Psychological impact of lifestyle-related disease disclosure at general checkup: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about psychological impact of disclosing lifestyle-related diseases. Previous studies discussed the long-term psychological impact of disease disclosure, and a significant psychological impact was not observed. This study clarified the psychological impact on anxiety state of patients when lifestyle-related diseases are disclosed at general checkups for local residents. In particular, this study evaluated the short-term impact on patients, and how the notification of abnormal values and the disclosure of disease at general checkups affect patients' subsequent behavioral changes. METHODS: The study design was a prospective cohort study. We compared the anxiety state of participants using a self-administered anxiety assessment scale, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), before and after Physician's explanation of abnormal values in markers of lifestyle-related diseases. The participants were those between the age of 40 and 75 years who underwent general checkups at two primary care facilities. In addition, we assessed the effects on lifestyle habits and the psychological impact caused by general checkup using STAI and a survey on behavioral changes one month after the checkup. RESULTS: The valid response rate at the survey of the general checkup was 92% (534/578). Of those who showed abnormal levels in markers of lifestyle-related diseases, anxiety was augmented significantly among those who responded that the physician had told them of their diagnosis compared to those who responded that the physician had not told them of their diagnosis (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, P < 0.007). The percentage of patients whose state anxiety scale of STAI increased ≥5 points was 30% in the disease disclosed group (33/111) and 17% in the disease undisclosed group (27/159), respectively. The risk ratio was 1.5 (95% CI: 1.1-2.0). One month after the general checkup, overall anxiety diminished regardless of whether diagnosis of lifestyle-related diseases was disclosed to patients notified of abnormal values. In addition, improvements in daily life behaviors as a result of notification of abnormalities or disclosure of diagnosis at general checkup were not observed. CONCLUSION: Even in a general checkup for the general population, disclosing non-critical diseases such as lifestyle-related diseases exacerbated anxiety as a short-term psychological impact.

An index of the fractal characteristic of an airway tree is associated with airflow limitations and future body mass index reduction in COPD patients.

Disorders of the fractality of an airway tree and a vessel tree have been studied in pulmonary diseases. Here we successfully applied Mishima's D to the bronchial minimal inner cross-sectional area (iCSA) measured in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) images of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and non-COPD smokers (n = 162), by defining D in the following formula: logN(≥X) = -D × logX + c, where X is a certain iCSA value, N(≥X) is the number of airway branches having iCSA greater than or equal to X, and c is a constant. Mathematically, this D of iCSA was associated with the expected reduction ratio of iCSA at bifurcations, which can be estimated by 2-1/D. This D of iCSA also correlated weakly with the box-counting fractal dimension and Weibel's reduction ratio over airway generations, which indicated that the airway tree was not a perfect fractal object and that the branch bifurcation was asymmetric. The D of iCSA showed positive correlations with lung function measurements of airflow limitation in study participants. In addition, D of iCSA representing the periphery showed an association with future body mass index reduction, most likely as an indicator of energy efficacy for breathing as predicted by Hess-Murray's law. D of iCSA may be helpful to understanding the pathogenesis of obstructive lung diseases.NEW & NOTEWORTHY An airway tree is a fractal object. We showed that the distribution of minimal inner cross-sectional area (iCSA) of airway branches can be expressed by a fractal index, D, of minimal iCSA. This D was correlated with airflow limitation and future body mass index reduction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients, as predicted by Hess-Murray's law.

Japanese citizens' attitude toward end-of-life care and advance directives: A qualitative study for members of medical cooperatives.

Background: Japanese citizens are interested in choosing their own end-of-life care, but few have created their own advance directive. This study examined changes among Japanese citizens' attitudes toward end-of-life care and advance directives and explored factors that affected these attitudes. Methods: We conducted five focus groups with 48 participants in 2009 and 2010. All participants were members of health cooperatives in Tokyo. Results: We identified many barriers and reasons for creating and writing down advance directives. Experience caring for dying people and having a serious disease affected attitudes toward advance directives. Some participants changed their attitude toward end-of-life care by writing their own advance directive. Conclusions: When someone is writing advance directives, asking about his/her past experience of caring may be helpful. And learning about or filling out advance directives may help to break down resistance to using these documents.

Recognition of and intent to use gastrostomy or ventilator treatments in older patients with advanced dementia: differences between laypeople and healthcare professionals in Japan.

AIM: We compared differences between laypeople and healthcare professionals in the recognition of and intent to use gastrostomy and ventilator treatments in older patients with dementia. METHODS: Between November 2011 and January 2012, a questionnaire survey was carried out. People who underwent a general health check-up at Nomura Hospital Preventive Medical Center were recruited as the laypeople group. Physicians and nurses working in Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan, were recruited as the healthcare professional group. We assessed the recognition rate of ventilator and gastrostomy treatments. Then we provided two scenarios for participants to determine whether these methods represented life-sustaining treatments that will simply delay an inevitable death. Intentions were compared between cases with and without advance directives. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of laypeople did not know what gastrostomy is. Healthcare professionals were more likely to recognize a ventilator as a life-sustaining treatment; in contrast, there were no significant differences in judgments regarding gastrostomy. Both groups were more likely to have intent to use a gastrostomy and a ventilator for family members than themselves. Furthermore, healthcare professionals were more likely to want to use these items for patients than their family members. Advance directive for withholding life-sustaining treatment reduced the intention to use these treatments. CONCLUSION: It is necessary to increase our understanding regarding knowledge of end-of-life care options of both laypeople and healthcare professionals.