunotherapies and the ketogenic diet. Future research will clarify the impact of these treatments and their timing on patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Dieta Cetogênica , Imunoterapia , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Estado Epiléptico/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Dieta Cetogênica/métodos , Imunoterapia/métodos , Imunoterapia/tendências , Adolescente , Adulto , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/terapia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/dietoterapia , Criança , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Escolar , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Adulto Jovem , Rituximab/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento ClínicoRESUMO
Patients with epilepsy often present with concurrent psychiatric disorders, posing unique challenges for healthcare providers. This review explores the intricate relationship between psychiatric comorbidities, epilepsy, and psychotropic medications to inform clinical decision-making. The bidirectional association between epilepsy and psychiatric conditions complicates treatment, with psychiatric symptoms preceding or following seizure onset. The review discusses the seizure risks associated with antidepressants, CNS stimulants, and antipsychotics, shedding light on both historical perspectives and recent empirical evidence. Antidepressants, particularly tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), are known to pose seizure risks, while newer agents like selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) exhibit lower incidences and even potential anticonvulsant effects. Contrary to common beliefs, CNS stimulants used in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment show efficacy without significantly increasing seizure risk. However, the association between ADHD and seizures warrants careful consideration. Among antipsychotics, clozapine stands out for its heightened seizure risks, especially during titration and at high doses, necessitating close monitoring and individualized approaches. Understanding the nuanced seizure risks associated with different psychotropic medications is crucial for optimizing patient care and minimizing iatrogenic seizures in this vulnerable population. By recognizing the complexities of psychiatric comorbidities in epilepsy and considering the unique challenges they pose, healthcare providers can make informed decisions to enhance patient safety and treatment outcomes. This review offers practical insights to guide clinicians in navigating the intricate landscape of managing psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Military spouses play a key role in the military family and contribute to military readiness. Despite their influence, they are an understudied population. Previous research has identified military spouses as a vulnerable group considering their unique life stressors and high mental distress; thus, it is critical to identify potential protective factors for military spouses. However, there is a lack of research exploring the role of religious coping and resilience in mental health outcomes of military spouses. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of religious coping on depression, anxiety, and stress, and the extent to which the effect is mediated by resilience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,079 military spouses completed self-administered surveys online. The questionnaires assessed demographic factors, depression, anxiety, stress, religious coping, and resilience. Zero-order correlations and descriptive statistics were analyzed. Additionally, multiple linear regression was utilized to investigate the extent to which resilience mediated the relationship between religious coping and mental health outcomes. RESULTS: The results indicate high levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among military spouses. Religious coping had significant effects on mental distress, such that increases in religious coping corresponded to decreases in depression (ß = -3.30), anxiety (ß = -1.89) and stress (ß = -1.58). Mediation analyses indicated resilience significantly mediated the relationship between religious coping and depression (95% CI [-1.38, -.431]), anxiety (95% CI [-1.23, -.376]), and stress (95% CI [-1.328, -0.420]). For military spouses, religious coping was associated with increased resilience, which was subsequently associated with reduced mental distress. CONCLUSIONS: This study draws attention to the role of religious coping and resilience in mental health outcomes for military spouses. Considering the role of military spouses in supporting service members, future research should explore how to strengthen military spouses' religious coping and resilience to mitigate mental distress, thereby facilitating service member success and military readiness.