Hysteroscopic laser ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids: insights from a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of in-office hysteroscopic ablation of submucous uterine fibroids using a diode laser. METHOD: A pilot study was conducted between January 2018 and January 2019 in a tertiary care university hospital. Patients with at least one symptomatic, class 0-2 FIGO classification, uterine fibroid ≤7 cm in size were eligible for inclusion. Evaluation of the changes in fibroid size and vascularity was performed using three-dimensional Doppler ultrasonography. Vaporization of the fibroid core was conducted using a 980-1470 nm wavelength diode laser inserted through the hysteroscope's working channel. The primary outcome was evaluation of the fibroid volume before and at 2 months after the procedure. RESULTS: Twenty women were enrolled in the study. At 2-month follow-up, the volume of the fibroids was significantly reduced (51.6 ± 22.5 vs. 33.4 ± 17.1 mm3; p < 0.001). A major reduction of three-dimensional sonographic color Doppler vascularity (observed by the same operator and confirmed by four blind reviewers) was also achieved in 12/20 patients (60%; p = 0.03) while a reported symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding decreased from 18/20 (90%) to 2/18 (10%; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic laser ablation represents a feasible and effective alternative for treating women with symptomatic submucous fibroids in the office setting. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up periods are needed to validate this promising technique.Key messageThis pilot study shows that in-office hysteroscopic laser ablation (HLA) could be a feasible alternative to treat symptomatic submucous uterine fibroids by coagulating their core, reducing their size and vascularization.

Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological neoplasia in western countries. Diagnosis of endometrial cancer requires an endometrial biopsy. A good quality endometrial biopsy allows not only the identification of the pathology, but also preoperative histologic subtype classification. Endometrial biopsy can be performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation, but also using blind sampling techniques. Objectives: To compare endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer. Materials and Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched from their inception until March 2022.We included all studies comparing endometrial biopsy performed under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling. Main outcome measures: Sample adequacy, failure rate to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia, and rate of detection of endometrial cancer. The summary measures were reported as relative risk (RR) with 95% of confidence interval (CI). Results: Four studies with a total of 1,295 patients were included. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation was associated with a significantly higher rate of sample adequacy (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.17), and significantly lower risk of failure to detect endometrial cancer or endometrial hyperplasia (RR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.92) compared to blind endometrial sampling. However, there was no significant difference between endometrial biopsies taken under direct hysteroscopic visualisation or blindly, with or without a preceding diagnostic hysteroscopy, in the rate of detection of endometrial cancer (RR 0.18, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.06). Conclusion: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation is associated with significantly higher rate of sample adequacy and is comparable to blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer and precancer. What is new?: Hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy under direct visualisation would be expected to reduce diagnostic failure for endometrial cancer compared to blind endometrial sampling.