Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 58(1)2022 Jan 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35056387

RESUMO

Background and Objectives: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been confirmed as the most accurate screening test for trisomies 21, 18, 13, sex chromosomes aneuploidies and several microdeletions. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of cell free DNA testing based on low-level whole-genome sequencing to screen for these chromosomal abnormalities and to evaluate the clinical performance of NIPT. Materials and Methods: 380 consecutive cases from a single genetic center, from Western Romania were included in this retrospective study. Cell-free nucleic acid extraction from maternal blood, DNA sequencing and analysis of sequenced regions were performed by BGI Hong Kong and Invitae USA to determine the risk of specific fetal chromosomal abnormalities. In high-risk cases the results were checked by direct analysis of fetal cells obtained by invasive methods: 6 chorionic villus sampling and 10 amniocenteses followed by combinations of QF-PCR, karyotyping and aCGH. Results: NIPT results indicated low risk in 95.76% of cases and high risk in 4.23%. Seven aneuploidies and one microdeletion were confirmed, the other results were found to be a false-positive. A gestational age of up to 22 weeks had no influence on fetal fraction. There were no significant differences in fetal fraction across the high and low risk groups. Conclusions: This is the first study in Romania to report the NIPT results. The confirmation rate was higher for autosomal aneuploidies compared to sex chromosome aneuploidies and microdeletions. All cases at risk for trisomy 21 were confirmed. Only one large fetal microdeletion detected by NIPT has been confirmed. False positive NIPT results, not confirmed by invasive methods, led to the decision to continue the pregnancy. The main limitation of the study is the small number of patients included. NIPT can be used as a screening method for all pregnancies, but in high-risk cases, an invasive confirmation test was performed.


Assuntos
Transtornos Cromossômicos , Aconselhamento Genético , Aneuploidia , Transtornos Cromossômicos/diagnóstico , Transtornos Cromossômicos/epidemiologia , Transtornos Cromossômicos/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Romênia
2.
J Pers Med ; 14(4)2024 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38672993

RESUMO

This study represents our second investigation into NIPT, involving a more extensive patient cohort with a specific emphasis on the high-risk group. The high-risk group was subsequently divided into two further groups to compare confirmed cases versus unconfirmed via direct methods. The methodology encompassed the analysis of 1400 consecutive cases from a single genetic center in western Romania, where NIPT was used to assess the risk of specific fetal chromosomal abnormalities. All high-risk cases underwent validation through direct analysis of fetal cells obtained via invasive methods, including chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis. The confirmation process utilized QF-PCR, karyotyping, and SNP-Array methods customized to each case. Results: A high risk of aneuploidy at NIPT was identified in 36 out of 1400 (2.57%) cases and confirmed in 28 cases. The study also detected an increased risk for copy number variations (CNVs) in 1% of cases, confirmed in two instances involving one large microdeletion and one large microduplication. Trisomy 21 was the exclusive anomaly where NIPT confirmed all cases with identified risk. High-risk NIPT results which were not validated by invasive methods, were classified as false positives; parents in these cases determined to continue the pregnancy. In conclusion, NIPT can serve as a screening method for all pregnancies; however, in high-risk cases, an invasive confirmation test is strongly recommended.

3.
Gene ; 741: 144565, 2020 May 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32165296

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a rare disease characterized by increased bone fragility and predisposition to fractures, bone deformities and other major signs such as dentinogenesis imperfecta, blue sclera and deafness. Over 90% of OI cases are caused by mutations in the COL1A1 and COL1A2 genes and the inheritance is autosomal dominant. METHODS: We present a case of a couple requesting genetic counseling, because the man was diagnosed with OI on a clinical and radiological basis and the woman was pregnant. Whole exomes sequencing (WES) was performed in order to identify the mutation (s), followed by prenatal diagnosis. RESULTS: WES identified a rare splicing mutation c.1155 + 1G > C in the COL1A1 gene recognized to be pathogenic and subsequently confirmed by next generation sequencing. The carrier state of the mutation was excluded for the fetus, so the pregnancy was further pursued and a healthy baby was born at term. CONCLUSIONS: WES is a new and effective technique for detecting pathogenic variants in monogenic diseases and it is preferable to use such a technique in diseases with genetic heterogeneity especially when time does not allow another time-consuming diagnostic technique such classical Sanger sequencing. WES offers possibility to expand the global spectrum of OI pathogenic variants enabling the diagnosis of the disease.


Assuntos
Colágeno Tipo I/genética , Sequenciamento do Exoma , Osteogênese Imperfeita/genética , Isoformas de Proteínas/genética , Adulto , Processamento Alternativo/genética , Cadeia alfa 1 do Colágeno Tipo I , Exoma/genética , Feminino , Genótipo , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala , Humanos , Masculino , Mutação/genética , Osteogênese Imperfeita/patologia , Linhagem , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA