Short-Term Peripheral Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: Evidence for Increasing Prevalence of Gram-Negative Microorganisms from a 25-Year Prospective Observational Study.

The aim of this study was to describe the etiology and outcome of short-term peripheral venous catheter (PVC)-related bloodstream infections (PVCRBSI) in a 25-year period (1992 to 2016) and to identify predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI. This was a prospective observational study including all episodes of PVCRBSI. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for calendar year was built to explore factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology. Over the study period, 711 episodes of PVCRBSI were identified. Incidence rate of PVCRBSI increased from 0.06 to 0.13 episodes/1,000 patient-days. A Gram-negative bacterial etiology was demonstrated in 162 (22.8%) episodes. There was a significant increase in the proportion of Gram-negative infections (22.6% in 1992 to 1996 versus 33.2% in 2012 to 2016). Independent predictive factors of Gram-negative PVCRBSI were the following: being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20 to 2.69), surgery in the previous month (aOR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40 to 4.09), and antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams (aOR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.78). In conclusion, we reported an increase in the prevalence of Gram-negative PVCRBSI over the last 25 years. Factors associated with a Gram-negative bacterial etiology were being in the hospital for more than 7 days with a catheter in situ for more than 3 days, having undergone surgery, and having received antimicrobial treatment with beta-lactams.

Influence of empirical double-active combination antimicrobial therapy compared with active monotherapy on mortality in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-adjusted and matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence on mortality of empirical double-active combination antimicrobial therapy (DACT) compared with active monotherapy (AM) in septic shock patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of monomicrobial septic shock patients admitted to a university centre during 2010-15. A propensity score (PS) was calculated using a logistic regression model taking the assigned therapy as the dependent variable, and used as a covariate in multivariate analysis predicting 7, 15 and 30 day mortality and for matching patients who received DACT or AM. Multivariate models comprising the assigned therapy group and the PS were built for specific patient subgroups. RESULTS: Five-hundred and seventy-six patients with monomicrobial septic shock who received active empirical antimicrobial therapy were included. Of these, 340 received AM and 236 DACT. No difference in 7, 15 and 30 day all-cause mortality was found between groups either in the PS-adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis or in the PS-matched cohorts. However, in patients with neutropenia, DACT was independently associated with a better outcome at 15 (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.92) and 30 (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08-0.79) days, while in patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection DACT was associated with lower 7 (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.7) and 30 day (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.92) mortality. CONCLUSIONS: All-cause mortality at 7, 15 and 30 days was similar in patients with monomicrobial septic shock receiving empirical double-active combination therapy and active monotherapy. However, a beneficial influence of empirical double-active combination on mortality in patients with neutropenia and those with P. aeruginosa infection is worthy of further study.