Hypoxic perfusion of pulmonary arterial vasa vasorum increases pulmonary arterial pressure.

The pathophysiology of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is not fully understood. Here, we tested the hypothesis that hypoxic perfusion of the vasa vasorum of the pulmonary arterial (PA) wall causes PH. Young adult pig lungs were explanted and placed into a modified ex vivo lung perfusion unit (organ care system, OCS) allowing the separate adjustment of parameters for mechanical ventilation, as well as PA perfusion and bronchial arterial (BA) perfusion. The PA vasa vasorum are branches of the BA. The lungs were used either as the control group (n = 3) or the intervention group (n = 8). The protocol for the intervention group was as follows: normoxic ventilation and perfusion (steady state), hypoxic BA perfusion, steady state, and hypoxic BA perfusion. During hypoxic BA perfusion, ventilation and PA perfusion maintained normal. Control lungs were kept under steady-state conditions for 105 min. During the experiments, PA pressure (PAP) and blood gas analysis were frequently monitored. Hypoxic perfusion of the BA resulted in an increase in systolic and mean PAP, a reaction that was reversible upon normoxic BA perfusion. The PAP increase was reproducible during the second hypoxic BA perfusion. Under control conditions, the PAP stayed constant until about 80 min of the experiment. In conclusion, the results of the current study prove that hypoxic perfusion of the vasa vasorum of the PA directly increases PAP in an ex situ lung perfusion setup, suggesting that PA vasa vasorum function and wall ischemia may contribute to the development of PH.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Hypoxic perfusion of the vasa vasorum of the pulmonary artery directly increased pulmonary arterial pressure in an ex vivo lung perfusion setup. This suggests that the function of pulmonary arterial vasa vasorum and wall ischemia may contribute to the development of pulmonary hypertension.

Lung transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antihuman leukocyte antigen antibodies: a 9-year single-center experience.

Pretransplant allosensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA) increases the recipient's waiting list time and mortality in lung transplantation. Rather than waiting for crossmatch-negative donors, since 2013, recipients with preformed donor-specific antiHLA antibodies (pfDSA) have been managed with repeated IgA- and IgM-enriched intravenous immunoglobulin (IgGAM) infusions, usually in combination with plasmapheresis before IgGAM and a single dose of antiCD20 antibody. This retrospective study presents our 9-year experience with patients transplanted with pfDSA. Records of patients transplanted between February 2013 and May 2022 were reviewed. Outcomes were compared between patients with pfDSA and those without any de novo donor-specific antiHLA antibodies. The median follow-up time was 50 months. Of the 1,043 patients who had undergone lung transplantation, 758 (72.7%) did not develop any early donor-specific antiHLA antibodies, and 62 (5.9%) patients exhibited pfDSA. Among the 52 (84%) patients who completed treatment, pfDSA was cleared in 38 (73%). In pfDSA vs control patients and at 8-year follow-up, respectively, graft survival (%) was 75 vs 65 (P = .493) and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (%) was 63 vs 65 (P = .525). In lung transplantation, crossing the preformed HLA-antibody barrier is safe using a treatment protocol based on IgGAM. Patients with pfDSA have a good 8-year graft survival rate and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction, similar to control patients.

Impact of total ischaemic time and disease severity class on graft function after bilateral lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: Total ischaemic time (IT) is considered a limiting factor in lung transplantation. In this retrospective study, we investigate effects of IT and disease burden on outcomes after bilateral lung transplantation. METHODS: A total of 1298 patients undergoing bilateral lung transplantation between January 2010 and May 2022 (follow-up 100%, median 54 months) were included. Pre-transplant diseases' severity (recipient body mass index, recipient age, previous lung transplantation, Tacrolimus immunosuppression, preoperative recipient extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, lung volume reduction) for graft failure was individually calculated and-as IT-categorized. Vice versa adjusted Cox models were calculated. Considering competing risks, we assessed cumulative incidences of airway obstructive complications and chronic lung allograft dysfunction with death as competing risk factors for primary graft dysfunction were assessed by binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Higher disease burden significantly accelerated chronic lung allograft dysfunction and death occurrence (P < 0.001); IT did not. IT-adjusted disease burden strata showed 50% graft survival differences at 11 years after transplantation (range 24-74%), disease burden-adjusted IT strata 18% for all and 6% (54-60%) among those above 7 h. All significant primary graft dysfunction risk factors were diagnoses related, IT was not significantly important and odds ratios did not increase with IT. CONCLUSIONS: The eventual graft survival disadvantage that results from an IT between 7 and at least 11 h is negligible in contrast to frequent recipients' disease-based risk levels.