A comparison of rapid bovine spongiform encephalopathy testing methods on autolyzed bovine brain tissue.

In 1999, the European Union (EU) approved 3 rapid methods for the testing of bovine brain samples for the presence of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). The evaluation that led to the approval did not include an analysis of autolyzed material. Member states of the EU have active surveillance programs for BSE, which target fallen stock as well as other categories of cattle. Autolysis is a common feature of fallen stock samples because there can be a considerable delay between death and collection of samples. Therefore, it is important to know whether these tests perform optimally on autolyzed samples. The Veterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA) selected 250 positive fallen stock samples. These had been detected during routine testing using the Prionics-Check Western blot and confirmed as BSE cases by immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy. Samples were graded according to the degree of autolysis and then tested by the 3 methods: Prionics-Check Western blot, Platelia test, and Enfer test. All 3 methods correctly classified the samples as positive BSE cases, therefore alleviating doubt about their ability to do so. Subsequent EU validation exercises, such as those conducted in 2002--2003, have included the testing of autolyzed material. It is important that all new methods be evaluated on autolyzed tissue before approval for official use.

Detection of pneumolysin in sputum.

Western blot detection of the species-specific pneumococcal product, pneumolysin (SPN), was shown to be almost as sensitive as PCR for the non-cultural detection of pneumococci in 27 Streptococcus pneumoniae culture-positive sputa from patients stated to have chest infections. Both techniques were considerably more sensitive than counter-current immuno-electrophoresis for pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide antigens (CPS-CIE) on the same specimens. Sensitivities for PCR, SPN-immunoblotting and CPS-CIE were 100%, 85% and 67%, respectively. In 11 S. pneumoniae culture-negative sputa taken from patients receiving antibiotics, but with proven recent pneumococcal infection, PCR and SPN-blot were positive in six (in two of which CPS-CIE was also positive), PCR alone was positive in one and SPN-blot alone was positive in one. In 11 S. pneumoniae culture-negative samples from patients not receiving antibiotics, all three tests were negative in eight, PCR was positive in three (in one of which CPS-CIE was also positive), but SPN-blot was negative in all 11. In 16 S. pneumoniae culture-negative samples from patients receiving antibiotics and with no known recent pneumococcal infections, one or more non-cultural test was positive in 11. Although further evaluation is required to assess the significance of pneumolysin detection in relation to carriage and infection and to devise a more suitable test format, these preliminary studies suggest that pneumolysin detection is a promising new approach to the non-cultural diagnosis of pneumococcal chest infection.