Implementation of an NGS-based sequencing and gene fusion panel for clinical screening of patients with suspected hematologic malignancies.

OBJECTIVES: The diagnosis of hematologic malignancies integrates multiple diagnostic and clinical disciplines. Historically, targeted (single-analyte) genetic testing has been used as reflex to initial prescreening by other diagnostic modalities including flow cytometry, anatomic pathology, and clinical cytogenetics. Given the wide range of mutations associated with hematologic malignancies a DNA/RNA-based NGS panel can provide a more effective and economical approach to comprehensive testing of patients as an initial, tier-1 screen. METHODS: Using a cohort of 380 patients, we performed clinical validation of a gene panel designed to assess 40 genes (DNA), and 29 fusion driver genes with over 600 gene fusion partners (RNA), including sample exchange data across three clinical laboratories, and correlation with cytogenetic testing results. RESULTS: The clinical validation of this technology demonstrated that its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity are comparable to the majority of targeted single-gene approaches, while assessment of the initial patient cohort data demonstrated a high diagnostic yield of 50.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a tier-1 NGS-based protocol for gene panel screening provides a comprehensive alternative to targeted molecular testing in patients with suspected hematologic malignancies, with increased diagnostic yield, scalability, reproducibility, and cost effectiveness, making it ideally suited for implementation in clinical laboratories.

Merkel cell carcinoma mimicking acute leukemia.

Bone marrow aspirate showed diffuse infiltration by a population of monomorphic cells with scant cytoplasm, markedly increased nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio, and numerous indistinct nucleoli. Bone marrow biopsy confirmed extensive marrow infiltration by a malignant neoplasm with strong and diffuse expression of synaptophysin by immunohistochemistry, consistent with metastases from Merkel Cell carcinoma.

Common flow cytometry pitfalls in diagnostic hematopathology.

Flow cytometry (FC) has proven to be an extremely versatile and useful tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of hematological diseases in addition to numerous other applications. Major advances in electronics, software, and reagents over the past years have simplified some aspects of FC, while at the same time the ability to combine 8-10 antibodies in a single tube can create both technical and interpretation issues that are more difficult to detect when using only 3-4 color combinations. Use of multiparameter panels can facilitate identification of abnormal populations; however, characteristics of the neoplastic population may create potential diagnostic pitfalls. An understanding of normal immunophenotypic patterns in states of rest, recovery, and activation is a critical first step in order to appropriately identify the abnormal populations that characterize hematopoietic neoplasms. Additionally, incorporation of newer therapeutic strategies, in particular targeted therapies, can confound standard methods for flow cytometric data analysis and knowledge of the impact of therapy on flow cytometric data is critical for accurate data interpretation. This manuscript will review preanalytical, instrument, and interpretation issues that may lead to incorrect interpretation of results.

Screening of patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism for paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is an uncommon disorder characterized by hemolysis, thrombosis and marrow failure. Whereas venous and arterial thrombosis is a very common symptom of the disease, the frequency of PNH clones in patients with unexplained venous thromboembolism, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, has not been studied. We conducted a cross sectional study evaluating the presence of PNH clones in patients with prevalent venous thromboembolism using a high sensitivity flow cytometry assay for erythrocytes and neutrophils. Among the 388 patients enrolled in the study one patient had a detectable PNH clone of 0.02% in the neutrophil population (0.26%; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.45) and no detectable erythrocyte clone. We conclude that the presence of PNH clones in patients with idiopathic venous thrombosis is rare. Screening for PNH clones among VTE patients might be better reserved for patients with signs of hemolysis.