Recommendations for reporting tissue and circulating tumour (ct)DNA next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer is a heterogeneous disease and molecular characterisation plays an important role in its clinical management. Next-generation sequencing-based panel testing enables many molecular alterations to be interrogated simultaneously, allowing for comprehensive identification of actionable oncogenic drivers (and co-mutations) and appropriate matching of patients with targeted therapies. Despite consensus in international guidelines on the importance of broad molecular profiling, adoption of next-generation sequencing varies globally. One of the barriers to its successful implementation is a lack of accepted standards and guidelines specifically for the reporting and clinical annotation of next-generation sequencing results. Based on roundtable discussions between pathologists and oncologists, we provide best practice recommendations for the reporting of next-generation sequencing results in non-small cell lung cancer to facilitate its use and enable easy interpretation for physicians. These are intended to complement existing guidelines related to the use of next-generation sequencing (solid and liquid). Here, we discuss next-generation sequencing workflows, the structure of next-generation sequencing reports, and our recommendations for best practice thereof. The aim of these recommendations and considerations is ultimately to ensure that reports are fully interpretable, and that the most appropriate treatment options are selected based on robust molecular profiles in well-defined reports.

Detection of Muscularis propria Invasion in Urothelial Carcinoma Using Artificial Intelligence.

Background & Objective: Assessment of muscularis propria invasion is a crucial step in the management of urothelial carcinoma since it necessitates aggressive treatment. The diagnosis of muscle invasion is a challenging process for pathologists. Artificial intelligence is developing rapidly and being implemented in various fields of pathology. The purpose of this study was to develop an algorithm for the detection of muscularis propria invasion in urothelial carcinoma. Methods: The Training cohort consisted of 925 images from 50 specimens of urothelial carcinoma. Ninety-seven images from 10 new specimens were used as a validation cohort. Clinical validation used 127 whole specimens with a total of 617 slides. The algorithm determined areas where tumor and muscularis propria events were in nearest proximity, and presented these areas to the pathologist. Results: Analytical evaluation showed a sensitivity of 72% for muscularis propria and 65% for tumor, and a specificity of 46% and 77% for muscularis propria and tumor detection, respectively. The incorporation of the spatial proximity factor between muscularis propria and tumor in the clinical validation significantly improved the detection of muscularis propria invasion, as the algorithm managed to identify all except for one case with muscle invasive bladder cancer in the clinical validation cohort. The case missed by the algorithm was nested urothelial carcinoma, a rare subtype with unusual morphologic features. The pathologist managed to identify muscle invasion based on the images provided by the algorithm in a short time, with an average of approximately 5 s. Conclusion: The algorithm we developed may greatly aid in accurate identification of muscularis propria invasion by imitating the thought process of the pathologist.

Algorithm-assisted diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease - evaluation of robustness and comparative image analysis on data from various labs and slide scanners.

BACKGROUND: Differences in the preparation, staining and scanning of digital pathology slides create significant pre-analytic variability. Algorithm-assisted tools must be able to contend with this variability in order to be applicable in clinical practice. In a previous study, a decision support algorithm was developed to assist in the diagnosis of Hirschsprung's disease. In the current study, we tested the robustness of this algorithm while assessing for pre-analytic factors which may affect its performance. METHODS: The decision support algorithm was used on digital pathology slides obtained from four different medical centers (A-D) and scanned by three different scanner models (by Philips, Hamamatsu and 3DHISTECH). A total of 192 cases and 1782 slides were used in this study. RGB histograms were constructed to compare images from the various medical centers and scanner models and highlight the differences in color and contrast. RESULTS: The algorithm was able to correctly identify ganglion cells in 99.2% of cases, from all medical centers (All scanned by the Philips slide scanner) as well as 95.5% and 100% of the slides scanned by the 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu brand slide scanners, respectively. The total error rate for center D was lower than the other medical centers (3.9% vs 7.1%, 10.8% and 6% for centers A-C, respectively), the vast majority of errors being false positives (3.45% vs 0.45% false negatives). The other medical centers showed a higher rate of false negatives in relation to false positives (6.81% vs 0.29%, 9.8% vs 1.2% and 5.37% vs 0.63% for centers A-C, respectively). The total error rates for the Philips, Hamamatsu and 3DHISTECH brand scanners were 3.9%, 3.2% and 9.8%, respectively. RGB histograms demonstrated significant differences in pixel value distribution between the four medical centers, as well as between the 3DHISTECH brand scanner when compared to the Philips and Hamamatsu brand scanners. CONCLUSIONS: The results reported in this paper suggest that the algorithm-based decision support system has sufficient robustness to be applicable for clinical practice. In addition, the novel method used in its development - Hierarchial-Contexual Analysis (HCA) may be applicable to the development of algorithm-assisted tools in other diseases, for which available datasets are limited. Validation of any given algorithm-assisted support system should nonetheless include data from as many medical centers and scanner models as possible.

Automatic analysis of nuclear features reveals a non-tumoral predictor of tumor grade in bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Tumor grade determines prognosis in urothelial carcinoma. The classification of low and high grade is based on nuclear morphological features that include nuclear size, hyperchromasia and pleomorphism. These features are subjectively assessed by the pathologists and are not numerically measured, which leads to high rates of interobserver variability. The purpose of this study is to assess the value of a computer-based image analysis tool for identifying predictors of tumor grade in bladder cancer. METHODS: Four hundred images of urothelial tumors were graded by five pathologists and two expert genitourinary pathologists using a scale of 1 (lowest grade) to 5 (highest grade). A computer algorithm was used to automatically segment the nuclei and to provide morphometric parameters for each nucleus, which were used to establish the grading algorithm. Grading algorithm was compared to pathologists' agreement. RESULTS: Comparison of the grading scores of the five pathologists with the expert genitourinary pathologists score showed agreement rates between 88.5% and 97.5%.The agreement rate between the two expert genitourinary pathologists was 99.5%. The quantified algorithm based conventional parameters that determine the grade (nuclear size, pleomorphism and hyperchromasia) showed > 85% agreement with the expert genitourinary pathologists. Surprisingly, the parameter that was most associated with tumor grade was the 10th percentile of the nuclear area, and high grade was associated with lower 10th percentile nuclei, caused by the presence of more inflammatory cells in the high-grade tumors. CONCLUSION: Quantitative nuclear features could be applied to determine urothelial carcinoma grade and explore new biologically explainable parameters with better correlation to grade than those currently used.