RESUMO
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of a self-management intervention targeting cognitive dysfunction to improve quality of life and reduce memory-related disability in adults with epilepsy. The intervention incorporates (1) education on cognitive function in epilepsy, (2) self-awareness training, (3) compensatory strategies, and (4) application of these strategies in day-to-day life using problem-solving therapy. In addition to the behavioral modification, formal working memory training was conducted by utilizing a commercially available program in a subgroup of patients. Our findings suggest that a self-management intervention targeting cognitive dysfunction was feasible for delivery to a rural population with epilepsy, with 13 of 16 enrolled participants completing the 8-session program. Qualitative data indicate high satisfaction and subjective improvement in cognitive functioning in day-to-day life. These findings provide support for further evaluation of the efficacy of this intervention through a randomized controlled trial.
Assuntos
Transtornos Cognitivos/reabilitação , Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental/métodos , Epilepsia/reabilitação , Memória de Curto Prazo , Autocuidado/métodos , Telefone , Adulto , Cognição , Transtornos Cognitivos/complicações , Epilepsia/complicações , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Aprendizagem , Masculino , Memória , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação do Paciente , Resolução de Problemas , Qualidade de Vida , População Rural , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Identification of variables prognosticating 30-day readmission among adult patients admitted for video-EEG (VEEG) monitoring at a major epilepsy center. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining 865 consecutive admissions to the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) from January 2010 to June 2013. Data extracted from chart review included demographics, length of stay (LOS), seizure type(s), number of 30-day readmissions or emergency department (ED) visits and reasons for these, and patient and system/provider factors potentially contributing to the readmission. RESULTS: Of 865 elective admissions for VEEG monitoring, 49 patients accounted for 33 readmissions and 40 ED visits within 30 days of discharge for an overall 30-day encounter rate of 7.0% after excluding those lost to follow-up; 9 patients had more than one ED visit or readmission. Statistically significant risk factors for urgent 30-day encounters included a history of nonepileptic seizures (NES) (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-3.4), a dual diagnosis of both epilepsy and NES (OR 5.9, 95% CI 3.0-11.8), an urgent index admission to the EMU (OR 2.5, 95%CI 1.4-4.8), and a shorter LOS of index hospitalization (median 4.0 days vs 5.0 days, p < 0.01). The most common contributing patient factors included active psychiatric symptoms, medically refractory epilepsy, and living alone; the most common hospitalization-related factors included antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment adverse events or AED adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the presence of intractable epilepsy and shorter LOS, mental health comorbidities and the presence of NES were important risk factors for 30-day readmissions and ED visits in the epilepsy population. Therefore, proactively addressing mental health comorbidities may decrease urgent health care utilization after VEEG monitoring.