Around and around the merry-go-round: multiple implantations of short- and long-term ventricular assist devices in a patient with severe heart failure.

Multiple implantations of left ventricular assist devices over a period of three years were performed in a 17-year-old gentleman with non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and congestive cardiac failure. The first device (HeartMate II) was implanted as a bridge to transplantation. However, after few months of support the patient showed signs of myocardial recovery and the device was successfully explanted. After 2 years of uneventful follow-up, the patient's condition deteriorated requiring further mechanical support. Due to the elevated risk associated with a redo full-support LVAD implantation, we decided to implant a partial support device (Synergy CircuLite). Because of recurrent pump thrombosis requiring device exchange, the final weeks to transplantation were bridged with CentriMag short-term LVAD. After successful cardiac transplantation the patient required further temporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support which was weaned off and explanted on the fourth postoperative day. After further uncomplicated postoperative recovery the patient was discharged and has been doing well for 1 year of follow-up.

Reversal of severe heart failure with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device and pharmacological therapy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that a specific combination of drug therapy and left ventricular assist device unloading results in significant myocardial recovery, sufficient to allow pump removal, in two thirds of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy receiving a Heartmate I pulsatile device. However, this protocol has not been used with nonpulsatile devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report the results of a prospective study of 20 patients who received a combination of angiotensin-converting enzymes, ß-blockers, angiotensin II inhibitors, and aldosterone antagonists followed by the ß2-agonist clenbuterol and were regularly tested (echocardiograms, exercise tests, catheterizations) with the pump at low speed. Before left ventricular assist device insertion, patient age was 35.2 ± 12.6 years (16 male patients), patients were on 2.0 ± 0.9 inotropes, 7 (35) had an intra-aortic balloon pump, 2 were hemofiltered, 2 were ventilated, 3 had a prior Levitronix device, and 1 had extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Cardiac index was 1.39 ± 0.43 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻², pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 31.5 ± 5.7 mm Hg, and heart failure history was 3.4 ± 3.5 years. One patient was lost to follow-up and died after 240 days of support. Of the remaining 19 patients, 12 (63.2) were explanted after 286 ± 97 days. Eight had symptomatic heart failure for ≤6 months and 4 for >6 months (48 to 132 months). Before explantation, at low flow for 15 minutes, ejection fraction was 70 ± 7, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was 48.6 ± 5.7 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter was 32.3 ± 5.7 mm, mV(O2) was 21.6 ± 4 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 5.9 ± 4.6 mm Hg, and cardiac index was 3.6 ± 0.6 L · min⁻¹ · m⁻². Estimated survival without heart failure recurrence was 83.3 at 1 and 3 years. After a 430.7 ± 337.1-day follow-up, surviving explants had an ejection fraction of 58.1 ± 13.8, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter of 59.0 ± 9.3 mm, left ventricular end-systolic diameter of 42.0 ± 10.7 mm, and mV(O2) of 22.6 ± 5.3 mL · kg⁻¹ · min⁻¹. CONCLUSIONS: Reversal of end-stage heart failure secondary to nonischemic cardiomyopathy can be achieved in a substantial proportion of patients with nonpulsatile flow through the use of a combination of mechanical and pharmacological therapy.

Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?

OBJECTIVES: Partial-support left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent a novel strategy for heart failure treatment. The Synergy Pocket Micro-pump (HeartWare Inc, Framingham, Mass), the smallest surgically implanted long-term LVAD, provides partial flow up to 4.25 L/min and was primarily designed for "less sick" patients with severe heart failure. This device is implanted minimally invasively without sternotomy or cardiopulmonary bypass. Early implantation in patients with Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class 4 and higher was shown to be feasible and associated with significantly improved hemodynamics and quality of life. The aim of this study was to present our experience with implementation of long-term partial circulatory support as a bridge to transplantation in patients with more advanced heart failure who were dependent preoperatively on inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump. METHODS: In this observational study, only inotropic or intra-aortic balloon pump-dependent patients with end-stage heart failure were included (n = 12). These patients underwent Synergy device implantation between February 2012 and August 2013. RESULTS: The mean preoperative Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support class was 2.17 ± 0.84 (class 1, 25%; class 2, 33%; class 3, 42%). The mean age was 46 ± 15 years, and 33% were female. Preoperatively, 4 patients (33%) had at least 1 previous sternotomy, 3 patients (25%) were supported with a balloon pump, 1 patient (8%) had a previous full-support LVAD, and 4 patients (33%) had cerebrovascular events in the past. After device implantation, there were no right ventricular failures, device-related infections, hemorrhagic strokes, arterial or venous thromboembolisms, or worsenings of aortic and mitral regurgitation observed over the follow-up. The mean follow up was 174 ± 171 days (range, 5-764 days; cumulative, 3199 days). One patient (8%) died, 3 patients (25%) successfully underwent transplantation, 1 device (8%) was explanted after myocardial recovery, and 5 patients (42%) are still on ongoing support. Two patients (17%) were upgraded to a full-support LVAD after 65 days of mean support. A total of 11 of 12 patients (92%) were discharged from the hospital and are presently alive. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was significantly reduced 3 months after device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Partial LVAD support may be clinically efficacious in inotropic and intra-aortic balloon pump-dependent patients. On the basis of our experience and evidence of previous research, such patients may benefit from minimally invasive access, no need for sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, a short implantation time, an easy exchange if necessary, and a lower risk of subsequent heart transplantation. Because the implantation is performed without sternotomy, device upgrade is feasible with a comparatively low operative risk and good clinical outcome. Our preliminary results show that partial-support devices may have the potential to replace full-support LVADs in the near future.

Outcomes after implantation of 139 full-support continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are a routine treatment for patients with advanced heart failure as a bridge to transplantation. The aim of this study was to present our institutional experience and mid-term outcomes after implantation of 139 continuous-flow (cf) LVADs as a bridge to transplantation. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-nine consecutive LVAD implantations were performed in our institution between July 2007 and August 2013. The mean age of the population was 44.0 ± 13.7 years and 24 (17%) of the patients were female. A substantial number of the patients were on preoperative mechanical support: 35 (25%) with an intra-aortic balloon pump, 9 (6.5%) with an extracorporeal membrane oxygenator and 25 (18%) with previous LVAD, for LVAD exchange. RESULTS: The mean support duration was 514 ± 481 days, whereas the longest support duration was 2493 days (>6 years). The overall cumulative survival rate following cfLVAD implantation was 89% at 30 days, 76% at 1 year and 66% at 2 years (Fig. 1). There was a statistically significant difference in survival in favour of first LVAD implantation compared with VAD exchange: 91 vs 80% at 30 days, 79 vs 57% at 1 year and 70 vs 43% at 2 years (log-rank P = 0.010). Postoperatively, patients had a significant improvement in end-organ function 1 month after LVAD implantation. In addition, comparison of two different devices [HeartMate II (HM II) and HeartWare] using propensity score matching showed no significant differences in survival and most postoperative adverse events. However, patients supported with HM II required significantly more units of fresh frozen plasma (P = 0.020) with a trend towards a higher use of red blood cells (P = 0.094), and were also more likely to develop percutaneous site infections (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: HM II and HeartWare cfLVADs have excellent early postoperative outcomes and good mid-term survival, despite a considerable number of patients needing VAD exchange.

Mitral commissurotomy through the left ventricle apical orifice with Heart Ware left ventricular assist device implantation.

Diseased, replaced or repaired mitral valve can lead to restricted blood flow to left ventricle and inadequate flow in left ventricular assist device (LVAD). A middle age woman with 'burnt out' hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation. She needed LVAD to support severe decompensating heart failure. Repaired mitral valve posed a risk of restricted flow through the device. Mitral commissurotomy was performed on beating heart through the left ventricular apical hole created for insertion of inflow cannula of LVAD.