Efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in active proliferative lupus nephritis: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab in patients with class III/IV lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive placebo, 400 mg ocrelizumab, or 1,000 mg ocrelizumab given as an intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15, followed by a single infusion at week 16 and every 16 weeks thereafter, accompanied by background glucocorticoids plus either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial (ELNT) regimen (cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine). The study was terminated early due to an imbalance in serious infections in ocrelizumab-treated patients versus placebo-treated patients. We report week 48 efficacy data for patients receiving ≥32 weeks of treatment (n = 223) and safety results for all treated patients (n = 378). RESULTS: The overall renal response rate was 54.7%, 66.7%, 67.1%, and 66.9% in the placebo-treated, 400 mg ocrelizumab-treated, 1,000 mg ocrelizumab-treated, and combined ocrelizumab-treated groups, respectively. The associated treatment difference versus placebo for the combined ocrelizumab-treated groups was 12.7% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.8, 26.1) (P = 0.065), with similar differences observed for both ocrelizumab-treated groups. Ocrelizumab versus placebo treatment differences were apparent in patients receiving the background ELNT regimen, but not in those receiving background MMF. A numerically greater proportion of ocrelizumab-treated patients had a ≥50% reduction in the urinary protein:urinary creatinine ratio at 48 weeks compared with placebo-treated patients (placebo-treated patients, 58.7%; 400 mg ocrelizumab-treated patients, 70.7%; 1,000 mg ocrelizumab-treated patients, 68.5%). Serious adverse events occurred in 27.2% of placebo-treated patients, 35.7% of 400 mg ocrelizumab-treated patients, and 22.0% of 1,000 mg ocrelizumab-treated patients. Corresponding serious infection rates (events/100 patient-years) were 18.7 (95% CI 12.2, 28.7), 28.8 (95% CI 20.6, 40.3), and 25.1 (95% CI 17.4, 36.1), respectively. The imbalance in serious infections with ocrelizumab occurred with background MMF but not with the background ELNT regimen. CONCLUSION: In patients with active LN, overall renal response rates with ocrelizumab were numerically but not statistically significantly superior to those with placebo. Ocrelizumab treatment was associated with a higher rate of serious infections in the subgroup receiving background MMF.

Open-label observation of addition of etanercept versus a conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy in the Latin American region.

BACKGROUND: Previous global studies examined etanercept (ETN) + methotrexate (MTX) for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but included few subjects from Latin America. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of ETN + MTX versus a standard-of-care disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) + MTX in Latin American subjects with moderate to severe active RA despite MTX therapy. METHODS: This open-label, active-comparator study (NCT00848354) randomized subjects 2:1 to ETN 50 mg/wk + MTX or investigator-selected DMARD (sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine) + MTX (ETN + MTX, n = 281; DMARD + MTX, n = 142). The primary end point was the proportion achieving American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 at week 24. Secondary end points included ACR20/70, disease activity score (DAS) 28 measures, and mean change in modified total Sharp score. Patient-reported outcomes were the Health Assessment Questionnaire, 36-item Short-Form, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: RA (WPAI:RA), and Caregiver Burden and Resource Utilization. Statistical analyses were stratified by country; χ test and analysis of covariance were used. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: More subjects achieved ACR50 at week 24 with ETN + MTX versus DMARD + MTX (62% vs 23%, respectively), in addition to secondary end points (P < 0.0001 for all); mean change in modified total Sharp score was lower for the ETN + MTX group (0.4 vs 1.4, respectively; P = 0.0270). Improvements in patient-reported outcomes favored ETN + MTX for Health Assessment Questionnaire, 36-item Short-Form, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for depression, WPAI:RA, and Caregiver Burden and Resource Utilization emergency department visits for RA (P < 0.01). Overall, adverse events were similar between the groups (69% vs 68%,); serious adverse events were also similar (4% vs 1%). The rate of overall infections was higher with ETN + MTX (38%) than DMARD + MTX (22%, P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with published global data among RA patients with inadequate response to MTX, adding ETN to MTX demonstrated better efficacy than adding one other conventional DMARD to MTX. No new safety issues were observed. ETN + MTX provided favorable benefit-risk profile among RA patients from LA region.

Impact of access to treatment on patient-reported outcomes among rheumatoid arthritis patients with tDMARDs and bDMARDS in two Latin-American countries: A prospective observational study.

Background and Aims: A noninterventional prospective study was performed in Colombia and Peru. The aim was to describe the impact of access to treatment on Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients with Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after failure to conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in real-life conditions. Methods: The impact of access to treatment was measured by access barriers, time to supply (TtS) and interruption evaluating their effect in changes of PROs between baseline and 6-month follow-up between February 2017 and November 2019. The association of access to care with disease activity, functional status, health-related quality of life was assessed using bivariate and multivariable analysis. Results are expressed in least mean difference; TtS in mean number of days for delivery of treatment at baseline. Variability measures were standard deviation and standard error. Results: One hundred seventy patients were recruited, 70 treated with tofacitinib and 100 with biological DMARDs. Thirty-nine patients reported access barriers. The mean of TtS was 23 ± 38.83 days. The difference from baseline to 6-month visit in PROs were affected by access barriers and interruptions. There was not statistically significant difference in the of PRO's score among visits in patients that reported delay of supply of more than 23 days compared to patients with less days of delay. Conclusion: This study suggested the access to treatment can affect the response to the treatment at 6 months of follow-up. There seems to be no effect in the PROs for delay of TtS during the studied period.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease that is associated with B-cell hyperactivity, autoantibodies, and increased concentrations of B-lymphocyte stimulator (BLyS). The efficacy and safety of the fully human monoclonal antibody belimumab (BLyS-specific inhibitor) was assessed in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus. METHODS: Patients (aged ≥18 years) who were seropositive with scores of at least 6 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) were enrolled in a multicentre phase 3 study, which was done in Latin America, Asia-Pacific, and eastern Europe. Patients were randomly assigned by use of a central interactive voice response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to belimumab 1 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg, or placebo by intravenous infusion in 1 h on days 0, 14, and 28, and then every 28 days until 48 weeks, with standard of care. Patients, investigators, study coordinators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignment. Primary efficacy endpoint was improvement in the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) at week 52 (reduction ≥4 points in SELENA-SLEDAI score; no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group [BILAG] A organ domain score and no more than 1 new B organ domain score; and no worsening [<0·3 increase] in Physician's Global Assessment [PGA] score) versus baseline. Method of analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00424476. FINDINGS: 867 patients were randomly assigned to belimumab 1 mg/kg (n=289) or 10 mg/kg (n=290), or placebo (n=288). 865 were treated and analysed in the belimumab (1 mg/kg, n=288; 10 mg/kg, n=290) and placebo groups (n=287). Significantly higher SRI rates were noted with belimumab 1 mg/kg (148 [51%], odds ratio 1·55 [95% CI 1·10-2·19]; p=0·0129) and 10 mg/kg (167 [58%], 1·83 [1·30-2·59]; p=0·0006) than with placebo (125 [44%]) at week 52. More patients had their SELENA-SLEDAI score reduced by at least 4 points during 52 weeks with belimumab 1 mg/kg (153 [53%], 1·51 [1·07-2·14]; p=0·0189) and 10 mg/kg (169 [58%], 1·71 [1·21-2·41]; p=0·0024) than with placebo (132 [46%]). More patients given belimumab 1 mg/kg (226 [78%], 1·38 [0·93-2·04]; p=0·1064) and 10 mg/kg (236 [81%], 1·62 [1·09-2·42]; p=0·0181) had no new BILAG A or no more than 1 new B flare than did those in the placebo group (210 [73%]). No worsening in PGA score was noted in more patients with belimumab 1 mg/kg (227 [79%], 1·68 [1·15-2·47]; p=0·0078) and 10 mg/kg (231 [80%], 1·74 [1·18-2·55]; p=0·0048) than with placebo (199 [69%]). Rates of adverse events were similar in the groups given belimumab 1 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg, and placebo: serious infection was reported in 22 (8%), 13 (4%), and 17 (6%) patients, respectively, and severe or serious hypersensitivity reactions on an infusion day were reported in two (<1%), two (<1%), and no patients, respectively. No malignant diseases were reported. INTERPRETATION: Belimumab has the potential to be the first targeted biological treatment that is approved specifically for systemic lupus erythematosus, providing a new option for the management of this important prototypic autoimmune disease. FUNDING: Human Genome Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline.

Anti-malarials exert a protective effect while Mestizo patients are at increased risk of developing SLE renal disease: data from a Latin-American cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of ethnicity and the use of anti-malarials (protective) on lupus renal disease. METHODS: A nested case-control study (1:2 proportion, n = 265 and 530) within GLADEL's (Grupo Latino Americano De Estudio de Lupus) longitudinal inception cohort was carried out. The end-point was ACR renal criterion development after diagnosis. Cases and controls were matched for follow-up time (end-point or a comparable time, respectively). Renal disease predictors were examined by univariable and multivariable analyses. Additional analyses were done to determine if the protective effect of anti-malarials persisted after adjusting for intake-associated confounders. RESULTS: Of the cases, 233 (87.9%) were women; their mean (s.d.) age at diagnosis was 28.0 (11.9) years and their median (Q3-Q1 interquartile range) follow-up time for cases and controls was 8.3 months (Q3-Q1: 23.5); 56.6% of the cases and 74.3% of the controls were anti-malarial users. Mestizo ethnicity [odds ratio (OR) 1.72, 95% CI 1.19, 2.48] and hypertension (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.38, 3.70) were independently associated with a higher risk of renal disease, whereas anti-malarial use (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26, 0.58), older age at disease onset (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96, 0.99) and female gender (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.32, 0.99) were negatively associated with such occurrence. After adjusting for variables associated with their intake, the protective effect of anti-malarials on renal disease occurrence persisted (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25, 0.58). CONCLUSION: Mestizo patients are at increased risk of developing renal disease, whereas anti-malarial use protects patients from such an occurrence.

Biology of anti-TNF agents in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: therapeutic implications.

Biologics are increasingly being used to modify the course of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. Some main agents are monoclonal antibodies and a fusion-protein that target TNF. This group includes adalimumab, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab and etanercept. Although the efficacy of anti-TNFs is supported by numerous randomized clinical trials, their pharmacokinetics depend on many factors, in particular immunogenicity, which can cause marked and rapid clearance and a consequent decrease in efficacy. Kinetics involve receptors that recognize the Fc fragment of the antibody and are responsible for various processes. Pharmacological advances permit optimizing the pharmacokinetics of anti-TNFs. In this review, we examine the kinetics of anti-TNF biologics, and consequent therapeutic implications, and overview some latest developments in the field. First draftsubmitted: 17 May 2016; Accepted for publication: 15 September2016; Published online: 14 October 2016.

Two-Year Safety and Efficacy Experience in Patients with Methotrexate-Resistant Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Etanercept and Conventional Disease-Modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs in the Latin American Region.

BACKGROUND: Although long-term data are available from biologic studies in North American/European populations with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), long-term findings in Latin American RA populations are limited. OBJECTIVE: To examine long-term safety/efficacy of etanercept, methotrexate, and/or other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in Latin American patients with moderate-to-severe active RA. METHODS: In the first phase of this open-label study, patients were randomized to etanercept 50 mg weekly plus methotrexate or conventional DMARD (hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine) plus methotrexate for 24 weeks. At the start of the second phase (week 24), investigators selected a treatment regimen that included any combination/dosage of etanercept, methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, or sulfasalazine based on previous treatment response, preference, and local product labeling, and was continued for the 104-week extension. RESULTS: In the extension, in the group previously randomized to etanercept-plus-methotrexate therapy, etanercept was continued in 259/260 patients; methotrexate continued in 260/260; and hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine added in 8/260 and 3/260, respectively. In the group previously randomized to conventional DMARD-plus-methotrexate therapy, conventional DMARD was discontinued in 86/126 and etanercept added in 105/126. Among etanercept-exposed patients (total exposure, 798.1 patient-year [PY]), rates of adverse events, serious adverse events, and serious infections per PY were 1.7, 0.07, and 0.02 events per PY. In both groups, after treatment modification was permitted, clinical response rates and improvements in clinical/patient-reported outcomes from baseline were sustained to week 128. CONCLUSION: After investigators were permitted to modify treatment, etanercept was part of the treatment regimen in 95% of patients. Continuation or addition of etanercept in the 2-year extension resulted in a consistently good risk:benefit profile. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Open-Label Study Comparing Etanercept to Conventional Disease Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) Therapy; ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00848354; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00848354.

Perspectivas éticas en el manejo de la pandemia COVID-19 y de su impacto en la salud mental / Ethical perspectives on the management of COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on mental health

Resumen En tanto que componente fundamental del quehacer médico a lo largo de la historia, la Ética es aún más prominente en situaciones de emergencia en salud pública. Luego de exponer los principios éticos esenciales y de enfatizar su valor en el cuidado médico de todo ser humano, se plantea la inevitable tensión que su aplicación genera en los diversos contextos de la relación médico-paciente. Se presta especial atención a las distinciones de la perspectiva ética en casos individuales y en el ámbito colectivo o de salud pública, particularmente en el curso de emergencias masivas como la desencadenada por COVID-19. A la luz de recientes documentos nacionales e internacionales, se discute el inevitable advenimiento de nuevas normas que deberán incluir aspectos socio-culturales, psicobiológicos y legales poseedores de un impacto clínico altamente significativo.

Summary As an essential component of medical work throughout history, Ethics becomes even more prominent in public health emergency situations. After presenting the fundamental ethical principles, and emphasizing their value in the medical care of every human being, the inevitable tensions that their application generates in the diverse contexts of the doctor-patient relationship, are examined. Particular attention must be paid to the distinctions between ethical perspectives of individual cases and those related to public health situations such as the massive emergency triggered by the COVID-1 pandemic. On the basis of recent national and international documents, the unavoidable upcoming of new ethical norms that must include socio-cultural, psychological and legal aspects of a highly significant clinical impact, is discussed.

The role of Community Mental Health in a new architecture of World psychiatry and Global Mental Health / Papel de la Salud Mental Comunitaria en una nueva arquitectura de la Psiquiatría Mundial y de la Salud Mental Global

Abstract Introduction The influx of new knowledge and scientific contributions into contemporary world psychiatry has counted on a vigorous dissemination through technology-inspired means. This process has led to the realities of Global Mental Health (GMH) inspired by "a new epistemology" of mostly positivistic roots. Objective To explore the basis of these realities and the resulting homogenization attempts of psychiatry as a medical, clinical, and research discipline. Discussion and conclusion The need for "a new architecture" of contemporary psychiatry is discussed as a reflection of a correct epistemological exercise and a renewed pact between professionals and communities, materialized in and enriched by the re-emerging Community Mental Health (CMH) movement. The essential bases of the movement are presented, and its mutually collaborative, multidisciplinary, integrated, and realistic nature, as reflected in national efforts like Peru's in Latin America, is described.

Resumen Introducción El flujo de nuevos conocimientos y contribuciones científicas surgido en la psiquiatría mundial contemporánea ha contado con una vigorosa diseminación mediada por recursos tecnológicos. Este proceso ha conducido a las realidades de la Salud Mental Global (SMG) inspiradas por una "nueva epistemología" de raíces fundamentalmente positivistas. Objetivo Explorar las bases de esta nueva realidad y los resultantes intentos de homogenización de la psiquiatría como disciplina médica, clínica y de investigación. Discusión y conclusión Se discute la necesidad de "una nueva arquitectura" de la psiquiatría contemporánea como reflejo de un correcto ejercicio epistemológico y de un pacto renovado entre profesionales y comunidades que se han materializado y enriquecido por el reemergente movimiento de la Salud Mental Comunitaria (SMC). Se presentan las bases esenciales del movimiento y su naturaleza de mutua colaboración multidisciplinaria, integrada y realista, reflejada en esfuerzos nacionales como es el caso del Perú en América Latina.

Expression of transforming growth factor-beta and platelet-derived growth factor in linear scleroderma.

Linear scleroderma (LS) is a localized form of scleroderma characterized by mononuclear cell infiltration and fibroblast proliferation. In the later stages of the disease, excessive collagen is deposited with concomitant skin and appendage atrophy. These symptoms suggest a breakdown of fibroblast cell function, and consequently, growth factors have been thought to play a role in the pathogenesis of LS. The present study examined the expression of TGF-beta and PDGF in skin biopsies obtained from patients with LS and from normal subjects. Samples were prepared for immunohistochemistry. To identify TGF-beta, two polyclonal antibodies were used: TGF-beta1 (RaB4) and TGF-beta2 (CL-B1/29) and, to identify PDGF, two monoclonal antibodies were used: PDGF-AA (3E-205) and PDGF-BB (1F-133). Staining for TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta2 was observed around blood vessels (endothelial cells), and sweat glands in both LS and normal skin. Staining for PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB was intense in endothelial cells and sweat glands in LS and normal skin. Mononuclear cell infiltrates and abnormal collagen bundles did not stain for TGF-beta or PDGF. The strength and extent of staining was evaluated in tissues using a scale from zero (no staining) to four (strong staining). The amount of TGF-beta1, TGF-beta2, PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB was found similar in LS and normal skin. These results do not support the hypothesis that the excessive fibroblast cell activity and abnormal collagen deposition observed in LS are associated with downregulation of TGF-beta or PDGF.

Biopharmaceuticals for rheumatic diseases in Latin America, Europe, Russia, and India: innovators, biosimilars, and intended copies.

A biosimilar is a biopharmaceutical product intended to be comparable to a previously licensed biopharmaceutical agent. The goal of such products is to increase the accessibility of biopharmaceutical therapy for rheumatoid arthritis by reducing costs. They are not like generic drugs, in that they may differ from the reference products in manufacturing, composition, and formulation. Regulatory authorities strive to ensure the absence of clinically meaningful differences between biosimilars and their reference drugs. However, small molecular differences may potentially affect pharmacodynamics (including affinity), pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. Intended copies are non-innovator biopharmaceutical products that, unlike biosimilars, do not have enough clinical evidence to demonstrate biosimilarity. For approval of a biosimilar, most countries require preclinical and clinical studies demonstrating comparability with the reference drug. The margin for determining equivalence or non-inferiority is determined on a case-by-case basis in each country, as there are no general criteria. The European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration have stringent regulatory processes to ensure comparability of biosimilars with their reference drugs. There are also post-marketing surveillance requirements to monitor safety. Only one biosimilar, CT-P13, has been approved for rheumatoid arthritis. However, in countries with less stringent regulation, intended copies are being commercialized and safety problems have been documented. Consequently, in such countries, there is an urgent need for appropriate regulatory processes to be established. Attempts to close the affordability gap of biopharmaceuticals should not open another gap between patients treated with an innovator drug and an intended copy.

Don Oscar (Del) Pino Galarza y la Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría: recordando a nuestro orfebre / Don Oscar (Del) Pino Galarza and The Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría: Remembering our goldsmith

Tributo in memoriam a Don Oscar Pino Galarza (1926-2014), secretario y asistente administrativo de la Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría por espacio de más de sesenta años, colaborador cercano de los Profesores Honorio Delgado, primero, y Javier Mariátegui, después. Luego de breves anotaciones biográficas, obtenidas mediante una entrevista con la esposa e hijos de Don Oscar, se describen rasgos fundamentales de su personalidad y su trabajo. En la Revista, su labor fue multidimensional al haber estado envuelto en tareas secretariales, administrativas, logísticas y editoriales que desempeñó con singular eficiencia, devoción, lealtad y modestia. Estas cualidades y su nobleza espiritual fueron evidentes en momentos decisivos de la trayectoria académica y editorial de los dos primeros Directores de nuestra publicación. Se reconocen así la vida y la obra de un auténtico orfebre, de alguien que reflejó lo mejor y más alto de una genuina calidad humana, más allá de orígenes sociales, documentos burocráticos o formalidades institucionales.

A tribute to Don Oscar Pino Galarza (1926-2014), secretary and administrative assistant of the Revista de Neuro-Psiquiatría for over 60 years, closely working with Professors Honorio Delgado, first, and Javier Mariátegui, later. After brief biographic notes obtained from an interview with Don Oscar’s wife and children, fundamental features of his personality and his work are described. At the Revista, his activity was multidimensional as he was involved in secretarial, administrative, logistic and editorial tasks which he conducted with unique efficiency, devotion, loyalty and modesty. These qualities and his spiritual nobility were evident during decisive moments in the academic and editorial careers of the first two Directors of our journal. Thus, due recognition is given to life and the work of a genuine goldsmith, one who reflected the best and the highest of a true human quality, beyond social origins, bureaucratic documents or institutional formalities.

Osteoporosis. Nutrición y tejido óseo. Calcio elemental / Osteoporosis. Nutrition and bone tissue. Elemental calcium

El calcio es un elemento mineral importante para muchas funciones del organismo, pero donde más de ha conocido sus múltiples beneficios es en el esqueleto. Participa en los procesos de desarrollo, crecimiento y mineralización ósea. Sus reservas titulares permiten la bipedestación y en conjunto con la vitamina D son esenciales para la salud de hueso. Hoy conocemos que los suplementos de calcio tienen acción preventiva y de tratamiento en la osteoporosis. Probablemente reconocer su deficiencia es de las medidas más sencillas para reconocer la enfermedad, de las más fáciles de identificar y de las mas simples de corregir...

Estudio multicéntrico para evaluar la efectividad y seguridad de una presentación de alendronato de sodio en cápsulas de gelatina blanda (Neobon 70 ®), en el tratamiento de osteoporosis posmenopáusica / Multicentre study to evaluate the effectiveness and security of sodium alendronate in a soft gelatin capsules in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

Objetivos: el objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la respuesta al tratamiento y seguridad del alendronato de sodio en una presentación de cápsulas blandas de gelatina (Neobon 70 ®), en mujeres posmenopáusicas con osteoporosis u osteopenia. Métodos: estudio clínico multicéntrico abierto a un año de tratamiento en mujeres postmenopáusicas. Las pacientes fueron asignadas a recibir 70 mg cada semana de alendronato sódico en presentación de cápsulas de gelatina blanda. Los desenlaces primarios fueron la densidad mineral ósea medida por DEXA y el valor plasmático del C-Telopéptido. La condición ósea fue evaluada por densitometría al inicio del estudio, al mes 6 y a los 12 meses de tratamiento. La resorción ósea fue evaluada por los niveles de C-Telopéptido basal, a los 3, 6 y 12 meses de tratamiento. Como desenlace secundario se evaluó la presentación de eventos adversos secundarios. Resultados: el estudio incluyó 146 mujeres reclutadas en diez centros de consulta externa de reumatología en cuatro ciudades de Colombia, que tuvieran diagnóstico de osteoporosis u osteopenia. La media de edad fue de 67±8 años (rango entre 45,7 y 92,8 años), y el promedio de tiempo transcurrido desde el inicio de la menopausia fue de 16±7,8 años. Treinta pacientes (20,54%) tenían una historia de fracturas previas. Al mes 12 de tratamiento se observó una reducción clínica y estadísticamente significativa en el nivel del C-Telopéptido (basal 0,53, tercer mes 0,22, sexto mes 0,17 y al año 0,17, p < 0,00001). Adicionalmente, se observó una mejoría estadísticamente significativa con el tratamiento en los valores del T-score a nivel de vértebras lumbares L2-L4 (basal -2,57, al sexto mes -2,27 y -2,29 al año), en el cuello de fémur (basal -2,37, al sexto mes -1,98 y al año -1,99), en el trocánter (basal -1,95, al sexto mes -1,55, y al año -1,41) y en la cadera (basal -1,73, al sexto mes -1,6 y -1,57 al año). También se observó mejoría en los parámetros de densidad mineral ósea, con un incremento de 2,3% a nivel vertebral lumbar y 2,59% en cadera. No hubo cambios en la densidad mineral ósea a nivel de cuello de fémur y trocánter. Estos cambios son similares a los observados con otras presentaciones de alendronatos y bifosfonatos. Como eventos adversos relacionados, solo se observó en el 8,2% la presencia de síntomas dispépticos, vértigo en el 3,4%, cefalea en el 2,7% y estreñimiento en el 1,4%. Conclusiones: estos resultados muestran que la presentación de alendronato sódico en cápsulas de gelatina blanda produce una gran mejoría en los parámetros evaluados por la densitometría y en el C-Telopéptido en mujeres posmenopáusicas con osteoporosis u osteopenia, y es una presentación farmacológica segura en mujeres jóvenes y de mayor edad.

Objectives: the purpose of this study was to evaluate the response to treatment and safety of Sodium Alendronate in a soft gelatin capsules presentation (Neobon 70 ®), in a postmenopausal women with osteoporosis or osteopenia. Methods: open multicenter clinical trial during one year was conducted in postmenopausal women. The patients were assigned to receive 70 mg of Sodic Alendronate in a soft gelatin capsule presentation, once time per week. The primaries endpoints were the bone density mineral measured by DEXA and the C-telopeptide serum level. The bone condition was evaluated by basal bone densitometry, 6 and 12 months. The bone resortion was evaluated by basal C-telopeptide serum levels, to 3, 6 and 12 months. The secondary endpoint was the presentation of secondary adverse events. Results: the study included 146 patients recruited in 10 rheumatologic clinical centers in Colombia, with diagnosis of osteopenia or osteporosis. Mean aged was 67±8 years (range 45.7 to 92.8 years) and the mean duration of menopausal time was 16±7.8 years. Thirty patients (20.54%) had a history of previous fracture bone. At month 12, a statistically significant reduction from base line in mean of C-telopeptide serum level was observed (basal 0.53, 3 month 0.22, 6 month 0.17 and 12 month 0.17, p < 0.00001). In addition, there was a clinical and statistically significant improvement in the T-score with the treatment in lumbar vertebrae L2-L4 (basal -2.57, 6 month -2.27 and 12 month -2.29), femur (basal -2.37, 6 month -1.98 and 12 month -1.99), trochanter (basal -1.95, 6 month -1.55 and 12 month -1.41), and in hip (basal -1.73, 6 month -1.6 and 12 month -1.57). Also it was observed an improvement in the parameters of bone density of 2.3% at lumbar vertebral level and of 2.59% in hip. No significant changes were observed in a left neck femur and trochanter. These increases are similar to observed with other presentations of alendronates and biphosphonates. Among this population, only the 8.2% had dyspeptic symptoms, 3.4% vertigo, 2.7% cephalea and 1.4% constipation. Conclusion: these findings showed that the presentation of sodium Alendronate in soft gelatin capsules produced a greater improvement in bone markers and densitometry scores in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and osteopenia and is a safety pharmacological presentation in young and older patients.

Agentes anabolicos oseos: Utilidad terapeutica / Bone anabolic agents

En este articulo se revisa la utilidad terapéutica del fluoruro de sodio y de la paratohormona, agentes anabólicos, en el tratamiento de la osteoporosis. Se discuten generalidades, mecanis10 de acción, efecto sobre la densidad mineral ósea indicaciones para su uso

Sindrome antifosfolipido (Sindrome de Hughes) / Antiphospholipid syndrome

El Síndrome Antifosfolípido cobra vigencia por la multiplicidad de manifestaciones clínicas que producen lo cual nos obliga a todos los médicos a identificarlo y conocerlo para evitar sus terribles consecuencias. El avance en la inmunología ha permitido conocer un poco mejor su físiopatología lo cual ha derivado en mejores opciones terapéuticas. Se reconoce que por sus características trombóticas recurrentes el tratamiento reside en anticoagulación, este campo avanza día tras día y es posible que con nuevas moléculas se logre un tratamiento anticoagulante eficaz, tejido-específico que evite complicaciones de sangrado en otras localizaciones. Aún quedan más preguntas que respuestas en el síndrome y el reto en los próximos años es resolverlas