Rural physician-community engagement: Building, supporting and maintaining resilient health care strategies in three rural Canadian communities.

OBJECTIVE: To explore rural physician-community engagement through three case studies in order to understand the role that these relationships can play in increasing community-level resilience to climate change and ecosystem disruption. DESIGN: Qualitative secondary case study analysis. SETTING: Three Canadian rural communities (BC n = 2, Ontario n = 1). PARTICIPANTS: Rural family physicians and community members. METHODS: Twenty-eight semi-structured virtual interviews, conducted between November 2021 and February 2022, were included. Communities were selected from the larger data set based on data availability, level of physician engagement and demographic factors. Thematic analysis was completed in NVivo using deductive coding. MAIN FINDINGS: The presented qualitative case studies shed light on the strategies employed by physicians to establish and foster relationships within rural communities during challenging circumstances. In Community A, the implementation of a Primary Care Society (PCS) not only addressed physician shortages but also facilitated the development of strong continuity of care through proactive recruitment efforts. Community B showcased the adoption of an 'intentional physician community' model, emphasising collaboration and community consultation, resulting in effective communication of public health directives and innovative interdisciplinary action during the COVID-19 pandemic. In Community C, engaged physicians and community advocates are aligned to contribute to the long-term sustainability of the rural community, particularly in the context of food security and climate change vulnerabilities. CONCLUSION: These findings underscore the significance of trust building, transparent communication and collaboration in addressing health care challenges in rural areas and emphasise the need to recognise and support physicians as agents of change.

Feasibility issues impacting optimal levels of maternity care in rural communities: implementing the Rural Birth Index in British Columbia.

INTRODUCTION: The continued attrition of maternity services across rural communities in high resource countries demands a rigorous, systematic approach to determining population level need, including a clear understanding of feasibility issues that may constrain achieving and sustaining recommended levels of services. The Rural Birth Index (RBI) proposes a robust and objective methodology to determine such need along with attention to the feasibility of implementation. BACKGROUND: Predictions of appropriate levels of maternity care in rural communities require consideration of the feasibility of implementation. Although previous work has focused on essential considerations that impact feasibility, there is little research documenting the barriers to implementation from the perspective of rural care providers and administrators. METHODS: We conducted in-depth, qualitative research interviews with rural community health care administrators and providers (n = 14) to understand the challenges of offering maternity care in 10 rural communities across British Columbia (BC). RESULTS: Participants articulated three thematic challenges to providing maternity services in their communities: maintaining clinical skills and financial stability in the context of low procedural volume, recruitment and retention of care providers and challenges with patient transport. CONCLUSIONS: Current models of compensation for maternity care are inadequate and inflexible and underscore many of the challenges to implementing a level of care that is based on population need. Re-thinking provision of care as a social obligation to actualize our system commitment to equity instead of working to achieve economies of scale is the first step to use equitable care. Addressing remuneration will provide the groundwork for solving other barriers to sustainable care.

Exploring fetal fibronectin testing as a predictor of labour onset: In parturient women from isolated communities.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the fetal fibronectin assay would be useful for determining if a woman was close to a term delivery. If effective, this test would allow parturient women to stay in their communities longer. DESIGN: This feasibility study used a prospective cohort design to examine the negative predictive value of the fetal fibronectin test at term. SETTING: Iqaluit, NU. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 30 parturient women from rural and isolated communities in Nunavut. INTERVENTION: Starting at 36 weeks' gestation, women were tested every 2 days, and after 39 weeks this increased to every day until labour. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The negative predictive value of the fetal fibronectin test was assessed. RESULTS: Women were no more likely to give birth at 7 or more days after their last negative fetal fibronectin test result relative to their likelihood of giving birth at 6 or fewer days after their last negative test result. Hence, the presence of fetal fibronectin in cervical secretion did not predict term delivery. CONCLUSION: This project indicated that the fetal fibronectin test did not have adequate sensitivity or specificity as a diagnostic measure to predict a delay of labour at term.

High acuity rural transport: findings from a qualitative investigation.

INTRODUCTION: The High Acuity Response Team (HART) was introduced in British Columbia (BC), Canada, to fill a gap in transport for rural patients that was previously being met by nurses and physicians leaving their communities to escort patients in need of critical care. The HART team consists of a critical care registered nurse (CCRN) and registered respiratory therapist (RRT) and attends acute care patients in rural sites by either stabilizing them in their community or transporting them. HART services are deployed in partnership with provincial ambulance services, which provide vehicles and coordination of all requests in the province for patient transport. This article presents the qualitative findings from a research evaluation of the efficacy of the HART model, including staffing and inter-organizational functioning. METHOD: Open-ended qualitative research interviewing was done with key stakeholders from 21 sites. Research participants included HART CCRNs, RRTs, administrative leads, as well as local emergency department (ED) physicians and nurses. Thematic analysis was done of the transcripts. RESULTS: A total of 107 interviews in 21 study sites were completed. Participants described characteristics of the model, perceptions of efficacy and areas for improvement. Rural sites reported a decrease in physician- and nurse-accompanied transports for high-acuity patients due to the HART team, but also noted challenges in delayed deployment, sometimes leading to adverse patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The salient issues for the HART model were grounded in a somewhat artificial distinction between pre-hospital and interfacility transport for rural patients, which leads to a lack of service coordination and potentially avoidable delays. A beneficial systems change would be to move towards dedicated integration of high-acuity transport services into hospital organizational structures and community health services in rural areas.

No. 282-Rural Maternity Care.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of current information on issues in maternity care relevant to rural populations . EVIDENCE: Medline was searched for articles published in English from 1995 to 2012 about rural maternity care . Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate organizations were also reviewed . OUTCOMES: This information will help obstetrical care providers in rural areas to continue providing quality care for women in their communities .

The distribution of maternity services across rural and remote Australia: does it reflect population need?

BACKGROUND: Australia has a universal health care system and a comprehensive safety net. Despite this, outcomes for Australians living in rural and remote areas are worse than those living in cities. This study will examine the current state of equity of access to birthing services for women living in small communities in rural and remote Australia from a population perspective and investigates whether services are distributed according to need. METHODS: Health facilities in Australia were identified and a service catchment was determined around each using a one-hour road travel time from that facility. Catchment exclusions: metropolitan areas, populations above 25,000 or below 1,000, and a non-birthing facility within the catchment of one with birthing. Catchments were attributed with population-based characteristics representing need: population size, births, demographic factors, socio-economic status, and a proxy for isolation - the time to the nearest facility providing a caesarean section (C-section). Facilities were dichotomised by service level - those providing birthing services (birthing) or not (no birthing). Birthing services were then divided by C-section provision (C-section vs no C-section birthing). Analysis used two-stage univariable and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 259 health facilities identified after exclusions. Comparing services with birthing to no birthing, a population is more likely to have a birthing service if they have more births, (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR): 1.50 for every 10 births, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [1.33-1.69]), and a service offering C-sections 1 to 2 h drive away (aOR: 28.7, 95% CI [5.59-148]). Comparing the birthing services categorised by C-section vs no C-section, the likelihood of a facility having a C-section was again positively associated with increasing catchment births and with travel time to another service offering C-sections. Both models demonstrated significant associations with jurisdiction but not socio-economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Our investigation of current birthing services in rural and remote Australia identified disparities in their distribution. Population factors relating to vulnerability and isolation did not increase the likelihood of a local birthing facility, and very remote communities were less likely to have any service. In addition, services are influenced by jurisdictions.

Rural health service planning: the need for a comprehensive approach to costing.

The precipitous closure of rural maternity services in industrialized countries over the past two decades is underscored in part by assumptions of efficiencies of scale leading to cost-effectiveness. However, there is scant evidence to support this and the costing evidence that exists lacks comprehensiveness. To clearly understand the cost-effectiveness of rural services we must take the broadest societal perspective to include not only health system costs, but also those costs incurred at the family and community levels. We must consider manifest costs (hard, easily quantifiable costs, both direct and indirect) and latent costs (understood as what is sacrificed or lost), and take into account cost shifting (reallocating costs to different parts of the system) and cost downloading (passing costs on to women and families). Further, we must compare the costs of having a rural maternity service to those incurred by not having a service, a comparison that is seldom made. This approach will require determining a methodological framework for weighing all costs, one which will likely involve attention to the rich descriptions of those experiencing loss.

The safety of Canadian rural maternity services: a multi-jurisdictional cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Small Canadian rural maternity services are struggling to maintain core staffing and remain open. Existing evidence states that having to travel to access maternity services is associated with adverse outcomes. The goal of this study is to systematically examine rural maternal and newborn outcomes across three Canadian provinces. METHODS: We analyzed maternal newborn outcomes data through provincial perinatal registries in British Columbia, Alberta and Nova Scotia for deliveries that occurred between April 1st 2003 and March 31st 2008. All births were allocated to maternity service catchments based on the residence of the mothers. Individual catchments were stratified to service levels based on distance to access intrapartum maternity services or the model of maternity services available in the community. The amalgamation of analyses from each jurisdiction involved comparison of logistic regression effect estimates. RESULTS: The number of singleton births included in the study is 150,797. Perinatal mortality is highest in communities that are greater than 4 h from maternity services overall. Rates of prematurity at less than 37 weeks gestation are higher for rural women without local access to services. Caesarean section rates are highest in communities served by general surgical models. CONCLUSION: Composite analysis of data from three Canadian provinces provides the strongest evidence to date demonstrating that we need to sustain small community maternity services with and without caesarean section capability.

Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic: The importance of physician leadership in responding to rural community ecosystem disruptions.

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic presented an unprecedented challenge for rural family physicians. The lessons learned over the course of 2 years have potential to help guide responses to future ecosystem disruption. This qualitative study aims to explore the leadership experiences of rural Canadian family physicians during the COVID-19 pandemic as both local care providers and community health leaders and to identify potential supports and barriers to physician leadership. METHODS: Semi-structured, virtual, qualitative interviews were completed with participants from rural communities in Canada from December 2021 to February 2022 inclusive. Participant recruitment involved identifying seed contacts and conducting snowball sampling. Participants were asked about their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, including the role of physician leadership in building community resilience. Data collection was completed on theoretical saturation. Data were thematically analysed using NVivo 12. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants took part from 22 rural communities in 4 provinces. Four key factors were identified that supported physician leadership towards rural resilience during ecosystem disruption: (1) continuity of care, (2) team-based care models, (3) physician well-being and (4) openness to innovative care models. CONCLUSION: Healthcare policy and practice transformation should prioritise developing opportunities to strengthen physician leadership, particularly in rural areas that will be adversely affected by ecosystem disruption. INTRODUCTION: La pandémie de COVID-19 a représenté un défi sans précédent pour les médecins de famille en milieu rural. Les leçons tirées au cours des deux années écoulées peuvent aider à orienter les réponses aux futures perturbations de l'écosystème. Cette étude qualitative vise à explorer les expériences de leadership des médecins de famille ruraux canadiens pendant la pandémie de COVID-19, en tant que prestataires de soins locaux et chefs de file de la santé communautaire, et à identifier les soutiens et les obstacles potentiels au leadership des médecins. MTHODES: Des entretiens qualitatifs virtuels semi-structurés ont été réalisés avec des participants issus de communautés rurales du Canada entre décembre 2021 et février 2022 inclus. Le recrutement des participants a consisté à identifier des contacts de base et à procéder à un échantillonnage boule de neige. Les participants ont été interrogés sur leurs expériences durant la pandémie de COVID-19, notamment sur le rôle du leadership des médecins dans le renforcement de la résilience des communautés. La collecte des données s'est achevée après saturation théorique. Les données ont été analysées thématiquement à l'aide de NVivo 12. RSULTATS: Soixante-quatre participants provenant de 22 communautés rurales de quatre provinces ont pris part à l'étude. Quatre facteurs clés ont été identifiés pour soutenir le leadership des médecins en faveur de la résilience rurale en cas de perturbation de l'écosystème: (1) la continuité des soins, (2) les modèles de soins en équipe, (3) le bien-être des médecins et (4) l'ouverture à des modèles de soins novateurs. CONCLUSION: La politique de santé et la transformation des pratiques devraient donner la priorité au développement d'opportunités pour renforcer le leadership des médecins, en particulier dans les zones rurales qui seront négativement affectées par la perturbation de l'écosystème.

Rural maternity care.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an overview of current information on issues in maternity care relevant to rural populations. EVIDENCE: Medline was searched for articles published in English from 1995 to 2012 about rural maternity care. Relevant publications and position papers from appropriate organizations were also reviewed. OUTCOMES: This information will help obstetrical care providers in rural areas to continue providing quality care for women in their communities. Recommendations 1. Women who reside in rural and remote communities in Canada should receive high-quality maternity care as close to home as possible. 2. The provision of rural maternity care must be collaborative, woman- and family-centred, culturally sensitive, and respectful. 3. Rural maternity care services should be supported through active policies aligned with these recommendations. 4. While local access to surgical and anaesthetic services is desirable, there is evidence that good outcomes can be sustained within an integrated perinatal care system without local access to operative delivery. There is evidence that the outcomes are better when women do not have to travel far from their communities. Access to an integrated perinatal care system should be provided for all women. 5. The social and emotional needs of rural women must be considered in service planning. Women who are required to leave their communities to give birth should be supported both financially and emotionally. 6. Innovative interprofessional models should be implemented as part of the solution for high-quality, collaborative, and integrated care for rural and remote women. 7. Registered nurses are essential to the provision of high-quality rural maternity care throughout pregnancy, birth, and the postpartum period. Maternity nursing skills should be recognized as a fundamental part of generalist rural nursing skills. 8. Remuneration for maternity care providers should reflect the unique challenges and increased professional responsibility faced by providers in rural settings. Remuneration models should facilitate interprofessional collaboration. 9. Practitioners skilled in neonatal resuscitation and newborn care are essential to rural maternity care. 10. Training of rural maternity health care providers should include collaborative practice as well as the necessary clinical skills and competencies. Sites must be developed and supported to train midwives, nurses, and physicians and provide them with the skills necessary for rural maternity care. Training in rural and northern settings must be supported. 11. Generalist skills in maternity care, surgery, and anaesthesia are valued and should be supported in training programs in family medicine, surgery, and anaesthesia as well as nursing and midwifery. 12. All physicians and nurses should be exposed to maternity care in their training, and basic competencies should be met. 13. Quality improvement and outcome monitoring should be integral to all maternity care systems. 14. Support must be provided for ongoing, collaborative, interprofessional, and locally provided continuing education and patient safety programs.

Cultures of risk and their influence on birth in rural British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: A significant number of Canadian rural communities offer local maternity services in the absence of caesarean section back-up to parturient residents. These communities are witnessing a high outflow of women leaving to give birth in larger centres to ensure immediate access to the procedure. A minority of women choose to stay in their home communities to give birth in the absence of such access. In this instance, decision-making criteria and conceptions of risk between physicians and parturient women may not align due to the privileging of different risk factors. METHODS: In-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups with 27 care providers and 43 women from 3 rural communities in B.C. RESULTS: When birth was planned locally, physicians expressed an awareness and acceptance of the clinical risk incurred. Likewise, when birth was planned outside the local community, most parturient women expressed an awareness and acceptance of the social risk incurred due to leaving the community. CONCLUSIONS: The tensions created by these contrasting approaches relate to underlying values and beliefs. As such, an awareness can address the impasse and work to provide a resolution to the competing prioritizations of risk.

Distance matters: a population based study examining access to maternity services for rural women.

BACKGROUND: In the past fifteen years there has been a wave of closures of small maternity services in Canada and other developed nations which results in the need for rural parturient women to travel to access care. The purpose of our study is to systematically document newborn and maternal outcomes as they relate to distance to travel to access the nearest maternity services with Cesarean section capability. METHODS: Study population is all women carrying a singleton pregnancy beyond 20 weeks and delivering between April 1, 2000 and March 31, 2004 and residing outside of the core urban areas of British Columbia. Maternal and newborn data was linked to specific geographic catchments by the B.C. prenatal Health Program. Catchments were stratified by distance to nearest maternity service with Cesarean section capability if greater than 1 hour travel time or level of local service. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to test predictors of adverse newborn and maternal outcomes. RESULTS: 49,402 cases of women and newborns resident in rural catchments were included. Adjusted odds ratios for prenatal mortality for newborns from catchments greater than 4 hours from services was 3.17 (95% CI 1.45-6.95). Newborns from catchments 2 to 4 hours, and 1 to 2 hours from services generated rates of 179 and 100 NICU 3 days per thousand births respectively compared to 42 days for newborns from catchments served by specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Distance matters: rural parturient women who have to travel to access maternity services have increased rates of adverse prenatal outcomes.

Stress and anxiety associated with lack of access to maternity services for rural parturient women.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the level of stress and anxiety between women resident in communities with different degrees of access to local maternity services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Fifty-two communities across rural British Columbia with different levels of access to maternity care services (ranging from no services to local specialist obstetrician). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 187 women, 40 of whom were from communities with no local access to services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Stress score on the R ural Pregnancy Experience Scale including financial and continuity of care subscales. RESULTS: Parturient women who had to travel more than one hour to access services were 7.4 times more likely to experience moderate or severe stress when compared to women who had local access to maternity services. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of access is strongly associated with stress in rural parturient women.

Development and psychometric testing of the rural pregnancy experience scale (RPES).

Rural pregnant woman who lack local access to maternity care due to their remote living circumstances may experience stress and anxiety related to pregnancy and parturition. The Rural Pregnancy Experience Scale (RPES) was designed to assess the unique worry and concerns reflective of the stress and anxiety of rural pregnant women related to pregnancy and parturition. The items of the scale were designed based on the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant rural women, thereby building a priori content validity into the measure. The relevancy content validity index (CVI) for this instrument was 1.0 and the clarity CVI was .91, as rated by maternity care specialists. A field test of the RPES with 187 pregnant rural women from British Columbia indicated that it had two factors: financial worries and worries/concerns about maternity care services, which were consistent with the conceptual base of the tool. Cronbach's alpha for the total RPES was .91; for the financial worries subscale and the worries/concerns about maternity care services subscale, alpha were .89 and .88, respectively. Construct validity was supported by significant correlations between the total scores of the RPES and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS [r =.39, p < .01]), and subscale scores on the RPES were significantly correlated and converged with the depression, anxiety, and stress subscales of the DASS supporting convergent validity (correlations ranged between .20; p < .05 and .43; p < .01). Construct validity was also supported by findings that the level of access and availability of maternity care services were significantly associated with RPES scores. It was concluded that the RPES is a reliable and valid measure of worries and concerns reflective of rural pregnant women's stress and anxiety related to pregnancy and parturition.