Impact of Tumor Size on Survival Outcome in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Esophagectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Large tumor size is a prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the effect of tumor size on outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has not been evaluated. This study aimed to assess the influence of tumor size on prognosis of patients undergoing esophagectomy after NAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was made up of 272 patients who underwent esophagectomy after NAC at Kobe University Hospital. We evaluated the pathological tumor size and determined the cutoff level for tumor size using receiver operating characteristics analysis to the survival status. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: The patients were categorized into two groups: patients with tumor sizes ≥ 36 mm and < 36 mm. Deep pathological tumor invasion and worse histological response to NAC were associated with tumor size ≥ 36 mm. In patients with pT0-1, pT2, and pT4 ESCC, no significant differences in overall survival (OS) rates were observed between the two groups. In patients with pT3, OS of the tumor size ≥ 36 mm group was significantly worse than that of the tumor size < 36 mm group (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis in pT3 patients revealed tumor size ≥ 36 mm was an independent risk factor for OS. The 5-year OS rate was 10% in patients with tumor size ≥ 36 mm pT3 ESCC with pathological lymph node metastasis (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size ≥ 36 mm is an independent risk factor for poorer survival in pT3 patients. Furthermore, tumor size ≥ 36 mm with pathological lymph node metastasis in pT3 patients was associated with very poor survival.

The number of resected lymph nodes from the upper mediastinal area predicts long-term outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND: The total number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) is an important determinant of longer survival after esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, the resected LN counts from areas that affect long-term outcomes remain unclear. METHODS: This study included 406 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIEs) at Kobe University Hospital. Resected LN counts were evaluated in the following areas: upper mediastinal (UM), middle mediastinal (MM), lower mediastinal (LM), and abdominal (Abd). Cut-off values for LN counts from each area were determined using receiver operating characteristics analysis of the survival status. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors. RESULTS: The cut-off values for large or small numbers of resected LN counts in the UM, MM, LM, and Abd areas were 4, 8, 5, and 18, respectively, in patients with upper and middle thoracic (Ut/Mt) ESCC and 7, 6, 5, and 24, respectively, in patients with lower thoracic (Lt) ESCC. Multivariate analysis in patients with Ut/Mt ESCC revealed that tumor invasion depth, LN metastasis, and the resected LN count from the UM area were independent risk factors for overall survival [hazard ratio (HR), 7.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.47-11.1; HR, 4.01; 95% CI 1.96-8.21; HR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.24-3.82, respectively]. In patients with Lt ESCC, tumor invasion depth, LN metastasis, and pulmonary complications were independent risk factors for overall survival (HR, 4.23; 95% CI 2.14-8.35; HR, 3.83; 95% CI 1.75-8.38; HR, 2.80; 95% CI 1.38-5.65, respectively). Resected LN counts from no areas were prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: The number of resected LNs from the UM area influenced the survival outcomes of patients with Ut/Mt ESCC after MIE.

Open left diaphragm method enables safe surgery with a good visual field in a laparoscopic transhiatal approach for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma laparoscopic transhiatal reconstruction via an open left diaphragm method.

BACKGROUND: Despite being oncologically acceptable for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with an esophageal invasion length of 3-4 cm, the transhiatal approach has not yet become a standard method given the difficulty of reconstruction in a narrow space and the risk of severe anastomotic leakage. This study aimed to clarify the safety and feasibility of the open left diaphragm method during the transhiatal approach for esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent proximal or total gastrectomy with lower esophagectomy for Siewert type II/III adenocarcinomas with esophageal invasion via the laparoscopic transhiatal approach with or without the open left diaphragm method from April 2013 to December 2021. RESULTS: Overall, 42 and 13 patients did and did not undergo surgery with the open left diaphragm method, respectively. The median operative time was only slightly shorter in the open left diaphragm group than in the non-open left diaphragm group (369 vs. 482 min; P = 0.07). Grade ≥ II postoperative respiratory complications were significantly less common in the open left diaphragm group than in the non-open left diaphragm group (17% vs. 46%, P = 0.03). Neither group had grade ≥ IV anastomotic leakage, and two cases of anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation were drained using the left diaphragmatic release technique. CONCLUSIONS: Transhiatal lower esophagectomy with gastrectomy using the open left diaphragm method is safe, highlighting its advantages for Siewert type II/III esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma with an esophageal invasion length of ≤ 4 cm.

Clinical significance of the maximum standardized uptake value on positron emission tomography to predict treatment response and outcomes in patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSES: The association between the reduction rate of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on positron emission tomography (PET) during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) and the prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent curative surgery after NACRT at Kobe University between 2008 and 2021. The SUVmax reduction rate was calculated from preoperative and postoperative PET scans, and its association with the prognosis was investigated. RESULTS: The cutoff value for SUVmax reduction rate was 61.5%. Twenty patients had an SUVmax reduction rate > 61.5% (SUV responder group) and 38 patients had an SUVmax reduction rate ≤ 61.5% (SUV nonresponder group). Regarding pathological outcomes, the rate of a good histological response was significantly higher in the SUV responder group than in the SUV nonresponder group (80.0% vs. 21.1%, p < 0.001). Both the overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were significantly better in the SUV responder group than in the SUV nonresponder group (OS, p = 0.035; RFS, p = 0.019). In the SUV responder group, only 1 case of recurrence was observed, with a median follow-up period of 56 months. CONCLUSION: The rate of SUVmax reduction during NACRT might predict the long-term prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Efficacy and long-term outcomes of abdominoperineal resection using transperineal total mesorectal excision approach for rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Although abdominoperineal resection (APR) is essential for a certain population of patients with low rectal cancer, it is technically difficult and sometimes contains oncological disadvantages. Thus, the use of the transperineal total mesorectal excision (TpTME) approach might overcome such concerns regarding APR. METHODS: In total, 27 patients who underwent conventional APR (conventional group) and 49 patients who underwent APR using the TpTME approach (TpTME group) for low rectal cancer were included. After propensity score matching, the outcomes of the 25 matched cases were compared between groups. RESULTS: The operative time was significantly shorter in the TpTME group than in the conventional group (452 vs. 565 min, P = 0.039). Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates were also significantly lower in the TpTME group than in the conventional group (25 mL vs. 200 mL, P < 0.001 and 0% vs. 28.0%, P = 0.015, respectively). Although the incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the TpTME group than in the conventional group (24 vs. 36 days, P = 0.001). The 5 year relapse-free survival rates in the TpTME and conventional groups were 62.0% and 57.6%, respectively (P = 0.648). CONCLUSION: APR using the TpTME approach for the treatment of low rectal cancer is feasible and can achieve favorable oncological outcomes.

Effectiveness of long-term tube feeding intervention in preventing skeletal muscle loss after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

PURPOSE: Esophageal cancer is a lethal tumor typically treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery. For patients undergoing esophagectomy, postoperative enteral nutrition is important in preventing complications. Sarcopenia is associated with poor postoperative outcomes in esophageal cancer. In this study, we evaluated the benefits of tube feeding intervention and compared its short- and long-term outcomes in patients who underwent esophagectomy. METHODS: Propensity score matching was performed in 303 patients who underwent esophagectomy at Kobe University Hospital between 2010 and 2020. Patients were divided into feeding and nonfeeding jejunostomy tube groups (n = 70 each). The feeding jejunostomy tube group was further divided into long-term (≥ 60 days) and short-term (< 60 days) subgroups. The groups were then retrospectively compared regarding postoperative albumin levels, body weight, and psoas muscle area and volume. RESULTS: In the long-term feeding jejunostomy tube group, anastomotic leakage (p = 0.013) and left laryngeal nerve palsy (p = 0.004) occurred frequently. There were no significant between-group differences in postoperative albumin levels, body weight, or psoas muscle area. However, significant psoas muscle volume recovery was confirmed in the long-term jejunostomy tube group at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: Tube feeding intervention after minimally invasive esophagectomy may attenuate skeletal muscle mass loss and help prevent sarcopenia.

The totally mechanical Collard technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces anastomotic stricture compared with triangular anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route: a propensity score-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is conventionally performed using the McKeown esophagectomy. However, an optimal anastomotic technique has not yet been established. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of triangular anastomosis (TA) and totally mechanical Collard anastomosis (TMCA) for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis during minimally invasive esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route. METHODS: In this matched- cohort study, 117 patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy between 2019 and 2024 were divided into TA and TMCA groups. The TA technique was performed between September 2019 and December 2021, and the TMCA technique was performed between January 2022 and January 2024. We then compared the surgical outcomes and postoperative complications (pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, anastomotic leakage, and stricture) between the two groups. RESULTS: Propensity score matching revealed that 40 patients were included in both the TA and TMCA groups. The rates of pneumonia, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, and anastomotic leakage were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the rate of anastomotic stricture was lower in the TMCA than in the TA group (2.5% vs. 27.5%, respectively, P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the TA technique, the TMCA technique reduced the rate of anastomotic stricture when performing cervical esophagogastric anastomosis during minimally invasive esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route.

Efficacy and Postoperative Outcomes of Laparoscopic Retrosternal Route Creation for the Gastric Conduit: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Posterior Mediastinal Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Retrosternal reconstruction has lower risks for severe postoperative morbidities, such as gastro-tracheal fistula or esophageal hiatal hernia. We have previously reported the laparoscopic retrosternal route creation (LRRC) method, but its safety and efficacy remain unclear. METHODS: In total, 374 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy in the prone position between 2010 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We performed a propensity score-matched analysis with the simple, nearest-neighbor method and no calipers to compare postoperative outcomes and reconstructed gastric conduit functionality between patients who underwent LRRC and counterparts who underwent posterior mediastinal reconstruction. RESULTS: After matching, 62 patients were included in the laparoscopic retrosternal group (LR group) or posterior mediastinal group (PM group). No significant differences were observed between the groups, apart from the number of robot-assisted surgeries, the extent of lymph node dissection, and the method of cervical anastomosis. There were no significant differences in the incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 complications. Gastro-tracheal fistula (n = 1) and esophageal hiatal hernia (n = 2) occurred in the PM group but not in the LR group. There were no differences in the incidence of pulmonary embolism between the groups (5% vs. 5%). The postoperative anastomotic stenosis rate was similar (16% vs. 27%, p = 0.192). Endoscopic findings of reflux esophagitis (modified Los Angeles classification ≥ M) at 1 year after surgery were significantly better in the LR group (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: LRRC for gastric conduit reconstruction is safe and valuable. It is associated with good reconstructed gastric conduit function.

The Influence of Preoperative Smoking Status on Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Outcome Following Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in Prone Position for Esophageal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma is associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates than other gastrointestinal surgeries. Smoking is an established risk factor for postoperative complications after esophagectomy. This study aimed retrospectively to investigate the impact of smoking status on short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (TEP) for esophageal carcinoma. METHODS: In this study, 234 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent TEP between 2012 and 2020 were divided into two groups based on smoking status (current or non-current smokers and the Brinkman index) by patients' declarations. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥2), overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between smoking statuses. RESULTS: The rates of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the two groups (current smoker vs non-current smoker; Brinkman index ≥800 vs <800). The rate of postoperative pneumonia was higher in the combination group of current and higher Brinkman index (≥800) smokers than in the other group (25.0 % vs 11.8 %; P = 0.036). Multivariate analysis showed that smoking status was an independent risk factor for postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95 % confidence interval, 0.18-0.93; P = 0.037). According to the long-term outcomes, no significant differences in OS and DFS were observed between the smoking statuses. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of current smoking and heavy smoking history is a risk factor for postoperative pneumonia in patients who have esophageal carcinoma treated with TEP, although no correlation was observed between the long-term outcomes and smoking status.

Patients younger than 40 years with colorectal cancer have a similar prognosis to older patients.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, the proportion of patients diagnosed with CRC at younger ages has increased. The clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC remain controversial. We aimed to analyze the clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes in younger patients with CRC. METHODS: We examined 980 patients who underwent surgery for primary colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2006 and 2020. Patients were divided into two cohorts: younger (< 40 years old) and older (≥ 40 years old). RESULTS: Of the 980 patients, 26 (2.7%) were under the age of 40 years. The younger group had more advanced disease (57.7% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.031) and more cases beyond the transverse colon (84.6% vs. 65.3%, p = 0.029) than the older group. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the younger group (50% vs. 25.8%, p < 0.01). Relapse-free survival and overall survival were similar between the groups at all stages. Moreover, in stages II and III they were also comparable, regardless of the administration of adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients with CRC have a prognosis equivalent to that of older patients. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal treatment strategies for these patients.