Comparison of radiation dose between different fluoroscopy systems in the modern catheterization laboratory: Results from bench testing using an anthropomorphic phantom.

BACKGROUND: Variations in radiation dose between various X-ray systems have received limited study. OBJECTIVE: We examined the impact of X-ray system type on patient radiation dose during cardiac catheterization. METHODS: An anthropomorphic phantom was used in a series of standardized experiments that involved 15 sec of continuous cineangiography in 7 projections. Three to seven experiments were performed in four commonly used X-ray systems: Innova IGS (GE Healthcare), Integris Allura FD20 (Philips), Allura Clarity (Philips), and Artis one (Siemens). Phantom radiation dose was measured with a dedicated X-ray dosimetry system (Gafchromic radiology film and Film QA XR software, Ashland) that was precalibrated at 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 Gray, and with the X-ray system built-in functions. RESULTS: Radiation dose was lowest with the Allura Clarity system [average film dose 4.2±0.1 cGray, peak film dose 18.3±1.6 cGray, Air Kerma (AK) dose 0.310±0.002 Gray, Dose Area Product (DAP) dose 23.72±0.84 Gray*cm2], intermediate with the Integris Allura FD20 (average film dose 4.4±1.1 cGray, peak film dose 29.4±15.5 cGray, AK 0.482±0.189 Gray, DAP 45.18±21.90 Gray*cm2), and highest with the Artis one system (average film dose 7.4±0.8 cGray, peak film dose 66.9±0.09 cGray, AK 0.746±0.085 Gray, DAP 75.93±9.11 Gray*cm2) and the Innova IGS system (average film dose 7.2±1.0 cGray, peak film dose 49.3±28.9 cGray, AK 0.874±0.340 Gray, DAP 92.28±14.73 Gray*cm2; P=0.011 for average film dose, P=0.019 for maximum film dose, P=0.033 for AK, and P=0.008 for DAP). CONCLUSIONS: The X-ray system type has significant impact on patient radiation dose during cardiac catheterization.

Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study.

BACKGROUND: The Radiation Reduction During Cardiac Catheterization Using Real-Time Monitoring study sought to examine the effect of a radiation detection device that provides real-time operator dose reporting through auditory feedback (Bleeper Sv; Vertec Scientific Ltd; Berkshire, UK) on patient dose and operator exposure during cardiac catheterization. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between January 2012 and May 2014, 505 patients undergoing coronary angiography, percutaneous coronary intervention, or both were randomized to use (n=253) or no use (n=252) of the Bleeper Sv radiation monitor. Operator radiation exposure was measured in both groups using a second, silent radiation exposure monitoring device. Mean patient age was 65±8 years, most patients (99%) were men, and 30% had prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar in the 2 study groups. Radial access was used in 18% and chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention constituted 7% of the total procedures. Median procedure time was 17 (12-27) minutes for diagnostic angiography, 42 (28-70) minutes for percutaneous coronary intervention, and 27 (14-51) minutes in the overall study population, with similar distribution between the study groups. First (9 [4-17] versus 14 [7-25] µSv; P<0.001) and second (5 [2-10] versus 7 [4-14] µSv; P<0.001) operator radiation exposure was significantly lower in the Bleeper Sv group. Use of the device did not result in a significant reduction in patient radiation dose. The effect of the Bleeper Sv device on operator radiation exposure was consistent among various study subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a real-time radiation monitoring device that provides auditory feedback can significantly reduce operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01510353.