Factors Influencing Anxiety Levels in Oncology Patients: A Study on the Impact of Earthquakes.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the multifaceted factors influencing anxiety levels in oncology patients, with a specific focus on the impact of earthquakes in the context of Turkey. Our objective is to identify and understand sociodemographic, clinical, and lifestyle determinants associated with anxiety in cancer patients, examining how traumatic events, such as earthquakes, contribute to heightened anxiety levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted, involving 149 oncology patients undergoing treatment at two prominent oncology centers in Turkey. The study collected comprehensive sociodemographic information and assessed anxiety levels using the Beck Anxiety Scale. The dataset was analyzed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), employing a range of statistical methods including descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: The findings underscore several factors significantly linked to anxiety levels in oncology patients. Notably, women, younger patients (age <65), and individuals with specific cancer types exhibited higher anxiety levels. Elevated anxiety was also associated with compromised physical functioning, experiences of earthquakes, irregular sleep patterns, dietary habits, fatigue, and the use of antidepressants. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the intricate interplay of factors influencing anxiety levels in oncology patients. Understanding these determinants is paramount for tailoring effective psychosocial support and interventions. The results underscore the need for holistic approaches to enhance the overall quality of life for cancer patients. Gender, age, cancer type, physical well-being, lifestyle choices, and exposure to trauma all play pivotal roles in influencing anxiety levels. These findings hold practical implications for the development and implementation of targeted psychosocial interventions aimed at improving anxiety management and overall well-being for oncology patients.

Greater occipital nerve block efficacy in COVID­19 associated headache: a preliminary study.

COVID­19 is an infection caused by the new coronavirus SARS­CoV­2. Headache is one of the most common neurological findings. In the treatment of various chronic headaches, the greater occipital nerve (GON) block is often used as a safe and effective method. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of the GON block in the treatment of headaches observed in COVID­19 patients. Between March and May 2020, 27 patients (with laboratory­confirmed 2019­nCoV infection by next­generation sequencing confirmation of real­time PCR) that had moderate or severe headache associated with COVID­19 and treated with a single session of GON block were retrospectively analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) values and the number of analgesic usage of patients were recorded before and after the blockade on the 1st and 10th days. Fifteen (55.6%) patients included in the study were male and twelve (44.4%) were female. In terms of VAS values, the difference between pre­treatment and post­treatment values on the 1st and 10th days was found statistically significant. Likewise, the difference between analgesic use before and after the procedure was statistically significant. GON block appears to be an effective pain management method in COVID­19 related headache, and it revealed promising reductions in pain scores and analgesic usage. As well as we know, this is the first study of "COVID­19 associated headache treated with GON blockade". More long term and well­designed prospective studies with more participants are needed to better define this headache and develop effective treatment strategies.

Duloxetine and pregabalin in neuropathic pain of lung cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain occurs in 1% of the population and is difficult to manage. This chronic pain causes psychological distress and impacts patient's quality of life, especially in cancer patients. The aim of this study was to show and compare the efficacy of pregabalin and duloxetine, which are reported in the group of first-line treatment at European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) guidelines on the pharmacological treatment of neuropathic pain (2010 revision) in lung cancer patients by using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Sign (LANSS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomized, open label, 3 month of study was conducted. A total of 44 patients that were diagnosed with neuropathic pain (14 women and 30 men) were included in the study. Patient's LANSS and VAS values were recorded before treatment. Then, 22 patients undergo pregabalin and 22 patients undergo duloxetine therapy. But due to side effects (dizziness, constipation), two patients had stopped to use pregabalin. Their LANSS and VAS values were recorded after 1 and 3 months of therapy. RESULTS: When we compare LANSS and VAS scores before treatment, after 1 and 3 months of treatment with pregabalin and duloxetine, a significant decrease was observed in both groups at the 1 and 3 months (p < .01). Duloxetine is superior to pregabalin in reducing the LANSS scores when we compare two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both duloxetine and pregabalin are effective in the treatment of neuropathic pain of lung cancer patients. And as far as we know, this is the first study comparing the efficacy of duloxetine and pregabalin in the neuropathic pain of lung cancer patients.

Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy (Aman) With Motor Conduction Blocks In Childhood; Case Report.

Objective Acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN), characterized with decreased compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) and absence of demyelinating findings in electrophysiological studies, is a subtype of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS). A 4 yr-old male patient presented with ascending weakness, dysarthria and dysphagia to Istanbul Dr. Lütfi Kirdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital Neurology outpatient for three days to in 2012. Dysphonia, restricted eye movements, flaccid tetraplegia and areflexia were found in neurological examination. There were motor conduction blocks in all peripheral nerves in electrophysiological studies.According to these findings the patient was diagnosed as Acute Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy (AIDP). Reduction of CMAP amplitudes in posterior tibial nerve, absence of CMAPs in median, ulnar and peroneal nerves and loss of motor conduction blocks were found in following electrophysiological studies. According to these findings, patient was diagnosed as AMAN. Motor conduction blocks may appear in early stage of AMAN and they disappear in later examinations. That's why electrophysiological studies must be repeated in patients with GBS.

The effects of topiramate therapy on cerebral metabolism in migraine with aura patients.

AIM: Topiramate is an antiepileptic drug with multiple mechanisms of action that is also used for migraine prophylaxis. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of topiramate therapy for migraine prophylaxis, based on vasomotor reactivity ([VMR] an indicator of cerebral autoregulation), and to identify changes in cerebral hemodynamics during the treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 20 migraine (with aura) patients (group 1) and 20 healthy controls (group 2) in the study. Transcranial Doppler monitoring was performed in both groups with patients in the supine and resting position. Using a two-sided temporal window at depths of 45-60 mm for the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and depths of 60-70 mm for the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), basal flow rates and VMR values were measured. Group 1 initially received 25 mg/d of topiramate orally, and then the dose was increased 25 mg every week. At the fourth week; the optimal dose was increased to 50 mg b.i.d. and the treatment was continued at this dose. Transcranial Doppler parameters were re-evaluated 2 months after treatment. In addition, the number of attacks per month, duration of pain, and visual analog scale (VAS) scores obtained before the treatment and 2 months after the treatment in group 1 were compared. RESULTS: Basal flow rates and VMR values recorded from the right and left MCA in group 1 were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Flow velocities obtained from the right and left MCA, and the VMR values in group 1 after topiramate treatment did not differ significantly from those in the control group (P > 0.05). In addition, the number of attacks, duration of pain, and VAS scores in group 1 were significantly lower after the treatment than before the treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Topiramate is an effective prophylactic treatment in migraine with aura patients and appeared to play a positive role in the regulation of cerebrovascular autonomic control.