Operative treatments compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures.

BACKGROUND: Few reports on external fixation to treat displaced midshaft clavicular fractures exist. We sought to compare the clinical effects of external fixation, plate fixation, and nonoperative treatment for treating displaced midshaft clavicular fractures in adults. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty-nine patients with a displaced midshaft fracture of the clavicle were selected (according to inclusion criteria) for a retrospective analysis and assigned to either operative treatment with external fixation (29 patients), plate fixation (30 patients) or nonoperative treatment with a sling (30 patients). The average follow-up period is 32 months. Outcome analysis included: Constant shoulder score (CSS); disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score (DASH); nonunion rate; satisfaction of shoulder appearance. RESULTS: Eighty-five cases were successfully followed up. No significant difference was observed between external fixation and plate fixation (p > 0.05 and p = 0.132, respectively). The operative groups achieved better effects (p < 0.001) compared to the nonoperative treatment. The healing time of the three groups were: 10.4 ± 2.3 weeks for external fixation; 12.1 ± 2.5 weeks for plate fixation; and 15.7 ± 2.2 weeks for nonoperative treatment. In the follow-up, patients in the external fixation group (96%) and plate fixation group (93%) were more likely to be satisfied with the appearance of the shoulder than were those in the nonoperative group (77%). CONCLUSION: The external fixation and plate fixation are overall better than the nonoperative treatment. As to choose between the two, it depends on the local soft tissue condition, surgeon's techniques, communication between doctor and patients and so on.

Epidemiology, microbiology and therapeutic consequences of chronic osteomyelitis in northern China: A retrospective analysis of 255 Patients.

The study aimed to explore the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of chronic osteomyelitis observed in a northern China hospital. Clinical data of 255 patients with chronic osteomyelitis from January 2007 to January 2014 were collected and analyzed, including general information, disease data, treatment and follow-up data. Chronic osteomyelitis is more common in males and in the age group from 41-50 years of age. Common infection sites are the femur, tibiofibular, and hip joint. More g+ than g- bacterial infections were observed, with S. aureus the most commonly observed pathogenic organism. The positive detection rate from debridement bacterial culture is 75.6%. The detection rate when five samples are sent for bacterial culture is 90.6%, with pathogenic bacteria identified in 82.8% of cases. The two-stage debridement method (87.0%) has higher first curative rate than the one-stage debridement method (71.2%). To improve detection rate using bacterial culture, at least five samples are recommended. Treatment of chronic osteomyelitis with two-stage debridement, plus antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) beads provided good clinical results in this study and is therefore recommended.