Establishing the relationship between familial dysbetalipoproteinemia and genetic variants in the APOE gene.

Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is the second most common monogenic dyslipidemia and is associated with a very high cardiovascular risk due to cholesterol-enriched remnant lipoproteins. FD is usually caused by a recessively inherited variant in the APOE gene (ε2ε2), but variants with dominant inheritance have also been described. The typical dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype has a delayed onset and requires a metabolic hit. Therefore, the diagnosis of FD should be made by demonstrating both the genotype and dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype. Next Generation Sequencing is becoming more widely available and can reveal variants in the APOE gene for which the relation with FD is unknown or uncertain. In this article, two approaches are presented to ascertain the relationship of a new variant in the APOE gene with FD. The comprehensive approach consists of determining the pathogenicity of the variant and its causal relationship with FD by confirming a dysbetalipoproteinemia phenotype, and performing in vitro functional tests and, optionally, in vivo postprandial clearance studies. When this is not feasible, a second, pragmatic approach within reach of clinical practice can be followed for individual patients to make decisions on treatment, follow-up, and family counseling.

The association between a genetic variant in the SULF2 gene, metabolic parameters and vascular disease in patients at high cardiovascular risk.

Clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) is mediated by several receptors, including heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). Sulfate glucosamine-6-O-endosulfatase-2 is a gene related to the regulation of HSPG. A variant in this gene, rs2281279, has been shown to be associated with triglycerides and insulin resistance. Objective: To determine the relationship between rs2281279, metabolic parameters and vascular events, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients at high cardiovascular risk and whether APOE genotype modifies this relationship. Methods: Patients (n = 4386) at high cardiovascular risk from the Utrecht Cardiovascular Cohort-Second Manifestations of Arterial Disease study were stratified according to their imputed rs2281279 genotype: AA (n = 2438), AG (n = 1642) and GG (n = 306). Effects of rs2281279 on metabolic parameters, vascular events and T2DM were analyzed with linear regression and Cox models. Results: There was no relationship between imputed rs2281279 genotype and triglycerides, non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, insulin and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index. During a median follow-up of 11.8 (IQR, 9.3-15.5) years, 1026 cardiovascular events and 320 limb events occurred. The presence of the G allele in rs2281279 did not affect the risk of vascular events [hazard ratio (HR), 1.03; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.94-1.14] or limb events (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.77-1.10). The presence of the G allele in rs2281279 did not affect the risk of T2DM (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27). The presence of the minor G allele of rs2281279 was associated with a beneficial risk profile in ε2ε2 patients, but not in ε3ε3 patients. Conclusions: Imputed rs2281279 genotype is not associated with metabolic parameters and does not increase the risk of vascular events or T2DM in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease.

Composition and distribution of lipoproteins after evolocumab in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) reduce fasting and post fat load cholesterol in non-HDL and intermediate density lipoprotein (IDL) in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD). However, the effect of PCSK9 mAbs on the distribution and composition of atherogenic lipoproteins in patients with FD is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 mAb evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in patients with FD on fasting and post fat load lipoprotein distribution and composition. METHODS: Randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. Patients received an oral fat load at the start and end of each treatment period. Apolipoproteins (apo) were measured with ultracentrifugation, gradient gel electrophoresis, retinyl palmitate and SDS-PAGE. RESULTS: PCSK9 mAbs significantly reduced particle number of all atherogenic lipoproteins, with a stronger effect on smaller lipoproteins than on larger lipoproteins (e.g. IDL-apoB 49%, 95%confidence interval (CI) 41-59 and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-apoB 33%, 95%CI 16-50). Furthermore, PCSK9 mAbs lowered cholesterol more than triglyceride (TG) in VLDL, IDL and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (e.g. VLDL-C 48%, 95%CI 29-63%; and VLDL-TG 20%, 95%CI 6.3-41%). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect the post fat load response of chylomicrons. CONCLUSION: PCSK9 mAbs added to standard lipid-lowering therapy in FD patients significantly reduced lipoprotein particle number, in particular the smaller and more cholesterol-rich lipoproteins (i.e. IDL and LDL). PCSK9 mAbs did not affect chylomicron metabolism. It seems likely that the observed effects are achieved by increased hepatic lipoprotein clearance, but the specific working mechanism of PCSK9 mAbs in FD patients remains to be elucidated.

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol measurement in Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia.

AIM: To compare LDL-C concentrations using the Friedewald formula, the Martin-Hopkins formula, a direct assay and polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PGGE) to the reference standard density gradient ultracentrifugation in patients with Familial Dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) patients. We also compared non-HDL-cholesterol concentrations by two methods. METHODS: For this study data from 28 patients with genetically confirmed FD from the placebo arm of the EVOLVE-FD trial were used. Four different methods for determining LDL-C were compared with ultracentrifugation. Non-HDL-C was measured with standard assays and compared to ultracentrifugation. Correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to compare the methods. RESULTS: Mean age of the 28 FD patients was 62 ± 9 years, 43 % were female and 93 % had an ɛ2ɛ2 genotype. LDL-C determined by Friedewald (R2 = 0.62, p <0.01), Martin-Hopkins (R2 = 0.50, p = 0.01) and the direct assay (R2 = 0.41, p = 0.03) correlated with density gradient ultracentrifugation. However, Bland-Altman plots showed considerable over- or underestimation by the four methods compared to ultracentrifugation. Non-HDL-C showed good correlation and agreement. CONCLUSION: In patients with FD, all four methods investigated over- or underestimated LDL-C concentrations compared with ultracentrifugation. In contrast, standard non-HDL-C assays performed well, emphasizing the use of non-HDL-C in patients with FD.

Effect of evolocumab on fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins in familial dysbetalipoproteinemia.

BACKGROUND: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD) is the second most common monogenic lipid disorder (prevalence 1 in 850-3500), characterized by postprandial remnant accumulation and associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Many FD patients do not achieve non-HDL-C treatment goals, indicating the need for additional lipid-lowering treatment options. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy on fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins in patients with FD. METHODS: A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover trial comparing evolocumab (140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks) with placebo during two 12-week treatment periods. At the start and end of each treatment period patients received an oral fat load. The primary endpoint was the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C area under the curve (AUC). Secondary endpoints included fasting and post fat load lipids and lipoproteins. RESULTS: In total, 28 patients completed the study. Mean age was 62±9 years and 93% had an Ɛ2Ɛ2 genotype. Evolocumab reduced the 8-hour post fat load non-HDL-C AUC with 49% (95%CI 42-55) and apolipoprotein B (apoB) AUC with 47% (95%CI 41-53). Other fasting and absolute post fat load lipids and lipoproteins including triglycerides and remnant-cholesterol were also significantly reduced by evolocumab. However, evolocumab did not have significant effects on the rise above fasting levels that occurred after consumption of the oral fat load. CONCLUSIONS: Evolocumab added to standard lipid-lowering therapy significantly reduced fasting and absolute post fat load concentrations of non-HDL-C, apoB and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins in FD patients. The clinically significant decrease in lipids and lipoproteins can be expected to translate into a reduction in CVD risk in these high-risk patients.

Clinical heterogeneity in monogenic chylomicronaemia.

Chylomicronaemia accompanies hypertriglyceridaemia, usually due to a polygenic predisposition in combination with secondary risk factors. Monogenic chylomicronaemia represents a small subgroup of patients with hypertriglyceridaemia. This article describes three patients and illustrates the heterogeneity in the presentation of monogenic chylomicronaemia. The first case is a man with mild hypertriglyceridaemia who is a compound heterozygote for two variants in the LMF1 gene, without relevant medical history. The second case is a woman who is a double heterozygote of variants in the LPL and APOA5 genes. She experienced pancreatitis. The third case is a man, with recurrent pancreatitis attributed to severe hypertriglyceridaemia and homozygous for a variant in the APOC2 gene. This article highlights that in patients with hypertriglyceridaemia, the absence of pancreatitis or the presence of mild hypertriglyceridaemia does not exclude monogenic chylomicronaemia. Genetic screening should be considered in patients with unexplained or severe hypertriglyceridaemia, to determine appropriate treatment and follow-up.

[An abnormal lipid profile: when to perform additional research for a genetic cause?] / Een afwijkend lipidenprofiel.

Abnormalities in the lipid profile are common, but it is often not easy to determine their cause. After exclusion of secondary causes, a primary (genetic) cause of dyslipidaemia should be considered. The most common monogenic dyslipidaemia is familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), but there are other clinically relevant genetic dyslipidaemias, including familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia (FD), monogenic chylomicronaemia and hypoalphalipoproteinemia. It is important to make a genetic diagnosis because it may influence the prognosis of the patient, for determining appropriate treatment goals and because it is relevant for family members. This clinical viewpoint explains the diagnostic process of genetic dyslipidaemias using two cases.

Genetic variants associated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and systolic blood pressure and the risk of recurrent cardiovascular disease in patients with established vascular disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) can be used to quantify the effect of genetic contribution to LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Several PRSs for LDL-C and SBP have been shown to be associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of an LDL-C PRS and an SBP PRS on the risk of recurrent CVD in patients with CVD. METHODS: Genotyping was performed in 4,416 patients included in the UCC-SMART study. Weighted LDL-C PRS (279 LDL-C-related SNPs) and SBP PRS (425 SBP-related SNPs) were calculated. Linear regression models were used to evaluate the relation between both PRSs and LDL-C and SBP. The effects of the LDL-C PRS and SBP PRS, and its combination on the risk of recurrent CVD (stroke, myocardial infarction, and vascular death) were analyzed with Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS: Per SD increase in LDL-C PRS, LDL-C increased by 0.18 mmol/L (95%CI 0.15-0.21). Per SD increase in SBP PRS, SBP increased by 3.19 mmHg (95%CI 2.60-3.78). During a follow-up of 11.7 years (IQR 9.2-15.0) 1,198 recurrent events occurred. Neither the LDL-C nor the SBP PRS were associated with recurrent CVD (HR 1.05 per SD increase in LDL-C PRS (95%CI 0.99-1.11) and HR 1.04 per SD increase in SBP PRS (95%CI 0.98-1.10)). The combination of both scores was neither associated with recurrent CVD (HR 1.09; 95%CI 0.93-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with vascular disease, LDL-C PRS and SBP PRS, both separately and in combination, were not significantly associated with recurrent CVD.

Adiposity and the development of dyslipidemia in APOE ε2 homozygous subjects: A longitudinal analysis in two population-based cohorts.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD), characterized by remnant lipoprotein accumulation and premature cardiovascular disease, occurs in homozygous carriers of the APOE ε2 allele, but genetic predisposition alone does not suffice for the clinical phenotype. Cross-sectional studies suggest that a second metabolic hit - notably adiposity or insulin resistance - is required, but the association between these risk factors and development of FD has not been studied prospectively. METHODS: For this study, we evaluated 18,987 subjects from two large prospective Dutch population-based cohorts (PREVEND and Rotterdam Study) of whom 118 were homozygous APOE ε2 carriers. Of these, 69 subjects were available for prospective analyses. Dyslipidemia - likely to be FD - was defined as fasting triglyceride (TG) levels >3 mmol/L in untreated subjects or use of lipid lowering medication. The effect of weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-TG metabolic syndrome on development of dyslipidemia was investigated. RESULTS: Eleven of the 69 ε2ε2 subjects (16%) developed dyslipidemia - likely FD - during follow-up. Age-, sex- and cohort-adjusted risk factors for the development of FD were BMI (OR 1.19; 95%CI 1.04-1.39), waist circumference (OR 1.26 95%CI 1.01-1.61) and presence of non-TG metabolic syndrome (OR 4.39; 95%CI 1.04-18.4) at baseline. Change in adiposity during follow-up was not associated with development of dyslipidemia. CONCLUSIONS: Adiposity increases the risk of developing an FD-like lipid phenotype in homozygous APOE ε2 subjects. These results stress the importance of healthy body weight in subjects at risk of developing FD.

The relation between VLDL-cholesterol and risk of cardiovascular events in patients with manifest cardiovascular disease.

INTRODUCTION: Apolipoprotein B containing lipoproteins are atherogenic. There is evidence that with low plasma low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels residual vascular risk might be caused by triglyceride rich lipoproteins such as very-low density lipoproteins (VLDL), chylomicrons and their remnants. We investigated the relationship between VLDL-cholesterol (VLDL-C) and recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major adverse limb events (MALE) and all-cause mortality in a cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in 8057 patients with cardiovascular disease from the UCC-SMART study. The relation between calculated VLDL-C levels and the occurrence of MACE, MALE and all-cause mortality was analyzed with Cox regression models. RESULTS: Patients mean age was 60 ± 10 years, 74% were male, 4894 (61%) had coronary artery disease, 2445 (30%) stroke, 1425 (18%) peripheral arterial disease and 684 (8%) patients had an abdominal aorta aneurysm at baseline. A total of 1535 MACE, 571 MALE and 1792 deaths were observed during a median follow up of 8.2 years (interquartile range 4.512.2). VLDL-C was not associated with risk of MACE or all-cause mortality. In the highest quartile of VLDL-C the risk was higher for major adverse limb events (MALE) (HR 1.49; 95%CI 1.16-1.93) compared to the lowest quartile, after adjustment for confounders including LDL-C and lipid lowering medication. CONCLUSION: In patients with clinically manifest cardiovascular disease plasma VLDL-C confers an increased risk for MALE, but not for MACE and all-cause mortality, independent of established risk factors including LDL-C and lipid-lowering medication.