Efficacy and safety of two treatment algorithms in bipolar depression consisting of a combination of lithium, lamotrigine or placebo and paroxetine.

OBJECTIVE: In a previous paper, we reported about the efficacy of the addition of lamotrigine to lithium in patients with bipolar depression. In the second phase of this study paroxetine was added to ongoing treatment in non-responders. METHOD: Bipolar depressed patients (n = 124) treated with lithium were randomized to addition of lamotrigine or placebo. In non-responders after 8 weeks, paroxetine 20 mg was added for another 8 weeks to ongoing treatment. RESULTS: After 8 weeks the improvement in patients treated with lamotrigine vs. patients treated with placebo was significant. After addition of paroxetine this difference disappeared as a result of greater further improvement in the non-responders to placebo. CONCLUSION: Addition of lamotrigine to lithium was found effective in bipolar depressed patients. Further addition of paroxetine in non-responders to lithium plus lamotrigine did not appear to provide additional benefit, while it appeared to do so in non-responders to lithium plus placebo.

Renal concentrating ability and glomerular filtration rate in lithium-treated patients.

BACKGROUND: Lithium is the most effective drug for mood stabilization in bipolar disorder. However, lithium exposure has been associated with an impaired renal concentrating ability (RCA) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We examined RCA and estimated GFR in a cohort of patients treated with lithium. METHODS: 134 patients (≥ 18 years of age) with a mood disorder treated with lithium were screened; 100 patients were included. Demographic and clinical characteristics and blood and urine samples were collected. Additionally, a dDAVP-test was performed to determine maximal RCA. RESULTS: A dDAVP-test was performed in 98 patients (37 males, 61 females). Mean age was 51 years (SD: 12), median duration of lithium therapy 7 years (IQR: 4-15), mean maximal urine osmolality (Uosmol) 725 mOsmol/kg (SD: 153), and median eGFR 84 ml/min/1.73 m2 (IQR: 68-95). Fifty patients (51%) had an impaired RCA and 17 patients (17%) had nephrogenic diabetes insipidus (Uosmol 600-800 and < 600 mOsmol/kg, respectively). Notably, clinical symptoms did not predict an impaired RCA. Nineteen patients (19%) had an eGFR ≤ 60 ml/min/ 1.73 m2. Multivariable regression analysis showed a significant association between the duration of lithium treatment and maximal Uosmol (B = -6.1, 95%-CI: -9.4, -2.9, p < 0.001) and eGFR (B = -0.6, 95%-CI: 0.2, -3.3; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: RCA is impaired in the majority of lithium-treated patients. Both RCA and eGFR are inversely associated with the duration of lithium therapy. Prospective follow-up will enable us to evaluate if abnormalities in RCA can be used to predict the development of lithium-induced chronic kidney disease.