A review of R-DHAP administration in the outpatient setting and a case of the alternative regimen R-DHAX given outpatient for refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

INTRODUCTION: Several regimens for treating hematologic malignancies are given inpatient due to multiple factors. Many clinicians are evaluating methods to deliver traditionally inpatient regimens in the outpatient setting to increase patient satisfaction, improve access to therapy, and reduce costs. A regimen traditionally administered inpatient, dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin (DHAP) is a common and effective salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. DHAX, which substitutes oxaliplatin for cisplatin, has been identified as a reasonable alternative to DHAP and offers the potential for tolerable administration in the outpatient setting as well. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 74-year-old patient with double hit relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma was given rituximab, dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (R-DHAX) in our outpatient clinic; however, this regimen is traditionally administered in the inpatient setting. Our main obstacle being cytarabine doses traditionally given 12 h apart. The outpatient regimen given to our patient was rituximab and oxaliplatin on day 1, cytarabine dose one late afternoon on day 2, cytarabine dose two early morning on day 3, and dexamethasone on days 1-4. Doses of oxaliplatin and cytarabine were reduced due to thrombocytopenia experienced with Cycle 1. He did not experience any increased toxicities or complications associated with the regimen moving forward. DISCUSSION: This illustrates a unique administration of R-DHAX in an infusion center that operates during typical outpatient clinic hours. Both DHAP and DHAX, with or without rituximab, administered in the outpatient setting may be options to consider in relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Venous thromboembolism incidence and risk factors in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line systemic therapy.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence and predictive factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) across first-line therapies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate VTE incidence rates and identify predictive factors in NSCLC patients receiving first-line systemic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). PATIENTS/METHODS: This is a single institution retrospective study of adult NSCLC patients who received first-line treatment, including chemotherapy, ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab, atezolizumab, avelumab, and durvalumab), and/or targeted therapies (TTs) (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib, crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib). Risk factors included Khorana score, cancer stage, central venous catheter, pacemaker, comorbidities, and prior VTE. The primary objective - cumulative incidence of VTE at 6- and 12-months by treatment group - was compared using Gray's test. Univariable and multivariable competing risk analyses were used to identify predictors. RESULTS: Of 1587 evaluable patients, 53% were male, 79% white, 18% black, median age was 66; 58% had adenocarcinoma, 32% squamous cell carcinoma, and 47% metastatic disease; 1043 received chemotherapy, 171 ICIs, 157 chemotherapy plus concomitant ICI, 107 chemotherapy and durvalumab maintenance, and 109 TTs. The 6-month cumulative incidence of VTE by treatment type was 5.0%, 7.6%, 9.9%, 9.4%, and 11.1%; 12-month incidence was 6.5%, 9.0%, 12.8%, 12.2%, and 13.1% per arm, respectively (p = 0.01). Treatment type (p = 0.034) and nicotine dependence (p = 0.048) were significantly associated with time to VTE in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSION: Treatment type and smoking status were predictive of time to VTE in NSCLC patients receiving various first-line therapies. Cumulative incidence was highest in those receiving TTs and combination chemotherapy plus ICI.

Transition from Intravenous to Subcutaneous Daratumumab Formulation in Clinical Practice.

INTRODUCTION: Daratumumab is an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody widely used for treating patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. The subcutaneous formulation of daratumumab was developed with the purpose of minimizing the treatment burden (to patients and health care system) associated with intravenous daratumumab. Given its recent approval, there is a knowledge gap regarding the best practices that should be instituted for safe administration of subcutaneous daratumumab. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from August 2020 until November 2020 to identify patients either switched to or treated upfront (daratumumab naive) with any subcutaneous daratumumab-based treatment regimen. All patients received appropriate premedications per institutional standards of care. The study end points were to report real-world data regarding administration-related reaction rates (at or following discharge from infusion center), as well as compare their incidence rates to those noted in the COLUMBA study (historical cohort). RESULTS: The study included 58 patients, of whom 38% (n = 22) were daratumumab naive. The majority (84%, n = 49) received subcutaneous daratumumab in combination with various antimyeloma regimens. There were no cases of administration-related reactions at infusion center or after discharge irrespective of previous exposure to intravenous daratumumab. None of the patients included herein required rescue home medications or visited the emergency department within 24 to 48 hours after subcutaneous daratumumab administration. These translated into a significant difference in incidence of administration-related reactions compared with historical cohort (0% vs. 13%, P = .003). CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous daratumumab was extremely well tolerated and could be safely administered without need for monitoring or rescue home medications.

Pharmacy Student Monitoring of Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Best practice recommendations are lacking. Thus far, literature has described pharmacist-led DOAC monitoring. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to describe a DOAC monitoring program involving pharmacy students. METHODS: This was an observational analysis of a quality improvement initiative. A clinical pharmacist preceptor identified clinic patients taking DOACs by running a report using the electronic medical record. Pharmacy students conducted chart reviews, called pharmacies for 6-month refill histories, and interviewed and educated patients. Findings were communicated to the care team and interventions were performed as applicable with the preceptor. RESULTS: Of 90 patients included, the mean age was 63 years, 54% were female, and 65.6% were black or African American. Rivaroxaban and apixaban were used most commonly. Sixty-two percent of DOACs were prescribed for atrial fibrillation/flutter, while 32.2% for venous thromboembolism. The mean MPR was 77.1%, with 27.7% of patients having an MPR ≤60%. Of the 136 student-led interventions, 25.2% involved medication access, 24.4% adherence education, 20.7% processing refills, 14.8% laboratory monitoring recommendations, 8.9% switching or recommending switching to another anticoagulant, and 4.4% stopping a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or aspirin. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy students can help to ensure medication safety and effective use of DOACs.