Comparison of anti-IL-6 receptor and JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis from the real-world practice FIRST study.

OBJECTIVES: A molecular-targeted drug that is suitable as the second choice for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who show an inadequate response to the first biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) is unknown. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6Ri) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis), often selected as molecular-targeted drugs for second or subsequent treatments. METHODS: The efficacy and safety of JAKis and IL-6Ri were compared using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW) using propensity scores after 26 weeks of therapy in patients with RA. RESULTS: The remission rate at week 26, determined by the clinical disease activity index (CDAI), and the incidence of infection were higher in the JAKis than in the IL-6Ri group. The CDAI trajectories were divided into four according to the growth mixture modeling. IL-6Ri demonstrated greater efficacy in RA patients with ineffective to single bDMARD therapy compared with those with multiple ineffective bDMARDs. In patients who failed to respond to one bDMARD, there was no significant difference in the CDAI remission rate at week 26 between the JAKis (29.1%) and IL-6Ri (21.8%) groups (p= 0.21). However, for patients who did not respond to at least two bDMARDs, the CDAI remission rate at week 26 was higher in the JAKis than in the IL-6Ri group. CONCLUSIONS: IL-6Ri offers a superior balance of efficacy and safety compared with JAKis for RA patients unresponsive to one bDMARD. However, JAKis may suit patients who do not respond to multiple bDMARDs.

Safety and efficacy of anifrolumab therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus in real-world clinical practice: LOOPS registry.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety and efficacy of anifrolumab in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classified based on the Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective observational study involved SLE patients who started anifrolumab therapy. The primary end point was the retention rate over 26 weeks after initiating anifrolumab therapy; 45 patients followed up for 12 weeks or longer were analyzed in the following groups to determine the safety and efficacy up to week 12 after treatment initiation: 1) non-LLDAS achievement group and 2) minor flare group. Safety and efficacy were compared between the minor flare group and the standard of care (SoC) group (treated by adding glucocorticoids (GCs) or immunosuppressants) after adjustment with inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score (PS-IPTW). RESULTS: The retention rate of anifrolumab was 89.7% at week 26.The LLDAS achievement rates at week 12 were 42.9% and 66.7% in the non-LLDAS achievement and minor flare groups, respectively. In both groups, GC doses and SELENA-SLEDAI score significantly decreased. When the anifrolumab group with minor flare was compared with the SoC group or the GC dose increase group, the GC dose and SLEDAI score were significantly lower in the anifrolumab group than in both groups; there was no significant difference in LLDAS achievement. CONCLUSIONS: At week 26 after initiating anifrolumab therapy, ∼90% patients remained on therapy. Anifrolumab might lower disease activity without initiating GCs and reduce GC doses, especially in patients who experience minor flares after LLDAS achievement.

Biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs do not arrest bone loss in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the differential effects of biological/target synthesized DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs) on bone metabolism in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a real-world cohort. METHODS: This was a multicentre prospective observational study of RA patients enrolled at the time of 1st b/tsDMARDs administration. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers (BTMs) were measured during the 52-week observation. The study was designed to enrol all eligible RA patients. The end-points were differences in changes in BMD according to b/tsDMARD type, and the correlation between BMD and BTMs. RESULTS: A total of 1,164 patients were enrolled in this study. b/tsDMARDs improved RA disease activity from mean CDAI 25.5 at baseline to 4.5 at week 26. Patients not receiving anti-osteoporotic agents (anti-OP) at baseline with no history of fracture experienced a significant decrease in both femoral neck (F: mean 0.666-0.655 g/cm3) and radial (R: 0.518-0.514) BMD at week 26. Despite maintaining low CDAI levels during weeks 26-52 (5.3-4.4), there was a continued decline in BMD (F: 0.653, R: 0.509. Weeks 52). None of b/tsDMARDs type preserved BMD. Conversely, patients receiving anti-OP at baseline maintained stable BMD throughout the study (Weeks 0/26/52. F: 0.551/0.551/0.555, R: 0.415/0.416/0.415). Although BTMs were changed by b/tsDMARDs, the changes were unrelated to those in BMD. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested the progression of osteoporosis in RA patients during b/tsDMARDs treatment without anti-OP. BTMs may not reflect BMD change. Regular monitoring of BMD in RA should be considered for early management of osteoporosis.

Efficacy and safety of belimumab during maintenance therapy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of belimumab (BEL) during maintenance therapy in patients with SLE remains unclear in the real-life clinical setting. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of BEL in patients with SLE during maintenance therapy. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, maintenance therapy was defined as low-dose glucocorticoid (GC) therapy (prednisolone equivalent dose of ≤0.2 mg/kg/day) in patients with a Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment-SLE Disease Activity Index (SELENA-SLEDAI) score <10. Participants comprised patients with SLE on HCQ or MMF [standard-of-care (SoC) group: n = 103] and those on BEL plus SoC (BEL+SoC group: n = 100). Selection bias was minimized using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). GC dose trajectories were modelled using growth mixture modelling (GMM). The primary end point was GC dose at 52 weeks. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in patient characteristics between the two groups after IPTW adjustment. The BEL+SoC group exhibited a significant decrease in GC dose. GC dose at 52 weeks and relapse rate were significantly lower in the BEL+SoC group than in the SoC group. The proportion of patients in one of four groups defined by GMM for which GC dose was tapered to 0 mg within 52 weeks (GC tapering-discontinuation group) was significantly higher in the BEL+SoC group than in the SoC group. In the BEL+SoC group, low SELENA-SLEDAI score and low GC dose at baseline were associated with being GC dose-tapering discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that BEL is suitable for patients with SLE during maintenance therapy.

Nailfold microvascular abnormalities are associated with a higher prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with MCTD.

OBJECTIVE: MCTD manifests with microvasculopathy and overlapping clinical features of SLE, SSc and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical significance of microvasculopathy in patients with MCTD using nailfold videocapillaroscopy (NVC). METHODS: Fifty patients with newly diagnosed and untreated MCTD were enrolled in this multicentre, prospective and observational study. Clinical features and NVC findings were assessed at baseline and after 1 year post-intervention, along with disease controls [SLE (n = 40), SSc (n = 70) and IIM (n = 50)]. RESULTS: All MCTD patients presented Raynaud's phenomenon and were positive for anti-U1 RNP antibodies, and 22.0% (11/50) had pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The prevalence of NVC scleroderma patterns in MCTD was 38.0%, which was lower than SSc (88.6%) but higher than SLE (10.0%). In addition, when we divided MCTD patients into two groups by presence or absence of NVC scleroderma patterns, we found a higher prevalence of PAH in patients with NVC scleroderma patterns. Namely, NVC scleroderma patterns were observed in all MCTD patients with PAH, and in 21.0% of those without PAH. After intensive immunosuppressive therapy, NVC scleroderma patterns disappeared in half of the MCTD patients but were not changed in SSc patients. CONCLUSIONS: MCTD differed from SLE, SSc and IIM in terms of the prevalence and responsiveness of NVC scleroderma patterns to immunosuppressive therapy. Detection of nailfold microvascular abnormalities in MCTD could contribute to predicting PAH and help us to understand further aspects of the pathogenesis of MCTD.

Efficacy and safety of high-dose of mycophenolate mofetil compared with cyclophosphamide pulse therapy as induction therapy in Japanese patients with proliferative lupus nephritis.

OBJECTIVES: To clarify the effectiveness and safety of induction therapy with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in patients with lupus nephritis (LN). METHODS: Patients with LN administered MMF (n = 35) or intravenous cyclophosphamide pulse therapy (IVCY) (n = 25) plus high-dose corticosteroids between July 2015 and June 2020 were included. MMF was increased from 2 to 3 g/day, with no adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was the 6 month renal remission rate. Secondary endpoints were retention rate and AEs. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, sex, disease duration, renal histological type, SLE disease activity index, and urine protein creatinine ratio between the two groups. Twenty-six patients (74%) continued with MMF therapy, whereas 12 (48%) completed six IVCY courses. The retention rate was significantly higher in the MMF than in the IVCY group (p = 0.048). Twenty-four and 14 patients in MMF and IVCY groups, respectively, achieved renal remission with insignificant differences. Grade 3 or higher AEs were observed in 8 and 14 patients in the MMF and IVCY groups, respectively (p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of high-dose MMF was comparable to that of IVCY in Japanese patients with proliferative LN, with fewer AEs and a higher retention rate than IVCY, suggesting the high tolerability of MMF.

Clinical aspects in patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated with lymphoproliferative disorders without regression after methotrexate withdrawal and treatment for arthritis after regression of lymphoproliferative disorders.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictive factors for lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs) that persist after methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal (Persistent-LPD) and the optimal treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after LPD regression. METHODS: Among 3666 patients with RA treated with MTX in our department from 2006 to 2017, 26 cases of LPD that regressed after MTX withdrawal (Regressive-LPD) and 25 cases of Persistent-LPD were compared. Multivariate logistic analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for Persistent-LPD. Retention rates of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Method. RESULTS: In Persistent-LPD, the incidence of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma was higher (76%). The overall 2-year survival rate was 83.9%: 95.8% for Regressive-LPD and 71.0% for Persistent-LPD. The International Prognostic Index (IPI) risk classification was useful for predicting Persistent-LPD. bDMARDs were introduced in 38 RA patients after LPD regression. Unadjusted retention rate of bDMARDs in the 51 LPD patients was significantly lower than that in the 1668 non-LPD RA patients in our bDMARD cohort (controls) (p = 0.029). The 1-year retention rates for bDMARDs were 69% and 64% for tocilizumab and abatacept, respectively vs. 46% for TNF-inhibitor (TNFi). CONCLUSION: Risk assessment using IPI predicted Persistent-LPD. After LPD regression, non-TNFi tended to have higher retention rates.

5-year remission rate after the discontinuation of adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Long-term follow-up results of the HONOR study.

Objectives: To determine the rate and factors associated with remission (disease activity score (DAS) 28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of <2.6) during a 5-year follow-up after the discontinuation of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods: 75 patients who had been treated with ADA + methotrexate (MTX) and maintained DAS28-ESR <2.6 for at least 6 months were enrolled. Among them, 52 patients discontinued ADA, and 46 patients completed a 5-year follow-up.Results: During the 5 years, 11 patients had DAS28-ESR <2.6. In 15 patients with DAS28-ESR <3.2, no significant changes were found in the health assessment questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) and modified total Sharp score (mTSS). When comparing patients with DAS28-ESR ≤1.61 versus 1.61 2 years). Among 31 patients who experienced flare, ADA was restarted in 24 patients, and 17 patients of these achieved DAS28-ESR <3.2 within 1-year.Conclusion: During the 5-year ADA-free period, remission rate was persistent in 21% of the patients. ADA-free remission was possible especially in patients with deeper remission (DAS28-ESR ≤1.61) and shorter disease duration (≤2 years).

Comparison of efficacy of TNF inhibitors and abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis; Adjusted with propensity score matching.

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcome of patients with rheumatoid arthritis seen in routine clinical practice treated with either TNF inhibitors or abatacept. To overcome potential bias, both propensity score matching and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting were used for patient selection. The propensity score matching procedure selected 315 matched pairs of patients who were treated with TNF inhibitors or abatacept. At week 52, SDAI in TNF inhibitors was lower than abatacept. In contrast, analysis of biologics-naive patients using the propensity-score matching (n = 150; in each group) showed comparable clinical efficacy. Consistent results were obtained by the use of Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (581 patients treated with TNF inhibitors and 353 patients treated with abatacept). The predictors of response to each treatment were different; abatacept appeared to benefit patients with high baseline RF titers while TNF inhibitors appeared to benefit patients with low baseline HAQ-DI.

Comparison of the efficacies of abatacept and tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis by propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical outcomes at 1 year after the treatment with either abatacept or tocilizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in routine clinical practice. METHODS: To overcome potential bias in allocation to treatment with abatacept or tocilizumab, a propensity score based on multiple baseline characteristics variables was calculated and 102 of 194 patients treated with abatacept and 102 of 273 patients treated with tocilizumab were statistically extracted. Clinical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were statistically comparable. At week 52, 72%/69% of patients (abatacept/tocilizumab) were still receiving treatment. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) decreased from 28.7/27.7 at baseline to 14.0/12.5 at week 52 with abatacept/tocilizumab, respectively. At week 52, the remission rates for abatacept/tocilizumab were 18%/20%, respectively. No statistical difference in clinical efficacy between abatacept and tocilizumab was seen. Moreover, a subanalysis showed that abatacept and tocilizumab had similar effectiveness with or without methotrexate. However, prognostic factors at baseline contributing to the Clinical Disease Activity Index at week 52 were different between the two groups by multiple regression analysis. A higher rheumatoid factor (RF) titre and lower SDAI at baseline were associated with lower SDAI at week 52 in patients treated with abatacept, whereas patients receiving tocilizumab with a lower Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and who were biologics-naïve at baseline had a lower SDAI at week 52. CONCLUSIONS: We compared patients treated with abatacept or tocilizumab after statistical adjustment by propensity score matching. Clinical efficacies, including SDAI, were comparable in both treatment groups. However, the predictive factors were different: abatacept appears to benefit patients with higher RF titres, and early induction of tocilizumab is an important factor for good clinical efficacy.

Association of the multi-biomarker disease activity score with joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor treatment in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the association between the multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) score and radiographic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors. METHODS: Change (Δ) in modified total Sharp score (mTSS) over 52 weeks and disease activity scores were examined retrospectively by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in patients (N = 83) with RA initiating TNF-inhibitor treatment. Relative risk (RR) of ΔmTSS >0.5 for low MBDA score and 28-joint count disease activity score (DAS28) categories and associations between ΔmTSS and MBDA score categories conditional on DAS28 categories were assessed. RESULTS: At 52 weeks, 34% of patients had ΔmTSS >0.5 and 12% had ΔmTSS >3. Strongest correlations were observed between ΔmTSS and MBDA score (r = 0.47) or DAS28 (r = 0.42) at Week 24 and for area under the curve at Week 52 (MBDA score: r = 0.44, DAS28: r = 0.41), all p < 0.001. At Week 24, RR of ΔmTSS >0.5 for moderate/high MBDA score (≥30) or DAS28 (>3.2) were 6.6 (p < 0.001) and 2.7 (p = 0.005), respectively. Low DAS28 had greater risk of ΔmTSS >0.5 at 52 weeks when MBDA score was ≥30 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Higher MBDA score or DAS28 at Week 24 was associated with greater radiographic progression over 52 weeks of TNF-inhibitor treatment. MBDA score improved risk discrimination for radiographic progression within DAS28 categories.

Discontinuation of adalimumab after achieving remission in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis: 1-year outcome of the HONOR study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the possibility of discontinuing adalimumab (ADA) for 1 year without flaring (DAS28-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥3.2), and to identify factors enabling established patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to remain ADA-free. METHODS: Of 197 RA patients treated with ADA+methotrexate (MTX), 75 patients who met the ADA-free criteria (steroid-free and sustained DAS28-ESR remission for 6 months with stable MTX doses) were studied for 1 year. RESULTS: The mean disease duration and DAS28-ESR score in 75 patients was 7.5 years and 5.1 at baseline, respectively. The proportion of patients who sustained DAS28-ESR <2.6 (48%) and DAS28-ESR <3.2 (62%) for 1 year were significantly lower in the ADA discontinuation group than in the ADA continuation group; however, in patients with deep remission (DAS28-ESR ≤1.98) identified by receiver operating characteristics analysis following logistic analysis, these rates increased to 68% and 79%, respectively, with no significant difference between both groups. Remarkably, ADA readministration to patients with flare was effective in returning DAS28-ESR to <3.2 within 6 months in 90% and 9 months in 100% patients; among the patients who sustained DAS28-ESR <3.2 during ADA discontinuation, 100% remained in structural remission and 94% in functional remission. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of remaining ADA-free for 1 year was demonstrated in established patients with RA with outcomes that ADA can be discontinued without flaring in 79% patients with deep remission, with similar rates in the ADA continuation group, and showed no functional or structural damage in patients with DAS28-ESR <3.2. ADA readministration to patients with flare during ADA discontinuation was effective.

Study on the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis complicated with AA amyloidosis.

OBJECTIVES: Although treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has progressed by the use of biologics, amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis is still an intractable complication in patients with RA. In the present study, safety and efficacy of 1-year treatment with an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody tocilizumab (TCZ) on RA and AA amyloidosis were estimated. METHODS: TCZ (8 mg/kg every 4 weeks) was administered to five RA patients complicated with AA amyloidosis. The primary end point was improvement in renal dysfunction and the secondary end point was CDAI at 1 year after the treatment. RESULTS: An improvement in the renal dysfunction, including urinary protein secretion, was found, in four patients including two patients who were refractory to etanercept, with a remarkable decrease of SAA concentration, and the progression of organ dysfunction was prevented at 1 year in all patients treated with TCZ. The mean clinical disease activity index decreased from 33.9 to 4.7 (p = 0.012) in five patients treated with TCZ for 1 year. Three non-serious adverse events were observed in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: TCZ ameliorates renal dysfunction in RA patients complicated with AA amyloidosis who are refractory to conventional therapies, thereby suggesting that TCZ has a potential to regulate AA amyloidosis.

Effect of interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, tocilizumab, in preventing joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis showing inadequate response to TNF inhibitors.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effectiveness of tocilizumab (TCZ) in preventing joint destruction in patients with inadequate response to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNF-IR) by assessing X-rays. METHODS: RA patients were extracted from the Retrospective actemra investigation for optimal needs of RA patients (REACTION) study. Parameters and components of disease activity were evaluated during anti-TNF treatment and during TCZ treatment. X-ray images of hands and feet at the beginning of this study during anti-TNF treatment (Pre), at the start point of TCZ treatment (Baseline) and after TCZ treatment (Post) were collected for assessing joint destruction. RESULTS: Forty-five patients from the REACTION study fulfilled the criteria of clinical TNF-IR. During anti-TNF treatment, mean DAS28-ESR rose from 5.35 to 5.87 (mean observation duration, 16 months) but improved significantly to 2.94 (P < 0.0001) at 52 weeks after switching to TCZ. Mean change in van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (TSS) during anti-TNF treatment was 3.17 in this TNF-IR population. After switching to TCZ, mean change in TSS was 1.20 (P < 0.05). Rate of radiographic non-progression improved to 66.7% during TCZ treatment from 40.0% during anti-TNF treatment. The predictive factor for no radiographic progression after switching to TCZ was a HAQ disability index (HAQ-DI) score of ≤ 1.88 at switching to TCZ. CONCLUSION: TCZ was a good treatment option for improving signs and symptoms and inhibiting progression of joint damage in patients with clinical and structural TNF-IR.

Dopamine induces IL-6-dependent IL-17 production via D1-like receptor on CD4 naive T cells and D1-like receptor antagonist SCH-23390 inhibits cartilage destruction in a human rheumatoid arthritis/SCID mouse chimera model.

A major neurotransmitter dopamine transmits signals via five different seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptors termed D1-D5. Several studies have shown that dopamine not only mediates interactions into the nervous system, but can contribute to the modulation of immunity via receptors expressed on immune cells. We have previously shown an autocrine/paracrine release of dopamine by dendritic cells (DCs) during Ag presentation to naive CD4(+) T cells and found efficacious results of a D1-like receptor antagonist SCH-23390 in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis mouse model of multiple sclerosis and in the NOD mouse model of type I diabetes, with inhibition of Th17 response. This study aimed to assess the role of dopaminergic signaling in Th17-mediated immune responses and in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In human naive CD4(+) T cells, dopamine increased IL-6-dependent IL-17 production via D1-like receptors, in response to anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 mAb. Furthermore, dopamine was localized with DCs in the synovial tissue of RA patients and significantly increased in RA synovial fluid. In the RA synovial/SCID mouse chimera model, although a selective D2-like receptor antagonist haloperidol significantly induced accumulation of IL-6(+) and IL-17(+) T cells with exacerbated cartilage destruction, SCH-23390 strongly suppressed these responses. Taken together, these findings indicate that dopamine released by DCs induces IL-6-Th17 axis and causes aggravation of synovial inflammation of RA, which is the first time, to our knowledge, that actual evidence has shown the pathological relevance of dopaminergic signaling with RA.

Generation-Dependent Retention Rates and Reasons for Discontinuation of Molecular Targeted Therapies in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: From FIRST Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The study aimed to optimize medical care for elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by examining the 3-year continuation rate of different molecular targeted therapies across age groups in Japan, which has a significant elderly population. METHODS: The study included patients with RA who started molecular targeted therapies between 2013 and 2019 and divided them into three age groups. The primary outcome was to assess the 3-year continuation rate of each drug and analyze reasons for treatment discontinuation using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: Among 2292 patients analyzed, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors were most commonly used in those younger than 65 years of age (43.5%), while Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors were also utilized (17.1%). In contrast, JAK inhibitors were less frequently used in patients aged 75 years and older (7.8%), with cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin fusion proteins (CTLA4-Ig) being the most common (39.2%). JAK inhibitors and anti-interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) antibodies had higher continuation rates than other drugs in patients under 65 years (p < 0.001). For those aged 65-74 years, JAK inhibitors and CTLA4-Ig had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001), while among those aged 75 years and older, CTLA4-Ig and IL-6R antibodies had higher continuation rates (p < 0.001). Inadequate efficacy was the main reason for discontinuation in all age groups, while infection leading to discontinuation increased with age. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the need to consider different age groups separately in elderly RA care. Among patients aged 75 years and older, abatacept and anti-IL-6R antibodies showed the highest continuation rates, suggesting their potential suitability and efficacy for this specific age cohort.

Efficacy and safety of guselkumab and adalimumab for pustulotic arthro-osteitis and their impact on peripheral blood immunophenotypes.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the treatment effectiveness between guselkumab and adalimumab in patients with pustulotic arthro-osteitis (PAO). In addition, we performed peripheral blood immunophenotyping to elucidate the immunological background and analyzed the impact of therapeutic drugs to verify the validity of immunological phenotypes as therapeutic targets. METHODS: Patients were treated with guselkumab 100 mg (guselkumab group; n = 12) and adalimumab 40 mg (adalimumab group; n = 13). Arthritis disease activity, skin lesion activity, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. The retention rate and adverse events were evaluated. Comprehensive phenotyping of peripheral immune cells was performed in both groups, and phenotypes were compared before and after treatment. RESULTS: At 6 months, both groups showed significant improvement in arthritis disease activity and PROs. In the guselkumab group, skin symptoms significantly improved. The 6-month continuation rates were 91.7% (11/12) and 69.2% (9/13) in the guselkumab and adalimumab groups, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 2/12 and 5/13 patients in the guselkumab (16.7%) and adalimumab (38.5%) groups, respectively. Peripheral blood immunophenotyping showed that the proportion of activated T helper (Th) 1 cells was significantly lower in patients with PAO than in healthy controls and that the proportion of activated Th17 cells was significantly higher in patients with PAO, which significantly decreased after treatment with guselkumab. CONCLUSION: Although guselkumab and adalimumab have comparable efficacy for PAO, their impact on immunophenotypes varies.

Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis exhibits T cell activation and IgG4 immune response in the tissue; comparison with IgG4-related disease.

OBJECTIVE: To study the pathophysiological differences of EGPA and IgG4-related disease (RD) by clarifying their clinical, pathological and immunological features. METHODS: Clinical and pathological findings were compared in patients with EGPA and IgG4-RD. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were used for comprehensive flow cytometric analysis. RESULTS: An elevation of the IgG4 level was found in all EGPA cases, with the accompanying pathological findings of lymphocytic infiltration and fibrosis observed in 30.8% patients, and the elevation of IgG4/IgG ratio in 61.5% patients. However, actual IgG4 levels, as well as the degree of the infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells, were still higher in patients with IgG4-RD than patients with EGPA. Examination by ACR/EULAR classification criteria showed only 13.6% of the EGPA patients met entry criteria, while all of them met the exclusion criteria. In regard to the immunophenotyping, EGPA patients had increases in activated CD4 and CD8 T cells compared with the healthy controls. However, no such similar changes occurred in IgG4-RD patients. On the other hand, both the EGPA and IgG4-RD patient groups had correlated increased plasmablasts and Tfh. These results indicate the presence of two axes: namely, the activation of T cells and that of B cells. Both axes are present in EGPA, but the T cell activation axis was not observed in IgG4-RD. CONCLUSIONS: The elevation of serum IgG4 as well as pathological IgG4 infiltration are not specific. Meanwhile, EGPA and IgG4-RD differ in immunological phenotypes, indicating the possible importance of the predominant activation of T cells in the development of vasculitis.

Safety and effectiveness of mepolizumab therapy in remission induction therapy for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the safety and effectiveness of mepolizumab (MPZ), an anti-interleukin-5 antibody, as remission induction therapy for severe eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). METHODS: The clinical courses of patients with severe EGPA over 6 months were retrospectively investigated and compared between patients treated with high-dose corticosteroid (CS) plus MPZ therapy (MPZ group, n = 7) and those treated with high-dose CS plus intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCY) pulse therapy (IVCY group, n = 13). The primary endpoints were the MPZ retention rate and the IVCY completion rate. The secondary endpoints were adverse events and changes in the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), Vascular Damage Index (VDI), eosinophil counts, and concomitant CS doses, and the extent and rates of these changes were compared between the MPZ and IVCY groups. RESULTS: Regarding the primary endpoints, the MPZ retention rate was 100%, and the IVCY completion rate was 61.5%. Regarding the secondary endpoints, adverse events were detected in 2/7 patients (28.6%) in the MPZ group and 7/13 patients (53.8%) in the IVCY group. BVAS and eosinophil counts significantly decreased in both groups at and after month 1, but there was no significant difference in the magnitude of changes between the two groups. VDI scores did not significantly increase in either group, and the degree of changes did not significantly differ between the two groups. Although concomitant CS doses significantly decreased at and after month 1 in both groups, the rates of decrease in CS doses at and after month 3 were significantly higher in the MPZ group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the use of MPZ as remission induction therapy for severe EGPA might be safe and effective for controlling disease activity and reducing CS doses.

Clinical, radiographic and functional effectiveness of tocilizumab for rheumatoid arthritis patients--REACTION 52-week study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in RA patients in clinical practice. METHODS: We observed 232 consecutive RA patients who began tocilizumab in three rheumatology centres in Japan for 52 weeks. Clinical, radiographic and functional status and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age of the 232 patients was 59.1 years, mean duration of disease was 12.4 years and average DAS using the 28-joint count (DAS-28) was 5.6. Although 62.8% of the patients had been treated previously with anti-TNF biologics, clinical remission at Week 52 was achieved in 43.7%, radiographic non-progression in 62.8% and functional remission in 26.4%. Retention rate at Week 52 was 71.1%, and the same for those with or without previous anti-TNF treatment. Adverse drug reactions leading to tocilizumab discontinuation were observed in 15.5% of patients, the most frequent adverse drug reaction being pneumonia in eight cases. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, DAS-28, HAQ-disability index (HAQ-DI), concomitant MTX and concomitant glucocorticoids (GCs) were predictive variables for clinical remission at Week 52 of tocilizumab treatment. In particular, HAQ-DI was found to be a predictive variable for remission of all three types-clinical, radiographic and functional-at Week 52 of tocilizumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In daily clinical practice, tocilizumab exhibited excellent effectiveness in established RA patients, some of whom had failed to respond to previous anti-TNF treatment. Although further detailed safety findings are required, this study provides valuable real-world findings on the management of RA with tocilizumab.