Comprehensive small RNA-sequencing of primary myeloma cells identifies miR-105-5p as a predictor of patient survival.

BACKGROUND: Small RNAs (sRNAs), a heterogenous group of non-coding RNAs, are emerging as promising molecules for cancer patient risk stratification and as players in tumour pathogenesis. Here, we have studied microRNAs (miRNAs) and other sRNAs in relation to survival and disease severity in multiple myeloma. METHODS: We comprehensively characterised sRNA expression in multiple myeloma patients by performing sRNA-sequencing on myeloma cells isolated from bone marrow aspirates of 86 myeloma patients. The sRNA expression profiles were correlated with the patients' clinical data to investigate associations with survival and disease subgroups, by using cox proportional hazards (coxph) -models and limma-voom, respectively. A publicly available sRNA dataset was used as external validation (n = 151). RESULTS: We show that multiple miRNAs are differentially expressed between ISS Stage I and III. Interestingly, we observed the downregulation of seven different U2 spliceosomal RNAs, a type of small nuclear RNAs in severe disease stages. Further, by a discovery-based approach, we identified miRNA miR-105-5p as a predictor of poor overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma. Multivariate analysis showed that miR-105-5p predict OS independently of established disease markers. CONCLUSIONS: Overexpression of miR-105-5p in myeloma cells correlates with reduced OS, potentially improving prognostic risk stratification in multiple myeloma.

A young man with acute abdomen and anaemia. / En ung mann med akutte magesmerter og anemi.

A young man was hospitalised with acute abdomen and signs of pancreatitis. He became seriously ill and required surgery to address the underlying cause.

Cold agglutinin disease revisited: a multinational, observational study of 232 patients.

We retrospectively studied 232 patients with cold agglutinin disease (CAD) at 24 centers in 5 countries. In Norway and a northern region of Italy, the study was close to being population-based. For the first time, we demonstrate fourfold differences between cold and warmer climates regarding prevalence (20 vs 5 cases/million) and incidence (1.9 vs 0.48 cases/million per year). Mean baseline hemoglobin level was 9.3 g/dL, but 27% had hemoglobin <8 g/dL. Identification of typical features of CAD-associated lymphoproliferative disorder in the bone marrow was greatly increased by centralized biopsy assessment. CAD seems to be associated with a slightly increased risk of venous thrombosis. This work includes a follow-up study of therapies, focusing on the long-term outcomes of the rituximab plus bendamustine and rituximab plus fludarabine regimens. Rituximab plus bendamustine therapy resulted in responses in 35 (78%) of 45 patients; 24 (53%) achieved complete response. Interestingly, these rates were still higher than observed in the original (2017) prospective trial, and we also found a shift toward deeper responses with time. This is explained by the prolonged time to response seen in many patients, probably related to long-lived plasma cells. In patients responding to rituximab-bendamustine, median response duration was not reached after 88 months, and estimated 5-year sustained remission was 77%. The regimen appeared safe regarding late-occurring malignancies. Rituximab plus fludarabine therapy seems to carry a higher risk of long-term adverse effects.

Longitudinal minimal residual disease assessment in multiple myeloma patients in complete remission - results from the NMSG flow-MRD substudy within the EMN02/HO95 MM trial.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma remains an incurable disease with multiple relapses due to residual myeloma cells in the bone marrow of patients after therapy. Presence of small number of cancer cells in the body after cancer treatment, called minimal residual disease, has been shown to be prognostic for progression-free and overall survival. However, for multiple myeloma, it is unclear whether patients attaining minimal residual disease negativity may be candidates for treatment discontinuation. We investigated, if longitudinal flow cytometry-based monitoring of minimal residual disease (flow-MRD) may predict disease progression earlier and with higher sensitivity compared to biochemical assessments. METHODS: Patients from the Nordic countries with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma enrolled in the European-Myeloma-Network-02/Hovon-95 (EMN02/HO95) trial and undergoing bone marrow aspiration confirmation of complete response, were eligible for this Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG) substudy. Longitdudinal flow-MRD assessment of bone marrow samples was performed to identify and enumerate residual malignant plasma cells until observed clinical progression. RESULTS: Minimal residual disease dynamics were compared to biochemically assessed changes in serum free light chain and M-component. Among 20 patients, reaching complete response or stringent complete response during the observation period, and with ≥3 sequential flow-MRD assessments analysed over time, increasing levels of minimal residual disease in the bone marrow were observed in six cases, preceding biochemically assessed disease and clinical progression by 5.5 months and 12.6 months (mean values), respectively. Mean malignant plasma cells doubling time for the six patients was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.4-2.3 months). Minimal malignant plasma cells detection limit was 4 × 10-5. CONCLUSIONS: Flow-MRD is a sensitive method for longitudinal monitoring of minimal residual disease dynamics in multiple myeloma patients in complete response. Increasing minimal residual disease levels precedes biochemically assessed changes and is an early indicator of subsequent clinical progression. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01208766.

A prospective study of Skeletal survey versus Low-dose whole-body CT for Osteolytic lesions in Multiple Myeloma.

Whole-body low-dose CT (WBLDCT) is recommended over classical skeletal surveys (CSS) for investigating bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) based on retrospective studies. No prospective studies with serial follow-up scans exist. OBJECTIVE: To compare WBLDCT to CSS for identifying progressive bone disease in MM in a prospective setting. METHODS: Ninety-six patients with MM at Odense University Hospital and Stavanger Hospital were followed for up to four years. Patients were scanned with WBLDCT and CSS every year for the first two years and every six months thereafter or at suspicion of progression. RESULTS: Nineteen cases of progressive bone disease were found using WBLDCT vs eight cases using CSS (p < 0.001). All cases of progressive bone disease using CSS were also identified by WBLDCT. Progression not found by CSS was primarily in the spine, sternum, and pelvis. Of the 19 cases, five patients had progressive bone disease only without other criteria for clinical progression. WBLDCT consistently identified more bone lesions per patient, 8.2 CI(6.8;9.6) vs CSS, 3.6 CI(2.7;4.5). CONCLUSION: WBLDCT outperformed CSS for finding progressive bone disease and osteolytic lesions. More new lesions were found during follow-up by WBLDCT than CSS. Using CSS for lytic lesions will underestimate progression rates. Our data offer prospective evidence for the current recommendation using WBLDCT for skeletal evaluations in patients with multiple myeloma.

Health-related quality of life in transplant ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with either thalidomide or lenalidomide-based regimen until progression: a prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study.

Data on the impact of long term treatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiD) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is limited. The HOVON-87/NMSG18 study was a randomized, phase 3 study in newly diagnosed transplant ineligible patients with multiple myeloma, comparing melphalan-prednisolone in combination with thalidomide or lenalidomide, followed by maintenance therapy until progression (MPT-T or MPR-R). The EORTC QLQ-C30 and MY20 questionnaires were completed at baseline, after three and nine induction cycles and six and 12 months of maintenance therapy. Linear mixed models and minimal important differences were used for evaluation. 596 patients participated in HRQoL reporting. Patients reported clinically relevant improvement in global quality of life (QoL), future perspective and role and emotional functioning, and less fatigue and pain in both arms. The latter being of large effect size. In general, improvement occurred after 6-12 months of maintenance only and was independent of the World Health Organisation performance at baseline. Patients treated with MPR-R reported clinically relevant worsening of diarrhea, and patients treated with MPT-T reported a higher incidence of neuropathy. Patients who remained on lenalidomide maintenance therapy for at least three months reported clinically meaningful improvement in global QoL and role functioning at six months, remaining stable thereafter. There were no clinically meaningful deteriorations, but patients on thalidomide reported clinically relevant worsening in neuropathy. In general, HRQoL improves both during induction and maintenance therapy with immunomodulatory drugs. The side effect profile of treatment did not negatively affect global QoL, but it was, however, clinically relevant for the patients. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NTR1630).

Bendamustine plus rituximab for chronic cold agglutinin disease: results of a Nordic prospective multicenter trial.

Primary chronic cold agglutinin disease (CAD) is a well-defined clinicopathologic entity in which a bone marrow clonal B-cell lymphoproliferation results in autoimmune hemolytic anemia and cold-induced circulatory symptoms. Rituximab monotherapy and fludarabine-rituximab in combination are documented treatment options. In a prospective, nonrandomized multicenter trial, 45 eligible patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 day 1 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 for 4 cycles at a 28-day interval. Thirty-two patients (71%) responded; 18 (40%) achieved complete response (CR) and 14 (31%) partial response (PR). Among 14 patients previously treated with rituximab or fludarabine-rituximab, 7 (50%) responded to bendamustine-rituximab (3 CR and 4 PR). Hemoglobin levels increased by a median of 4.4 g/dL in the complete responders, 3.9 g/dL in those achieving PR, and 3.7 g/dL in the whole cohort. The 10th percentile of response duration was not reached after 32 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia occurred in 15 patients (33%), but only 5 (11%) experienced infection with or without neutropenia. Thirteen patients (29%) had their dose of bendamustine reduced. In conclusion, bendamustine-rituximab combination therapy is highly efficient, sufficiently safe, and may be considered in first line for patients with CAD requiring therapy. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02689986.

Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide versus melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide in untreated multiple myeloma.

The combination of melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT) is considered standard therapy for newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation. Long-term treatment with thalidomide is hampered by neurotoxicity. Melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide, followed by lenalidomide maintenance therapy, showed promising results without severe neuropathy emerging. We randomly assigned 668 patients between nine 4-week cycles of MPT followed by thalidomide maintenance until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (MPT-T) and the same MP regimen with thalidomide being replaced by lenalidomide (MPR-R). This multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial was undertaken by Dutch-Belgium Cooperative Trial Group for Hematology Oncology and the Nordic Myeloma Study Group (the HOVON87/NMSG18 trial). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). A total of 318 patients were randomly assigned to receive MPT-T, and 319 received MPR-R. After a median follow-up of 36 months, PFS with MPT-T was 20 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 18-23 months) vs 23 months (95% CI, 19-27 months) with MPR-R (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.72-1.04; P = .12). Response rates were similar, with at least a very good partial response of 47% and 45%, respectively. Hematologic toxicity was more pronounced with MPR-R, especially grades 3 and 4 neutropenia: 64% vs 27%. Neuropathy of at least grade 3 was significantly higher in the MPT-T arm: 16% vs 2% in MPR-R, resulting in a significant shorter duration of maintenance therapy (5 vs 17 months in MPR-R), irrespective of age. MPR-R has no advantage over MPT-T concerning efficacy. The toxicity profile differed with clinically significant neuropathy during thalidomide maintenance vs myelosuppression with MPR.

Bortezomib consolidation after autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma: a Nordic Myeloma Study Group randomized phase 3 trial.

The Nordic Myeloma Study Group conducted an open randomized trial to compare bortezomib as consolidation therapy given after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with no consolidation in bortezomib-naive patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Overall, 370 patients were centrally randomly assigned 3 months after ASCT to receive 20 doses of bortezomib given during 21 weeks or no consolidation. The hypothesis was that consolidation therapy would prolong progression-free survival (PFS). The PFS after randomization was 27 months for the bortezomib group compared with 20 months for the control group (P = .05). Fifty-one of 90 patients in the treatment group compared with 32 of 90 controls improved their response after randomization (P = .007). No difference in overall survival was seen. Fatigue was reported more commonly by the bortezomib-treated patients in self-reported quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaires, whereas no other major differences in QOL were recorded between the groups. Consolidation therapy seemed to be beneficial for patients not achieving at least a very good partial response (VGPR) but not for patients in the ≥ VGPR category at randomization. Consolidation with bortezomib after ASCT in bortezomib-naive patients improves PFS without interfering with QOL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00417911.

Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Treatment with Cytogenetic Risk-Based Maintenance in Transplant-Eligible Myeloma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group.

Scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients. The treatment consisted of four cycles of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation and cytogenetic risk-based maintenance therapy with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for HR patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for NHR patients. The main endpoint of the study was undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with sensitivity of <10-5 by flow cytometry at any time, and other endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We present the preplanned analysis after the last patient has been two years on maintenance. At any time during protocol treatment, 28% (34/120) had MRD < 10-5 at least once. At two years on maintenance, 66% of the patients in the HR group and 76% in the NHR group were progression-free (p = 0.395) and 36% (43/120) were CR or better, of which 42% (18/43) had undetectable flow MRD <10-5. Altogether 95% of the patients with sustained MRD <10-5, 82% of the patients who turned MRD-positive, and 61% of those with positive MRD had no disease progression at two years on maintenance (p < 0.001). To conclude, prolonged maintenance with all-oral ixazomib plus lenalidomide might improve PFS in HR patients.

Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma.

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 363 patients with untreated multiple myeloma were randomized to receive either melphalan-prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) or melphalan-prednisone and placebo (MP). The dose of melphalan was 0.25 mg/kg and prednisone was 100 mg given daily for 4 days every 6 weeks until plateau phase. The dose of thalidomide/placebo was escalated to 400 mg daily until plateau phase and thereafter reduced to 200 mg daily until progression. A total of 357 patients were analyzed. Partial response was 34% and 33%, and very good partial response or better was 23% and 7% in the MPT and MP arms, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival, with median survival being 29 months in the MPT arm and 32 months in the MP arm. Most quality of life outcomes improved equally in both arms, apart from constipation, which was markedly increased in the MPT arm. Constipation, neuropathy, nonneuropathy neurologic toxicity, and skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the MPT arm. The number of thromboembolic events was equal in the 2 treatment arms. In conclusion, MPT had a significant antimyeloma effect, but this did not translate into improved survival. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00218855.

Paired miRNA- and messenger RNA-sequencing identifies novel miRNA-mRNA interactions in multiple myeloma.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable cancer of terminally differentiated plasma cells that proliferate in the bone marrow. miRNAs are promising biomarkers for risk stratification in MM and several miRNAs are shown to have a function in disease pathogenesis. However, to date, surprisingly few miRNA-mRNA interactions have been described for and functionally validated in MM. In this study, we performed miRNA-seq and mRNA-seq on CD138 + cells isolated from bone marrow aspirates of 86 MM patients to identify novel interactions between sRNAs and mRNAs. We detected 9.8% significantly correlated miRNA-mRNA pairs of which 5.17% were positively correlated and 4.65% were negatively correlated. We found that miRNA-mRNA pairs that were predicted by in silico target-prediction algorithms were more negatively correlated than non-target pairs, indicating functional miRNA targeting and that correlation between miRNAs and mRNAs from patients can be used to identify miRNA-targets. mRNAs for negatively correlated miRNA-mRNA target pairs were associated with gene ontology terms such as autophagy, protein degradation and endoplasmic stress response, reflecting important processes in MM. Targets for two specific miRNAs, miR-125b-5p and miR-365b-3p, were functionally validated in MM cell line transfection experiments followed by RNA-sequencing and qPCR. In summary, we identified functional miRNA-mRNA target pairs by correlating miRNA and mRNA data from primary MM cells. We identified several target pairs that are of potential interest for further studies. The data presented here may serve as a hypothesis-generating knowledge base for other researchers in the miRNA/MM field. We also provide an interactive web application that can be used to exploit the miRNA-target interactions as well as clinical parameters associated to these target-pairs.

[Survival in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia]. / Overlevelse hos voksne med akutt lymfoblastisk leukemi.

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian treatment protocol for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adults was introduced in 1982 and has undergone minor changes thereafter. Earlier studies from The South Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority have reported 50 % five-year overall survival in patients treated according to this protocol. This article presents survival data for Norwegian adults with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia on a national basis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data for all patients between 15 and 65 years, who were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in the period 2000-2007 according to The Norwegian Registry for Acute Leukaemia and Lymphoblastic Lymphoma, and were treated with chemotherapy with a curative intent were analysed for survival. RESULTS: 128 patients were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in the study period. The overall remission rate was 85.9 %. Five-year survival was 49.2 % overall, 31.4 % for patients 40 years or older and 62.6 % for those younger than 40 years. INTERPRETATION: These results are in line with previous Norwegian studies and show a five- year overall survival which is more than 10 % higher than that reported in international multicenter studies. One explanation can be that the Norwegian treatment program is more intensive than most treatment protocols used in other countries.

[Survival in adults with acute myelogenous leukemia]. / Overlevelse hos voksne med akutt myelogen leukemi.

BACKGROUND: Acute myelogenous leukemia is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. The condition is lethal within a few months without treatment, but most young patients reach complete remission with chemotherapy. Many of them will relapse after a while, but an increasing number of young people survive for a long time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Survival data were retrieved from the Norwegian Registry for Acute Leukemias and Lymphoblastic Lymphomas for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (aged from 16 to 60 years) who were registered in the period 1.1.2000-31.12.2005. The patients were divided in risk groups according to karyotype and response to initial chemotherapy. Patients with secondary acute myelogenous leukemia were classified as high-risk. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: 4-year survival was 94.5% in acute promyelocytic leukemia, 77.7% in other low-risk acute myelogenous leukemia, 39.0% in standard risk patients and 29.1% in high-risk patients. For all patients totally 4-year survival was 43.0%. This is an increase of about 15% compared to previous Norwegian studies. The increase is most probably due to an intensification of chemotherapy after remission and to the implementation of all-trans-retinoic acid in the treatment of promyelocytic leukemia.