Outcomes Among Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 and Acute Kidney Injury.

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Outcomes of patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and acute kidney injury (AKI) are not well understood. The goal of this study was to investigate the survival and kidney outcomes of these patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Patients (aged≥18 years) hospitalized with COVID-19 at 13 hospitals in metropolitan New York between March 1, 2020, and April 27, 2020, followed up until hospital discharge. EXPOSURE: AKI. OUTCOMES: Primary outcome: in-hospital death. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: requiring dialysis at discharge, recovery of kidney function. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Univariable and multivariable time-to-event analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 9,657 patients admitted with COVID-19, the AKI incidence rate was 38.4/1,000 patient-days. Incidence rates of in-hospital death among patients without AKI, with AKI not requiring dialysis (AKI stages 1-3), and with AKI receiving dialysis (AKI 3D) were 10.8, 31.1, and 37.5/1,000 patient-days, respectively. Taking those without AKI as the reference group, we observed greater risks for in-hospital death for patients with AKI 1-3 and AKI 3D (HRs of 5.6 [95% CI, 5.0-6.3] and 11.3 [95% CI, 9.6-13.1], respectively). After adjusting for demographics, comorbid conditions, and illness severity, the risk for death remained higher among those with AKI 1-3 (adjusted HR, 3.4 [95% CI, 3.0-3.9]) and AKI 3D (adjusted HR, 6.4 [95% CI, 5.5-7.6]) compared with those without AKI. Among patients with AKI 1-3 who survived, 74.1% achieved kidney recovery by the time of discharge. Among those with AKI 3D who survived, 30.6% remained on dialysis at discharge, and prehospitalization chronic kidney disease was the only independent risk factor associated with needing dialysis at discharge (adjusted OR, 9.3 [95% CI, 2.3-37.8]). LIMITATIONS: Observational retrospective study, limited to the NY metropolitan area during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: AKI in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was associated with significant risk for death.

Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

The rate of acute kidney injury (AKI) associated with patients hospitalized with Covid-19, and associated outcomes are not well understood. This study describes the presentation, risk factors and outcomes of AKI in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. We reviewed the health records for all patients hospitalized with Covid-19 between March 1, and April 5, 2020, at 13 academic and community hospitals in metropolitan New York. Patients younger than 18 years of age, with end stage kidney disease or with a kidney transplant were excluded. AKI was defined according to KDIGO criteria. Of 5,449 patients admitted with Covid-19, AKI developed in 1,993 (36.6%). The peak stages of AKI were stage 1 in 46.5%, stage 2 in 22.4% and stage 3 in 31.1%. Of these, 14.3% required renal replacement therapy (RRT). AKI was primarily seen in Covid-19 patients with respiratory failure, with 89.7% of patients on mechanical ventilation developing AKI compared to 21.7% of non-ventilated patients. 276/285 (96.8%) of patients requiring RRT were on ventilators. Of patients who required ventilation and developed AKI, 52.2% had the onset of AKI within 24 hours of intubation. Risk factors for AKI included older age, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, black race, hypertension and need for ventilation and vasopressor medications. Among patients with AKI, 694 died (35%), 519 (26%) were discharged and 780 (39%) were still hospitalized. AKI occurs frequently among patients with Covid-19 disease. It occurs early and in temporal association with respiratory failure and is associated with a poor prognosis.

Update on the End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program.

The End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program continues to evolve and expand. In this article, we will review the program's structure and critically assess the clinical metrics in place. In addition, we will discuss upcoming program changes to help prepare dialysis facilities and nephrologists to meet new proposed metrics.

Novel iron-based phosphate binders in patients with chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Management of hyperphosphatemia remains an integral component in the care of patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis. In addition to dietary restriction and dialysis, oral phosphate binders remain a key strategy in the control of serum phosphorus levels in this population. We review two new oral phosphate binders that are currently marketed in the United States. RECENT FINDINGS: Sucroferric oxyhydroxide was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in November 2013. A recent international, multicenter study found the drug to be efficacious and noninferior to sevelamer carbonate in magnitude of serum phosphate control. This was achieved with a significantly reduced daily pill burden for sucroferric oxyhydroxide. A second novel agent, ferric citrate was approved by the FDA in September, 2014. The drug was found to have similar phosphate control efficacy to active comparators and was superior to placebo. In addition, the drug delivers a significant amount of iron, resulting in improved erythropoietic parameters. Both drugs had diarrhea as a fairly frequent side-effect. SUMMARY: These new phosphate binders offer alternatives to currently available agents. Both have interesting properties that may make them particularly useful in clinical practice.

Treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in chronic kidney disease patients with cancer.

Treatment of anemia remains an important component in the care of patients with nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) remains a key anemia treatment strategy in this patient population. However, anemia management in this group can become more complicated by prior or current history of malignancy. There has been a great deal of work both scientifically and in clinical trials in oncology that have revealed certain concerns and risks of ESA use in patients with cancer. In this review, we will bring together knowledge from nephrology and oncology literature to help nephrologists understand the implications for ESA treatment when CKD/ESRD is complicated by cancer. We also suggest an approach to the management of anemia in this patient group with active or previous malignancy.

Increasing hip fractures in patients receiving hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Dialysis patients are at increased risk for hip fractures. Because changes in treatment of metabolic bone disease in this population may have impacted bone fragility, this study aims to analyze the longitudinal risk for fractures in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: Using the United States Renal Data System database from 1992 to 2009, the temporal trend in hip fractures requiring hospitalization was analyzed using an overdispersed Poisson regression model. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to assess the adjusted effect of dialysis modality on hip fractures. RESULTS: 842,028 HD and 87,086 PD patients were included. There was a significant temporal increase in hip fractures in both HD and PD with stabilization of rates after 2005. With stratification, the increase in fractures occurred in patients who were white and over 65 years of age. In adjusted analyses, HD patients had 1.6 times greater odds of hip fracture than PD patients (OR 1.60 95% CI 1.52, 1.68, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the declining hip fracture rates in the general population, we identified a temporal rise in incidence of hip fractures in HD and PD patients. HD patients were at a higher risk for hip fractures than PD patients after adjustment for recognized bone fragility risk factors. The increase in fracture rate over time was limited to older white patients in both HD and PD, the demographics being consistent with osteoporosis risk. Further research is indicated to better understand the longitudinal trend in hip fractures and the discordance between HD and PD.

Longitudinal predictors of uremic pruritus.

OBJECTIVE: Pruritus is a common problem among hemodialyzed patients. Its causes are poorly understood, and, as a result, itching is often attributed to elevated serum phosphorus and other disorders of bone and minerals. The primary purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between pruritus and common tests of bone and mineral disease. METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial of 3 months of ergocalciferol versus placebo treatment in 50 hemodialysis patients with uremic pruritus. A pruritus survey was administered at baseline and then every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Concurrent serum phosphorus, intact parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum calcium, and calcium-phosphate product were measured. RESULTS: Pruritus score was not found to be associated or correlated with serum phosphate, intact PTH, serum calcium, or calcium-phosphate product at each time interval or over time. Likewise, when analyzed by original study group (placebo or ergocalciferol), no association or correlation between the mineral and bone indicators and itching were found. CONCLUSION: Neither serum phosphate nor other tests of bone and mineral status were found to be significant predictors of pruritus at any point in time or over time.

Meeting the 2012 QIP (Quality Incentive Program) clinical measures: strategies for dialysis centers.

The US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services end-stage renal disease Quality Incentive Program (QIP) is a pay-for-performance program that reduces dialysis center payments by up to 2% for suboptimal patient care. In January 2012, the performance year began for payment year 2014, bringing significant changes to the QIP by introducing 6 quality indicators (3 clinical measures and 3 reporting measures) and a new scoring methodology. To succeed under the new QIP, dialysis facilities must meet 3 clinical measures that assess anemia management, hemodialysis adequacy, and vascular access type in patients receiving dialysis treatment, as well as 3 reporting measures that involve the reporting of dialysis safety events, attestation of administering a patient satisfaction survey, and attestation of patient mineral metabolism monitoring. To help dialysis providers reach these targets, this article provides an overview of the 3 clinical measures and the QIP scoring methodology, as well as a description of patient claims that are excluded when the scores for these measures are calculated. Strategies and solutions that address provider- and patient-related factors also are discussed to help ensure that more dialysis centers meet the new QIP clinical measures for performance year 2012/payment year 2014.

Ranolazine, tacrolimus, and diltiazem might be a hazardous combination in a transplant patient.

We report a case of a renal transplant patient who was maintained on tacrolimus and diltiazem therapy and developed tacrolimus toxicity leading to reversible acute kidney injury when started on ranolazine. A 62-year-old Caucasian male status post renal transplant in 2009 (on prednisone and tacrolimus) was evaluated for ischemic heart disease and was initiated on ranolazine 500 mg tablets twice daily, which was later increased to 1000 mg twice daily. After 2 weeks, he developed fatigue, loss of appetite, tremors, and decreased urine output and was admitted to our hospital. His other significant medications included enalapril 2.5 mg and diltiazem 240 mg daily. The patient was awake and alert, but lethargic. He was found to be bradycardic with a heart rate of 42/min. The rest of his physical examination was benign. His electrocardiogram revealed sinus bradycardia. Laboratory studies revealed serum creatinine of 2.4 mg/dL from a baseline of 1.5 mg/dL (stable for the past 2 years). The tacrolimus trough was elevated at 14 ng/mL, which decreased after stopping ranolazine, reaching 7 ng/mL after 3 days, while continuing the same dose of tacrolimus. His creatinine trended downward and reached his baseline of 1.5 mg/dL over the next 2 days. His bradycardia and other symptoms resolved after cessation of ranolazine. He was discharged to follow up, to initiate an alternate agent for ischemic heart disease. Specific pharmacokinetic studies are warranted to study these drug interactions, and tacrolimus levels should be closely monitored in transplant patients who initiate ranolazine treatment.

Recovery of Severe Acute Kidney Injury in a Patient with COVID-19: Role of Lung Ultrasonography.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is recognized as a complication of COVID-19 among hospitalized patients. Lung ultrasonography (LUS) can be a useful tool in the management of COVID-19 pneumonia when interpreted correctly. However, the role of LUS in management of severe AKI in the setting of COVID-19 remains to be defined. We report a 61-year-old male who was hospitalized with acute respiratory failure from COVID-19 pneumonia. In addition to requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, our patient developed AKI and severe hyperkalemia requiring urgent dialytic therapy during his hospital stay. Our patient remained dialysis dependent despite subsequent recovery of lung function. Three days following discontinuation of mechanical ventilation, our patient developed a hypotensive episode during his maintenance hemodialysis treatment. A point of care LUS performed soon after the intradialytic hypotensive episode found no extravascular lung water. Hemodialysis was discontinued and the patient was initiated on intravenous fluids for one week. AKI subsequently resolved. We consider LUS an important tool in identifying COVID-19 patients that would benefit from intravenous fluids following recovery of lung function.

Medication discrepancies in late-stage chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: Late-stage chronic kidney disease (LS-CKD) can be defined by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 0-30 mL/min. It is a period of risk for medication discrepancies because of frequent hospitalizations, fragmented medical care, inadequate communication and polypharmacy. In this study, we sought to characterize medication discrepancies in LS-CKD. METHODS: We analyzed all patients enrolled in Northwell Health's Healthy Transitions in LS-CKD program. All patients had estimated GFR 0-30 mL/min, not on dialysis. Medications were reviewed by a nurse at a home visit. Patients' medication usage and practice were compared with nephrologists' medication lists, and discrepancies were characterized. Patients were categorized as having either no discrepancies or one or more. Associations between patient characteristics and number of medication discrepancies were evaluated by chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon text for continuous variables. RESULTS: Seven hundred and thirteen patients with a median age of 70 (interquartile range 58-79) years were studied. There were 392 patients (55.0% of the study population) with at least one medication discrepancy. The therapeutic classes of medications with most frequently occurring medication discrepancies were cardiovascular, vitamins, bone and mineral disease agents, diuretics, analgesics and diabetes medications. In multivariable analysis, factors associated with higher risk of discrepancies were congestive heart failure [odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.44-3.16; P = 0.0002] and number of medications (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.21-1.37; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Medication discrepancies are common in LS-CKD, affect the majority of patients and include high-risk medication classes. Congestive heart failure and total number of medications are independently associated with greater risk for multiple drug discrepancies. The frequency of medication discrepancies indicates a need for great care in medication management of these patients.

Ferric Pyrophosphate Citrate: A Novel Iron Replacement Agent in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Management of anemia remains an integral component in the care of patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis. In addition to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, iron-replacement agents remain a key strategy for anemia treatment in this patient population. Ferric pyrophosphate citrate (FPC), a novel iron-replacement agent, was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in January 2015 for use in adult patients receiving chronic hemodialysis (HD). This iron product is administered to patients on HD via the dialysate. The recently published, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials found FPC to maintain hemoglobin level and iron balance in patients undergoing chronic HD. The mean hemoglobin level in these phase 3 clinical studies was maintained from baseline to the end of the treatment in the dialysate iron (FPC-treated) group, however, it decreased by 0.4 g/dL in the control group (P < 0.001). Adverse and serious adverse events were similar in both groups. Another recent study showed a significant reduction in the prescribed ESA dose at the end of treatment in the FPC-treated group compared with placebo. These studies have shown that FPC administered via the dialysate is efficacious and apparently well tolerated. In this article, in addition to reviewing the clinical studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of FPC, we propose a protocol for iron management in HD centers where FPC is to be used.

Bone Parameters and Risk of Hip and Femur Fractures in Patients on Hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients on hemodialysis have a high rate of hip fractures. In this study, we performed a contemporary analysis of mineral and bone parameters and their relationship to hip and femur fracture risk. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients on hemodialysis treated between 2000 and 2013 in Fresenius Medical Care North America facilities were included. Predictors were on the basis of data as of December 31 of each baseline year and time-averaged values of selected laboratory parameters and medication doses throughout the year. Four period cohorts were constructed from baseline years: 2000, 2003, 2006, and 2009. Follow-up for each cohort was ≤3 years. RESULTS: The incidence of hip and femur fractures remained generally unchanged (P=0.40), except among patients who were white and >65 years of age, in whom the rate decreased significantly over the 14-year period (P<0.01). Results from combined multivariable models indicated that the lowest quartiles of time-averaged intact parathyroid hormone were independently associated with higher hip fracture risk (intact parathyroid hormone =181-272 pg/ml: hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.03 to 1.41 and intact parathyroid hormone <181 pg/ml: hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.44; referent third quartile, 273 to <433 pg/ml). The lowest quartile of time-averaged serum calcium was also associated with higher risk (calcium <8.7 mg/dl; hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.37) compared with the referent third quartile of 9.1 to <9.5 mg/dl. CONCLUSIONS: We found an association between lower levels of intact parathyroid hormone and serum calcium and greater risk for hip and femur fractures among patients on hemodialysis. These findings support additional research toward elucidating long-term safety of treatment approaches for hyperparathyroidism in patients with ESRD.

Epidemiology and Challenges to the Management of Advanced CKD.

Advanced CKD is a period of CKD that differs greatly from earlier stages of CKD in terms of treatment goals. Treatment during this period presents particular challenges as further loss of kidney function heralds the need for renal replacement therapy. Successful management during this period increases the likelihood of improved transitions to ESRD. However, there are substantial barriers to optimal advanced CKD care. In this review, we will discuss advanced CKD definitions and epidemiology and outcomes.

Challenges and opportunities in late-stage chronic kidney disease.

There is increasing recognition that chronic diseases are a major challenge for health delivery systems and treasuries. These are highly prevalent and costly diseases and frequency is expected to increase greatly as the population of many countries ages. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not received the same attention as other chronic diseases such as congestive heart failure; yet, the prevalence and costs of CKD are substantial. Greater recognition and support for CKD may require that the disease no longer be viewed as one continuous disease state. Early CKD stages require less complex care and generate lower costs. In contrast, late-stage CKD is every bit as complex and costly as other major chronic diseases. Health authorities may not recognize and fund CKD care appropriately until late-stage CKD is defined clearly as separate and distinct from earlier stages of disease. In this review, we describe the burden of chronic diseases, consider the challenges and barriers and propose processes to improve late-stage CKD care. In particular, we recommend the need for improved continuity of care, enhanced use of information technology, multidisciplinary care, timely referral to nephrologists, protocol use and improved patient engagement.