Editorial Commentary: Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes May Have a Gender Bias.

It is a great challenge to analyze whether sex difference affects outcome of hip arthroscopy, because the indications, risk factors, and comorbidities are difficult to determine and may be heterogeneous between and within studies. For instance, mental health disorders, namely depression, are associated with worse outcomes following hip arthroscopy, and these disorders tend to be more prevalent in a female population. There are also known bony morphologic differences between men and women. Women tend to have a higher rate of borderline hip dysplasia defined by lateral center-edge angle between 18 and 25°. This is notable because long-term (10 year) survivorship of patients with this morphology undergoing hip arthroscopy is notably lower (79-82.2%) compared with patients undergoing hip arthroscopy without BHD (>90%). These gender differences, although notable within specific cohorts, are more difficult to tease out in large systematic reviews with all comers. In addition, many studies do not have longer-term follow-up required to assess conversion to THA. Perhaps hip arthroscopy outcomes are instead directly linked to independent bony morphologic, psychologic, and soft tissue-based risk factors that may have a gender bias.

Calcific Tendinosis Reduces Diagnostic Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection of Rotator Cuff Tears.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of calcific tendinosis on the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Calcific tendinosis was confirmed radiographically. Two musculoskeletal radiologists then retrospectively and independently reviewed the MRI/MRA examinations, with surgery or arthroscopy performed within 90 days of the MRI. Rotator cuffs were categorized as no tear, partial-thickness tear, and full-thickness tear. Partial-thickness tear/full-thickness tear groups were combined for analysis. RESULTS: Forty-eight MRI (mean age, 63.4 years; range, 37-83 years; female-to-male ratio, 29:19) and 7 MRA (mean age, 49.2 years; range, 25-60 years; female-to-male ratio, 4:3) patients were included. Reader 1 and reader 2 sensitivity/specificity values for RCTs on MRI were 95%/50% and 89%/30%, and the values on MRA were 100%/67% and 100%/100%, respectively. Overall agreement was present in 87% (48 of 55; κ = 0.55 [95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.85]). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging has decreased specificity in diagnosing RCTs when calcific tendinosis is present. Magnetic resonance arthrography performed better in this population and could be considered.

Editorial Commentary: Ligamentum Teres Reconstruction May Improve Hip Stability But Has High Revision Rates: Fad or Restoration of Function?

Ligamentum teres (LT) tears are correlated with hip instability, and biomechanical research suggests there is a stabilizing function of the intact native LT. With regard to LT reconstruction, currently, there are imaging studies demonstrating that the ligament goes on to heal and properly function. There are also no long-term clinical studies on the success rates of LT reconstruction. The clinical studies that have been done are done with a fairly high number of concomitant procedures, which makes it difficult to discern whether improvement can be attributed to the LT reconstruction. A recent review shows that after LT reconstruction, these very difficult patients can respond favorably to surgery two-thirds of the time. However, in the remaining one-third of patients, an additional surgery was required. In my own practice, patients with instability patterns on examination who have failed primary arthroscopy and have any degree of even minor bony dysplasia with signs of ligamentous laxity and LT tear are a population that I personally would recommend a periacetabular osteotomy to optimize bony stability. For those not a candidate for periacetabular osteotomy , the patient should be educated on the risks of failure of LT reconstruction and have reasonable expectations, and the operation should be performed by an experienced hip arthroscopist with LT reconstruction experience.

Is Labral Size Predictive of Failure With Repair in Hip Arthroscopy?

PURPOSE: To assess whether labral size is predictive of labral repair failure or shows an association with patient outcomes after hip arthroscopy. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent arthroscopic hip labral repair. Labral size was measured in 4 quadrants with an arthroscopic probe. The average size across torn labral segments was assessed for failure as determined by the change in patient-reported outcomes, the rate at which subjects achieved the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptomatic state, and the need for additional surgery. Outcomes were evaluated for any continuous correlation as well as significant differences between the middle 50% of labral sizes and classes of labral sizes derived from upper and lower quartile and decile ranges. Included hips were those from patients aged between 18 and 55 years with 2-year postoperative follow-up and lateral center-edge angles between 25° and 40°. RESULTS: The study included 571 hips. Labral width did not show a significant difference between hips requiring revision and those not requiring revision (P = .4054). No significant correlation was found between labral width and the change in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (R2 = 0.05780), modified Harris Hip Score (R2 = 0.19826), or Nonarthritic Hip Score (R2 = 0.23543) from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. Hips with labral sizes in the upper decile of our cohort showed significantly decreased improvement in the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 score (P = .0287) and Nonarthritic Hip Score (P = .0490) compared with the middle 50% of labral sizes. No statistically significant difference was found in the rate at which the groups achieved the minimal clinically important difference or patient acceptable symptomatic state. CONCLUSIONS: Hypertrophic labra in the largest 10th percentile showed lower postoperative outcome scores. However, no detectable clinical benefit was found in terms of patient-perceived clinical difference or acceptable symptomatic state. For most patients, labral size does not appear to significantly alter patient outcomes or the need for arthroplasty. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Calcific Tendonitis of the Shoulder: Protector or Predictor of Cuff Pathology? A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation is to assess the incidence of rotator cuff tears in cases of calcific tendonitis and evaluate for differences in the incidences of rotator cuff tears by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between calcific lesions of different morphology, size, or location. METHODS: This single-center study involved a retrospective chart review searching for patients from January 2010 to April 2017 with a diagnosis of calcific tendonitis of the shoulder based on review of all MRI reads done on patients with shoulder pain. Anteroposterior radiographic and MRI studies were reviewed by a musculoskeletal radiologist to assess calcific tendonitis morphology, size, distance from cuff insertion, and any rotator cuff tear. An additional radiologist evaluated calcific tendonitis size, morphology, and location to evaluate the reliability of these variables. RESULTS: In the final cohort of 318 shoulders with calcific tendonitis, the incidence of concomitant rotator cuff tears was 56%. Of all 177 tears, 164 (93%) were partial-thickness and 13 (7%) were complete. Type III calcification morphology (cloudy with soft contour) was most frequently associated with rotator cuff tears and demonstrated an increased odds of tear by a factor of 1.8 (CI95% 1.1-2.9).There was no statistical difference regarding calcification size or location prognosticating rotator cuff tears or tear thickness. Intraclass correlation coefficients for calcification size, morphology, and location were 0.78, 0.30, and 0.50, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of rotator cuff tears in cases of calcific tendonitis in this cohort of patients who underwent MRI is higher than previously reported. Cloudy-appearing calcified lesions showed a significant association with rotator cuff tears with an odds ratio of 1.8. Specific locations or sizes of calcified lesions do not appear to be reliable factors to predict concomitant rotator cuff tears. Interobserver agreement for these radiographic variables ranged from fair to substantial and prompt a cautious interpretation of these results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Retrospective Case Series.

Editorial Commentary: Modified False-Profile View-Two Birds With One Stone?

Pathology in the hip is most commonly described using radiographic parameters. Accurately delineating this pathology is paramount in proper diagnosis and care. The anterior center-edge angle measures the anterior coverage of the acetabulum, which has implications in treating the hip. The modified false-profile view will allow visualization of not only the anterior coverage of the femoral head but also the patient's alpha angle. As such, the modified false-profile view could replace both the standard false-profile view and the 45° Dunn view, essentially reducing by 1 the number of images required to evaluate patients presenting with hip symptoms. A disadvantage is that hip instability may be more difficult to identify radiographically.

Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy: Can Results From Initial Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Predict Future Contralateral Results?

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of correlation of radiographic measurements, degree of correlation of intraoperative pathology, and difference in outcomes between sides of patients requiring staged bilateral hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Two high-volume hip preservation centers retrospectively reviewed hip preservation databases for staged bilateral hip arthroscopies conducted between 2008 and 2015. Patients were separated into those who presented with bilateral hip pain and those that presented with unilateral pain and developed contralateral pain >2 years later. Patients were analyzed for radiographic correlation (alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, magnetic resonance imaging alpha angle, Tönnis grade) and correlation of intraoperative pathology (acetabular labrum articular disruption grade, Outerbridge grade/location, Villar class ligamentum teres tears, labral tear location, symmetry of Seldes tear types, and the differences between operative procedures). Patient-reported outcomes were analyzed (modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool-12, hip outcome score-sport specific subscale, visual analog scale, patient satisfaction). Correlative tests included Pearson and Spearman; univariate and multivariate analysis for differences included χ-square test and Student t tests for ordinal and continuous variables respectively. RESULTS: A total of 133 of 2,705 patients (4.6%) underwent bilateral hip arthroscopy. Radiographic alpha angle, magnetic resonance imaging alpha angle, lateral center edge angle, and anterior center edge angle demonstrated strong correlation (Pearson's coefficients 0.651, 0.648, 0.644, 0.667, respectively, P < .0001). Tönnis grade was weakly correlated (Pearson's coefficient 0.286, P = .001). Intraoperative pathology was moderately correlated (Pearson's coefficients for acetabular Outerbridge location, 0.300, P = .0170; acetabular labrum articular disruption, 0.490, P < .0001; acetabular Outerbridge; 0.530; P < .0001; femoral head Outerbridge, 0.459, P < .0001; Villar class, 0.393, P < .0001; and labral tear location, 0.468, P < .0001). Labral tear Seldes type was compared with Bowker's symmetry test and there was no significant difference between sides. There were no significant differences in surgical interventions performed between sides. Patients with bilateral hip arthroscopies significantly improved in all measured patient-reported outcomes and had a high patient satisfaction after both procedures. Final patient-reported outcomes and change in patient-reported outcomes were not different between procedures; follow up ranged from 3 months to 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated an incidence of 4.6% of patients who require bilateral hip arthroscopy. These patients can expect significant improvement after surgical intervention. Patients that had 1 side done gained similar improvement when the contralateral side was performed. Preoperative radiographic, intraoperative pathology, and procedures performed were similar between hips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Do Larger Acetabular Chondral Defects Portend Inferior Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Acetabular Microfracture? A Matched-Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: To elucidate the effect, if any, of acetabular chondral defect size on surgical outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture was performed with concomitant treatment for labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome. METHODS: The study period was between February 2008 and November 2014. Data were collected on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy. The inclusion criteria were acetabular microfracture; concomitant treatment for labral tears and FAI syndrome; and preoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Nonarthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale. Exclusion criteria were Workers' Compensation, preoperative Tönnis grade >1, or previous ipsilateral hip surgeries or conditions. Patients were grouped based on smaller chondral defects (SCDs) or larger chondral defects (LCDs), then matched 1:1 by age at surgery ±10 years, sex, body mass index ±5, labral treatment, capsular treatment, acetabuloplasty, and femoroplasty. Outcomes, secondary arthroscopies, and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were documented. RESULTS: Of 131 eligible cases, 107 (81.7%) had minimum 2-year follow-up. Before matching, the conversion rate to THA was higher for LCDs (24.6%) than for SCDs (12.0%). Thirty-five patients were matched for each group. Mean follow-up time was 47.9 months (range, 24.0, 84.1) for the matched LCD group and 46.1 months (range, 24.0, 88.1) for the matched SCD group. Ligamentum teres debridement (P = .03) was performed more frequently in the LCD group. No other differences were found regarding demographics, intraoperative findings, procedures, traction time, preoperative scores, or follow-up scores. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in all scores. Rates of revision or conversion to THA were similar between groups. The relative risk for conversion to THA was 2.33 for patients with defects ≥300 mm2 compared with patients with defects ≤250 mm2 (P = .13). Deep vein thrombosis occurred in 3 (5.3%) patients with LCDs. CONCLUSIONS: Matched patients with either SCDs or LCDs undergoing arthroscopic acetabular microfracture with concomitant treatment for labral tears and FAI syndrome demonstrated similar improvements at minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients with chondral defects approaching 300 mm2 or greater may have a higher propensity toward conversion to THA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

Radiographic Risk Factors and Signs of Abductor Tears in the Hip.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify radiographic risk factors (RRFs) and radiographic signs of abductor tendon tears. METHODS: Between April 2008 and October 2015, patients with intraoperative diagnosis of partial- or full-thickness abductor tear noted at the time of open or endoscopic treatment were included in this study. Exclusion criteria included lack of preoperative standard supine pelvic radiograph, lack of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or abductor tear not present at the time of operative intervention. Patients were matched by age ±5 years, gender, and body mass index ±5 with patients with no abductor pathology by clinical exam and MRI. A standardized supine anterior-posterior pelvis radiograph was performed on all patients. The radiographs were evaluated for RRF (pelvic width, body weight moment arm, abductor moment arm, abductor angle, pelvic height) and signs of abductor tendon pathology (greater trochanteric enthesophyte). Femoral version was measured on MRI when images were available. Statistical analysis was performed and included bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: There were 152 patients with abductor tears identified at the time of surgery out of 2,838 eligible patients matched with 125 patients without abductor tendon pathology. The study institution was unable to perform a 1:1 match because of the advanced age of the abductor tendon group, which led to a greater age in the abductor group (n = 58) versus the control group (n = 54; P = .01. In abductor group the average age was 58, and 137 of 152 (90%) patients were female; in the control group the average age was 54, with 111 of 125 (89%) patients being female. Abductor tear patients were treated with surgical repair. The RRFs found with bivariate analysis were an increased pelvic width (14.8 cm for abductor tears vs 14.3 cm for control; P < .001), body weight moment arm (11.1 cm vs 10.9 cm; P < .001), and abductor moment arm (7.8 cm vs 7.6 cm; P < .001); decreased femoral anteversion (7.6° vs 10.6°; P = .045); and enthesophyte presence (41% vs 3%; P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis of all variables showed that teardrop distance and enthesophyte presence were the 2 variables most predictive of abductor tears, and other variables did not significantly increase or decrease the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered. The presence of an enthesophyte on the greater trochanter was notable for an odds ratio of 20.7 of having an abductor tear. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with abductor tears have a wider pelvis, longer abductor moment arm, and longer body weight moment arm and have greater trochanteric enthesophyte as noted on nearly half of patients with an abductor tear. Presence of an enthesophyte was noted to have an odds ratio of 20.7 and a positive predictive value of 94% for having an abductor tendon tear. The 2 variables predictive of abductor tendon tear when controlling for all variables were enthesophyte presence and teardrop distance, with no other variables significantly increasing or decreasing the likelihood of tear when these 2 variables were considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Excision of Labral Amorphous Calcification as a Part of Hip Arthroscopy-Clinical Outcomes in a Matched-Controlled Study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes, demographics, and radiographic findings for patients whose hip arthroscopies involved amorphous calcification (AC) excision and to compare them with a control group with no AC and with the general population regarding diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism. METHODS: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy involving surgical excision of AC deposit in the anterosuperior labralcapsular recess between October 2008 and July 2014 were reviewed. Demographics, radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, and procedures were reviewed. Minimum follow-up was 2 years and included visual analog scale for pain, patient satisfaction, and the following patient-reported outcome scores: modified Harris hip score, hip outcomes score sport-specific subscale, and nonarthritic hip score. These patients were matched (1:2 ratio) to patients who underwent hip arthroscopy with no AC using the following matching criteria: age at surgery ± 5 years, body mass index ± 5, gender, type of labral treatment, and type of capsular treatment. RESULTS: We reviewed 12 cases in 11 female patients. Mean latest follow-up scores improved from 64.0 to 83.4 (P = .003) for modified Harris hip score, from 57.6 to 80.6 (P < .001) for nonarthritic hip score, from 35.4 to 62.7 (P = .021) for hip outcomes score sport-specific subscale, and from 6.4 to 2.8 (P = .016) for visual analog scale. The survivorship rate was 91.7%, with one hip converting to total hip arthroplasty. Mean patient satisfaction was 8.4 ± 2.3. Six hips of the 12 (50%) had clock face localization of the AC. They were all between 11 and 12 with a mean of 12:30. Postoperative radiographic findings showed no subsequent AC in all 12 hips. No complications or revisions were reported. There were no significant differences between the AC group and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of AC as part of hip arthroscopy for labral tear and femoro-acetabular impingement is safe and has favorable and similar outcomes compared with a control group at minimum 2-year follow-up. Female gender may be a risk factor for the development of AC. There is no strong evidence that AC should be debrided. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case control study.

The Correlation Between Arthroscopically Defined Acetabular Cartilage Defects and a Proposed Preoperative Delayed Gadolinium-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Index in Hips of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC) index designed to predict focal acetabular articular cartilage damage in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). METHODS: The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent dGEMRIC and hip arthroscopy between April 2010 and August 2015 for FAI syndrome. The exclusion criteria were previous hip conditions, a Tönnis grade greater than 1, and a delay between magnetic resonance imaging and surgery greater than 180 days. The cutoff value for full-thickness chondral damage was set to 350 milliseconds. The coronal anterolateral (CAL) index was designed to evaluate focal articular anterolateral chondral defects. We calculated the binary classification test of the CAL index for full-thickness chondral damage, with arthroscopy as the gold standard. We calculated the correlation between the CAL index and the arthroscopically defined acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) and Outerbridge grades and tested for differences between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage. We repeated this analysis on the sagittal superior index, a combination of the sagittal anterior and posterior indices. RESULTS: A total of 195 hips (183 patients) were reviewed. The CAL index showed a sensitivity of 55% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32%-76%), specificity of 81% (95% CI, 74%-86%), positive predictive value of 27% (95% CI, 18%-37%), and negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI, 90%-96%). The CAL index showed a significant difference between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage per both ALAD and Outerbridge groups (P < .0001). The CAL index was moderately inversely correlated with ALAD and Outerbridge grades (ρ = -0.403, P < .0001). The sagittal superior index was not significantly different between the groups and showed a weak correlation with focal defects. CONCLUSIONS: The CAL index may play a role in ruling out full-thickness articular cartilage defects in patients with FAI syndrome. In addition, it may help in differentiating between no or mild focal chondral damage and moderate or severe focal chondral damage. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Clinical Outcomes and Return to Sport in Competitive Athletes Undergoing Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening Compared With a Matched Control Group Without Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening.

PURPOSE: To compare the minimum 2-year outcomes and return to sports in competitive athletes after arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IFL) and treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) to competitive athletes treated for FAI who did not undergo IFL. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed between November 2009 and April 2014. Included patients were high school, collegiate, or professional athletes who underwent arthroscopic IFL, treatment for FAI, and preoperative modified Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Athletic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, and visual analog scale. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 16 years, Tönnis grade >1, microfracture, abductor pathology, and previous hip conditions. A subgroup of athletes were matched to athletes who did not undergo IFL by age ± 5 years, sex, and body mass index ± 5. RESULTS: There were 75 athletes eligible for inclusion, 60 (80.0%) of whom had minimum 2-year follow-up. All patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores demonstrated significant improvements at latest follow-up (P < .001). Mean satisfaction was 7.9. No patients converted to arthroplasty. Painful snapping was resolved in 55 athletes (91.7%). Nine athletes (15.0%) had nonpainful snapping at follow-up. Thirty-nine (65%) returned to their sport. Forty (66.7%) maintained or improved their competitive abilities. There was one case (1.6%) of temporary postoperative numbness. There were no complaints of weakness in hip flexion. Forty-one IFL athletes were matched to 41 controls. No differences were detected in demographics, follow-up time, intraoperative findings, procedures, mean magnitudes of improvement, or return to sports. CONCLUSIONS: In competitive athletes, IFL during hip arthroscopy is safe and demonstrates favorable improvements in PROs and VAS, high satisfaction, and high rate of symptom resolution at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Most patients were able to return to sports and maintain or improve their competitive levels. These results were similar to a control group of athletes not requiring IFL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Endoscopic Repair of Partial-Thickness Undersurface Tears of the Abductor Tendon: Clinical Outcomes With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To report the minimum 2-year outcomes of transtendinous repair of partial-thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon using patient-reported outcomes (PROs), visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and patient satisfaction scores. METHODS: All patients who underwent endoscopic transtendinous gluteus medius repair between October 2009 and May 2013 at 1 institution were prospectively evaluated. The exclusion criteria consisted of less than 2 years' follow-up, previous hip surgery, inflammatory arthritis, open surgery, full-thickness abductor tear, and Workers' Compensation patients. All patients underwent a documented preoperative physical examination with strength testing (scale of 0-5) and observation of their gait. Patient satisfaction and PRO scores were recorded preoperatively; at 3 months postoperatively; and at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years after surgery. The PRO scores collected were the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale, Non-arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score. Preoperative strength and gait were compared with latest follow-up. RESULTS: There were 25 patients who fit our criteria. Significant improvement in PRO scores were shown for the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living Subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific Subscale, Non-arthritis Hip Score, and VAS score from 54.9 to 76.2, from 50.2 to 80.6, from 30.1 to 67.3, from 51.9 to 82.4, and from 7.1 to 2.7, respectively (P < .001). Before surgery, 11 patients had objective weakness; 7 of these patients moved up at least 1 strength grade by final follow-up. Preoperatively, 14 patients had a Trendelenburg gait; 12 of them had a normal gait at latest follow-up (P < .001). The average patient satisfaction rating was 7.5. There were no revision surgical procedures, and no complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Partial-thickness undersurface tears of the abductor can be treated successfully with endoscopic transtendinous repair preserving the intact attachment of the superficial fibers of the gluteus medius. We recommend this treatment for partial undersurface tears recalcitrant to nonoperative treatment because patients showed clinical benefit at greater than 2 years' follow-up that exceeded substantial clinical benefit and the minimal clinically important difference. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Arthroscopic Treatment of Iliopsoas Snapping in Patients With Radiographic Acetabular Dysplasia Using Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening and Capsular Plication.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the greater than 2-year patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient satisfaction of patients who were treated with hip arthroscopy for snapping iliopsoas tendons that were painful with concomitant acetabular dysplasia and who underwent iliopsoas lengthening for symptomatic iliopsoas tendon snapping with concomitant capsular plication and treatment of hip impingement. Secondary measures included observation of the change in the Tönnis grade at greater than 2 years' follow-up. METHODS: Between July 2009 and December 2011, data on patients with a lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of less than 25° (range, 19°-24°) who underwent hip arthroscopy with central-compartment iliopsoas fractional lengthening and capsular plication were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Interportal capsular repair was performed using between 2 and 5 simple sutures. Patients also underwent procedures to treat hip impingement pathology. All patients had preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative PRO measures: modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific subscale, and Non-arthritic Hip Score. The visual analog scale score and patient satisfaction with surgery (from 0 to 10) were also collected. Radiographs were analyzed preoperatively and at latest follow-up to assess progression of the Tönnis grade. RESULTS: We analyzed 32 patients who met the inclusion criteria (30 female and 2 male patients; mean age, 25 years). The mean LCEA and anterior center-edge angle were 21.6° and 25.5°, respectively. Four patients required revision arthroscopy for labral retears. Among the 28 patients who did not undergo revision surgery, the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living subscale, Hip Outcome Score-Sports-Specific subscale, and Non-arthritic Hip Score improved from 68.7 to 83.5, from 64.9 to 86.6, from 71.6 to 86.7, and from 52.6 to 75.8, respectively (P < .001). The visual analog scale score improved from 5.6 preoperatively to 1.9 at latest follow-up (P < .001). The mean patient satisfaction rating was 8.0. There was no radiographic progression of the Tönnis grade at final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that patients with an LCEA of less than 25° and associated painful iliopsoas snapping can be treated by addressing concomitant pathology and performing central-compartment fractional lengthening of the iliopsoas tendon with concomitant capsular plication and have high satisfaction, improvement in PROs, and improved pain scores, without significant progression of osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Does Bony Regrowth Occur After Arthroscopic Femoroplasty in a Group of Young Adolescents?

PURPOSE: To evaluate femoral head-neck bone regrowth and PROs in skeletally immature patients that underwent arthroscopic femoroplasties over a minimum 2-year period. METHODS: Eleven skeletally immature hips (10 patients) with open femoral head physes underwent femoroplasty between October 2008 and November 2013. Inclusion criteria were minimum 2-year follow-up with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and radiographs preoperatively, at 2 weeks, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Exclusion criteria were >16 years of age, preoperative Tönnis grade >1 and previous hip conditions. Preoperative radiographs were used to assess skeletal immaturity, which was indicated by a Risser score ≤4 and femoral head physis >1 mm. Alpha angles were measured preoperatively, at 2 weeks, and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. PROs, including the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS) score, were measured preoperatively and at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age at surgery was 14.7 years (range: 13.2-15.9). Mean follow-up was 35.7 months (range: 23.3-61.4). All hips tested positive for anterior impingement preoperatively. The mean preoperative alpha angle was 61.8°, which decreased to 41.5° postoperatively (P < .0001) and was 40.7° at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. No bony regrowth was documented at the latest follow-up. Mean improvements in scores were as follows: mHHS = 58.5 to 79.8 (P < .0001), NAHS = 56.8 to 87.1 (P = .008), HOS-SSS = 34.3 to 78.3 (P = .004), and VAS score = 7.5 to 1.3 (P < .0001). Mean patient satisfaction was 8.7 ± 1.7. One hip (9.0%) required revision arthroscopy at 31.1 months. No postoperative complications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Bony regrowth of the femoral head-neck region did not occur in this study of skeletally immature females who underwent arthroscopic femoroplasty. In this group of patients, hip arthroscopic treatment of FAI and labral tears is a safe and favorable intervention because of its high patient satisfaction and outcome scores and absence of postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prognostic study.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Competitive Athletes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the minimum 2-year postoperative clinical outcomes and the rate of return to sports in athletes who underwent capsular plication for the treatment of ligamentous laxity and/or borderline dysplasia during hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and labral pathology. METHODS: Since 2008, data were prospectively collected on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement and/or labral tears. Inclusion criteria were as follows: athlete at the high school, collegiate, or professional levels preoperatively, underwent capsular plication, and preoperatively recorded patient-reported outcome scores including modified Harris hip score (mHHS), nonarthritic athletic hip score (NAHS), hip outcome score-sports-specific subscale (HOS-SSS), and visual analog scale (VAS). Exclusion criteria were as follows: <16 years old, preoperative Tönnis grade >1, and previous hip conditions. Sports activity and competitive levels were collected at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Fifty-one hips (49 patients) met the inclusion criteria, and 41 hips (39 patients) had minimum 2-year follow-up (80.4% follow-up). Mean mHHS increased from 67.1 preoperatively to 83.5 (P < .0001). Mean NAHS increased from 66.8 to 88.8 (P < .0001). Mean HOS-SSS improved from 46.8 to 80.1 (P < .0001). Mean VAS decreased from 5.1 to 1.7 (P < .0001). Thirty-five (85.4%) hip arthroscopies allowed the patients to return to sports at follow-up. Thirty-four (82.9%) hip arthroscopies allowed the patients to maintain their competitive physical abilities at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcomes and VAS in athletes significantly improved at a minimum of 2 years after capsular plication as a part of hip arthroscopy addressing varying pathologies. In addition, most patients returned to sports at similar or higher competitive levels. These results suggest that capsular plication is a favorable treatment option in athletes with ligamentous laxity and/or borderline dysplasia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Visibility of Anterolateral Ligament Tears in Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Deficient Knees With Standard 1.5-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

PURPOSE: To attempt to visualize the ligament with standard 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-torn knee, and if it is visible, attempt to characterize it as torn or intact at its femoral, meniscal, and tibial attachment sites. METHODS: This was a retrospective MRI study based on arthroscopic findings of a known ACL tear in 72 patients between the years 2006 and 2010. Patients all had hamstring ACL reconstructions, no concomitant lateral collateral ligament, or posterolateral corner injury based on imaging and physical examination, and had a preoperative 1.5-tesla MRI scan with standard sequences performed within 3 weeks of the injury. Two fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologists retrospectively reviewed the preoperative MRI for visualization of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) for concomitant tears. Inter- and intraobserver reliability was calculated. Learning effect was analyzed to determine if radiologists' agreement improved as reads progressed. RESULTS: Both radiologists were able to visualize the ALL in 100% of the scans. Overall, ALL tears were noted in 26% by radiologist 1 and in 62% by radiologist 2. The agreement between the ligament being torn or not had a kappa of 0.54 between radiologists. The agreements in torn or not torn between radiologists in the femoral, meniscal, and tibial sites were 0.14, 0.15, and 0.31. The intraobserver reliability by radiologist 1 for femoral, meniscal, and tibial tears was 0.04, 0.57, and 0.54 respectively. For radiologist 2, they were 0.75, 0.61, and 0.55. There was no learning effect noted. CONCLUSIONS: ALL tears are currently unable to be reliably identified as torn or intact on standard 1.5-tesla MRI sequences. Proper imaging sequences are of crucial importance to reliably follow these tears to determine their clinical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series study.

Reconstruction of the proximal humerus for bone neoplasm using an anatomic prosthesis-bone graft composite.

This study assesses function after limb sparing bone tumour resections of the proximal humerus. Twenty-seven patients had an intraarticular resection with reconstruction using an anatomic prosthesis-bone graft composite with average clinical follow-up of 63 years (range: 13-15.8 years). Pain relief was achieved for 22 shoulders (81%); 19 of 25 patients responding (76%) were satisfied. Active elevation averaged 62 degrees, external rotation 25 degrees, and internal rotation to L-4. Complications included instability in 7, nonunion in 4, implant loosening in 3 of these and tumour recurrence in 1. There were 7 reoperations. Using the Neer rating, 19 primary operations (70%) were successful. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score averaged 18.5 (62%), the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons functional score 18.4 (37%) with a total score of 51 (51%), and on the Simple Shoulder Test 5.4 of 12 questions were answered affirmatively. This procedure is oncologically safe. There are structural complications, notably shoulder instability. Function ratings are one-third to one-half normal.

Outcomes of Open and Endoscopic Repairs of Chronic Partial- and Full-Thickness Proximal Hamstring Tendon Tears: A Multicenter Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: The preponderance of literature on the repair of proximal hamstring tendon tears focuses on the acute phase (<4 weeks). As such, there is a paucity of data reporting on the outcomes of chronic proximal hamstring tears. PURPOSE: To report minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction from patients who underwent open or endoscopic repair of partial- and full-thickness chronic proximal hamstring tendon tears. STUDY DESIGN: Case series study; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Between April 2002 and May 2017, prospectively collected data from 3 tertiary care institutions were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent open and endoscopic repair of partial- and full-thickness chronic proximal hamstring tendon tears. Patients were included only if they had a chronic proximal hamstring tear (defined as ≥4 weeks from symptom onset to surgery). Patients were excluded if they had a tear treated <4 weeks after injury, underwent hamstring reconstruction, or claimed workers' compensation. Patients who reported minimum 2-year follow-up for VAS, patient satisfaction, and the following PROs had their outcomes analyzed: the modified Hip Harris Score, Non-arthritic Hip Score, iHOT-12 (International Hip Outcome Tool), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale. RESULTS: Fifty patients (34 females and 16 males) were included in this study. There were 19 endoscopic repairs and 31 open repairs. Within the cohort, 52.0% had a full-thickness tendon tear on magnetic resonance imaging, and 48.0% had a partial tear. Average follow-up time was 58.07 ± 37.27 months (mean ± SD; range, 24-220 months). The mean age and body mass index of the group were 46.13 ± 13 years and 25.43 ± 5.14. The average time from injury to surgery was 66.73 weeks (range, 5.14-215.14 weeks). Average postoperative PROs were as follows: modified Hip Harris Score, 91.94 ± 9.96; Non-arthritic Hip Score, 91.33 ± 9.99; iHOT-12, 87.17 ± 17.54; Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale, 87.15 ± 18.10; and VAS, 1.16 ± 1.92. Patient satisfaction was 8.22 ± 1.20. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent open and endoscopic repairs for chronic partial- and full-thickness proximal hamstring tendon tears reported high PROs and satisfaction at a minimum 2-year follow-up with low rates of complications.

Risk of Conversion to Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy: Validation of a Published Risk Score Using an Independent, Prospectively Collected Database.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy is rapidly advancing and increasingly commonly performed. The most common surgery after arthroscopy is total hip arthroplasty (THA), which unfortunately occurs within 2 years of arthroscopy in up to 10% of patients. Predictive models for conversion to THA, such as that proposed by Redmond et al, have potentially substantial value in perioperative counseling and decreasing early arthroscopy failures; however, these models need to be externally validated to demonstrate broad applicability. PURPOSE: To utilize an independent, prospectively collected database to externally validate a previously published risk calculator by determining its accuracy in predicting conversion of hip arthroscopy to THA at a minimum 2-year follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: Hip arthroscopies performed at a single center between November 2015 and March 2017 were reviewed. Patients were assessed pre- and intraoperatively for components of the THA risk score studied-namely, age, modified Harris Hip Score, lateral center-edge angle, revision procedure, femoral version, and femoral and acetabular Outerbridge scores-and followed for a minimum of 2 years. Conversion to THA was determined along with the risk score's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Brier score calibration characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients (43 men, 144 women, mean age, 36.0 ± 12.4 years) underwent hip arthroscopy and were followed for a mean of 2.9 ± 0.85 years (range, 2.0-5.5 years), with 13 patients (7%) converting to THA at a mean of 1.6 ± 0.9 years. Patients who converted to THA had a mean predicted arthroplasty risk of 22.6% ± 12.0%, compared with patients who remained arthroplasty-free with a predicted risk of 4.6% ± 5.3% (P < .01). The Brier score for the calculator was 0.04 (P = .53), which was not statistically different from ideal calibration, and the calculator demonstrated a satisfactory area under the curve of 0.894 (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This external validation study supported our hypothesis in that the THA risk score described by Redmond et al was found to accurately predict which patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were at risk for converting to subsequent arthroplasty, with satisfactory discriminatory, ROC curve, and Brier score calibration characteristics. These findings are important in that they provide surgeons with validated tools to identify the patients at greatest risk for failure after hip arthroscopy and assist in perioperative counseling and decision making.