Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241248973, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717441

RESUMO

To preserve residual hearing during cochlear implant (CI) surgery it is desirable to use intraoperative monitoring of inner ear function (cochlear monitoring). A promising method is electrocochleography (ECochG). Within this project the relations between intracochlear ECochG recordings, position of the recording contact in the cochlea with respect to anatomy and frequency and preservation of residual hearing were investigated. The aim was to better understand the changes in ECochG signals and whether these are due to the electrode position in the cochlea or to trauma generated during insertion. During and after insertion of hearing preservation electrodes, intraoperative ECochG recordings were performed using the CI electrode (MED-EL). During insertion, the recordings were performed at discrete insertion steps on electrode contact 1. After insertion as well as postoperatively the recordings were performed at different electrode contacts. The electrode location in the cochlea during insertion was estimated by mathematical models using preoperative clinical imaging, the postoperative location was measured using postoperative clinical imaging. The recordings were analyzed from six adult CI recipients. In the four patients with good residual hearing in the low frequencies the signal amplitude rose with largest amplitudes being recorded closest to the generators of the stimulation frequency, while in both cases with severe pantonal hearing losses the amplitude initially rose and then dropped. This might be due to various reasons as discussed in the following. Our results indicate that this approach can provide valuable information for the interpretation of intracochlearly recorded ECochG signals.


Assuntos
Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Cóclea , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Humanos , Cóclea/cirurgia , Cóclea/fisiologia , Cóclea/fisiopatologia , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Implante Coclear/métodos , Audiometria de Resposta Evocada/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Masculino , Feminino , Audição/fisiologia , Adulto , Resultado do Tratamento , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estimulação Elétrica , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/reabilitação , Pessoas com Deficiência Auditiva/psicologia , Limiar Auditivo/fisiologia
2.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241252240, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38715410

RESUMO

In recent years, tools for early detection of irreversible trauma to the basilar membrane during hearing preservation cochlear implant (CI) surgery were established in several clinics. A link with the degree of postoperative hearing preservation in patients was investigated, but patient populations were usually small. Therefore, this study's aim was to analyze data from intraoperative extracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) recordings for a larger group.During hearing preservation CI surgery, extracochlear recordings were made before, during, and after CI electrode insertion using a cotton wick electrode placed at the promontory. Before and after insertion, amplitudes and stimulus response thresholds were recorded at 250, 500, and 1000 Hz. During insertion, response amplitudes were recorded at one frequency and one stimulus level. Data from 121 patient ears were analyzed.The key benefit of extracochlear recordings is that they can be performed before, during, and after CI electrode insertion. However, extracochlear ECochG threshold changes before and after CI insertion were relatively small and did not independently correlate well with hearing preservation, although at 250 Hz they added some significant information. Some tendencies-although no significant relationships-were detected between amplitude behavior and hearing preservation. Rising amplitudes seem favorable and falling amplitudes disadvantageous, but constant amplitudes do not appear to allow stringent predictions.Extracochlear ECochG measurements seem to only partially realize expected benefits. The questions now are: do gains justify the effort, and do other procedures or possible combinations lead to greater benefits for patients?


Assuntos
Audiometria de Resposta Evocada , Limiar Auditivo , Cóclea , Implante Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Audição , Humanos , Audiometria de Resposta Evocada/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Implante Coclear/instrumentação , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Idoso , Adulto , Audição/fisiologia , Cóclea/cirurgia , Cóclea/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adolescente , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Adulto Jovem , Criança , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pré-Escolar , Perda Auditiva/diagnóstico , Perda Auditiva/fisiopatologia , Perda Auditiva/cirurgia , Perda Auditiva/reabilitação
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA