Quantitative CT lumbar spine BMD cutpoint value for classifying osteoporosis among older Chinese men can be the same as that of older Chinese women, both much lower than the value for Caucasians.

For older Caucasian women and men, the QCT (quantitative CT) lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) threshold for classifying osteoporosis is 80 mg/ml. It was recently proposed that, for older East Asian women, the QCT LS BMD value equivalent to the Caucasian women's threshold of 80 mg/mL is about 45∼50 mg/ml. For a data of 328 cases of Chinese men (age: 73.6 ± 4.4 years) who had QCT LS BMD and DXA LS BMD at the same time and with the DXA BMD value of ≤ 0.613 g/cm2 to classify osteoporosis, the corresponding QCT LS BMD threshold is 53 mg/ml. Osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture sum score (OLVFss) ≤ -2.5 has been proposed to diagnose osteoporosis. For 316 cases of Chinese men (age:73.7±4.5 years), OLVFss ≤ -2.5 defines an osteoporosis prevalence of 4.4%; to achieve this osteoporosis prevalence, the corresponding QCT LS BMD value is < 47.5 mg/ml. In the China Action on Spine and Hip Status study, a Genant grades 2/3 radiographic 'osteoporotic vertebral fracture' prevalence was 2.84% for Chinese men (total n = 1267, age: 62.77 ± 9.20 years); to achieve this osteoporosis prevalence, the corresponding BMD value was < 42.5 mg/ml. In a study of 357 Beijing older men, according to the clinical fragility fracture prevalence and femoral neck DXA T-score, the QCT LS BMD value to classify osteoporosis was between 39.45 mg/ml and 51.38 mg/ml. For older Chinese men (≥ 50 years), we recommend the cutpoint for the QCT LS BMD definition of osteoporosis to be 45∼50 mg/ml which is the same as the value for Chinese women.

Quantitative CT lumbar spine BMD cutpoint value for classifying osteoporosis among older East Asian women should be lower than the value for Caucasians.

For Caucasian women, the QCT (quantitative CT) lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) cutpoint value for classifying osteoporosis is 80 mg/ml. At the age of approximate 78 years, US Caucasian women QCT LS BMD population mean is 80 mg/ml, while that of Chinese women and Japanese women is around 50 mg/ml. Correlation analyses show, for Chinese women and Japanese women, QCT LS BMD of 45 mg/ml corresponds to the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry cutpoint value for classifying osteoporosis. For Chinese and Japanese women, if QCT LS BMD 80 mg/ml is used as the threshold to classify osteoporosis, then the specificity of classifying subjects with vertebral fragility fracture into the osteoporotic group is low, whereas threshold of 45 mg/ml approximately achieve a similar separation for women with and without vertebral fragility fracture as the reports for Caucasian women. Moreover, by using 80mg/ml as the cutpoint value, LS QCT leads to excessively high prevalence of osteoporosis for Chinese women, with the discordance between hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and LS QCT measures far exceeding expectation. Considering the different bone properties and the much lower prevalence of fragility fractures in the East Asian women compared with Caucasians, we argue that the QCT cutpoint value for classifying osteoporosis among older East Asian women will be close to and no more than 50 mg/ml LS BMD. We suggest that it is also imperative the QCT osteoporosis classification criterion for East Asian male LS, and male and female hips be re-examined.

Radiological diagnosis of prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fracture on radiographs: an interim consensus from a group of experts of the ESSR osteoporosis and metabolism subcommittee.

When a low-energy trauma induces an acute vertebral fracture (VF) with clinical symptoms, a definitive diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) can be made. Beyond that, a "gold" radiographic standard to distinguish osteoporotic from non-osteoporotic VFs does not exist. Fracture-shaped vertebral deformity (FSVD) is defined as a deformity radiographically indistinguishable from vertebral fracture according to the best of the reading radiologist's knowledge. FSVD is not uncommon among young populations with normal bone strength. FSVD among an older population is called osteoporotic-like vertebral fracture (OLVF) when the FSVD is likely to be associated with compromised bone strength. In more severe grade deformities or when a vertebra is collapsed, OVF diagnosis can be made with a relatively high degree of certainty by experienced readers. In "milder" cases, OVF is often diagnosed based on a high probability rather than an absolute diagnosis. After excluding known mimickers, singular vertebral wedging in older women is statistically most likely an OLVF. For older women, three non-adjacent minimal grade OLVF (< 20% height loss), one minimal grade OLVF and one mild OLVF (20-25% height loss), or one OLVF with ≥ 25% height loss, meet the diagnosis of osteoporosis. For older men, a single OLVF with < 40% height loss may be insufficient to suggest the subject is osteoporotic. Common OLVF differential diagnoses include X-ray projection artifacts and scoliosis, acquired and developmental short vertebrae, osteoarthritic wedging, oncological deformities, deformity due to high-energy trauma VF, lateral hyperosteogeny of a vertebral body, Cupid's bow, and expansive endplate, among others.

Developmental cervical spinal canal size: population reference range.

Background: The developmental size of the cervical spinal canal varies considerably. Neural compression and injury are more likely with a developmentally small spinal canal. This study was designed to develop a population reference range for developmental cervical spinal canal size for the Hong Kong population. Methods: Prospective study of 522 ambulatory patients (256 males, 266 females, mean age 55±18 years; range, 20-89 years) who underwent computed tomography (CT) neck examinations. Using a manually operated segmentation program, spinal canal, and vertebral body cross-sectional area (CSA), anteroposterior (AP) sagittal diameter, and width were measured at each level from C3-C7. Patient height and weight were measured. Results: Considerable variation in spinal canal size existed with, for example, a 164-168% variation exists for males and females between the largest and smallest spinal canal CSA at C5. All spinal canal measurements increased slightly with height (r=0.25-0.36, P<0.001), while vertebral body AP sagittal diameter increased with age (r=0.48-0.51, P<0.001). All spinal canal measurements were larger (<0.0001) in males. Although spinal canal CSA was larger in males (at C5, males 276.0±41.5 mm2; females 252.6±38.4 mm2), relative to vertebral body CSA, spinal canal CSA was larger in females. Arbitrary population thresholds indicating the smallest 25% spinal canal CSA and AP sagittal diameter as well as other parameters were defined. Conclusions: There is a large variation in developmental cervical spinal canal size within the Hong Kong population. A reference range of developmental spinal canal size was developed which will enable an objective assessment of an individual's cervical spinal canal size relative to the wider population.