Predicting outcomes after blunt chest wall trauma: development and external validation of a new prognostic model.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt chest wall trauma accounts for over 15% of all trauma admissions to Emergency Departments worldwide. Reported mortality rates vary between 4 and 60%. Management of this patient group is challenging as a result of the delayed on-set of complications. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prognostic model that can be used to assist in the management of blunt chest wall trauma. METHODS: There were two distinct phases to the overall study; the development and the validation phases. In the first study phase, the prognostic model was developed through the retrospective analysis of all blunt chest wall trauma patients (n = 274) presenting to the Emergency Department of a regional trauma centre in Wales (2009 to 2011). Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the model and identify the significant predictors for the development of complications. The model's accuracy and predictive capabilities were assessed. In the second study phase, external validation of the model was completed in a multi-centre prospective study (n = 237) in 2012. The model's accuracy and predictive capabilities were re-assessed for the validation sample. A risk score was developed for use in the clinical setting. RESULTS: Significant predictors of the development of complications were age, number of rib fractures, chronic lung disease, use of pre-injury anticoagulants and oxygen saturation levels. The final model demonstrated an excellent c-index of 0.96 (95% confidence intervals: 0.93 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: In our two phase study, we have developed and validated a prognostic model that can be used to assist in the management of blunt chest wall trauma patients. The final risk score provides the clinician with the probability of the development of complications for each individual patient.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of somatostatin and its analogues in the treatment of enterocutaneous fistula.

OBJECTIVE: Somatostatin analogues may help pancreatic fistula although it remains unclear whether they help nonpancreatic fistula. This study involved meta-analysis of somatostatin analogues for treatment of enterocutaneous fistula. METHODS: Meta-analysis of studies was undertaken, to estimate the effect of somatostatin analogues on spontaneous closure, time to closure and mortality. RESULTS: Results showed significant associations between somatostatin and both spontaneous closure rate [odds ratio (OR) 6.61, 95% (CI) confidence interval 1.35-32.43] and time to closure (standardized mean difference -0.80, 95% CI: -1.34 to -0.26). Octreotide reduced closure time (standardized mean difference -0.57, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.20) but not spontaneous closure (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 0.64-4.76). Lanreotide also improved time to closure (mean of 17 days vs. 26 days, standard deviation not stated) but not spontaneous closure (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.42-2.12). Somatostatin, octreotide and lanreotide did not significantly affect mortality (OR: 0.30, 0.82, and 0.48; 95% CI: 0.03-3.47, 0.38-1.78, and 0.04-5.07 respectively). CONCLUSION: Somatostatin and octreotide improved fistula closure time but only somatostatin improved spontaneous closure rate.