Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Stat Med ; 36(13): 2100-2119, 2017 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28233395

RESUMO

Survival data analysis becomes complex when the proportional hazards assumption is violated at population level or when crude hazard rates are no longer estimators of marginal ones. We develop a Bayesian survival analysis method to deal with these situations, on the basis of assuming that the complexities are induced by latent cohort or disease heterogeneity that is not captured by covariates and that proportional hazards hold at the level of individuals. This leads to a description from which risk-specific marginal hazard rates and survival functions are fully accessible, 'decontaminated' of the effects of informative censoring, and which includes Cox, random effects and latent class models as special cases. Simulated data confirm that our approach can map a cohort's substructure and remove heterogeneity-induced informative censoring effects. Application to data from the Uppsala Longitudinal Study of Adult Men cohort leads to plausible alternative explanations for previous counter-intuitive inferences on prostate cancer. The importance of managing cardiovascular disease as a comorbidity in women diagnosed with breast cancer is suggested on application to data from the Swedish Apolipoprotein Mortality Risk Study. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Medição de Risco , Apolipoproteínas/sangue , Teorema de Bayes , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Doenças Cardiovasculares/sangue , Doenças Cardiovasculares/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/etiologia , Medição de Risco/métodos , Medição de Risco/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Suécia/epidemiologia
2.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 68(12): 1619-30, 2012 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22562608

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Adherence has not been studied in male oncology populations. The aim of this study on both the prescriber and user perspectives in prostate cancer treatment was to analyse real-life prescribing patterns of anti-androgens (AA), primarily bicalutamide, and factors influencing the patients' adherence to treatment. METHODS: A nationwide clinical cohort of incident prostate cancer, PCBaSe, was linked to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Men with a planned first line monotherapy AA treatment were identified; dosages and extent of off-label treatment were investigated. Cumulative incidence proportions for reasons for drug discontinuation were calculated. Factors potentially influencing adherence were explored using the medical possession ratio based on the individual prescribed daily dose. RESULTS: First line monotherapy AA was planned in 4.4 % of all incident cases and in 2.1 % of low risk disease cases. Among 1,406 men prescribed bicalutamide, 1,109 (79 %) received the approved daily dose of 150 mg. Discontinuation reasons differed with disease severity. Off-label, low-dose prescription associated with age above 75 years and disease categorised as low risk was noted in 297 men (21 %). Sixty percent of the men adhered well, i.e. to ≥80 %. Age above 75 years and less severe disease were both negatively associated with adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Patient age and tumour risk group influenced the prescriber's choice of dose, pointing to important issues for critical reflection. Possible over-treatment was noted in low risk disease. Interventions to increase adherence in older men and in men with less severe disease are worth considering after critically reviewing the appropriateness of the treatment indication, especially in the latter case.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Anilidas/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Compostos de Tosil/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Suécia/epidemiologia
4.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 34(5): 547-52, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17574369

RESUMO

AIMS: To investigate if the pattern of cytotoxic drug sensitivity in vitro in patient samples of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is supportive to the current standardized approach for drug selection for perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC). METHODS: The cytotoxic effect of cisplatin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, mitomycin-C, doxorubicin and melphalan was investigated in vitro on tumour cells from 223 patient tumour samples of different PC origins. RESULTS: Considerable differences in cytotoxic drug sensitivity between tumour types of the PC entity and within each tumour type were observed. Cisplatin showed high cross-resistance with oxaliplatin but low cross-resistance with doxorubicin and irinotecan. No cross-resistance was found between irinotecan and doxorubicin. The dose-response relationships for melphalan and irinotecan in individual samples showed great variability. CONCLUSIONS: The activity in vitro of cytotoxic drugs commonly used in IPC for PC is very heterogeneous. Efforts for individualizing drug selection for PC patients undergoing IPC seem justified.


Assuntos
Citotoxinas/farmacologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Camptotecina/farmacologia , Cisplatino/farmacologia , Citotoxinas/uso terapêutico , Doxorrubicina/farmacologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Feminino , Fluoruracila/farmacologia , Humanos , Irinotecano , Masculino , Melfalan/farmacologia , Mitomicina/farmacologia , Compostos Organoplatínicos/farmacologia , Oxaliplatina , Assistência Perioperatória , Células Tumorais Cultivadas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA