Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Health Commun ; 31(4): 400-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26362334

RESUMO

Midwives and doctors require effective information-sharing strategies to provide safe and evidence-based care for women and infants, but this can be difficult to achieve. This article describes maternity care professionals' perceptions of communication in their current workplace in Australia. We invoke social identity theory (SIT) to explore how these perceptions affect interprofessional practice. A survey was conducted with 337 participants (281 midwives and 56 doctors). Using exploratory factor analysis we developed three scales that measured interprofessional workplace practice collaboration. Results indicated an intergroup environment in maternity care in which the professionals found exchange of ideas difficult, and where differences with respect to decision making and professional skills were apparent. Although scores on some measures of collaboration were high, the two professions differed on their ratings of the importance of team behaviors, information sharing, and interprofessional socialization as indicators of collaborative practice. These results highlight the complexities among maternity care providers with different professional identities, and demonstrate the impact of professional identity on interprofessional communication.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Relações Interprofissionais , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Tocologia , Médicos , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Health Commun ; 20(7): 827-34, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26020149

RESUMO

In this study, 3,531 Queensland women, who had recently given birth, completed a questionnaire that included questions about their participation in decision making during pregnancy, their ratings of client-centered care, and perceived quality of care. These data tested a version of the Linguistic Model of Patient Participation in Care, adapted to the maternity context. The authors investigated how age and education influenced women's perceptions of their participation and quality of care. Hierarchical multiple regressions revealed that women's perceived ability to make decisions, and the extent of client-centered communication with maternity care providers, were the most influential predictors of participation and perceived quality of care. Participation in care predicted perceived quality of care, but the influence of client-centered communication by a care provider and a woman's confidence in decision making were stronger predictors of perceived quality of care. Age and education level were not important predictors. These findings extend and support the use of Linguistic Model of Patient Participation in Care in the maternity context.


Assuntos
Comunicação , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Participação do Paciente/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Relações Médico-Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parto , Participação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gravidez , Queensland , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
3.
Aust Health Rev ; 36(4): 466-70, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22958328

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate agreement with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) definition of collaboration in maternity care by care providers, and to examine their preferences for models of care in order to shed light on the lack of success in implementing collaborative practice. METHODS: Maternity care providers completed a survey in Queensland. The final sample consisted of 337 participants, including 281 midwives (83.38%), 35 obstetricians (10.39%), and 21 general practitioners (6.23%). RESULTS: Ninety-one percent of the participants agreed with the NHMRC definition of collaboration: Midwives (M=5.97, s.d.=1.2) and doctors (obstetricians and general practitioners: M=5.7, s.d.=1.35) did not differ significantly in their level of agreement with definition (t (332)=-1.8, P=.068). However, 72% of doctors endorsed a doctor-led model of care, whereas only 6.8% of midwives indicated agreement with it. Fewer (56%) doctors agreed with the midwife-led model of care, whereas 99.3% of midwives endorsed it. CONCLUSION: The concept of collaboration does not recognise the different interpretations by midwives and doctors of its impact on their roles and behaviours. Successful collaborative practice requires the development of guidelines that recognise these differences and specify the communication behaviour that would assist midwives and doctors to practice collaboratively.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comportamento Cooperativo , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Feminino , Clínicos Gerais , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Tocologia , Obstetrícia , Relações Médico-Enfermeiro , Gravidez , Queensland
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA