Collective Weakness and Fluidity in Weakness Status Associated With Basic Self-Care Limitations in Older Americans.

Aims: To examine the associations of 1) absolute and normalized weakness cut-points, 2) collective weakness categories, and 3) changes in weakness status on future activities of daily living (ADL) limitations in older Americans. Methods: The analytic sample included 11,656 participants aged ≥65-years from the 2006-2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. ADL were self-reported. A handgrip dynamometer measured handgrip strength (HGS). Males were classified as weak if their HGS was <35.5-kg (absolute), <0.45-kg/kg (body mass normalized), or <1.05-kg/kg/m2 (body mass index (BMI) normalized); females were considered weak if their HGS was <20.0-kg, <0.337-kg/kg, or <0.79-kg/kg/m2. Collective weakness categorized those below 1, 2, or all 3 absolute and normalized cut-points. These collective categories were also used to classify observed changes in weakness status over time (onset, persistent, progressive, recovery). Results: Older Americans below absolute and normalized weakness cut-points had greater future ADL limitations odds: 1.34 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.22-1.47) for absolute, 1.36 (CI: 1.24-1.50) for BMI normalized, and 1.56 (CI: 1.41-1.73) for body mass normalized. Persons below 1, 2, or 3 cut-points had 1.36 (CI: 1.19-1.55), 1.60 (CI: 1.41-1.80), and 1.70 (CI: 1.50-1.92) greater odds for future ADL limitations, respectively. Those in each changing weakness classification had greater future ADL limitation odds: 1.28 (CI: 1.01-1.62) for onset, 1.53 (CI: 1.22-1.92) for persistent, 1.72 (CI: 1.36-2.19) for progressive, and 1.34 (CI: 1.08-1.66) for recovery. Conclusions: The presence of weakness, regardless of cut-point and change in status over time, was associated with greater odds for future ADL limitations.

Prevalence and Trends of Basic Activities of Daily Living Limitations in Middle-Aged and Older Adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Population-level surveillance of the prevalence and trends of basic self-care limitations will help to identify the magnitude of physical disablement in the rapidly growing older American demographic. We sought to evaluate the prevalence and trends of activities of daily living (ADL) limitations in the United States. METHODS: The analytic sample included 30,418 Americans aged ≥50 years from the 2006-2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. ADLs were self-reported. Weighted prevalence estimates were presented, and trends analyses were performed. RESULTS: Although overall ADL disability prevalence was 16.5% (95% confidence interval: 15.8-17.2) in 2018, there were no changes in limitations during the study period (p = 0.52). Older adults had a greater ADL disability prevalence than middle-aged adults (p < 0.001). While older persons experienced a declining trend of ADL limitations (p < 0.001), middle-aged persons had an increasing trend (p < 0.001). Males had a lower ADL limitation prevalence than females (p < 0.001). Hispanic and non-Hispanic Black had a higher ADL disability prevalence than non-Hispanic White (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This investigation revealed that while the estimated prevalence of ADL limitations in the United States was substantial, changes in such limitations were not observed. Our findings can help guide ADL screening, target sub-populations with an elevated ADL limitation prevalence, and inform interventions.

The Prevalence and Trends of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Impairments in the United States from 2008-2018.

Background: Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) are neuropsychological-driven tasks that are linked to cognitive dysfunction. Examining population-based IADL deficits may reveal insights for the presence of these impairments in the United States. Objective: This investigation sought to evaluate the prevalence and trends of IADL impairments in Americans. Methods: A secondary analysis of data from the 2006-2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study was conducted. The overall unweighted analytic sample included 29,764 Americans aged≥50 years. Respondents indicated their ability to perform six IADLs: manage money, manage medications, use a telephone, prepare hot meals, shop for groceries, and use a map. Persons reporting difficulty or an inability to complete an individual IADL were considered as having a task-specific impairment. Similarly, those indicating difficulty or an inability to perform any IADL were classified as having an IADL impairment. Sample weights were utilized to generate nationally-representative estimates. Results: Having an impairment in using a map (2018 wave: 15.7% (95% confidence interval (CI): 15.0-16.4) had the highest prevalence in individual IADLs regardless of wave examined. The overall prevalence of IADL impairments declined during the study period (p < 0.001) to 25.4% (CI: 24.5-26.2) in the 2018 wave. Older Americans and women had a consistently higher prevalence of IADL impairments compared to middle-aged Americans and men, respectively. The prevalence of IADL impairments was also highest among Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks. Conclusion: IADL impairments have declined over time. Continued surveillance of IADLs may help inform cognitive screening, identify subpopulations at risk of impairment, and guide relevant policy.