A complicated quasicrystal approximant epsilon16 predicted by the strong-reflections approach.

The structure of a complicated quasicrystal approximant epsilon(16) was predicted from a known and related quasicrystal approximant epsilon(6) by the strong-reflections approach. Electron-diffraction studies show that in reciprocal space, the positions of the strongest reflections and their intensity distributions are similar for both approximants. By applying the strong-reflections approach, the structure factors of epsilon(16) were deduced from those of the known epsilon(6) structure. Owing to the different space groups of the two structures, a shift of the phase origin had to be applied in order to obtain the phases of epsilon(16). An electron-density map of epsilon(16) was calculated by inverse Fourier transformation of the structure factors of the 256 strongest reflections. Similar to that of epsilon(6), the predicted structure of epsilon(16) contains eight layers in each unit cell, stacked along the b axis. Along the b axis, epsilon(16) is built by banana-shaped tiles and pentagonal tiles; this structure is confirmed by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The simulated precession electron-diffraction (PED) patterns from the structure model are in good agreement with the experimental ones. Epsilon(16) with 153 unique atoms in the unit cell is the most complicated approximant structure ever solved or predicted.

Atomic structure solution of the complex quasicrystal approximant Al77Rh15Ru8 from electron diffraction data.

The crystal structure of the novel Al77Rh15Ru8 phase (which is an approximant of decagonal quasicrystals) was determined using modern direct methods (MDM) applied to automated electron diffraction tomography (ADT) data. The Al77Rh15Ru8 E-phase is orthorhombic [Pbma, a = 23.40 (5), b = 16.20 (4) and c = 20.00 (5) Å] and has one of the most complicated intermetallic structures solved solely by electron diffraction methods. Its structural model consists of 78 unique atomic positions in the unit cell (19 Rh/Ru and 59 Al). Precession electron diffraction (PED) patterns and high-resolution electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were used for the validation of the proposed atomic model. The structure of the E-phase is described using hierarchical packing of polyhedra and a single type of tiling in the form of a parallelogram. Based on this description, the structure of the E-phase is compared with that of the ε6-phase formed in Al-Rh-Ru at close compositions.

Structures of pseudo-decagonal approximants in Al-Co-Ni.

Quasi-crystals shocked the crystallographic world when they were reported in 1984. We now know that they are not a rare exception, and can be found in many alloy systems. One of the richer systems for quasi-crystals and their approximants is Al-Co-Ni. A large series of pseudo-decagonal (PD) approximants have been found. Only two of them, PD4 and PD8, have been solved by X-ray crystallography. We report here the structures of PD1, PD2, PD3 and PD5, solved from the limited information that is provided by electron diffraction patterns, unit cell dimensions and high-resolution electron microscopy images.

Skeletal Ru/Cu catalysts prepared from crystalline and quasicrystalline ternary alloy precursors: characterization by X-ray absorption spectroscopy and CO oxidation.

The Ru/Cu system is of historical significance in catalysis. The early development and application of X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) led to the original 'bimetallic cluster" concept for highly-immiscible systems. This work explores alkali leaching of Al-based ternary crystalline and quasicrystalline precursors as a potential route to bulk Ru/Cu alloys. Single-phase ternary alloys at 3 trial compositions; Al(71)Ru(22)Cu(7), Al(70.5)Ru(17)Cu(12.5), and Al(70)Ru(10)Cu(20), were prepared by arc melting of the pure metal components. After leaching, the bimetallic residues were characterized principally by transmission XAS, "as-leached" and after annealing in H(2) (and passivation) in a thermobalance. XRD and BET revealed a nanocrystalline product with a native structure of hexagonal Ru. XPS surface analysis of Ru(22)Cu(7) and Ru(17)Cu(12.5) found only slight enrichment by Cu in the as-leached forms, with little change upon annealing. Ru(10)Cu(20) was highly segregated as-leached. XANES data showed preferential oxidation of Cu in Ru(22)Cu(7), implying that it exists as an encapsulating layer. TG data supports this view since it does not show the distinct two-stage O(2) uptake characteristic of skeletal Ru. Cu K-edge EXAFS data for Ru(22)Cu(7) were unique in showing a high proportion of Ru neighbours. The spacing, d(CuRu) = 2.65 A, was that expected from a hypothetical (ideal) solid solution at this composition, but this is unlikely in such a bulk-immiscible system and Ru K-edge EXAFS failed to confirm bulk alloying. Furthermore its invariance under annealing was more indicative of an interfacial bond between bulk components, although partial alloying with retention of local order cannot entirely be ruled out. The XAS and XPS data were reconciled in a model involving surface and bulk segregation, Cu being present at both the grain exterior and in ultra-fine internal pores. This structure can be considered as the 3-dimensional analogue of the classical type. Preliminary studies in CO and H(2) oxidation were made in a DRIFTS flow reactor with on-line MS, and their activities and selectivities were compared against skeletal Ru and Cu controls, Ru/Al(2)O(3), and Au/Fe(2)O(3). All samples were active in CO oxidation above approximately 50 degrees C, showing light-off temperatures in the range 60-70 degrees C. Ru(22)Cu(7) and Ru(17)Cu(12.5) also showed good selectivities (vs. H(2) oxidation), attributed tentatively to Ru-modified Cu surfaces of varying thickness. These compositions are promising candidates to test in a (PROX) fuel processor to supply purified (CO-free) H(2) to a PEM fuel cell.