Steady state vascular imaging with extracellular gadobutrol: evaluation of the additional diagnostic benefit in patients who have undergone a peripheral magnetic resonance angiography protocol.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the feasibility and additional diagnostic benefit of a high-resolution steady state 3D-volume interpolated breath-hold exam (VIBE) sequence between a continuous table movement (CTM) MR angiography of the entire runoff vasculature and a time-resolved (TWIST) MRA of the calves. METHODS: In this retrospective IRB approved study 224 patients (72 women, 152 men, mean age 67.29 ± 13.9) were included who had undergone a low-dose MR angiographic protocol at 3T (Siemens TimTrio) after injection of 0.1 mmol/kg gadobutrol including a CTM MRA, a time-resolved MRA of the calf station and a steady state 3D VIBE sequence prior to the time-resolved MRA. One board-certified radiologist rated the image quality of the steady state VIBE sequences on an ordinal three point scale (excellent, good, poor) and analyzed the images for additional diagnostic findings of and beyond the vascular system in comparison to the CTM MRA and the time-resolved MRA. Descriptive statistics and demographic patient data were used for further evaluation. RESULTS: The image quality of the steady state imaging of the pelvis, upper and lower leg was excellent in up to 88%, 84% and 47%, respectively, while poor image quality was only detected in the upper (2%) and lower leg (6%). An additional diagnostic benefit was found in 44% of the patients overall. The most common relevant pathologies included inflammatory processes of the soft tissues (26%), thrombi (14%), abscesses (13%) and tumors (11%). In subgroups of patients above the age of 60, 65, 70, 75 and 80 years an additional pathology was found in 50% 33%, 44%, 65% and 58%, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of additional findings between men and women (46% and 39%, p > 0.05) and inpatients and outpatients (42% and 45%, p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Steady state imaging is also feasible with extracellular contrast agents with good image quality yielding additional diagnostic findings in up to 44% and above in patients older than 60 years of age irrespective of gender or patient status. Given the short acquisition time of 4 minutes this sequence could be added to all peripheral MRA exams.

Differing X-ray patterns in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) status are important predictors for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) erosivity. Qualitative differences on hand/feet radiographs have been described, indicating more carpal fusion in seronegative RA. This study explores these differences further using the total Sharp/van der Heijde score (TSS), digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR), and qualitative description. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Matched seronegative (ACPA negative, RF negative, snRA) and seropositive (ACPA, RF > 3xULN, spRA) were examined. TSS scores both for erosions and joint space narrowing (JSN) were registered separately and compared for both groups. Joint compartments and single joints were compared, using a heat map. The degree of carpal fusion was quantified 0-5. DXR measurements (bone mineral density, cortical thickness, bone width, metacarpal index) were determined for each hand separately. Finally, selected radiographs were examined unblinded to search for non-quantifiable differences. RESULTS: A total of 56 snRA and 57 spRA patients were examined. spRA patients had more erosions and joint space narrowing. Erosion load differed significantly between spRA and snRA in the foot and metacarpophalangeal joint, but not in the wrist or proximal interphalangeal joint compartments. Intracompartmental differences were greater in spRA. JSN scores were greater in spRA, in all compartments except wrist. Carpal fusion and DXR scores did not differ between the groups. The qualitative comparison showed that snRA patients displayed periarticular ossifications, carpal shortening, and sparing of the CMC joints, whereas spRA patients had more CMC damage and less shortening. CONCLUSION: X-ray manifestations in snRA and spRA are qualitatively and quantitatively different. This suggests pathophysiological differences between the two forms. Key Points • Seronegative and seropositive RA display qualitatively and quantitatively different X-ray patterns, suggesting differences in the underlying pathophysiological process. This is the first time that this has been shown in a systematic, quantitative fashion.

Correction to: Differing X-ray patterns in seronegative and seropositive rheumatoid arthritis.

The first and family names of the authors were interchanged and are now presented correctly. The original article has been corrected.