Taking a Chance to Recover: Families Look Back on the Decision to Pursue Tracheostomy After Severe Acute Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomy represents one important and value-laden treatment decision after severe acute brain injury (SABI). Whether to pursue this life-sustaining treatment typically hinges on intense conversations between family and clinicians. The aim of this study was, among a cohort of patient who had undergone tracheostomy after SABI, to explore the long-term reflections of patients and their families as they look back on this decision. METHODS: For this qualitative study, we reviewed the electronic medical records of patients with SABI who underwent tracheostomy. We included all patients who were admitted to our 30-bed neuro-intensive care unit with SABI and underwent tracheostomy between November 2017 and October 2019. Using purposive sampling, we invited survivors and family members to participate in telephone interviews greater than 3 months after SABI until thematic saturation was reached. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed, and analyzed by using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 38 patients with SABI in the neuro-intensive care unit underwent tracheostomy. The mean age of patients was 49 (range 18-81), with 19 of 38 patients diagnosed with traumatic brain injury and 19 of 38 with stroke. We interviewed 20 family members of 18 of 38 patients at a mean of 16 (SD 9) months after hospitalization. The mean patient age among those with an interview was 50 (range 18-76); the mean modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was 4.7 (SD 0.8) at hospital discharge. At the time of the interview, ten patients lived at home and two in a skilled nursing facility and had a mean mRS of 2.6 (SD 0.9), and six had died. As families reflected on the decision to proceed with a tracheostomy, two themes emerged. First, families did not remember tracheostomy as a choice because the uncertain chance of recovery rendered the certain alternative of death unacceptable or because they valued survival above all and therefore could not perceive an alternative to life-sustaining treatment. Second, families identified a fundamental need to receive supportive, consistent communication centering around compassion, clarity, and hope. When this need was met, families were able to reflect on the tracheostomy decision with peace, regardless of their loved one's eventual outcome. CONCLUSIONS: After SABI, prognostic uncertainty almost transcends the concept of choice. Families who proceeded with a tracheostomy saw it as the only option at the time. High-quality communication may mitigate the stress surrounding this high-stakes decision.

Outcomes After Tracheostomy in Patients with Severe Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To synthesize reported long-term outcomes in patients undergoing tracheostomy after severe acute brain injury (SABI). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for studies in English, German, and Spanish between 1990 and 2019, reporting outcomes in patients with SABI who underwent tracheostomy. We adhered to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and the meta-analyses of observational studies in epidemiology guidelines. We excluded studies reporting on less than 10 patients, mixed populations with other neurological diseases, or studies assessing highly select subgroups defined by age or procedures. Data were extracted independently by two investigators. Results were pooled using random effects modeling. The primary outcome was long-term functional outcome (mRS or GOS) at 6-12 months. Secondary outcomes included hospital and long-term mortality, decannulation rates, and discharge home rates. RESULTS: Of 1405 studies identified, 61 underwent full manuscript review and 19 studies comprising 35,362 patients from 10 countries were included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcome was available from five studies with 451 patients. At 6-12 months, about one-third of patients (30%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 17-48) achieved independence, and about one-third survived in a dependent state (36%, 95% CI 28-46%). The pooled short-term mortality for 19,048 patients was 12%, (95% CI 9-17%) with no significant difference between stroke (10%) and TBI patients (13%), and the pooled long-term mortality was 21% (95% CI 11-36). Decannulation occurred in 79% (95% CI 51-93%) of survivors. Heterogeneity was high for most outcome assessments (I2 > 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that about one in three patients with SABI who undergo tracheostomy may eventually achieve independence. Future research is needed to understand the reasons for the heterogeneity between studies and to identify those patients with promising outcomes as well as factors influencing outcome.

Comparison of Thromboembolic Events Between Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) Shield and PED/PED Flex: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pipeline embolization device (PED) Flex with Shield technology is a third-generation flow diverter used for intracranial aneurysm treatment designed to decrease thrombogenicity through a phosphorylcholine coating. Herein, we aim to compare the rate of thromboembolic events in PED with Shield technology and PED without it through propensity score matching. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of aneurysms treated with PED first-generation/PED Flex and PED with Shield between 2013 and 2023 at a single academic institution. Patients were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, smoking history, diabetes, previous subarachnoid hemorrhage, modified Rankin Scale pretreatment, location, aneurysm size, previous treatment, and clopidogrel or aspirin resistance. After matching, we evaluated for periprocedural and postoperative thromboembolic events. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14. RESULTS: A total of 543 patients with 707 aneurysms treated in 605 procedures were included in the analysis. From these, 156 aneurysms were treated with PED with Shield (22.07%) and 551 (77.93%) without Shield technology. Propensity score matching resulted in 84 matched pairs. The rate of thromboembolic events was 3.57% for PED Shield and 10.71% for PED first-generation/PED Flex ( P = .07), while retreatment rates were 2.38% for PED Shield and 8.32% for PED Flex ( P = .09). Complete occlusion at first ( P = .41) and last imaging follow-up ( P = .71), in-stent stenosis ( P = .95), hemorrhagic complications ( P = .31), and functional outcomes ( P = .66) were comparable for both groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first study in the literature performing a propensity scored-matched analysis comparing PED with PED with Shield technology. Our study suggests a trend toward lower thromboembolic events for PED Shield, even after controlling for aspirin and clopidogrel resistance, and a trend toward lower aneurysm retreatment rates with PED Shield, without reaching statistical significance.

Thromboembolic Events in the Posterior Circulation After Flow Diversion-A Closer Look at Coverage of the Posterior Cerebral Artery.

BACKGROUND: Flow diversion for bifurcation aneurysms requires excluding one of the branches from the parent artery, raising concern for ischemic events. We evaluated thromboembolic events and their relationship with covering the origin of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA). METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients with confirmed basilar and proximal PCA aneurysms treated with flow diversion between 2013 and 2023. Procedures were classified according to the coverage of the origin of the PCA. Thromboembolic events associated with the excluded PCA were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the total 28 aneurysms included, 7 were at the basilar tip, 16 in the basilar trunk, and 5 in the first segment of the PCA; 15 were treated by excluding one of the PCAs. Dual antiplatelet therapy included aspirin and ticagrelor (57.1%), aspirin and clopidogrel (35.7%), or aspirin and prasugrel (3.57%). Complete and near-complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 80.8% of the aneurysms treated at a median follow-up of 12.31 months. Thromboembolic complications occurred in 3 patients (2 with basilar perforator stroke and 1 with basilar in-stent thrombosis). However, the difference in these events was not statistically significant between patients with PCA coverage and those without (P = 0.46). Diminished flow and a lack of flow was seen in 8 and 7 of the covered vessels, respectively. A modified Rankin scale score of ≤2 was reported for 89.3% of patients at a median clinical follow-up of 5.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of thromboembolic events is high in distal basilar and proximal PCA aneurysms; however, PCA coverage was not associated with their occurrence. There was no difference in postprocedural disability between patients whose aneurysms were treated by excluding one of the PCAs and those who were not.

Endovascular Treatment of Basilar Apex Aneurysms: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in the Era of Flow Diversion.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular options for the treatment of basilar apex aneurysms (BAAs) are heterogeneous, and evidence is limited to retrospective cohorts and case series. We seek to evaluate the efficacy and complications associated with various endovascular treatment methods of BAAs. METHODS: Systematic review of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Retrospective and prospective studies evaluating endovascular treatment of BAAs between January 2010 and July 2024 were included. Relevant information including occlusion rates, aneurysm recurrence, retreatment rates, and complications were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Fifteen studies with 1,049 BAAs were included. The median aneurysm diameter was 8.5 mm (range 4.6-19.75), with a median follow-up of 33.7 months (range 6.0-117.6). Residual aneurysm filling occurred in 24% after primary coiling (95% CI=0.16-0.32), 25% after single stent-assisted coiling (s-SAC; 95% CI=0.04-0.46), 25% after Y-stenting (95% CI=0.12-0.37), and 23% after flow diverter stenting (FDS; 95% CI=0.11-0.35). Recurrence rates were high for primary coiling (27%, 95% CI=0.18-0.36) and s-SAC (19%, 95% CI=0.13-0.26), but significantly lower for Y-stenting (9%, 95% CI=0.03-0.15) and FDS (4%, 95% CI=-0.04-0.11). Retreatment rates were 19% for primary coiling (95% CI=0.12-0.26), 17% for s-SAC (95% CI=0.07-0.27), 5% for Y-stenting (95% CI=-0.03-0.12), and 13% for FDS (95% CI=-0.01-0.27). Meta-regression indicated larger aneurysms had higher complication rates (p=0.02). Thromboembolic events were most frequent with FDS and Y-stenting (12%). CONCLUSION: Occlusion rates were similar across treatments, but recurrence rates were significantly lower after Y-stenting and FDS treatments compared to primary coiling, although they carried a higher number of thromboembolic complications.