Bioelectric Silver-Zinc Dressing Equally Effective to Chlorhexidine in Reducing Skin Bacterial Load in Healthy Volunteers.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of the silver-zinc bioelectric dressing as compared with skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine or 4% chlorhexidine in reducing the bacterial count on the knee. METHODS: Three groups consisting of 48 healthy volunteers were included. Age range was 23 to 54 years old and 60% of participants were male. Each subject had 1 knee serve as the test and the contralateral as the control. The test site was prepared with either 2% chlorhexidine, 4% chlorhexidine, or a silver-zinc bioelectric dressing and after 24 hours skin cultures were taken and examined for bacterial growth. RESULTS: In the 2% chlorhexidine group 23 of 48 unprepped knees had positive cultures, compared with 9 of 48 prepped knees (P = .003; risk reduction, 4.0 times). In the 4% chlorhexidine group 25 of 48 unprepped knees had positive cultures, compared with 14 of 48 prepped knees (P = .027; risk reduction, 2.6 times). In the silver-zinc bioelectric dressing group 29 of 48 unprepped knees had positive cultures, compared with 7 of 48 prepped knees (P < .001; risk reduction, 8.9 times). There was no difference in the positive skin culture rate between the 3 methods. CONCLUSIONS: Application of the silver-zinc bioelectric dressing was equally effective at reducing skin bacterial load when compared with skin preparation with 2% chlorhexidine or 4% chlorhexidine in healthy volunteers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Basic Science - Microbiology. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The findings of this study indicate that the use of a bioelectric dressing after knee surgery can match the standard of care of preparing the skin with an antiseptic before surgery.

Does Capsular Closure Affect Clinical Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing concern of iatrogenic hip instability after capsulotomy during surgery. Greater emphasis is now being placed on capsular closure during surgery. There are no prospective studies that address whether capsular closure has any effect on outcomes. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient outcomes after interportal capsulotomy repair compared with no repair. We hypothesized that restoration of normal capsular anatomy with interportal repair will achieve clinical outcomes similar to those for no repair. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Adult patients with femoral acetabular impingement indicated for hip arthroscopy were randomized into either the capsular repair (CR) or the no repair (NR) groups. All patients underwent standard hip arthroscopy with labral repair with or without CAM/pincer lesion resection. Clinical outcomes were measured via the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sport Specific (HOS-SS) subscale, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analog scale for pain, International Hip Outcome Tool, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12). RESULTS: A total of 54 patients (56 hips) were included (26 men and 30 women) with a mean age of 33 years. The HOS-ADL score significantly improved at 2 years in both the NR group (from 68.1 ± 20.5 to 88.6 ± 20.0; P < .001) and the CR group (from 59.2 ± 18.8 to 91.7 ± 12.3; P < .001). The HOS-SS score also significantly improved in both the NR group (from 41.1 ± 25.8 to 84.1 ± 21.9; P < .001) and the CR group (from 32.7 ± 23.7 to 77.7 ± 23.0; P < .001). Improvement was noted for all secondary outcome measures; however, there was no significant difference between the groups at any time point. Between 1 and 2 years, the NR group showed significant worsening on the HOS-ADL (-1.21 ± 5.09 vs 4.28 ± 7.91; P = .044), mHHS (1.08 ± 10.04 vs 10.12 ± 11.76; P = .042), and VR-12 Physical (-2.15 ± 5.52 vs 4.49 ± 7.30; P = .014) subsets compared with the CR group. CONCLUSION: There was significant improvement in the VR-12 Physical subscale at 2 years postoperatively in the capsular CR group compared with the NR group. Capsular closure appears to have no detrimental effect on functional outcome scores after hip arthroscopy. We recommend restoration of native anatomy if possible when performing hip arthroscopy.

A Technique for Arthroscopic-Assisted Ligamentum Teres Augmentation Using a Suture Tape Augmentation.

Ligamentum teres (LT) tears are a pathologic condition being identified at increasing frequency because of growing use of hip arthroscopy. The exact role of the LT is not well understood, but it has been shown in recent biomechanical studies to contribute to hip stability. Patients with hip pain, instability, and/or mechanical symptoms with advanced imaging findings showing LT pathology may benefit from an LT augmentation. We present an arthroscopic-assisted LT augmentation technique, which can be performed as an isolated procedure or in conjunction with an arthroscopic labral repair and/or debridement, chondroplasty, and femoroplasty.