Transradial versus transfemoral access for cardiac catheterization: a nationwide pilot study of training preferences and expertise in The United States.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to assess current training preferences, expertise, and comfort with transfemoral access (TFA) and transradial access (TRA) amongst cardiovascular training fellows and teaching faculty in the United States. As TRA continues to dominate the field of interventional cardiology, there is a concern that trainees may become less proficient with the femoral approach. METHODS: A detailed questionnaire was sent out to academic General Cardiovascular and Interventional Cardiology training programs in the United States. Responses were sought from fellows-in-training and faculty regarding preferences and practice of TFA and TRA. Answers were analyzed for significant differences between trainees and trainers. RESULTS: A total of 125 respondents (75 fellows-in-training and 50 faculty) completed and returned the survey. The average grade of comfort for TFA, on a scale of 0 to 10 (10 being most comfortable), was reported to be 6 by fellows-in-training and 10 by teaching faculty (p < 0.001). TRA was the first preference in 95% of the fellows-in-training compared to 69% of teaching faculty (p 0.001). While 62% of fellows believed that they would receive the same level of training as their trainers by the time they graduate, only 35% of their trainers believed so (p 0.004). CONCLUSION: The shift from TFA to radial first has resulted in significant concern among cardiovascular fellows-in training and the faculty regarding training in TFA. Cardiovascular training programs must be cognizant of this issue and should devise methods to assure optimal training of fellows in gaining TFA and managing femoral access-related complications.

Trend, predictors, and outcomes of combined mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft in patients with concomitant mitral valve and coronary artery disease: a National Inpatient Sample database analysis.

Aims: Combined mitral valve replacement (MVR) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedures have been the norm for patients with concomitant mitral valve disease (MVD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) with no large-scale data on their safety and efficacy. Methods and results: The National Inpatient Sample database (2002-18) was queried to identify patients undergoing MVR and CABG. The major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and its components were compared using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (OR). A total of 6 145 694 patients (CABG only 3 971 045, MVR only 1 933 459, MVR + CABG 241 190) were included in crude analysis, while a matched cohort of 724 237 (CABG only 241 436, MVR only 241 611 vs. MVR + CABG 241 190) was selected in PSM analysis. The combined MVR + CABG procedure had significantly higher adjusted odds of MACE [OR 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.14 and OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.93-1.99] and in-hospital mortality (OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.27-1.31 and OR 2.1, 95% CI 2.05-2.14) compared with CABG alone and MVR alone, respectively. Similarly, the risk of post-procedure bleeding, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, cardiogenic shock, sepsis, need for intra-aortic balloon pump, mean length of stay, and total charges per hospitalization were significantly higher for patients undergoing the combined procedure. These findings remained consistent on yearly trend analysis favouring the isolated CABG and MVR groups. Conclusion: Combined procedure (MVR + CABG) in patients with MVD and CAD appears to be associated with worse in-hospital outcomes, increased mortality, and higher resource utilization compared with isolated CABG and MVR procedures. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the relative safety of these procedures in the full spectrum of baseline valvular and angiographic characteristics.

Utility of Coronary Artery Calcium Scores in Predicting Risk of Subclinical Cardiovascular Atherosclerotic Disease: An Analysis of Limitations to its Adoption With Policy Recommendations.

This survey-based analysis aims to highlight key limitations to a wider adoption of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring as a means of screening asymptomatic individuals for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The need for a screening tool that adds objective anatomical information to historically established risk scores in the aforementioned population has been met by this imaging modality. Despite that, there has been a hesitance towards frequent usage of these scans. Within the pre-set sampling frame of the University of Toledo, a convenience sampling technique was used to reach out to 60 health care providers. The resultant responses were analyzed and discussed. In addition to identifying patients who need to be worked up further, CAC scans can also help re-stratify patients within-risk groups and inform decision-making regarding the use of lipid-lowering therapies. The public health impact of a greater but appropriate utilization of this diagnostic tool will be impactful. This analysis seeks to better understand real-life obstacles to a wider adoption of these scans and attempts to lay out policy recommendations to address these issues.

Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes and resource utilization of type 2 myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Sex-based differences in clinical outcomes have been previously well described in type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI). However, type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI) is more common in contemporary practice, with scarce data regarding sex-based differences of outcomes. METHODS: The Nationwide Readmission Database 2018 was queried for hospitalizations with T2MI as a primary or secondary diagnosis. Complex samples multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to determine the association between T2MI and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, index length of stay [LOS], hospital costs, discharge to nursing facility, and 30-day all-cause readmissions) in females compared to males with T2MI. RESULTS: A total of 252,641 hospitalizations [119,783 (47.4%) females and 132,858 (52.6%) males] were included in this analysis. Females with T2MI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.96; P < 0.001), shorter LOS (adjusted parameter estimate [aPE] -0.28; 95% CI -0.38-0.17; P < 0.001), less hospital costs (aPE -1510.70; 95% CI -1916.04-1105.37; P < 0.001), and increased nursing home discharges (aOR 1.08; 95% CI 1.05-1.12; P < 0.001) compared to males with T2MI. Females and males with T2MI had similar rates of 30-day all-cause readmission (aOR 1.00; 95% CI 0.97-1.04; P = 0.841). CONCLUSION: Among T2MI hospitalizations, females have lower in-hospital mortality, hospitalization costs, shorter LOS, and increased rates of nursing home discharge compared to males. Although statistically significant, the clinical significance of these small differences are unknown and require future studies.

Interarterial course of anomalous right coronary artery: role of symptoms and surgical outcomes.

Anomalous origin of right coronary artery with interarterial course (ARCA-IA) is a risk factor for sudden death and other cardiac complications. Surgical correction remains its gold standard treatment. We describe clinical characteristics, workup, surgical techniques and outcomes of ARCA-IA at our center. A retrospective analysis of cardiovascular database was performed. From March 2005 through January 2011, 11 patients with mean age of 53 ± 18 years were diagnosed with ARCA-IA. Reported symptoms included chest pain (64%), arrhythmia [27%; i.e. atrial flutter (9%), recurrent supraventricular tachycardia (9%), ventricular tachycardia (9%)], syncope (18%), dyspnea (9%) and aborted sudden cardiac death (9%). Chest pain (n = 7) was episodic and lasted longer than 6 months before diagnosis. Initial diagnosis was made at coronary computed tomography in two patients and at cardiac catheterization in nine patients. Four patients had positive stress test and were subsequently found to have ARCA-IA at cardiac catheterization. There was no operative mortality. Surgery (bypass with ligation of native vessel or translocation and reimplantation) was performed in seven patients. Three patients refused surgery, and in one patient, surgery was not considered due to comorbidities. Symptom relief was noted in all surgical patients. At mean follow-up of 36 months, two patients had noncardiac-related deaths whereas nine were asymptomatic. There were no deaths reported in patients treated surgically. Definitive surgery is indicated in symptomatic ARCA-IA and is associated with excellent long-term outcome. RCA dominance in ARCA-IA is an adverse marker with increased symptoms; this hypothesis should be tested in larger studies.

Appropriateness of Prescription and Safety of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillators: A Single-center Experience.

Introduction Wearable cardioverter defibrillators (WCD) are recommended for patients with a high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) secondary to arrhythmia that have not qualified for placement of an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). This study provides insights into a single-center experience with WCD in terms of its usage and safety. Materials and methods We studied all patients that were prescribed a WCD in the Fairview Hospital in Cleveland Clinic Health System, from January 2014 to June 2016. Institutional Review Board of the Cleveland Clinic approved the study. A retrospective chart review was performed to collect data regarding demographics and baseline comorbidities including age, gender, history of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. The patients that were lost to follow up in our electronic medical record (EMR) were excluded. Ejection fraction (EF) at the time of diagnosis and follow-up was recorded. The primary outcome was ICD placement at follow up focusing on appropriate use while the secondary outcome was delivery of shock (appropriate or inappropriate) focusing on efficacy and safety of the device. Patients were stratified based on ICD placement. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 23 (IBM Corp., NY, USA) was used for the statistical analysis. Results We identified 73 patients with WCD placement. After the exclusion of 23/73 (31.5%) patients due to loss of follow-up, 50 patients were included in the study (n=50). Clinical characteristics showed 66% patients were males, 76% had hypertension, 40% had diabetes, 34% had chronic kidney disease, 56% patient had a New York Heart Association functional status of >II and 34% were on anti-arrhythmic medication. Indication for WCD use was ischemic cardiomyopathy in 23/50 (46%) patients and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy in 27/50 (54%) patients. No ICD was placed in 39/50 (78%) patients and ICD was placed in 11/50 (22%) patients at end time of follow up. Mean age was 59.9 years (95% confidence interval (CI), 55.9 - 63.9 years) in the group with no ICD placement and 63.5 years (95% CI, 56.5 - 70.6 years) in the group with ICD placement. Mean EF in the group with no ICD placement at the time of diagnosis was 25.8% (95% CI, 23.8% - 27.9%) which improved by 18.8% to a mean EF of 44.6% (41.1% - 48.1%) at the follow-up. Mean EF in the group with ICD placement was 32.7% (95% CI, 27.6% - 37.9%) which reduced by 4.1% to mean EF of 28.6% (95% CI, 12.2% - 44.9%) which was statistically significant (p<0.0001). Patients who had no ICD placement were followed for an average of 162 days and with ICD placement for 78 days. There was no difference between ischemic or nonischemic groups in getting the ICD. There were no shocks delivered whether appropriate or inappropriate in our population. Conclusion Almost a quarter of the patients that were prescribed WCD in our center ended up with an implanted device which demonstrates appropriate use. Equally important was the observed safety of WCDs as a treatment modality with no inappropriate shocks recorded in the followed cohort.

Recurrent Bacteremia with Corynebacterium Striatum After Prosthetic Valve Replacement: A Case Report.

Infective endocarditis is typically caused by Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), coagulase-negative staphylococci and streptococci but infection with Corynebacterium striatum (C. striatum) is also becoming prominent. We present the case of a 65-year-old female with a recent history of the coronary artery bypass graft with bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. The surgery was complicated by sternal wound dehiscence with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) for which she was treated for six weeks with intravenous antibiotics. Two months later, she was found to have C. striatum which was treated. A transesophageal echocardiogram was done as well which did not show any vegetation. She presented to the hospital with vomiting, cough, fever, and shortness of breath. She had pyuria on urinalysis and was started on empiric antibiotics after taking blood cultures. She decompensated soon after admission and was transferred to the intensive care unit where she had a pulseless ventricular tachycardia and was resuscitated but required vasopressor support. The blood cultures from admission started growing C. striatum again. Daptomycin was added to the empiric antibiotics and supportive care was continued, but the family decided to make her 'do not resuscitate - comfort care only'. The support was withdrawn and she passed away.

Cerebrovascular Events After Cardiovascular Procedures: Risk Factors, Recognition, and Prevention Strategies.

Stroke has long been a devastating complication of any cardiovascular procedure that unfavorably affects survival and quality of life. Over time, strategies have been developed to substantially reduce the incidence of stroke after traditional cardiovascular procedures such as coronary artery bypass grafting, isolated valve surgery, and carotid endarterectomy. Subsequently, with the advent of minimally invasive technologies including percutaneous coronary intervention, carotid artery stenting, and transcatheter valve therapies, operators were faced with a new host of procedural risk factors, and efforts again turned toward identifying novel ways to reduce the risk of stroke. Fortunately, by understanding the procedural factors unique to these new techniques and applying many of the lessons learned from prior experiences, we are seeing significant improvements in the safety of these new technologies. In this review, the authors: 1) carefully analyze data from different cardiac procedural experiences ranging from traditional open heart surgery to percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter valve therapies; 2) explore the unique risk factors for stroke in each of these areas; and 3) describe how these risks can be mitigated with improved patient selection, adjuvant pharmacotherapy, procedural improvements, and novel technological advancements.

Long-term mortality in patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation and normal left ventricular ejection fraction: interventional perspective.

AIMS: Patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) and normal ejection fraction are being excluded from clinical trials evaluating transcatheter mitral devices. We sought to evaluate the long-term mortality with medical management alone in this patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively evaluated patients diagnosed with ≥3+ MR at our institution over 15 years. Only patients with an ejection fraction ≥60% were included in the study. Those with degenerative mitral valve disease, papillary muscle dysfunction, or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and those who underwent mitral valve intervention were excluded. The study included 400 patients (age 71.1±14.8, 25.1% male, ejection fraction 62.5±3.6%). Mechanism of secondary MR was restricted valve motion, annular dilation and apical tethering in 91.5, 4.5 and 4%, respectively. One-year and three-year mortality were 19.1 and 26.3%, respectively. On multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis, older age, New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV, >3+ MR and larger left atrium were independent predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Severe secondary MR with normal left ventricular systolic function has significant mortality with medical management alone. This initial observation needs to be confirmed in larger prospective studies. These patients should be included in future transcatheter clinical trials.

Pacemaker Placement in Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava.

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare disorder which is asymptomatic and hence is usually discovered while performing interventions through the left subclavian vein. We present a case of a 78-year-old male who was undergoing elective placement of a permanent pacemaker for tachycardia - bradycardia syndrome with post-conversion pauses of up to nine seconds. After achieving access through the left subclavian vein the wire kept on going on the left side of the chest instead of crossing the midline to the right side. The wire was removed and contrast venography was done, PLSVC with dilated coronary sinus emptying into the right atrium was confirmed. There was some difficulty in passing the lead to the right ventricle even with the acute curve in the stylet. The sheath size was increased and a longer deflectable sheath was used and with the tip of the lead anteriorly the right ventricle was cannulated and the lead was affixed. There were good sensing and pacing parameters. Post procedure chest x-ray was done and the patient was discharged without any complications.

Narrow Complex Ventricular Tachycardia.

Myocardial infarctions are frequently complicated by tachyarrhythmias, which commonly have wide QRS complexes (QRS duration > 120 milliseconds). Many published criteria exist to help differentiate between ventricular and supraventricular mechanisms. We present a case of a 61-year-old male with a history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease with prior stenting of the right coronary artery (RCA). He had been noncompliant with his antiplatelet medication and presented with cardiac arrest secondary to in-stent thrombosis. He was resuscitated and his RCA was re-stented, after which he made a good neurological recovery. During cardiac rehabilitation several weeks post-intervention, he was noted to have sustained tachycardia with associated nausea and lightheadedness, but no palpitation symptoms, chest pain or loss of consciousness. He was sent to the emergency department, where his electrocardiogram showed a tachycardia at 173 beats per minute which was regular, with a relatively narrow QRS duration (maximum of 115-120 msec in leads I and AVL) with a slurred QRS upstroke. This morphology was significantly different from his QRS complex during sinus rhythm. Intravenous diltiazem was ineffective but an amiodarone bolus terminated the tachycardia. The patient was admitted to the coronary care unit and treated with intravenous amiodarone infusion. A subsequent electrophysiology study was performed, showing inducibility of the clinical tachycardia. Atrioventricular (AV) dissociation was present during the induced arrhythmia, confirming the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia. An implantable cardiac defibrillator was placed and the patient was discharged.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Ischemic and Non-Ischemic Complete Heart Block.

INTRODUCTION: Third degree or complete heart block (CHB) is a medical emergency and usually requires permanent pacemaker placement. CHB can be caused by cardiac ischemia or non-ischemic conditions such as infiltrative diseases or fibrosis. The purpose of this study is to identify the baseline clinical characteristics associated with ischemic versus non-ischemic causes of complete heart block and compare their outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review broad approval was granted by the Cleveland Clinic Health System. In our study, 216 patients with CHB presenting to Fairview Hospital between January 2014 and June 2016 were initially identified using the International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes at discharge. Only the patients with a new diagnosis of complete heart block (CHB) were included in the study (total N=62), which led to the exclusion of 154 patients. The patients were characterized into non-ischemic and ischemic groups based on cardiac marker elevation, electrocardiogram changes and/or cardiac catheterization findings. In all the patients, data including the following was collected: demographics such as age, gender, ethnicity and body mass index; pre-existing comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, thyroid disease, previous coronary artery disease, history of cancer; use of nodal blocking agents, electrolyte abnormalities on admission, echocardiographic parameters such as ejection fraction (EF), right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), left ventricular end diastolic and systolic volumes (LVEDV and LVESV, respectively). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and the secondary outcome was pacemaker placement. Categorical variables were analyzed using chi-square and continuous variables using ANOVA. RESULTS: Out of 62 patients (N=62), 48 had non-ischemic and 14 had ischemic CHB. The mean age was 67 years (95% CI, 60.55-74.73) in the ischemic group and 75 years (95% CI, 71.52-78.80) in the non-ischemic group, p=0.04. Patients with ischemic CHB had a lower mean EF of 49.6% (95% CI, 42.04%-57.23%) compared to 57.42% in non-ischemic CHB patients (95% CI, 53.97%-60.87%), p=0.05. History of coronary artery disease was present in 71.4% (10/14) patients with ischemic CHB compared to 37.5% (18/48) patients with non-ischemic CHB, p=0.02. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of gender, diabetes, hypertension, thyroid dysfunction, chronic kidney disease, nodal blocking agents, electrolyte abnormalities or smoking status. For outcomes, 6/48 (12.5%) of patients with non-ischemic CHB had died compared to 3/14 (21.4%) ischemic CHB (p=0.327). Permanent pacemaker was implanted in 45/48 patients (93.75%) of the non-ischemic CHB compared to 6/14 (42.83%) in the ischemic group (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic CHB are younger, and they have a lower ejection fraction but they are less likely to get a pacemaker compared to non-ischemic CHB. Further studies with a bigger sample size are required to understand the long term mortality outcomes of patients with CHB.

Prognostic significance of mild aortic regurgitation in predicting mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: Moderate to severe aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with worse outcomes. The impact of mild aortic regurgitation has been less clear, possibly because of the broad categories that have been used in clinical trials, but holds increasing importance in the study of next-generation devices in low- and intermediate-risk cohorts. A more granular scheme, which is common in clinical practice and proposed for future trials, may add prognostic value. METHODS: We evaluated all patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement at the Cleveland Clinic from 2006 to 2012. The degree of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement was reported from the echocardiography database based on a clinical, transthoracic echocardiogram performed within 30 days of the procedure. Aortic regurgitation was finely discriminated on the basis of a multiwindow, multiparametric, integrative approach using our usual clinical scale: none, trivial to 1+, 1+, 1 to 2+, 2+, 2 to 3+, 3+, 3 to 4+, or 4+. RESULTS: There were 237 patients included in the analysis. By controlling for age, gender, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, baseline ejection fraction, and aortic regurgitation before transcatheter aortic valve replacement, there was a significant increase in mortality for each half grade of aortic regurgitation compared with the complete absence of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. The unit hazard ratio for each 1+ increase in aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement was 2.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.48-3.43; P < .001) considering aortic regurgitation as a continuous variable. Other clinical variables did not significantly affect mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Even mild aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with worse long-term mortality. There may be prognostic value in reporting milder categories of aortic regurgitation with more granular gradations.