RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening programs were introduced in many countries worldwide following randomized controlled trials in the 1980s showing a reduction in breast cancer-specific mortality. However, their effectiveness remains debated and estimates vary. A breast cancer screening program was introduced in 2001 in Flanders, Belgium where high levels of opportunistic screening practices are observed. The effectiveness of this program was estimated by measuring its effect on breast cancer-specific mortality. METHODS: We performed a case-referent study to investigate the effect of participation in the Flemish population-based mammography screening program (PMSP) on breast cancer-specific mortality from 2005 to 2017. A multiple logistic regression model assessed the association between breast cancer-specific death and screening program participation status in the four years prior to (pseudo)diagnosis (yes/no), with adjustment for potential confounders (individual socio-economic position and calendar year of diagnosis) and stratified for age. In addition, we performed different sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: We identified 1571 cases and randomly selected 6284 referents. After adjustment, women who participated in PMSP had a 51 % lower risk of breast cancer-specific mortality compared to those who did not (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] =0.49, 95 % CI: 0.44-0.55). Sensitivity analyses did not markedly change the estimated associations. Correction for self-selection bias reduced the effect size, but the estimate remained significant. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that in a context of high opportunistic screening rates, participation in breast cancer screening program substantially reduces breast cancer-specific mortality. For policy, these results should be balanced against the potential harms of screening, including overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Mamografia/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Modelos Logísticos , Programas de Rastreamento/métodosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess the proportion of parenteral treatment of the total outpatient antibiotic use in Europe, and to identify the antibiotic groups and individual antibiotics most commonly administered in this way. METHODS: Within the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC; www.esac.ua.ac.be), using the anatomic therapeutic chemical (ATC) and defined daily dose (DDD) classification, data on outpatient use of antibacterials for systemic use (ATC J01), aggregated at the level of the active substance and expressed in DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID; WHO version 2007), were extracted for 2006 by route of administration and by country. Parenteral use was expressed as a percentage of the total outpatient use in DID. RESULTS: In 20 European countries, the total outpatient antibiotic use ranged from 27.91 DID in France to 9.58 DID in Russia. The proportion of outpatient parenteral antibiotic treatment ranged from 6.75% in Russia to 0.001% in Iceland. The three most commonly used antibiotic groups for parenteral treatment in Europe were the cephalosporins (J01D; 44.58%), the aminoglycosides (J01G; 25.27%) and the penicillins (J01C; 17.78%). Four antibiotics [gentamicin (J01GB03) 18.53%; ceftriaxone (J01DD04) 17.85%; cefazolin (J01DB04) 13.16%; and lincomycin (J01FF02) 5.47%] represented more than half of the use. CONCLUSIONS: In all 20 European countries studied together, 2.04% of outpatient antibiotics were used for parenteral treatment. However, as for the total outpatient antibiotic use and the use of different antibiotic groups and antibiotics, there is a striking variation in the proportions of parenteral antibiotic use in Europe. More in-depth data on outpatient antibiotic use are needed to explain this variation.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Injeções Intravenosas , Pacientes AmbulatoriaisRESUMO
BACKGROUND: When calculating life expectancy, it is usually assumed that deaths are uniformly distributed within each of the age intervals. As most of the infant deaths are neonatal deaths, this calls for a better assessment for that age group. METHODS: The Flemish unified death and birth certificates database for all calendar years between 1999 and 2008 was used. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis on a yearly basis was performed to assess the mean time-to-event and to compare survival curves between both genders. RESULTS: Over the last years, a slight though not steady decrease of the infant mortality rate is observed. In 2008, the probability among live births of dying before their first anniversary is 4.6 in boys and 3.5 in girls. The large majority (about 85%) of these have died in their year of birth. The mean survival time of deaths in their year of birth was found to centre around 1 month (about 30 days), which results in a 'mean proportion of the calendar year lived' (k1) close to 0.09. Among those who died in the year after their year of birth yet before their first anniversary, no such concentration in time of the deaths is observed. Differences between the gender groups are small and generally not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Statistics Belgium, the federal statistics office, imputes a value for k1 equal to 0.1 for infant deaths in their year of birth when calculating life expectancy. Our data fully support this value. We think such refinement is generally feasible in calculating life expectancy.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The ESAC project, granted by DG SANCO of the European Commission, is an international network of surveillance systems, aiming to collect comparable and reliable data on antibiotic use in Europe. Data on outpatient antibiotic use were collected from 34 countries using the ATC/DDD methodology. METHODS: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic antibiotics aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Outpatient antibiotic (ATC J01) use in 25 European countries, able to deliver valid data, was analysed. RESULTS: Total outpatient antibiotic use in 2003 varied by a factor of 3 between the country with the highest (31.4 DID in Greece) and the country with the lowest (9.8 DID in the Netherlands) use. General use patterns in individual countries as well as trends during the period 1997-2003 are described in this paper, while major antibiotic classes (penicillins, cephalosporins, macrolides/lincosamides/streptogramins and quinolones) will be analysed in detail in separate papers. CONCLUSION: The ESAC project established for the first time a credible alternative to industry sources for the collection of internationally comparable data on antibiotic use in Europe, based on cooperation between regulatory authorities, scientific societies, health insurers and professional organizations. These data provide a tool for assessing public health strategies aiming to optimize antibiotic prescribing.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on outpatient penicillin use in Europe were collected from 25 countries within the ESAC project, funded by DG SANCO of the European Commission, using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology. METHODS: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic penicillins aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Of the 'Penicillins' (J01C), outpatient use of narrow-spectrum penicillins (J01CE), broad-spectrum penicillins (J01CA), penicillinase-resistant penicillins (J01CF) and combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors (J01CR) in 25 European countries was analysed in detail. RESULTS: Total outpatient penicillin use in 2003 varied by a factor of 4 between the country with the highest (15.27 DID in Slovakia) and lowest use (3.86 DID in the Netherlands). Narrow-spectrum penicillins, broad-spectrum penicillins and combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors were used most in 4, 12 and 9 countries, respectively. Penicillin use increased by more than 1 DID in nine countries, whereas it decreased by more than 1 DID in two countries (Czech Republic, France). An increase of the use of combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors by more than 10% in 10 countries coincided with an equal decrease of broad-spectrum penicillins in seven countries and narrow-spectrum penicillins in three countries. CONCLUSION: Penicillins represent the most widely used antibiotic class in all 25 participating countries; albeit with considerable variation of their use patterns. A distinct shift from narrow-spectrum penicillins to broad-spectrum penicillins, and specifically their combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors, was observed during the period 1997-2003.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on outpatient cephalosporin use in Europe were collected from 25 countries within the ESAC project, funded by DG SANCO of the European Commission, using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology. METHODS: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic cephalosporins aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Use was analysed in detail, using the new ATC codes J01DB, J01DC, J01DD and J01DE, introduced in the 2005 issue of the WHO ATC index and assigned to the four cephalosporin generations. RESULTS: Total outpatient cephalosporin use in 2003 varied by a factor of 270 between the country with the highest (6.18 DID in Greece) and lowest (0.02 DID in Denmark) use. First-, second- and third-generation cephalosporins were used most in 6, 16 and 3 countries, respectively. We observed fourth-generation use (mainly cefepime) in ambulatory care in 11 countries. From 1997 to 2003 cephalosporin use decreased in 13 countries, in France by more than 1 DID. A relative increase of second-generation (mainly cefuroxime) or third-generation use (mainly cefpodoxime or cefixime) by more than 10% in 12 countries coincided with an equally large decrease of first-generation use in eight countries (mainly cefadroxil, cefalexin or cefatrizine). In six countries, first-generation use increased, second-generation use decreased or both occurred. CONCLUSION: The new ATC codes allow a more detailed description of outpatient cephalosporin use. The variation in antibiotic use in Europe is most extreme for this class of antibiotics, suggesting that in many countries in Europe these antibiotics are prescribed inappropriately.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on outpatient macrolide, lincosamide and streptogramin (MLS) use in Europe were collected from 25 countries within the ESAC project, funded by DG SANCO of the European Commission, using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology. METHODS: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic MLS aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Macrolide use was analysed in detail, using a classification based on their mean plasma elimination half-life. RESULTS: Total outpatient MLS use in 2003 varied by a factor of 11 between the country with the highest (9.36 DID in Greece) and lowest (0.85 DID in Sweden) use. MLS use showed high seasonal variation. Short-, intermediate- and long-acting macrolides were used most in 6, 18 and 1 countries, respectively (mainly erythromycin, clarithromyin and azithromycin, respectively). Lincosamide use was observed in all countries (mainly clindamycin) and substantial streptogramin use only in France (pristinamycin). From 1997 to 2003, MLS use increased in 14 countries and was most pronounced in Greece (increase of >5 DID). Except for Sweden, a relative increase of intermediate- (mainly clarithromycin) and/or long-acting (mainly azithromycin) macrolide use was observed, at the expense of short-acting macrolide (mainly erythromycin) use. CONCLUSION: The observed differences between European countries in the levels of MLS use and the extreme seasonal variations in their use suggest that this class of antibiotics is prescribed inappropriately in many countries. The MLS classification developed here facilitates a more comprehensive description of macrolide use in Europe. These data (collected as part of ESAC) could promote investigations that lead to a deeper understanding of the link between macrolide use and resistance.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Estreptograminas/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , LincosamidasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data on outpatient quinolone use in Europe were collected from 25 countries within the ESAC project, funded by DG SANCO of the European Commission, using the WHO ATC/DDD methodology. METHODS: For the period 1997-2003, data on outpatient use of systemic quinolones aggregated at the level of the active substance were collected and expressed in DDD (WHO, version 2004) per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID). Because a new DDD for levofloxacin was published in the ATC 2004 index (0.5 g instead of 0.25 g) all data were recalculated accordingly. Quinolone use was analysed in detail, using a classification into three generations based on their pharmacokinetic and in vitro potency profiles, which determines the area of clinical use. RESULTS: Total outpatient quinolone use in 2003 varied by a factor of 12 between the country with the highest (3.10 DID in Portugal) and lowest (0.25 DID in Denmark) quinolone use. The second-generation quinolones represented more than 50% of the quinolone use (mainly ciprofloxacin) except for Croatia, where the first-generation was used most (mainly norfloxacin). In 22 countries, the use of second and/or third-generation quinolones increased at the expense of the use of first-generation quinolones. The new so-called respiratory quinolones (levofloxacin and moxifloxacin) represented more than 10% of quinolone use in 12 countries, with extreme seasonal variation in all these countries except for one. CONCLUSION: There has been a substantial change in the use pattern of quinolones between 1997 and 2003, since the introduction of quinolones that are effective for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. These quinolones are not the first-line antibiotics for this indication and therefore quinolone use should in general still be limited and not show substantial seasonal variation.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Quinolonas/uso terapêutico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Europa (Continente) , HumanosRESUMO
Em Colômbia, tradicionalmente se ha visto la leishmaniosis como un problema de Salud Pública para hombres adultos dado que se considera que la transmisión es selvática y que ellos empiezan a infectarse cuando entran a los biotopos del vector con el fin de utilizar los recursos naturales. Sin embargo, el Programa de Estudio y Control de Enfermedades Tropicales (PECET) ha observado iguales proporciones de hombres y mujeres con leishmaniosis activa y pruebas cutáneas positivas. Alguns factores, hasta ahora nunca analizados, parecen distorsionar el patrón de la enfermedad y al parecer existen diferencias inherentes al género relacionadas con el acceso a la atención en salud. Como consecuencia, el sufrimiento humano no es aliviado y las repercusiones socio-económicas para las amas de casa son significativas. El Ministerio de Salud subestima la magnitud de la transmisión intra y peridomiciliaria y la detección de casos activos se descuida para mujeres, por lo cual se deben mejorar los programas de control de leishmaniosis, especialmente en lo relacionado con la detección de casos activos, entrenamiento y educación, de tal forma que el diagnóstico se realice en forma más rápida.