Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is a biomarker of acute-on-chronic liver failure and prognosis in cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome that occurs in cirrhosis characterized by organ failure(s) and high mortality rate. There are no biomarkers of ACLF. The LCN2 gene and its product, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), are upregulated in experimental models of liver injury and cultured hepatocytes as a result of injury by toxins or proinflammatory cytokines, particularly Interleukin-6. The aim of this study was to investigate whether NGAL could be a biomarker of ACLF and whether LCN2 gene may be upregulated in the liver in ACLF. METHODS: We analyzed urine and plasma NGAL levels in 716 patients hospitalized for complications of cirrhosis, 148 with ACLF. LCN2 expression was assessed in liver biopsies from 29 additional patients with decompensated cirrhosis with and without ACLF. RESULTS: Urine NGAL was markedly increased in ACLF vs. no ACLF patients (108(35-400) vs. 29(12-73)µg/g creatinine; p<0.001) and was an independent predictive factor of ACLF; the independent association persisted after adjustment for kidney function or exclusion of variables present in ACLF definition. Urine NGAL was also an independent predictive factor of 28day transplant-free mortality together with MELD score and leukocyte count (AUROC 0.88(0.83-0.92)). Urine NGAL improved significantly the accuracy of MELD in predicting prognosis. The LCN2 gene was markedly upregulated in the liver of patients with ACLF. Gene expression correlated directly with serum bilirubin and INR (r=0.79; p<0.001 and r=0.67; p<0.001), MELD (r=0.68; p<0.001) and Interleukin-6 (r=0.65; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NGAL is a biomarker of ACLF and prognosis and correlates with liver failure and systemic inflammation. There is remarkable overexpression of LCN2 gene in the liver in ACLF syndrome. LAY SUMMARY: Urine NGAL is a biomarker of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). NGAL is a protein that may be expressed in several tissues in response to injury. The protein is filtered by the kidneys due to its small size and can be measured in the urine. Ariza, Graupera and colleagues found in a series of 716 patients with cirrhosis that urine NGAL was markedly increased in patients with ACLF and correlated with prognosis. Moreover, gene coding NGAL was markedly overexpressed in the liver tissue in ACLF.

Clinical and genetic factors involved in Porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder after oxaliplatin exposure.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Oxaliplatin (OX) has been described as a potential etiologic agent for porto-sinusoidal vascular disorder (PSVD). Our aim was to describe the natural history of PSVD due to OX in colon cancer (CRC) and identify risk factors for its development. METHODS: We made a multicenter retrospective case-control (ratio 1:3) study with patients diagnosed of PSVD-OX. Baseline data, end of treatment, years of follow-up and diagnosis of PSVD were collected and compared to controls (without PSVD). Besides, 16 different SNPs were selected from bibliography and analyzed by genotyping in the case group to identify potential genetic risk factors. RESULTS: 41 cases were identified, with a median time to PSVD diagnosis after the end of OX of 34 months. Spleen diameter was the strongest predictor of PSVD during treatment (OR 43.94 (14.48-133.336); p < 0.0001). Additionally, thrombocytopenia (<150 × 10^9) at one year was a significant disease risk marker (OR 9.35; 95% CI: 3.71-23.58; p = 0.001). We could not establish any significant association between the selected SNPs and PSVD diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The increase of spleen diameter is the strongest predictor of PSVD in patients treated with OX for CRC. These patients could be candidates for a specific follow-up of portal hypertension-related complications.

The macrophage activation marker sCD163 combined with markers of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) score predicts clinically significant portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive identification of significant portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis is needed in hepatology practice. AIM: To investigate whether the combination of sCD163 as a hepatic inflammation marker and the fibrosis markers of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis score (ELF) can predict portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. METHODS: We measured sCD163 and the ELF components (hyaluronic acid, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 and procollagen-III aminopeptide) in two separate cohorts of cirrhosis patients that underwent hepatic vein catheterisation. To test the predictive accuracy we developed a CD163-fibrosis portal hypertension score in an estimation cohort (n = 80) and validated the score in an independent cohort (n = 80). A HVPG ≥10 mmHg was considered clinically significant. RESULTS: Both sCD163 and the ELF components increased in a stepwise manner with the patients' Child-Pugh score (P < 0.001, all), and also with increasing HVPG (P < 0.001). receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analyses showed that each one of the individual components predicted a HVPG >10 mmHg with AUROC's of approximately 0.80. The combined score optimised by logistic regression analyses improved the AUROC to 0.91 in the estimation cohort and 0.90 in the validation cohort. Furthermore, a high value of the combined score was associated with a high short-term mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of the macrophage activation marker sCD163 and the fibrosis markers predicted significant portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. This score may prove useful for screening purposes and highlights the importance of both the inflammatory and the fibrotic components of cirrhotic portal hypertension.